Surveillance San Francisco (Office of the Mayor)

Jason Koebler filed this request with the Office of the Mayor of San Francisco of San Francisco City and County, CA.
Multi Request Surveillance San Francisco
Status
Completed

Communications

From: Jason Koebler

To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to the California Public Records Act, I hereby request the following records:

Recent media reports show San Francisco PD will have access to live surveillance cameras: https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/3656738-san-francisco-oks-surveillance-plan-allowing-police-to-access-private-cameras-in-real-time/
https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=11240602&GUID=8E192C3D-24AF-4851-A25A-DC5DA85E7E77

Therefore, I request the following:

1) All instructional materials, presentations and presentation materials (including recorded video and audio, PowerPoint files, prepared remarks, and slides formats), and other guidance on police use of private surveillance cameras. This includes A) any notes taking during meetings that discussed the use of these cameras, B) any explanations (whether internally or externally generated) of how this program works, and C) any other document that has been used to help explain the use of this program to any party, including internal documentation, public relations materials, and executive summaries.

2) A copy of any privacy impact assessments, use policies, standard operating procedures, data retention policies, legal opinions, warranties, non-disclosure agreements, contracts, liability waivers, insurance agreements, Requests for Proposals, Responses to Requests for Proposal, Memorandums of Understanding, Letters of Interest, usage policies, or informal agreements between the police department (or the city of San Francisco) and owners/operators of private surveillance cameras.

3) Any digital communications including but not limited to emails and text messages) as well as documents, (including but not limited to PDF, word processing, excel, and slide documents) related to this legislation and its implementation.

This will be used in the course of reporting for Motherboard, VICE Media's science and tech site (www.motherboard.vice.com). Because of the time sensitive nature of this new law, I request expedited processing.

The requested documents will be made available to the general public, and this request is not being made for commercial purposes.

In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 10 calendar days, as the statute requires.

Sincerely,

Jason Koebler

From: Office of the Mayor of San Francisco

Dear Jason,

Please see the attached records responsive to your request below. Additional records will be produced on a rolling basis.

Phone conference dial-information and video conference links have been redacted pursuant to the official information privilege. Evid. Code 1040. Please also note that certain records have been withheld pursuant to the attorney/client privilege and to the attorney work product doctrine. See Gov Code § 6254(k); 6276.04; Cal. Evid. Code § 950 et seq; Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2018.030.
Regards,

Hank Heckel
Legal Compliance Officer
Office of the Mayor
City and County of San Francisco

Warning An exclamation point.

There are too many files to display on this communication. See all files

From: Office of the Mayor of San Francisco

Dear Jason,

Please see the supplemental production of records responsive to your request below. Please note that personal contact information has been redacted to protect personal privacy. See Cal. Govt. Code Secs. 6254(c); California Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 1.

If you have any questions about your request, let us know.
Regards,

Hank Heckel
Legal Compliance Officer
Office of the Mayor
City and County of San Francisco

Warning An exclamation point.

There are too many files to display on this communication. See all files

Files

pages

Close
  • 10/14/2022

    Surveillance.Email 1

  • 10/14/2022

    Surveillance.Email 2

  • 10/14/2022

    Surveillance.Email 5

  • 10/14/2022

    Surveillance.Email 3_Redacted

  • 10/14/2022

    Surveillance.Email 4_Redacted

  • 10/14/2022

    2022-07-20 - Anti-Surveillance Coalition Amendments to SFPD Ordinance on Non-City Entity Surveillance Cameras

  • 10/14/2022

    2022-07-08 - One-Pager Explanation of SFPD Proposal on Non-City Surveillance Cameras

  • 10/14/2022

    2022-07-08 - One-Pager Explanation of SFPD Proposal on Non-City Surveillance Cameras

  • 10/14/2022

    2022-07-08 - SFPD Ordinance on Non-City Surveillance Camera Redlines

  • 10/14/2022

    2022-07-08 - Surveillance Technology Policy Redlines

  • 10/14/2022

    07.18.22_Commissions Updates

  • 10/14/2022

    07.18.22_Legislative Updates

  • 10/27/2022

    RE_ Surveillance ordinance - introducing tomorrow

  • 10/27/2022

    RE_ Surveillance ordinance 1

  • 10/27/2022

    Re_ Surveillance Legislation_Hearings Introduced 1_25_22

  • 10/27/2022

    Re_ surveillance legislation

  • 10/27/2022

    Fwd_ Briefing on Surveillance Technology _ 220080

  • 10/27/2022

    RE_ SFPD and Rules Committee on Monday, July 11

  • 10/27/2022

    RE_ Surveillance briefing

  • 10/27/2022

    Memo Style 10

  • 10/27/2022

    RE_ Request for a copy of surveillance ordinance legislation

  • 10/27/2022

    220606-2

  • 10/27/2022

    Re_ Please provide the amended legislation for File NO. 220606 Surveillance Technology Policy

  • 10/27/2022

    RE_ MLB Interview_ Camera Surveillance_illegal vending

  • 10/27/2022

    RE_ Mayor -- Ordinance -- Surveillance Technology

  • 10/27/2022

    RE_ Briefing on Surveillance Technology _ 220080 2

  • 10/27/2022

    RE_ Briefing on Surveillance Technology _ 220080 1

  • 10/27/2022

    RE_ Briefing on Surveillance Technology _ 220080

  • 10/27/2022

    RE_ 19B surveillance technology

  • 10/27/2022

    RE_ 19B SFPD Non-City Surveillance Camera Policy

  • 10/27/2022

    RE_ 19B SFPD Non-City Surveillance Camera Policy _Redacted

  • 10/27/2022

    RE_ 19B SFPD Non-City Surveillance Camera Policy

  • 10/27/2022

    Fw_ SFPD Non-City Entity Surveillance Cameras Policy Ordinance - approved as to form

  • 10/27/2022

    7-25-22 As Modified - SFPD Non-City Entity Surveillance Cameras Policy

  • 10/27/2022

    As amended 7-25-22 Rules - SFPD non-city entity surv cameras policy ordinance

  • 10/27/2022

    Fw_ Mayor -- Ordinance -- Surveillance Technology

  • 10/27/2022

    Memo Style 2

  • 10/27/2022

    Submittal - Surveillance - Signed _Stamped MLB DOE COB 1.18.22

  • 10/27/2022

    1-18-22 Mayor Initiative Ordinance Amending 19B

  • 10/27/2022

    Submittal Form - Mayor - 19B Surveillance

  • 10/27/2022

    FW_ Briefing on Surveillance Technology _ 220080

  • 10/27/2022

    Fw_ 19B Non-City Ordinance Talking Points

  • 10/27/2022

    Fw_ 19B Non-City Entity Surveillance Camera Policy

  • 10/27/2022

    SFPD Non City Entity Surveillance Camera STP_Draft_2022_ Updated

  • 10/27/2022

    Memo Style 1

  • 10/27/2022

    Summary of Non-city entity technology policy

  • 10/27/2022

    Response to BASF

  • 10/27/2022

    RE_ Surveillance Technology - Initiative Ordinance - Withdrawal

  • 10/27/2022

    RE_ Surveillance ordinance