Permanent Calendar Archive - Immediate Disclosure Request

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a new immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for:

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars (all of them, Prop G and non-Prop G, including but not limited to 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)', 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)', 'Breed, London (MYR)', 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)', 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)' and all successors to or renames of these accounts), scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates: October 27, 2019 to November 9, 2019 (inclusive). For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format.

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record identified in #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following information, regardless of format, for each record identified in #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to a statute or case law.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent record, both forward- and backward-looking. If you would like to suggest a change in the form of future periodic requests that would provide *all* of the same information I've requested, with less work, I may consider such suggestions - however that will not affect this request.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Thank you Mr. Heckel. I agree that Prop G calendar records do not need to be created and provided until 3 business days after the event *unless such records already existed*. If the Prop G calendar records between 0 and 3 business days prior existed at the time you received the request, they are public records regardless of Prop G. Prop G cannot reduce in anyway what a public record is as defined by the CPRA. I am contesting your claim about future calendars in a separate case, so the only point of contention, at this time, is the above point.

Please provide all Prop G records that existed at the time you received this request.

Thanks,
Anonymous

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as November 1, 2019 to November 16, 2019 (inclusive)). I've updated the format of this periodic request so please read carefully.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

[Internal reference 82814-0002]

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as November 8, 2019 to November 23, 2019 (inclusive)). I've updated the format of this periodic request so please read carefully.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

[Internal reference 82814-0003]

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as November 15, 2019 to November 30, 2019 (inclusive)). I've updated the format of this periodic request so please read carefully.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

[Internal reference 82814-0005]

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as November 21, 2019 to December 7, 2019 (inclusive)). I've updated the format of this periodic request so please read carefully.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

[Internal reference 82814-0006]

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Thank you. Please note that 82814-0005 (from Nov 21) has not had a response AFAIK.

Have a good Thanksgiving,
Anonymous

This is an immediate disclosure request for the full record, in individual meeting view, in PDF form, of Sean Eslbernd's following two Oct. 3 meetings: "2019 Citywide Fleet Week Meeting" and "HSOC Principals Policy Group".

This is an immediate disclosure request for the individual PropG AND non-PropG meeting entries from Oct. 20-Oct. 29 of Mayor Breed.

First, please provide as an immediate disclosure request, the summary view of Oct. 3 calendar view for Sean Elsbernd. Something strange is going on here.

To answer your question:

1. Your Elsbernd record Responsive_SE_Calendar_Oct._to_Nov..pdf pg 17 contains "HSOC Principals Policy Group" with a recurrence of every alternate Thursday. That implies an Oct 3 recurrence (4 weeks prior).

2. Other agencies release calendars as well, and they include Elsbernd as attendees in various meetings which I am now cross-checking. For example:
Subject: 2019 Citywide Fleet Week Meeting
Location: San Francisco Emergency Operations Center (1011 Turk Street)
Start: Thu 10/3/19 9:30 AM
End: Thu 10/3/19 10:30 AM

Subject: HSOC Principals Policy Group
Location: City Hall, Room 201
Start: Thu 10/3/19 11:15 AM
End: Thu 10/3/19 12:30 PM

Thanks,
Anonymous

Mr. Heckel,

Please provide the entry you withheld re: personnel processes Cal. Govt. Code Secs. 6254(c), Admin. Code § 67.24(c). You should produce the record, and redact the names in order to protect just those people's identity, in order to fulfill SFAC 67.26.

Thanks,
Anonymous

Thanks.

I want to confirm something before I file a complaint: Does the Mayor's Office still take the position that meeting items for Elsbernd and Bruss (not Breed) that are in the future as of the date of request (and recurrence entries for Elsbernd and Bruss (not Breed) that would show future meetings as of the date of request) are exempt pursuant to Gov Code 6254(f) and Times Mirror?

For example:
A. On Nov. 27, you stated "See the attached records from Sean Elsbernd's calendar responsive to your request below. Please note that certain recurrence patterns have been redacted per the previously cited security exemptions, including CPRA 6254(f) and the Times Mirror case, re future entries. "
B. On Dec. 5, in "AB Oct to Nov_Redacted," you withheld, without justification, on pages 7, 9, 12, 15 (and others) certain recurrence patterns. To be clear, these recurrences were in fact entered in by a human being and are thus "writings" (which frankly you already conceded in "A").

I want to confirm you stand by exemptions of future meetings of Elsbernd/Bruss before we file a separate complaint. Unlike 19103, these people are not the Mayor and its highly unlikely they have round-the-clock SFPD protection detail, therefore, even if we lose 19103, we would still pursue a separate case regarding Elsbernd/Bruss.

Thanks,
Anonymous

Thanks- At this moment then we will not file a separate complaint re: Elsbernd/Bruss if the sole purported exemptions are recurrences that would evidence future meetings which the Mayor attends, but I will include this back/forth in the record for SOTF 19103 so its clear to SOTF the extent of the exemption. Obviously, we too reserve the right to file further complaints if your position changes or if we win SOTF 19103.

In order to test the second part of this: This is an immediate disclosure request for the PDF monthly summary view of Dec 2019, Jan 2020, Feb 2020 for Elsbernd and Bruss, which should be a total of 6 pages to produce. Even if a month has no items yet, please provide the "shell" month view. Please remember to justify with clear reference each withholding or redaction. To speed this along, we waive (solely in this request) 67.26 clear references and 67.27 statute/case law citations solely for: redacting conference call numbers/pins or personal (non-government) phone numbers.

--Anonymous

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as November 28, 2019 to December 14, 2019 (inclusive)). I've updated the format of this periodic request so please read carefully.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

[Internal reference 82814-0007]

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Thank you. I would like to ask a few question about your office's operations, plans, policies and positions (67.22). If you will require that this be posed orally over phone as is your right, then I would need to issue an IDR instead - I figured this would be easier.

1. Does the Office of the Mayor store any parts, past or future/expected, of the mayor's calendar or schedule on any account other than "Calendar, Mayor" and "PropG, Mayor" (including but not limited to scheduling@sfgov.org, mayorlondonbreed@sfgov.org, or london.breed@sfgov.org)? (This is not about her past calendars as supervisor, nor as acting mayor, but only as mayor)

2. Does the office (not Elsbernd) have a retention policy that deletes her non-Prop G calendars with less than 2 years of retention?

3. Does the Mayor or her office have plans to delete any part of any of her calendars earlier than 2 years after the entry date?

Thanks,
Anonymous

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as December 5, 2019 to December 21, 2019 (inclusive)).

*** The 1-business day IDR acknowledgement is waived. The 10-day deadline is not waived. All records that exist as of my request must be provided. All date-ranges in these requests are intentionally overlapping by at least one day to ensure we get a full calendar without any deletion.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

[Internal reference 82814-0008]

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as December 10, 2019 to December 30, 2019 (inclusive)) made after close of business Dec 19 (deemed received Dec 20).

*** The 1-business day IDR acknowledgement is waived. The 10-day deadline is not waived. All records that exist as of my request must be provided. All date-ranges in these requests are intentionally overlapping by at least one day to ensure we get a full calendar without any deletion.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law. Exact copies are requested.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

[Internal reference 82814-0009]

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Pursuant to SFAC 67.21(c) please let me know within 7-days if there are any Outlook calendar or meeting entries in 2019 for scheduling@sfgov.org, mayorlondonbreed@sfgov.org, or london.breed@sfgov.org .

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as December 17, 2019 to January 8, 2019 (inclusive)) made after close of business Dec 19 (deemed received Dec 20).

*** The 1-business day IDR acknowledgement is waived. The 10-day deadline is not waived. All records that exist as of my request must be provided. All date-ranges in these requests are intentionally overlapping by at least one day to ensure we get a full calendar without any deletion.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law. Exact copies are requested.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

[Internal reference 82814-0010]

Sincerely,

Anonymous

CORRECTED: Internal reference 82814-0010

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as December 17, 2019 to January 8, 2019 (inclusive)).

*** The 1-business day IDR acknowledgement is waived. The 10-day deadline is not waived. All records that exist as of my request must be provided. All date-ranges in these requests are intentionally overlapping by at least one day to ensure we get a full calendar without any deletion.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law. Exact copies are requested.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Internal reference 82814-0011

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as December 24, 2019 to January 15, 2019 (inclusive)).

*** The 1-business day IDR acknowledgement is waived. The 10-day deadline is not waived. HOWEVER: All records that exist as of my request must be provided. All date-ranges in these requests are intentionally overlapping by at least one day to ensure we get a full calendar without any deletion.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law. Exact copies are requested.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Internal reference 82814-0012

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as December 31, 2019 to January 22, 2019 (inclusive)).

*** The 1-business day IDR acknowledgement is waived. The 10-day deadline is not waived. HOWEVER: All records that exist as of my request must be provided. All date-ranges in these requests are intentionally overlapping by at least one day to ensure we get a full calendar without any deletion.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law. Exact copies are requested.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Internal reference 82814-0013

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as January 10, 2019 to February 7, 2019 (inclusive)).

*** The 1-business day IDR acknowledgement is waived. The 10-day deadline is not waived. HOWEVER: All records that exist as of my request must be provided. All date-ranges in these requests are intentionally overlapping by at least one day to ensure we get a full calendar without any deletion.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law. Exact copies are requested.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Before the request: Have you decided on the formal 37 or more day retention policy for all Mayor's Office calendar records as discussed elsewhere?

Internal reference 82814-0014

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as January 17, 2019 to February 14, 2019 (inclusive)).

*** The 1-business day IDR acknowledgement is waived. The 10-day deadline is not waived. HOWEVER: All records that exist as of my request must be provided. All date-ranges in these requests are intentionally overlapping by at least one day to ensure we get a full calendar without any deletion.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law. Exact copies are requested.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Before the request: Have you decided on the formal 37 or more day retention policy for all Mayor's Office calendar records as discussed elsewhere?

Internal reference 82814-0015

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as January 24, 2019 to February 21, 2019 (inclusive)).

*** The 1-business day IDR acknowledgement is waived. The 10-day deadline is not waived. HOWEVER: All records that exist as of my request must be provided. All date-ranges in these requests are intentionally overlapping by at least one day to ensure we get a full calendar without any deletion.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law. Exact copies are requested.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Before the request: Have you decided on the formal 37 or more day retention policy for all Mayor's Office calendar records as discussed elsewhere?

Internal reference 82814-0016

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as February 2, 2019 to March 8, 2019 (inclusive)).

*** The 1-business day IDR acknowledgement is waived. The 10-day deadline is not waived. HOWEVER: All records that exist as of my request must be provided. All date-ranges in these requests are intentionally overlapping by at least one day to ensure we get a full calendar without any deletion.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law. Exact copies are requested.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Office of the Mayor and Sandra Zuniga,

READ CAREFULLY - This is NOT the usual request for calendars - it will also be sent to Zuniga herself.

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE REQUEST: an electronic copy of all of Sandra Zuniga's ("Named Custodians") government calendars, scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates, defined as August 1, 2019 to present. For this and only this request, you may produce calendars in the "Weekly View" PDF but do not print and scan.

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE REQUEST: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law. Exact copies are requested.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

NOTE: THE EMAIL ADDRESS SENDING THIS REQUEST IS A PUBLICLY-VIEWABLE MAILBOX. Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Sandra Zuniga,

READ CAREFULLY - This request was also sent to the general Sunshine address.

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE REQUEST: an electronic copy of all of Sandra Zuniga's ("Named Custodians") government calendars, scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates, defined as August 1, 2019 to present. For this and only this request, you may produce calendars in the "Weekly View" PDF but do not print and scan.

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE REQUEST: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law. Exact copies are requested.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

NOTE: THE EMAIL ADDRESS SENDING THIS REQUEST IS A PUBLICLY-VIEWABLE MAILBOX. Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Internal reference 82814-0017

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as February 9, 2019 to March 15, 2019 (inclusive)).

*** The 1-business day IDR acknowledgement is waived. The 10-day deadline is not waived. HOWEVER: All records that exist as of my request must be provided. All date-ranges in these requests are intentionally overlapping by at least one day to ensure we get a full calendar without any deletion.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law. Exact copies are requested.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Internal reference 82814-0017

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as February 9, 2019 to March 15, 2019 (inclusive)).

*** The 1-business day IDR acknowledgement is waived. The 10-day deadline is not waived. HOWEVER: All records that exist as of my request must be provided. All date-ranges in these requests are intentionally overlapping by at least one day to ensure we get a full calendar without any deletion.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law. Exact copies are requested.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

REQUEST: 20-881

Mr. Steinberg,

Can you clarify your response? I believed Ms. Zuniga worked for the Office of the Mayor. Does she instead work for Public Works?
I assume she has 3 calendars: Mayor's Office, Public Works, Personal (City of San Jose). You're only able to produce the Public Works one?

Internal reference 82814-0018

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as February 16, 2019 to March 23, 2019 (inclusive)).

*** The 1-business day IDR acknowledgement is waived. The 10-day deadline is not waived. HOWEVER: All records that exist as of my request must be provided. All date-ranges in these requests are intentionally overlapping by at least one day to ensure we get a full calendar without any deletion.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law. Exact copies are requested.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Internal reference 82814-0019

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as February 23, 2019 to March 30, 2019 (inclusive)).

*** The 1-business day IDR acknowledgement is waived. The 10-day deadline is not waived. HOWEVER: All records that exist as of my request must be provided. All date-ranges in these requests are intentionally overlapping by at least one day to ensure we get a full calendar without any deletion.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law. Exact copies are requested.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

RE 20-881:

Mr. Steinberg-

DPW has not released even one ICS file here, even with improper redaction which we could then debate and refine or dispute at SOTF.

It does so in contradiction of SOTF 19047, which found the ICS file format to be easily generated and required the Mayor's Office to provide it under SFAC 67.21(L).

No argument has been provided why *no part* of even one ICS file has been provided.

Anonymous

Internal reference 82814-0020

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as Feb 29, 2020 to April 7, 2020 (inclusive)).

*** The 1-business day IDR acknowledgement is waived. The 10-day deadline is not waived. HOWEVER: All records that exist as of my request must be provided. All date-ranges in these requests are intentionally overlapping by at least one day to ensure we get a full calendar without any deletion.

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law. Exact copies are requested.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

This is a written waiver of any CPRA/Sunshine response deadlines by the Office of the Mayor to any pending request from this email address only until April 7, 2020, which I may extend depending on the duration of Order of the Health Officer C19-07. However, I do not waive the requirement that the City must retain and must not destroy any records I have requested.

I will take up as a separate matter whether the Mayor can suspend the Sunshine Ordinance unilaterally, including without any particular justification for that clause specifically.

NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be public records.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

DPW,

ICS files can be redacted as follows.

OPTION 1:
1. Open the ICS file in Notepad or similar.
2. Delete whatever you want. (deletion is allowed explicitly by SFAC 67.26)
3. Save the file (as ICS or TXT it doesn't matter). Release this file.

OPTION 2:
1. Open the ICS file in Notepad or similar.
2. "Print" the ICS file to a PDF file.
3. Redact the PDF as you would normally. Release the redacted PDF.

If you don't believe me, ask your IT person.

NOTE: Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature (signature.asc attachment), if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the government all be disclosable public records.

That is not indeed the full ICS file.

The following line indicates you are making these files instead of getting them from Outlook:
PRODID:LibPST v0.6.72

You should be able to export them from Outlook and redact them as above.

Also, having your PST files be processed by some third-party website would seem like a far greater security risk if that is what is happening here.

NOTE: Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature (signature.asc attachment), if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the government all be disclosable public records.

Office of the Mayor,

This is a written waiver until April 7, 2020 for the timeliness requirements (only, but not any non-timeliness requirement) of all pending requests from me to Office of Mayor, including from this email address. (See also my most recent email from protonmail)

This waiver does NOT apply to SOTF Order 19047 or its associated ICS file requests (which was never complied with), or to the COVID-19 requests from requests@muckrock.com .

This waiver also does NOT absolve the City and its officers/employees of its responsibility to not destroy and to affirmatively retain all responsive records that exist as of the date of my requests (you can't destroy things between now or receipt of a request and April 7)

NOTE: Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature (signature.asc attachment), if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the government all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

No these are the ICS files of the invite attachment not of the meeting itself; notice how the summary has "Accepted" in it - "Accepted: 16th & Mission Site Visit".

I will get back to you on April 7, 2020. This request cannot be closed out as you have not completed it yet.

No - it would have inviteees, their rsvp status, etc. Working on covid stuff - will get back to you in April.

1 of 2 messages:

Office of the Mayor,

This is a written waiver until May 3, 2020 for the timeliness requirements (only, but not any non-timeliness requirement) of all pending requests from me to Office of Mayor, including from this email address, however:
- This waiver does NOT apply to SOTF Order 19047 or its associated ICS file requests (which was never complied with), or to the COVID-19 requests from requests@muckrock.com .

This waiver also does NOT absolve the City and its officers/employees of its responsibility to not destroy and to affirmatively retain all responsive records that exist as of the date of my requests (you can't destroy things between now or receipt of a request and end of waiver)

NOTE: Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature (signature.asc attachment), if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the government all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

2 of 2 messages:

Internal reference 82814-0021

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as Feb 29, 2020 to May 10, 2020 (inclusive)).

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law. Exact copies are requested.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

1 of 2 messages:

Office of the Mayor,

This is a written waiver until June 1, 2020 for the timeliness requirements
(only, but not any non-timeliness requirement) of all pending requests from
me to Office of Mayor, including from this email address, however:
- This waiver does NOT apply to SOTF Order 19047 or its associated ICS file
requests (which was never complied with), or to the COVID-19 requests from
requests@muckrock.com .

This waiver also does NOT absolve the City and its officers/employees of its responsibility to not destroy and to affirmatively retain all responsive records that exist as of the date of my requests (you can't destroy things between now or receipt of a request and end of waiver)

NOTE: Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The
author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the
author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature (signature.asc attachment),
if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer;
it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential
information, as I intend that these communications with the government all
be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

2 of 2 messages:

Internal reference 82814-0022

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as Feb 29, 2020 to June 14, 2020 (inclusive)).

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law. Exact copies are requested.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Internal reference 82814-0023

Mayor Breed, Andrea Bruss, Sean Elsbernd, and the Office of the Mayor,

** NOTE: Redact your records correctly. This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

This is a NEW immediate disclosure request under the Sunshine Ordinance and under the CPRA for the following (where "Requested Dates" is defined as Feb 29, 2020 to July 14, 2020 (inclusive)).

**Please respond to 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 separately. I want to know which parts have responsive records and which do not.**

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: an electronic copy of all of London Breed's, Andrea Bruss's and Sean Elsbernd's ("Named Custodians") government calendars scheduling entries, appointments, and meeting invitations from the Requested Dates. For calendars, you may provide this by directly exporting to PDF any Outlook view that shows for each and every event at least Subject, Location, Start, End, Recurrence, Meeting Status, Organizer, Show Time As, Required/Optional Attendees, Categories, Importance, Description/Body/Message, and preserving full color, formatting and text-searching. For meeting invitations, you should convert the invitations directly and individually to PDF. This includes declined or not-yet-accepted invitations, and those both sent and received for events on those days. Printing and scanning will be appealed. Use of PDF images as opposed to selectable text will be appealed. For examples of proper production, see DPW's PDF provision here: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/19-4150 - they provide PDFs of each item, and a screenshot of all of the attendee status. I am explicitly asking for those same parts of these records. All Attachments should also be provided and in their original electronic format. Remember, all records, including even Prop G calendar records that happen to exist prior to the 3-business day rule, that are retained, owned, prepared, or used, must be produced or exempted under a non-prohibited exemption provision of the CPRA. This request includes:
a) 'PropG, Mayor (MYR)',
b) 'Calendar, Mayor (MYR)',
c) 'Breed, London (MYR)',
d) 'Elsbernd, Sean (MYR)',
e) 'Bruss, Andrea (MYR)'
f) all other Prop G and non-Prop G calendars or accounts for the Named Custodians not specifically listed in (a)-(e), and all successors to or renames of these (a)-(e) accounts

2) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: Furthermore, I request that a City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) search be performed of each Named Custodian to provide: calendar items, scheduling entries, and meeting invitations for the Requested Dates that are present on their personal calendars/email or on personal accounts/devices/property (solely to the extent the record or portion thereof relates to the public's business). Any electronic format easily generated by the Named Custodian is acceptable here. Notwithstanding Gov Code 6253.3(b)(1), you may redact the Named Custodian's personal email addresses "used by the employee to conduct public business, or necessary to identify a person in an otherwise disclosable communication."

3a) regular disclosure: Furthermore, I request .ICS copies of each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1.

3b) regular disclosure: Finally, the following public information, regardless of format, for each record responsive (whether exempt or not) to #1:
i) creation timestamp,
ii) modification timestamp,
iii) creator identity,
iv) timezone,
v) name, email address, and acceptance status of each attendee
vi) categories
vii) importance
viii) organizer name and email address
ix) subject
x) location
xi) description/body
If you provide all of (i)-(xi) in 3a, you may disregard this 3b. For 3b you may use whichever format you wish as long as this public information, which is not an information security record, is not withheld.

4) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: every record evidencing any search of personal property, any declarations/affidavits/statements re: City of San Jose searches, any requests to search personal property and all responses, any indication of what records may or may not exist on personal property and/or which of those are or are not exempt made for EVERY prior records request from this email address. At the time you receive the instant request, of course you will not have any San Jose records for this request, but you probably will for our prior requests. We will request all of these cumulatively to ensure we eventually get them.

It is likely that you will refuse some portion, and I will appeal all withholdings, exemptions, delays, and refusals. Preserve originals of all records during my appeals.

All records must be provided in rolling fashion. Every withholding (including redactions) must be justified with clear reference to an exemption statute or case law. Exact copies are requested.

Provide only those records without fees.

My purpose is to maintain a permanent record of the Mayor's business, including through her top surrogates, regardless of how you wish to destroy records internally. Such requests will be made continually and periodically to retain this permanent public record, both forward- and backward-looking. Alternatively, the City may publish these records voluntarily and proactively, which I hope they do.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Please clearly identify all 67.23(a)(2) (e), 6254(a), 6255(a) redactions in https://cdn.muckrock.com/foia_files/2020/09/15/March_-_April_SE_Calendars_Redacted.pdf - we are challenging them all.

Furthermore this is an immediate disclosure request for (please indicate "no records" if that is the case)
a) all Outlook meeting invites or calendar entries currently in the Trash, Deleted Items, or similar feature (whether in a server or local deleted area) for Sean Elsbernd, London Breed, Andrea Bruss.

Remember you have to preserve any documents that exist as of the time I make a request. You cannot destroy requested records that run out of a retention time period during the pendency of my request or any appeals thereof.

This is also a regular records request for:
b) the full 2020 calendar, (future and past): specifically, each calendar item individually printed from Outlook *not the timeline view you just gave*, for Sean Elsbernd, London Breed, and Andrea Bruss (including ALL calendars, Prop G or non Prop G, personal or . Your output should look like: https://cdn.muckrock.com/foia_files/2020/01/31/Memo_Style_45.pdf
c) all entries in (a) but in ICS format per SFAC 67.21(l). To be clear, even if you refuse to provide these ICS records, intentionally violating SOTF's order 19047, you must still preserve the original Outlook calendar entries because I will appeal.

Supervisor of Records,

This is a 67.21(d) petition against Sean Elsbernd and the Office of the Mayor regarding the following records production:
https://cdn.muckrock.com/foia_files/2020/09/15/March_-_April_SE_Calendars_Redacted.pdf

We are challenging specifically those redactions which fall under this justification from Hank Heckel: " Further, information relating to negotiations concerning labor issues and hotel procurement has been redacted because it constitutes bargaining information, the disclosure of which would place the city at a competitive disadvantage, and because the balance of the public interest disfavors production regarding such sensitive contracting and procurement information. See SF Admin Code 67.23(a)(2), (e); Cal. Gov. Code 6254(a); 6255(a). " Note that Heckel believes which redactions fall under this category are self-evident, so while I cannot be certain which ones fall under that justification, perhaps you can be.

Please determine one or more parts of records currently withheld are public and order Sean Elsbernd and Office of Mayor to disclose those parts.

Sincerely,
--Anonymous

SOTF,

Please file a new complaint against Sean Elsbernd, Hank Heckel, London Breed, and the office of the Mayor.

Complainant: Anonymous (this email)
Respondents: Sean Elsbernd, Hank Heckel, London Breed, and the office of the Mayor.
Violations: 67.21, 67.26, 67.27, 67.34

I made a request on May 20, 2020 (attached).
They provided this record on Sept 15, 2020: https://cdn.muckrock.com/foia_files/2020/09/15/March_-_April_SE_Calendars_Redacted.pdf

1. Redactions are not marked with a footnote or other clear reference to a legal justification.

2. Individual outlook entries were not provided and no written justification was provided - a summary view was provided instead, which withholds information. This is a willful violation, per SOTF 19047 vs Breed, Heckel, Office of Mayor.

3. ICS calendar entries were not provided and no written justification was provided. This is a willful violation, per SOTF 19047 vs Breed, Heckel, Office of Mayor.

4. Attachments were withheld and no written justification was provided. This is a willful violation, per SOTF 19091 vs Office of Mayor.

5. We are also challenging specifically those redactions which fall under this justification from Hank Heckel: " Further, information relating to negotiations concerning labor issues and hotel procurement has been redacted because it constitutes bargaining information, the disclosure of which would place the city at a competitive disadvantage, and because the balance of the public interest disfavors production regarding such sensitive contracting and procurement information. See SF Admin Code 67.23(a)(2), (e); Cal. Gov. Code 6254(a); 6255(a). " It is unclear which redactions are being referred to, but we challenge all of them.

Sincerely,
--Anonymous

SOTF,

Please file a new complaint against Sean Elsbernd, Hank Heckel, London Breed, and the office of the Mayor.

Complainant: Anonymous (this email)
Respondents: Sean Elsbernd, Hank Heckel, London Breed, and the office of the Mayor.
Violations: 67.21, 67.26, 67.27, 67.34

I made a request on May 20, 2020 (attached).
They provided this record on Sept 15, 2020: https://cdn.muckrock.com/foia_files/2020/09/15/March_-_April_SE_Calendars_Redacted.pdf

1. Redactions are not marked with a footnote or other clear reference to a legal justification.

2. Individual outlook entries were not provided and no written justification was provided - a summary view was provided instead, which withholds information. This is a willful violation, per SOTF 19047 vs Breed, Heckel, Office of Mayor.

3. ICS calendar entries were not provided and no written justification was provided. This is a willful violation, per SOTF 19047 vs Breed, Heckel, Office of Mayor.

4. Attachments were withheld and no written justification was provided. This is a willful violation, per SOTF 19091 vs Office of Mayor.

5. We are also challenging specifically those redactions which fall under this justification from Hank Heckel: " Further, information relating to negotiations concerning labor issues and hotel procurement has been redacted because it constitutes bargaining information, the disclosure of which would place the city at a competitive disadvantage, and because the balance of the public interest disfavors production regarding such sensitive contracting and procurement information. See SF Admin Code 67.23(a)(2), (e); Cal. Gov. Code 6254(a); 6255(a). " It is unclear which redactions are being referred to, but we challenge all of them.

Sincerely,
--Anonymous

Correct - two separate complaints from two separate email addresses.

Thank you,
Anonymous