CPRA/Sunshine Responses - Immediate Disclosure Request (SF Sheriff)
It is a clone of this request.
| Submitted | Dec. 19, 2019 |
MuckRock users can file, duplicate, track, and share public records requests like this one. Learn more.
Communications
From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester
To Whom It May Concern:
Below is a new, distinct Immediate Disclosure Request (SF Admin Code 67.25(a)). Please keep your responses to this request on this email thread.
Your response is required by Dec. 20, 2019. Rolling records responses are requested (SFAC 67.25(d)) if you are unable to finish them by tomorrow. Exact copies (Gov Code 6253(b)) are requested.
1. All response letters/emails/mailings provided by anyone in your Department in response to any member of the public for a request pursuant to the CPRA or Sunshine Ordinance sent from Nov. 1, 2019 to Dec. 19, 2019 (inclusive). We do not need the responsive records you sent to others, just the response letters. We do not need any particular electronic format - PDFs are fine. We do not need metadata.
Please read carefully the exact wording of my request and follow the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA precisely. Every violation will be appealed, including but not limited to:
● any untimely or incomplete response (SF Admin Code 67.21, 67.25),
● failure to provide records in a rolling fashion as soon as each is available (SF Admin Code 67.25),
● failing to indicate whether you have responsive records or not for each request below and whether or not you withheld any records for each request below (Gov Code 6253(c))
● withholding more than the minimum exempt portion of any record or withholding an entire record if any portion at all is non-exempt (SF Admin Code 67.26),
● failure to justify with a footnote or "other clear reference" to an exemption statute or case law for each and every redaction or withholding (SF Admin Code 67.26, 67.27)
● redacting or withholding information whose exemption you have already waived by producing it to the public before (Gov Code 6254.5),
● refusing to use email (SF Admin Code 67.21(b))
Please provide only copies not requiring fees - and a required notice of in-person inspection of fee-based records.
NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.
Sincerely,
Anonymous
From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester
This is yet a further Immediate Disclosure Request (SF Admin Code 67.25(a)). Please keep your responses to this request on this email thread.
Your response is required by Dec. 20, 2019. Rolling records responses are requested (SFAC 67.25(d)) if you are unable to finish them by tomorrow. Exact copies (Gov Code 6253(b)) are requested.
2. Your department's procedures, policies, training, memos, and orders governing public records compliance, the CPRA, and the Sunshine Ordinance. We do not need any particular electronic format - PDFs are fine. We do not need metadata.
Please read carefully the exact wording of my request and follow the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA precisely. Every violation will be appealed, including but not limited to:
● any untimely or incomplete response (SF Admin Code 67.21, 67.25),
● failure to provide records in a rolling fashion as soon as each is available (SF Admin Code 67.25),
● failing to indicate whether you have responsive records or not for each request below and whether or not you withheld any records for each request below (Gov Code 6253(c))
● withholding more than the minimum exempt portion of any record or withholding an entire record if any portion at all is non-exempt (SF Admin Code 67.26),
● failure to justify with a footnote or "other clear reference" to an exemption statute or case law for each and every redaction or withholding (SF Admin Code 67.26, 67.27)
● redacting or withholding information whose exemption you have already waived by producing it to the public before (Gov Code 6254.5),
● refusing to use email (SF Admin Code 67.21(b))
Please provide only copies not requiring fees - and a required notice of in-person inspection of fee-based records.
NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.
Sincerely,
Anonymous
From: Muckrock Staff
To Whom It May Concern:
I wanted to follow up on the following California Public Records Act request, copied below, and originally submitted on Dec. 19, 2019. Please let me know when I can expect to receive a response.
Thanks for your help, and let me know if further clarification is needed.
From: San Francisco Sheriff's Department
Please see attached response letter from the San Francisco Sheriff's Department to PRA129, along with responsive documents.
Alison Lambert, Legal Assistant
Central Records and Warrants Unit
San Francisco Sheriff’s Department
850 Bryant Street RM 460
415-553-1780
There are too many files to display on this communication. See all files
From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester
Thank you. These records show that SFSD's use of prohibited citations to exemptions extends far beyond my case. As per our supplementary letter in SOTF 19143, we will be investigating the duration of such citations.
Therefore, this is a further Immediate Disclosure Request (SF Admin Code 67.25(a)). Please keep your responses to this request on this email thread.
Your response is required by Jan. 14, 2019. Rolling records responses are requested (SFAC 67.25(d)) if you are unable to finish them by Jan 14. Exact copies (Gov Code 6253(b)) are requested.
1. All response letters/emails/mailings provided by anyone in your Department in response to any member of the public for a request pursuant to the CPRA or Sunshine Ordinance sent from Jan. 1, 2019 to Oct. 31, 2019 (inclusive). We do not need the responsive records you sent to others, just the response letters. We do not need any particular electronic format - PDFs are fine. We do not need metadata.
Please read carefully the exact wording of my request and follow the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA precisely. Every violation will be appealed, including but not limited to:
● any untimely or incomplete response (SF Admin Code 67.21, 67.25),
● failure to provide records in a rolling fashion as soon as each is available (SF Admin Code 67.25),
● failing to indicate whether you have responsive records or not for each request below and whether or not you withheld any records for each request below (Gov Code 6253(c))
● withholding more than the minimum exempt portion of any record or withholding an entire record if any portion at all is non-exempt (SF Admin Code 67.26),
● failure to justify with a footnote or "other clear reference" to an exemption statute or case law for each and every redaction or withholding (SF Admin Code 67.26, 67.27)
● redacting or withholding information whose exemption you have already waived by producing it to the public before (Gov Code 6254.5),
● refusing to use email (SF Admin Code 67.21(b))
Please provide only copies not requiring fees - and a required notice of in-person inspection of fee-based records.
NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.
Sincerely,
Anonymous
From: San Francisco Sheriff's Department
To Whom It May Concern:
Please find attached the San Francisco Sheriff’s Department’s response to your immediate disclosure request dated January 13, 2020, along with two attachments which include the response letters.
Thank you,
Alison Lambert, Legal Assistant
Central Records and Warrants Unit
San Francisco Sheriff’s Department
850 Bryant Street RM 460
415-553-1780
From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester
Thank you for your response.
We will file further complaints.
We strongly suggest that the Sheriff's department fully comply with the Sunshine Ordinance.
From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester
SOTF,
Please file a new complaint:
Complainant: Anonymous (this email address)
Respondents: Sheriff Dept, Sheriff PAUL MIYAMOTO, Lt. J. Quanico #1429
Alleged Sections: SFAC 67.26, 67.27
Complaint:
See attached Jan 11 request and Jan 14 response.
Respondents stated they redacted information, however:
- they did not justify in writing the withholding (67.27)
- they did not key by footnote or clear reference the redactions to justifications (67.26)
Furthermore, we believe this is non-minimal withholding (67.26) - the names of records requestors, if provided, are not secret.
We do not have any obligation to instruct the City in its legal obligations; however, we had nevertheless warned that we would file complaints for:
● withholding more than the minimum exempt portion of any record or withholding an entire record if any portion at all is non-exempt (SF Admin Code 67.26),
● failure to justify with a footnote or "other clear reference" to an exemption statute or case law for each and every redaction or withholding (SF Admin Code 67.26, 67.27)
Please find violations and order disclosure of all redacted info, unless Respondents justify all redactions.
I will ask the SOTF committee to move to combine this case with 19143 (same agency, but different requests). Please schedule this new complaint along with 19143 if possible.
Sincerely,
Anonymous
NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.
From:
Good Morning:
The Sheriff's Department has been named as a Respondent in the attached complaint filed with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force. Please respond to the following complaint/request within five business days.
The Respondent is required to submit a written response to the allegations including any and all supporting documents, recordings, electronic media, etc., to the Task Force within five (5) business days of receipt of this notice. This is your opportunity to provide a full explanation to allow the Task Force to be fully informed in considering your response prior its meeting.
Please include the following information in your response if applicable:
1. List all relevant records with descriptions that have been provided pursuant to the Complainant request.
2. Date the relevant records were provided to the Complainant.
3. Description of the method used, along with any relevant search terms used, to search for the relevant records.
4. Statement/declaration that all relevant documents have been provided, does not exist, or has been excluded.
5. Copy of the original request for records (if applicable).
Please refer to the File Number when submitting any new information and/or supporting documents pertaining to this complaint.
The Complainant alleges:
Complaint Attached.
Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724
<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.
The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.
Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.
-
image001
From: San Francisco Sheriff's Department
Dear Assistant Clerk,
Please find attached the Sheriff's office written response to SOTF File No. 20009, along with two attachments. Original documents are also being sent by first class mail.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns.
Thank you,
Alison Lambert, Legal Assistant
Central Records and Warrants Unit
San Francisco Sheriff's Department
850 Bryant Street RM 460
415-553-1780
-
image001
From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester
FOR FILE 20009:
SOTF,
This is a clear-cut case of violation which Respondents appear to be admitting in their response. However they appear to argue some sort of inability to comply due to reorganization which should shield them from violations. The people do not lose their Sunshine rights due to the City's reorganizations.
Did SFSD withhold any information without a written justification? Yes, no justifications were given whatsoever. (Therefore, SFSD violated SFAC 67.27).
Did SFSD mask any part of the records without keying by footnote or clear reference to a specific justification? Yes, both requesters' names and contact info. (Therefore, SFSD violated SFAC 67.26).
Did SFSD mask any part of the record that cannot actually be lawfully withheld? Yes, the requesters' names. (Therefore, SFSD violated SFAC 67.26 again).
This case is among the simplest of all that I have brought to your Task Force. Respondents should take their loss and use it as a lesson to learn from.
Respondents have the choice of having the Sheriff as department head sign and publish a consent letter addressed to me and SOTF, acknowledging the violations of 67.26 and 67.27 in this case, accepting responsibility for them, and committing in writing that SFSD will going forward comply with SFAC 67.26 and 67.27 for all requests.
Such a compromise would allow me to withdraw the complaint and is in the public interest, guaranteeing Sunshine for all.
If respondents wish to do so, they may contact me.
NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.
Sincerely,
Anonymous
From: San Francisco Sheriff's Department
Dear Assistant Clerk,
Please find attached the Sheriff's office supplemental written response to SOTF File No. 20009, along with an attachment. The attachment is a revised production of documents. Original documents are also being sent by first class mail.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns.
Thank you,
Alison Lambert, Legal Assistant
Central Records and Warrants Unit
Office of the Sheriff
City and County of San Francisco
850 Bryant Street RM 460
415-553-1780
-
image001
From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester
FOR FILE 20009:
Respondents appear to have now complied, but in an untimely fashion, which remains a violation of the law and SOTF should of course not dismiss the complaint.
What Respondents do not seem to understand is that violations are not undone when agencies only comply with the law after requesters file complaints, and SOTF routinely finds a violation for untimely or incomplete response by the City (see for example my own SOTF 19091 Anonymous v Office of the Mayor wherein the City eventually complied but was still found in violation for untimeliness).
It is unclear whether Respondents accept their legal responsibility to provide justifications and keys and minimal redaction to all records requests, without filing complaints.
I will again ask Respondents to accept responsibility to comply with SFAC 67.26 and SFAC 67.27 in future requests in a signed response, after which I can dismiss the complaint. If they do so, it is as good for me and the public interest as a formal finding of violation of the law.
NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.
Sincerely,
Anonymous
From: San Francisco Sheriff's Department
I will be out of the office unitl Monday, March 2, 2020. If you need immediate assistance, please call 415-554-7225. Thank you.
From: San Francisco Sheriff's Department
Dear SOTF Petitioners, Respondents and other Stakeholders:
As you most likely know SOTF operations have been delayed over the last few months due to the Covid-19 emergency. The SOTF have started to conduct remote meetings via videoconference and are working to establish procedures to resume all operations including the processing of complaints.
While the Sunshine Ordinance requires that certain actions be taken within 45 days, the Covid-19 emergency has forced delays and immense new backlogs for complaint hearings. We write today to ask if you are willing to waive the 45 day rule for your complaint.
The SOTF intends to resume hearing complaints on a limited basis and complaints will be queued to be heard in the near future. We continue to work to address technical issues posed by remote meetings. We are aware of the time sensitivity of your records requests. Please be assured that the SOTF appreciates the urgency of your matters and the importance of handling them in a timely manner.
If you have further questions about your files or have other issues, please feel free to email the SOTF Administrator at the email below.
Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org<mailto:Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org>
Tel: 415-554-7724
Fax: 415-554-5163
www.sfbos.org
[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.
The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.
Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.
-
image001_oqyTJ7v
From: Muckrock Staff
To Whom It May Concern:
I wanted to follow up on the following California Public Records Act request, copied below, and originally submitted on Dec. 19, 2019. Please let me know when I can expect to receive a response.
Thanks for your help, and let me know if further clarification is needed.
From: San Francisco Sheriff's Department
We have no responsive documents. This e-mail appears to have been sent to the Office of Economic and Workforce Development in error.
Marianne Mazzucco Thompson
Office of Economic and Workforce Development
City Hall, Room 448
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, CA 94102
P: 415-554-6297
E: Marianne.Thompson@sfgov.org<mailto:Marianne.Thompson@sfgov.org>
[cid:image001.png@01D681C7.BDF78A80]<http://www.twitter.com/sfoewd> [cid:image002.png@01D681C7.BDF78A80] <http://www.facebook.com/sfoewd> [cid:image003.png@01D681C7.BDF78A80] <http://www.oewd.org/>
From: San Francisco Sheriff's Department
Dear SOTF Parties:
The agenda packet for the April 20, 2021, Complaint Committee remote meeting of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, 5:30 pm hearing is available online at the following link:
https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/default/files/complaint_042021_agenda.pdf
The packet material is linked to each item listed on the agenda mark with an "attachment". Click anywhere on the title of the item to open the link to the pdf of the packet material in question.
Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org<mailto:Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org>
Tel: 415-554-7724
Fax: 415-554-5163
www.sfbos.org
[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.
The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.
Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.
-
image001
From: San Francisco Sheriff's Department
How do I join the meeting?
-
image001
From: San Francisco Sheriff's Department
I also need info about how to join the meeting, please.
Deborah Kaplan
Deputy Director for Programmatic Access
Mayor's Office on Disability
City and County of San Francisco
415-554-6750
-
image001
From: San Francisco Sheriff's Department
Good Afternoon:
The agenda and packet for the of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force July 7, 2021 4:00 p.m. meeting is online at the following link:
https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/default/files/sotf_070721_agenda.pdf
The packet material is linked to each item listed on the agenda marked with an “attachment”. Click anywhere on the title of the item to open the link to the pdf of the packet material in question.
Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org<mailto:Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org>
Tel: 415-554-7724
Fax: 415-554-5163
<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.
The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.
Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information—including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees—may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.
-
image001
From: San Francisco Sheriff's Department
Good Afternoon:
You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in the following complaints scheduled before the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.
Date: March 2, 2022
Location: Remote Meeting
Time: 4:00 p.m.
Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.
Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.
Complaints:
File No. 19143: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Sheriff Paul Miyamoto, James Wilson and the Sheriff's Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.24, 67.25 and 67.27, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.
File No. 20009: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Sheriff Paul Miyamoto, Lt. J. Quanico and the Sheriff's Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.26 and 67.27, by failing to justify withholding and keeping withholding to a minimum.
For inclusion in the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00 pm, February 24, 2022.
Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724
<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.
The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.
Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.
-
image001
From: San Francisco Sheriff's Department
Dear Parties: The attached Orders of Determination were approved on March 1, 2023 by the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force and posted on line on March 3, 2023. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Cheryl Leger
Sunshine Administrator
Board of Supervisors
phone 415-554-7724 | fax 415-554-5163
cheryl.leger@sfgov.org<mailto:cheryl.leger@sfgov.org> | www.sfbos.org<http://www.sfbos.org>
There are too many files to display on this communication. See all files
From: San Francisco City Attorney
Hello,
Thanks for this email and attaching the determination letters.
Please let me know which attachment pertains to one of my complaints.
I do not wish to open all thirteen attachments.
Regards,Michael Petrelis
Files
pages
There are too many files to display on the request page. See all files .