Stingray Warrants (City of Chicago Department of Law)

Freddy Martinez filed this request with the City of Chicago Department of Law of Chicago, IL.
Multi Request Stingray Warrants
Est. Completion None
Status
Withdrawn

Communications

From: Freddy Martinez


To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to the Illinois Freedom of Information Act., I hereby request the following records:

On 7/22/2016, then Governor Rauner signed Public Act 099-0622 (passed by the 99th General Assembly) a new law governing the use of "cell site simulators" by law enforcement agencies to take effect January 1, 2017. Therefore under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act we are requesting:

- Any internal documentation about the implementation of Public Act 099-0622 including changes to internal policies, any changes to directives or other memorandums of understandings.
- Internal communications including emails, documents, notes, and memos about the public act 099-0622. Please limit your search from January 1st 2016th to the present.
- If available, documents sufficient to show a blank search warrant application (electronic or otherwise).
- If available, documents sufficient to show a blank search warrant application (electronic or otherwise) after the passage of Public Act 099-0622.
- If available, documents sufficient to distinguish an electronic search warrant application versus a physical search warrant application.
- Any external communications between your office and any of the following departments ( Cook County States Attorney, Chicago Police Department and the City of Chicago Department of Law )about Public Act 099-0622. (I am sending this request to multiple offices so be aware that this request is for _external_ communications).
- If available, documents sufficient to show how your office processes search warrants. For example, documents should be sufficient to show where a filed search warrant is sent for processing, where all search warrants are stored by your office etc.

Please be aware that this request is being a non-profit organization as part of a media request. I request expedited processing if possible. Please contact me with any questions if needed.

The requested documents will be made available to the general public, and this request is not being made for commercial purposes.

In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 5 business days, as the statute requires.

Sincerely,

Freddy Martinez

From: City of Chicago Department of Law

April 15, 2019

Freddy Martinez

Lucy Parsons Labs

Via email at requests@muckrock.com

Dear Mr. Martinez,

On behalf of the City of Chicago Department of Law, I am responding to your Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") request which was dated April 8, 2019 and received in our offices on the same day. At this time, the Law Department is seeking an extension of five additional working days to respond to the request for one or more of the following reasons identified in 5 ILCS 140/3(e) of FOIA:
( ) the requested records are stored in whole or in part at other locations than the office having charge of the requested records;
( ) the request requires the collection of a substantial number of specified records;
( ) the request is couched in categorical terms and requires an extensive search for the records responsive to it;
( ) the requested records have not been located in the course of routine search and additional efforts are being made to locate them;
( ) the requested records require examination and evaluation by personnel having the necessary competence and discretion to determine if they are exempt from disclosure under Section 7 of the FOIA or should be revealed only with appropriate deletions;
( ) the request for records cannot be complied with by the public body within the time limits prescribed by 5 ILCS 140/3(d) without unduly burdening or interfering with the operations of the public body;

(xx) there is need for consultation, which shall be conducted with all practicable speed, with another public body or among two or more components of a public body having a substantial interest in the determination or in the subject matter of the request.

Sincerely,

Tom Skelton

FOIA Officer - Department of Law

From: City of Chicago Department of Law

April 22, 2019

Freddy Martinez

Lucy Parsons Labs

Via email at requests@muckrock.com

Dear Mr. Martinez,

On behalf of the City of Chicago Department of Law, I am responding to your Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") request which was dated April 8, 2019 and received in our offices on the same day. The Law Department took a 5 day extension on April 15, 2019. You requested:

Requesting Pursuant to the Illinois Freedom of Information Act., I hereby request the following records:

On 7/22/2016, then Governor Rauner signed Public Act 099-0622 (passed by the 99th General Assembly) a new law governing the use of "cell site simulators" by law enforcement agencies to take effect January 1, 2017. Therefore under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act we are requesting:

- Any internal documentation about the implementation of Public Act 099-0622 including changes to internal policies, any changes to directives or other memorandums of understandings.

- Internal communications including emails, documents, notes, and memos about the public act 099-0622. Please limit your search from January 1st 2016th to the present.

- If available, documents sufficient to show a blank search warrant application (electronic or otherwise).

- If available, documents sufficient to show a blank search warrant application (electronic or otherwise) after the passage of Public Act 099-0622.

- If available, documents sufficient to distinguish an electronic search warrant application versus a physical search warrant application.

- Any external communications between your office and any of the following departments ( Cook County States Attorney, Chicago Police Department and the City of Chicago Department of Law )about Public Act 099-0622. (I am sending this request to multiple offices so be aware that this request is for _external_ communications).

- If available, documents sufficient to show how your office processes search warrants. For example, documents should be sufficient to show where a filed search warrant is sent for processing, where all search warrants are stored by your office etc.

The Law Department has no responsive records regarding the first, third, fourth, fifth, and seventh bullet point to your request. Please note that each City department is a separate "public body" under Section 2 of FOIA. 5 ILCS 140/2(a); Duncan Publishing, Inc. v. City of Chicago, 304 Ill. App. 3d 778, 784 (1st Dist. 1999) ("Clearly, each of the individual departments are subsidiary bodies of the City and are 'public bodies' as defined by the FOIA."). A FOIA request must be directed to the Department that maintains the records you seek.

To the extent your request seeks emails, your request is unduly burdensome. Section 3(g) of FOIA provides that "requests for all records falling within a category shall be complied with unless compliance with the request would be unduly burdensome for the complying public body and there is no way to narrow the request and the burden on the public body outweighs the public interest in the information."

In order to effectively run an email search, the Law Department needs the following search parameters: (1) the e-mail address(es) or employee name(s) of the account(s) you wish searched; (2) key words you wish to search for; and (3) the timeframe to be searched. Without search parameters, the Law Department would need to review all department emails to determine whether any are responsive to your request. Such an undertaking would pose an immense burden on the department.

It is necessary that your FOIA request be narrowed and clarified. If you would like assistance in narrowing your request, please contact me, and I will assist you. Otherwise, for the reasons provided above, the Law Department is unable to respond to your FOIA request as currently drafted.

If you agree to narrow your request, you must submit a revised written request to my attention. The Law Department will take no further action or send you any further correspondence unless and until your current request is narrowed in writing. If we do not receive your narrowed request within fourteen calendar days of the date of this letter, your current request will be denied.

In the event that we do not receive a narrowed request and your current FOIA request is therefore denied, you have the right to have a denial reviewed by the Public Access Counselor (PAC) at the Office of the Illinois Attorney General, 500 S. 2nd Street, Springfield, Illinois 62706, (877) 299-3642. You also have the right to seek judicial review of your denial by filing a lawsuit in Cook County Circuit Court.

Sincerely,

Tom Skelton

FOIA Officer - Department of Law

From: Freddy Martinez

Hi Tom,

I would like to narrow this request but I am unsure how to. Can we schedule a call on Thursday to discuss this request? If so please give me the best number to reach you at.

Best,
Freddy Martinez

From: City of Chicago Department of Law

Hi Freddy,

Sure, that works for me. My phone number is 312-744-8853. I am free all Thursday at the moment.

Sincerely,

Tom Skelton
FOIA Officer
City of Chicago - Department of Law
30 N. LaSalle St. #1720
(312) 744-8853
Thomas.Skelton@cityofchicago.org

From: City of Chicago Department of Law

Hello again Freddy,

Sorry, I forgot that I am out of the office Thursday and Friday. I can talk today or tomorrow or on Monday, whichever you choose.

The Law Department's search did not indicate any responsive records for the non-email bullet points from your request. To do an email search, we need custodians (employee names or email addresses), timeframe, and search terms. You can use 1/1/2016 to present as the timeframe if you want and "cell site simulator" as a search term if you want, but I still need the custodians. Once you provide this information, I'll send it off to DoIT to complete the search and find the responsive emails.

Sincerely,

Tom Skelton
FOIA Officer
City of Chicago - Department of Law
30 N. LaSalle St. #1720
(312) 744-8853
Thomas.Skelton@cityofchicago.org

From: Freddy Martinez

Hi Tom,

Can I call you at the (312) 744-8853 number on Monday?

From: City of Chicago Department of Law

Yeah, that's fine. Just let me know when you want to talk. I'll be away from my desk for at least part of today.

From: Freddy Martinez

Hi Tom,

I apologize for not getting back to you earlier. I attempted to do additional research on your office to narrow this request but I came up empty. Essentially I would like to narrow this request but I don't have enough information to narrow the request. For one thing, I have no way to know who was employed by the City Law Department in January 1st 2016th to Janary 1 2017 (when the statue when into effect). This further complicates real issue that I do not know who in the Law Department is responsible for issuing guidance for new statues. Given that I can't guess that information (because I don't have access to any internal HR systems nor do I know the job responsibilities of anyone at the Law Department), I don't know how to narrow it.

I am happy to discuss how to narrow it.

Freddy

From: City of Chicago Department of Law

Hi Freddy,

I have some thoughts on this. Do you have some time to have a phone call? Generally, the Law Department is organized based on litigation divisions (FCRL, Constitution and Commercial Litigation, ect.). There is no division that deals with police practices in the sense of monitoring how CPD complies with the cell site simulator law. So, there is not really a readily available answer to your questions, but we can discuss it more.

Sincerely,

Tom Skelton
FOIA Officer
City of Chicago - Department of Law
30 N. LaSalle St. #1720
(312) 744-8853
Thomas.Skelton@cityofchicago.org

From: Freddy Martinez

Hi Tom,

As discussed on the phone we can close this request as no responsive records.

Freddy

Files

pages

Close