Warning An exclamation point.

This request is permanently embargoed.

Mitigation Plans under the Exceptional Events Rule (Department of Environmental Quality)

Dillon Bergin filed this request with the Department of Environmental Quality of Arizona.

It is a clone of this request.

Multi Request Mitigation Plans under the Exceptional Events Rule
Est. Completion None
Status
Withdrawn

Communications

From: Dillon Bergin

To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to the Arizona Public Records Law, I hereby request the following records:

1. All draft and final mitigation plans and packages as required by the EPA under the Exceptional Events Rule , according to https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2016-10-03/pdf/2016-22983.pdf.
2. Any acknowledgement or response from the EPA to mitigation plans or packages.
3. All subsequent responses, decisions and correspondence communicated by the EPA about mitigation plans, including approvals, denials or requests for more information.

Please note that this request was first filed with the Nevada Division of Environment Protection who said that it did not have jurisdiction over Washoe or Clark County, and this request would thus have to be filed separately to the according agencies in those two counties.

Request for Explanation of Withholdings and Redactions
If this request is denied in whole or in part, please provide a reasonable description of any withheld materials and a justification for all such withholdings that includes reference to the specific FOIA exemptions authorizing withholding and specific reasons why such exemptions apply. 45 C.F.R. § 5.31. An agency shall withhold information only if “the agency reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an interest protected by an exemption” or “disclosure is prohibited by law.” 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(8)(A)(i). We therefore request that if the EPA determines that an exemption applies that it also provide specific reasons why disclosure would harm any interest protected by such exemption. An agency shall also “consider whether partial disclosure of information is possible whenever the agency determines that a full disclosure of a requested record is not possible” and “take reasonable steps necessary to segregate and release nonexempt information.” Id. 552(a)(8)(A)(ii). We therefore request that the EPA release all segregable portions of otherwise exempt material.

Limitation of Fees
We are also entitled to a limitation of fees because we are a member of the news media. 45 C.F.R. § 5.53(b); 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(A)(ii)(II). Accordingly, even if our application for a waiver of all fees is denied, we are entitled to a limitation of fees. As a news media requester, we are “entitled to search time, review time, and up to 100 pages of duplication” and can be charged only duplication fees after the first 100 pages or its cost equivalent. 45 C.F.R. § 5.53(b). We request that the information be provided in its native electronic format, and thus there should be no duplication fees.

The requested documents will be made available to the general public, and this request is not being made for commercial purposes.

In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 10 business days.

Sincerely,

Dillon Bergin

From: Molly Peterson

Hello

We seek an acknowledgement of our request, and an estimated date by which it will be complete, as the law requires.

Thank you!

Dillon Bergin

From: Department of Environmental Quality

Hi Dillon,

We've received several copies of the attached request on different dates in
several sections here at the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality.
Based on the verbiage in the request and a search and review of your open
requests (https://www.muckrock.com/accounts/profile/Dillon-Bergin/), it
appears that this request was sent to us by mistake and meant for a
different recipient:

[image: image.png]

Therefore, ADEQ will not be taking any further action related to this
request.

If there is something you need from the Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality, please let me know.

Thank you,

Caroline E. Oppleman, MSPH

Communications Director

Ph: 602-540-8072

azdeq.gov

Follow Us on

[image: FB.png] <https://www.facebook.com/azdeq> [image: twitter.png]
<https://twitter.com/arizonadeq> [image: linkedin.png]
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/arizona-department-of-environmental-quality>

Your feedback matters to ADEQ.
Visit azdeq.gov/feedback

From: Dillon Bergin

Hi Caroline,

I apologize! You're right that the request was sent to other areas well and had incorrect language in it. I will withdraw this request and refile a separate one.

Best,
Dillon Bergin

From: Dillon Bergin

This request was accidentally and incorrectly addressed to a separate city and state. I'm withdrawing and filing a corrected request.

Files

pages

Close