Surveillance San Francisco (San Francisco City Attorney)

Jason Koebler filed this request with the San Francisco City Attorney of San Francisco, CA.

It is a clone of this request.

Multi Request Surveillance San Francisco
Status
Rejected

Communications

From: Jason Koebler

To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to the California Public Records Act, I hereby request the following records:

Recent media reports show San Francisco PD may have the ability to use robots to kill:

https://missionlocal.org/2022/11/killer-robots-to-be-permitted-under-sfpd-draft-policy/
https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=11449771&GUID=9FC57C5A-6E68-4485-A989-632C3837B909
https://sfgov.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5664065&GUID=71062664-A857-437A-8C49-97D48CF9F2A2&Options=ID%7CText%7C&Search=220641

"Robots will only be used as a deadly force option when risk of loss of life to members of the public or officers is imminent and outweighs any other force option available to SFPD."

Therefore, I request the following:

1) All instructional materials, presentations and presentation materials (including recorded video and audio, PowerPoint files, prepared remarks, and slides formats), and other guidance on police use of robots, including but not limited to REMOTEC F5A, REMOTEC F6A, REMOTEC RONS, QinetiQ TALON, QinetiQ DRAGON RUNNER, IRobot FirstLook, Recon Robotics Recon Scout ThrowBot. This includes A) any notes taking during meetings that discussed the use of these robots, B) any explanations (whether internally or externally generated) of how this program works, and C) any other document that has been used to help explain the use of this program to any party, including internal documentation, public relations materials, and executive summaries.

2) Any guidance, legal opinions, presentations, memos, on the use of deadly force by robots.

3) A copy of any privacy impact assessments, use policies, standard operating procedures, data retention policies, legal opinions, warranties, non-disclosure agreements, contracts, liability waivers, insurance agreements, Requests for Proposals, Responses to Requests for Proposal, Memorandums of Understanding, Letters of Interest, usage policies, or informal agreements between the police department (or the city of San Francisco) and manufacturers of these robots.

4) Any digital communications including but not limited to emails and text messages) as well as documents, (including but not limited to PDF, word processing, excel, and slide documents) related to this legislation and its implementation.

5) Please include all attachments to any responsive emails.

This will be used in the course of reporting for Motherboard, VICE Media's science and tech site (www.motherboard.vice.com). Because of the time sensitive nature of this new law, I request expedited processing.

The requested documents will be made available to the general public, and this request is not being made for commercial purposes.

In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 10 calendar days, as the statute requires.

Sincerely,

Jason Koebler

From: San Francisco City Attorney

Dear requester,

We would like to update that we didn't receive your Dec. 1, 2022 request, but we are in receipt now and will respond within 10 days.

Sincerely,

[signature_540561676]Odaya Buta-Scott (she/her/hers)
Office of City Attorney David Chiu
(415) 554-5960 Office Direct Line
odaya.buta@sfcityatty.org<mailto:odaya.buta@sfcityatty.org>, www.sfcityattorney.org<http://www.sfcityattorney.org/>
Find us on: Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/sfcityattorney/> Twitter<https://twitter.com/SFCityAttorney> Instagram<https://www.instagram.com/sfcityattorney/>

This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may include privileged or confidential information.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately, and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you.

From: San Francisco City Attorney

Dear Jason Koebler,

I am writing on behalf of the City Attorney's Office in response to your records request. The City Attorney's Office has no disclosable records responsive to your request. We withheld responsive records covered by attorney-client privilege (Cal. Gov't Code § 6276.04; Cal. Evid. Code § 954) and attorney work product (Cal. Gov't Code § 6276.04; Cal. Code of Civil Pro. § 2018.030).

If you have any questions, please direct them to cityattorney@sfcityatty.org<mailto:cityattorney@sfcityatty.org>. Thank you.

[signature_540561676]Odaya Buta-Scott (she/her/hers)
Office of City Attorney David Chiu
odaya.buta@sfcityatty.org<mailto:odaya.buta@sfcityatty.org>, www.sfcityattorney.org<http://www.sfcityattorney.org/>
Find us on: Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/sfcityattorney/> Twitter<https://twitter.com/SFCityAttorney> Instagram<https://www.instagram.com/sfcityattorney/>

This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may include privileged or confidential information.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately, and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you.

Files