Warning An exclamation point.

This request is permanently embargoed.

Email and Electronic Communications Audit (SFPD)

twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester filed this request with the San Francisco Police Department of San Francisco, CA.
Tracking #

P008260-071519

Due July 31, 2023
Est. Completion Aug. 23, 2022
Status
Awaiting Response
Tags

Communications

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

RE: Email and Electronic Communications Audit

To Whom It May Concern:

** NOTE: this is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

We request under the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance (Ordinance) and the California Public Records Act (CPRA) the following items from the SFPD.
Similar requests were recently made of the Board of Supervisors, Clerk, and Mayor's Office. If a person has multiple email addresses (including but not limited to email aliases), 10 emails from each are requested. For example the Mayor may have a public-facing email alias and also an email address she uses to do business internally- 10 from each are requested. Please do not include spam or product advertisement emails.

We remind you of your obligations to provide electronic records in the original format you hold them in. Therefore, e-mails exported in the .eml or .msg format with all non-exempt headers, metadata, attachments, etc. are best.
However, if you choose to convert emails, for example, to PDF or printed format, to easily redact them, you must ensure that you have preserved the full content of the original email record (as specified in request "A"), which contains many detailed headers beyond the generally used From/To/Subject/Sent/etc. For the chat apps, a screenshot or print-out is acceptable.

If you use PDF, use properly redacted searchable or text pdfs. Please don't use image PDFs to make it harder to analyze the records.
If you provide PDFs instead of original email files, only give a few of the headers or lacking attachments/images, and/or improperly withhold public records that exist on private accounts/devices you may be in violation of SF Admin Code and/or CPRA, and we may challenge your decision at the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, Supervisor of Records, judicially, and/or via any other remedies available to us. I currently have pending petitions to the Task Force and Supervisor of Records to correct prior disclosure failures of electronic information from various SF agencies.

You must justify all withholding.

Provide records in a rolling fashion. Do not wait for all records to be available.

Please provide only those copies of records available without any fees. If you determine certain records would require fees, please instead provide the required free notice of which of those records are available and non-exempt for inspection in-person if we so choose. Please use email to respond.

I look forward to your prompt disclosure.

PART 1 - Email

A. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails RECEIVED BY EACH OFFICIAL government email account of
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

B. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails SENT FROM EACH OFFICIAL government email account of
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

C. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails IN THE DRAFT or OUTBOX folder of EACH OFFICIAL government email account of the following. Please remember the special Sunshine exceptions to CPRA draft withholding under SF Admin Code 67.24(a).
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

D. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails regarding the public's business (specifically those disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)) SENT FROM EACH PERSONAL email account(s) of the following officials, TO/CC/BCC any sfgov.org email address. If NO such emails exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

E. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails regarding the public's business (specifically those disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)) RECEIVED BY EACH PERSONAL email account(s) of the following officials, FROM any sfgov.org email address. If NO such emails exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

PART 2 - Chat/Messaging

As used below "Conversations" include but are not limited to any metadata records showing that a conversation had taken place but is now deleted (due to expiration for example).
Various types of apps are mentioned below.

A. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Facebook Messenger ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

B. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Telegram ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

C. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Slack ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

D. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Google Hangouts ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

E. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Signal ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

F. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [SMS/MMS/text messages]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

G.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Facebook Messenger ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

H.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Telegram ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

I.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Slack ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

J.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Google Hangouts ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

K.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Signal ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

L.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ text/SMS/MMS messaging ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

PART 3: all instruments used to inquire of each official as to whether they possess any responsive records above, and all of their responses

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: San Francisco Police Department

Dear Anonymous:
Thank you for your interest in public records of the San Francisco Police Department ("SFPD").
The San Francisco Police Department ("SFPD") received your request, dated July 15, 2019 and given the reference number P008260-071519 for tracking purposes.
Record(s) Requested: This is a follow up to a previous request:To Whom It May Concern:I wanted to follow up on the following California Public Records Act request, copied below, and originally submitted on July 2, 2019. Please let me know when I can expect to receive a response.Thanks for your help, and let me know if further clarification is needed.Filed via MuckRock.com E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com Upload documents directly: https://accounts.muckrock.com/accounts/login/?url_auth_token=AAAIhlTo97b9_LHR4GSfxVrJz9g%3A1hlrQ5%3AwP7oGkTVY5wnLxdkReQflr06gyU&next=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.muckrock.com%2Faccounts%2Flogin%2F%3Fnext%3D%252Faccounts%252Fagency_login%252Fsan-francisco-police-department-367%252Femail-and-electronic-communications-audit-sfpd-76435%252F%253Femail%253Dsfpdmediarelations%252540sfgov.org Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.For mailed responses, please address (see note): MuckRock News DEPT MR 76435 411A Highland Ave Somerville, MA 02144-2516PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Dear Anonymous ,

Thank you for registering with the San Francisco Public Records Portal.  Please log in to update any contact or password information and to track the progress of your request.
Login: requests@muckrock.com

If you have never used this system or cannot remember your password you may request a temporary password here: Request Temporary Password (https://SANFRANCISCOPD.mycusthelp.com/webapp/_rs/forgotpassword.aspx)
This is an auto-generated email and has originated from an unmonitored email account. Please DO NOT REPLY.

From: San Francisco Police Department

--- Please respond above this line ---

July 15, 2019
Via email requests@muckrock.com

Anonymous

,

RE: Public Records Request, dated July 15, 2019, Reference # P008260-071519

Dear Anonymous:

The San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) received your Public Records Act request, dated July 15, 2019, on July 15, 2019.

You requested, " This is a follow up to a previous request:"

To Whom It May Concern:

I wanted to follow up on the following California Public Records Act request, copied below, and originally submitted on July 2, 2019. Please let me know when I can expect to receive a response.

Thanks for your help, and let me know if further clarification is needed.

Filed via MuckRock.com
E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com
Upload documents directly: https://accounts.muckrock.com/accounts/login/?url_auth_token=AAAIhlTo97b9_LHR4GSfxVrJz9g%3A1hlrQ5%3AwP7oGkTVY5wnLxdkReQflr06gyU&next=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.muckrock.com%2Faccounts%2Flogin%2F%3Fnext%3D%252Faccounts%252Fagency_login%252Fsan-francisco-police-department-367%252Femail-and-electronic-communications-audit-sfpd-76435%252F%253Femail%253Dsfpdmediarelations%252540sfgov.org
Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.

For mailed responses, please address (see note):
MuckRock News
DEPT MR 76435
411A Highland Ave
Somerville, MA 02144-2516

PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.

---

On July 2, 2019:
Subject: California Public Records Act Request: Email and Electronic Communications Audit (SFPD)
RE: Email and Electronic Communications Audit

To Whom It May Concern:

** NOTE: this is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

We request under the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance (Ordinance) and the California Public Records Act (CPRA) the following items from the SFPD.
Similar requests were recently made of the Board of Supervisors, Clerk, and Mayor's Office. If a person has multiple email addresses (including but not limited to email aliases), 10 emails from each are requested. For example the Mayor may have a public-facing email alias and also an email address she uses to do business internally- 10 from each are requested. Please do not include spam or product advertisement emails.

We remind you of your obligations to provide electronic records in the original format you hold them in. Therefore, e-mails exported in the .eml or .msg format with all non-exempt headers, metadata, attachments, etc. are best.
However, if you choose to convert emails, for example, to PDF or printed format, to easily redact them, you must ensure that you have preserved the full content of the original email record (as specified in request "A"), which contains many detailed headers beyond the generally used From/To/Subject/Sent/etc. For the chat apps, a screenshot or print-out is acceptable.

If you use PDF, use properly redacted searchable or text pdfs. Please don't use image PDFs to make it harder to analyze the records.
If you provide PDFs instead of original email files, only give a few of the headers or lacking attachments/images, and/or improperly withhold public records that exist on private accounts/devices you may be in violation of SF Admin Code and/or CPRA, and we may challenge your decision at the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, Supervisor of Records, judicially, and/or via any other remedies available to us. I currently have pending petitions to the Task Force and Supervisor of Records to correct prior disclosure failures of electronic information from various SF agencies.

You must justify all withholding.

Provide records in a rolling fashion. Do not wait for all records to be available.

Please provide only those copies of records available without any fees. If you determine certain records would require fees, please instead provide the required free notice of which of those records are available and non-exempt for inspection in-person if we so choose. Please use email to respond.

I look forward to your prompt disclosure.

PART 1 - Email

A. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails RECEIVED BY EACH OFFICIAL government email account of
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

B. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails SENT FROM EACH OFFICIAL government email account of
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

C. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails IN THE DRAFT or OUTBOX folder of EACH OFFICIAL government email account of the following. Please remember the special Sunshine exceptions to CPRA draft withholding under SF Admin Code 67.24(a).
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

D. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails regarding the public's business (specifically those disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)) SENT FROM EACH PERSONAL email account(s) of the following officials, TO/CC/BCC any sfgov.org email address. If NO such emails exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

E. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails regarding the public's business (specifically those disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)) RECEIVED BY EACH PERSONAL email account(s) of the following officials, FROM any sfgov.org email address. If NO such emails exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

PART 2 - Chat/Messaging

As used below "Conversations" include but are not limited to any metadata records showing that a conversation had taken place but is now deleted (due to expiration for example).
Various types of apps are mentioned below.

A. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Facebook Messenger ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

B. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Telegram ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

C. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Slack ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

D. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Google Hangouts ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

E. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Signal ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

F. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [SMS/MMS/text messages]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

G.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Facebook Messenger ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

H.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Telegram ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

I.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Slack ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

J.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Google Hangouts ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

K.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Signal ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

L.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ text/SMS/MMS messaging ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

PART 3: all instruments used to inquire of each official as to whether they possess any responsive records above, and all of their responses

Sincerely,
Anonymous

Filed via MuckRock.com
E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com
Upload documents directly: https://accounts.muckrock.com/accounts/login/?url_auth_token=AAAIhlTo97b9_LHR4GSfxVrJz9g%3A1hlrQ5%3AwP7oGkTVY5wnLxdkReQflr06gyU&next=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.muckrock.com%2Faccounts%2Flogin%2F%3Fnext%3D%252Faccounts%252Fagency_login%252Fsan-francisco-police-department-367%252Femail-and-electronic-communications-audit-sfpd-76435%252F%253Femail%253Dsfpdmediarelations%252540sfgov.org
Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.

For mailed responses, please address (see note):
MuckRock News
DEPT MR 76435
411A Highland Ave
Somerville, MA 02144-2516

PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.

Although SFPD has 10 calendar days to respond to your request, we are invoking an additional 14 day extension of time to respond to your request pursuant to Government Code section 6253(c) because of the need to search, collect, review, and consult with another department. Once it has been determined whether or not the information you request is responsive and subject to disclosure we will advise you as soon practicable but no later than August 8, 2019.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 415-837-7395.

Thank you for your attention.

Sincerely,

Michael Andraychak
Media Relations

To monitor the progress or update this request please log into the SFPD Public Records Center. (https://u8387795.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=Ow1KccipsoIsnXbuEgm-2FN-2B3KuyZ5YHnuXVUop6SBUj6Zl2gPWQsh2hjE0JdlwH66ZMXJDGxIkhWqlkMGRI8K8RdgfchCPn5hbqdWnlrcjvklsbezoDgEiXr0fpETGrLw_RS48PfEuBadMkLIhY2xrI2uthodKUGOQzPwgXQnJV8Phu7-2F4gUOxiqjyEwuJDKFH9hTPdLxRRGK3fw-2B3znbIdO-2F0Hb8Wg-2FP9H72ZfRidoAbCxdHfg5DvCVBDtEcuAEU3gIQ-2B9ALx7Nhuov50VF55TAnrwHg2bBxJX8V1y32EtuadhpqlTqUnsBE8uEFyUUfLFbBAfwl0WtuRJ0ZW7Ery0p-2BuatDKpcy-2FfIIzQ1neyXg7NWxQD5Toh6n4Z5VFfaBWPVvifuYznOYP0IeDt3IXY6hLDGeoCujKzuMsRgSHuP5XPiwenwaVbOvG2clIBttc7pSwr6les4H9Lz-2BJ8DIiTV72c9khoNHmMkqy9tI-2F7rypOLTA5Lhhb72o8FdXZBN6QEtNXqAbeP9hhVhXOehXWQ-3D-3D)
This is an auto-generated email and has originated from an unmonitored email account. Please DO NOT REPLY.

From: San Francisco Police Department

From: San Francisco Police Department

From: San Francisco Police Department

Chief Scott inbox.

Some redaction was done in accordance with Cal Constitution Article 1, Privacy and Gov Code 6254(f) open investigation/intelligence/security file information.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

Warning An exclamation point.

There are too many files to display on this communication. See all files

From: San Francisco Police Department

Some redaction was done in accordance with

6254(c) – Personnel, personal, medical information

6254(f) – law enforcement sensitive, investigatory

I continue to work on your request.

Some text messages have also been uploaded to the GovQA portal as they are smaller file sizes.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

Warning An exclamation point.

There are too many files to display on this communication. See all files

From: San Francisco Police Department

Hello,

Chief Scott had not "draft/outbox" emails.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Attached are emails for Commander Operations/Metro Division, Darryl Fong.

Some redaction were done in accordance with Cal Const., Article 1, Privacy.

6254 (f) GC, Open Investigations, Records of Intelligence, Security Procedures.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

There were no draft files.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Attached are inbox/outbox emails from Dir of Crime Strategies. There were no drafts.

Some redaction was done (personal emails, cell phone or direct phone numbers) other redaction was done in accordance with 6254(f) GC open investigation.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Attached are emails from Dir. Communications David Stevenson.

There were two emails in the draft folder.

Some redaction was done in accordance with Cal Const., Article 1, Privacy.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

Warning An exclamation point.

There are too many files to display on this communication. See all files

From: San Francisco Police Department

Attached are emails from DC of Investigations McEeachern.
Some redaction was done (private email, cell phones, desk extensions) under Cal Const., Art 1, Privacy and others under 6254(f) Open Investigations.

There are no draft emails.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

** NOTE: this is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

What is the status of this request? Have all the City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) searches of personal property been conducted?

From: San Francisco Police Department

Hello,

We have identified no responsive records from personal devices or accounts.

We are processing the request and have sent numerous emails containing responsive records from SFGOV email accounts. Also, sms/text messages from Department cell phones are being uploaded to the GovQA records portal.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

--- Please respond above this line ---

September 03, 2019
Via email requests@muckrock.com

Anonymous

,

RE: Public Records Request, dated July 15, 2019, Reference # P008260-071519

Dear Anonymous:

The San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) received your Public Records Act request, dated July 15, 2019, on September 03, 2019.

You requested, " This is a follow up to a previous request:"

To Whom It May Concern:

I wanted to follow up on the following California Public Records Act request, copied below, and originally submitted on July 2, 2019. Please let me know when I can expect to receive a response.

Thanks for your help, and let me know if further clarification is needed.

Filed via MuckRock.com
E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com
Upload documents directly: https://accounts.muckrock.com/accounts/login/?url_auth_token=AAAIhlTo97b9_LHR4GSfxVrJz9g%3A1hlrQ5%3AwP7oGkTVY5wnLxdkReQflr06gyU&next=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.muckrock.com%2Faccounts%2Flogin%2F%3Fnext%3D%252Faccounts%252Fagency_login%252Fsan-francisco-police-department-367%252Femail-and-electronic-communications-audit-sfpd-76435%252F%253Femail%253Dsfpdmediarelations%252540sfgov.org
Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.

For mailed responses, please address (see note):
MuckRock News
DEPT MR 76435
411A Highland Ave
Somerville, MA 02144-2516

PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.

---

On July 2, 2019:
Subject: California Public Records Act Request: Email and Electronic Communications Audit (SFPD)
RE: Email and Electronic Communications Audit

To Whom It May Concern:

** NOTE: this is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

We request under the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance (Ordinance) and the California Public Records Act (CPRA) the following items from the SFPD.
Similar requests were recently made of the Board of Supervisors, Clerk, and Mayor's Office. If a person has multiple email addresses (including but not limited to email aliases), 10 emails from each are requested. For example the Mayor may have a public-facing email alias and also an email address she uses to do business internally- 10 from each are requested. Please do not include spam or product advertisement emails.

We remind you of your obligations to provide electronic records in the original format you hold them in. Therefore, e-mails exported in the .eml or .msg format with all non-exempt headers, metadata, attachments, etc. are best.
However, if you choose to convert emails, for example, to PDF or printed format, to easily redact them, you must ensure that you have preserved the full content of the original email record (as specified in request "A"), which contains many detailed headers beyond the generally used From/To/Subject/Sent/etc. For the chat apps, a screenshot or print-out is acceptable.

If you use PDF, use properly redacted searchable or text pdfs. Please don't use image PDFs to make it harder to analyze the records.
If you provide PDFs instead of original email files, only give a few of the headers or lacking attachments/images, and/or improperly withhold public records that exist on private accounts/devices you may be in violation of SF Admin Code and/or CPRA, and we may challenge your decision at the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, Supervisor of Records, judicially, and/or via any other remedies available to us. I currently have pending petitions to the Task Force and Supervisor of Records to correct prior disclosure failures of electronic information from various SF agencies.

You must justify all withholding.

Provide records in a rolling fashion. Do not wait for all records to be available.

Please provide only those copies of records available without any fees. If you determine certain records would require fees, please instead provide the required free notice of which of those records are available and non-exempt for inspection in-person if we so choose. Please use email to respond.

I look forward to your prompt disclosure.

PART 1 - Email

A. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails RECEIVED BY EACH OFFICIAL government email account of
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

B. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails SENT FROM EACH OFFICIAL government email account of
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

C. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails IN THE DRAFT or OUTBOX folder of EACH OFFICIAL government email account of the following. Please remember the special Sunshine exceptions to CPRA draft withholding under SF Admin Code 67.24(a).
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

D. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails regarding the public's business (specifically those disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)) SENT FROM EACH PERSONAL email account(s) of the following officials, TO/CC/BCC any sfgov.org email address. If NO such emails exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

E. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails regarding the public's business (specifically those disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)) RECEIVED BY EACH PERSONAL email account(s) of the following officials, FROM any sfgov.org email address. If NO such emails exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

PART 2 - Chat/Messaging

As used below "Conversations" include but are not limited to any metadata records showing that a conversation had taken place but is now deleted (due to expiration for example).
Various types of apps are mentioned below.

A. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Facebook Messenger ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

B. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Telegram ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

C. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Slack ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

D. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Google Hangouts ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

E. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Signal ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

F. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [SMS/MMS/text messages]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

G.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Facebook Messenger ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

H.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Telegram ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

I.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Slack ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

J.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Google Hangouts ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

K.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Signal ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

L.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ text/SMS/MMS messaging ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

PART 3: all instruments used to inquire of each official as to whether they possess any responsive records above, and all of their responses

Sincerely,
Anonymous

Filed via MuckRock.com
E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com
Upload documents directly: https://accounts.muckrock.com/accounts/login/?url_auth_token=AAAIhlTo97b9_LHR4GSfxVrJz9g%3A1hlrQ5%3AwP7oGkTVY5wnLxdkReQflr06gyU&next=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.muckrock.com%2Faccounts%2Flogin%2F%3Fnext%3D%252Faccounts%252Fagency_login%252Fsan-francisco-police-department-367%252Femail-and-electronic-communications-audit-sfpd-76435%252F%253Femail%253Dsfpdmediarelations%252540sfgov.org
Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.

For mailed responses, please address (see note):
MuckRock News
DEPT MR 76435
411A Highland Ave
Somerville, MA 02144-2516

PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.

We have identified no responsive records from personal devices or accounts.
We are processing the request and have sent numerous emails containing responsive records from SFGOV email accounts.  Also, sms/text messages from Department cell phones are being uploaded to the GovQA records portal.

Thank you for your attention.

Sincerely,

Michael Andraychak
Media Relations
415-837-7395
To monitor the progress or update this request please log into the SFPD Public Records Center. (https://u8387795.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=Ow1KccipsoIsnXbuEgm-2FN-2B3KuyZ5YHnuXVUop6SBUj6Zl2gPWQsh2hjE0JdlwH66ZMXJDGxIkhWqlkMGRI8K8RdgfchCPn5hbqdWnlrcjvklsbezoDgEiXr0fpETGrLw_RS48PfEuBadMkLIhY2xrI2uthodKUGOQzPwgXQnJV8Phu7-2F4gUOxiqjyEwuJDKFH9hTPdLxRRGK3fw-2B3znbIdN6xXkfLOu-2FAGM3m8EkzF3hUbvUKQp9n-2FuWYT2JLhewp6p1TryqRq4-2BoyXthw-2BqomVNQVDLElkw20sSPSikowCZucvnpqh8rAxUwcOCVWQO22rQy-2FHs3qAMWTJPPeHPyAlpZ7UxY7I2iruBS893tuw5scTecYQiusoIMzZJLLHfM2Nnu5OlOVX-2BFKM22sqyl8IR3nSHXwh9EqV5OB5-2BQ1xrz34fC-2B4KChAvv985tlcXGC7g13rqNHUJUNPOLYNx2Q9b-2BDL3DZMA4Zco4FA8oav7GagVLUXEmc-2FgHSIbHZhKL15JgTpoSLanP1F-2FhlCLR3g-3D-3D)
This is an auto-generated email and has originated from an unmonitored email account. Please DO NOT REPLY.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Acknowledged, thank you.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

** Please redact your responses correctly! This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including emails, attachments, file shares, and the disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Once you send them to us, there's no going back. **

SFPD,

Is your response for 76435 (your #P008260-071519) complete? I would like the final determination of whether or not responsive documents exist (regardless of whether they were exempt) for each request. I would also like all of your redaction & withholding justifications. Remember SFAC 67.26 requires: "Information that is exempt from disclosure shall be masked, deleted or otherwise segregated in order that the nonexempt portion of a requested record may be released, and **keyed by footnote or other clear reference to the appropriate justification** for withholding required by section 67.27 of this article." (emphasis mine) -- you need to be clear which justification is for every redaction and withholding.

Finally I would like the full set of disclosed documents sent by email please.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

** Please redact your responses correctly! This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including emails, attachments, file shares, and the disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Once you send them to us, there's no going back. **

Sgt. Andraychak is I believe OOF on Fridays. Sending to mailing list.

SFPD,

Is your response for 76435 (your #P008260-071519) complete? I would like the final determination of whether or not responsive documents exist (regardless of whether they were exempt) for each request. I would also like all of your redaction & withholding justifications. Remember SFAC 67.26 requires: "Information that is exempt from disclosure shall be masked, deleted or otherwise segregated in order that the nonexempt portion of a requested record may be released, and **keyed by footnote or other clear reference to the appropriate justification** for withholding required by section 67.27 of this article." (emphasis mine) -- you need to be clear which justification is for every redaction and withholding.

Finally I would like the full set of disclosed documents sent by email please.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Task Force,

Attached is a new complaint. Please create a file and send it and the respondant's response to me.
I will also file your Google Form.

Respondent agency: SFPD

Respondent individuals: Police Chief William Scott, Sgt. Michael Andraychak, and Custodian Does 1–20

Alleged violations: SFAC 67.21, 67.26, 67.27, Gov Code 6253 and 6253.9

Complainant: Anonymous (requests@muckrock.com)

Thanks,
Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Supervisor of Records,

Attached is a new 67.21(d) petition against SFPD (dated 9/12, but sent 9/13).

Thanks,
Anonymous

From: San Francisco Police Department

Attached are Text Messages per your request. More emails are to come to fulfill your request on a rolling basis due to the volume and required redaction.

Officer Robert Rueca

Warning An exclamation point.

There are too many files to display on this communication. See all files

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

** Please redact your responses correctly! This is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including emails, attachments, file shares, and the disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Once you send them to us, there's no going back. **

Thank you Officer Rueca. Please note I requested a statement regarding the existence or non-existence of each of the records I requested (per SFAC 67.21(c) ).

From: San Francisco Police Department

Please see the attached redacted Text Messages. Due to the volume and required redactions, you will received additional emails on a rolling basis for the other requested information.
Regards,
Officer Robert Rueca

Warning An exclamation point.

There are too many files to display on this communication. See all files

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Supervisor of Records,

Since I sent the initial SFPD petition from this email, I have received responsive text messages as well.
Attached is an amendment adding more requests to our earlier petition, or alternatively, an additional petition (depending on how you wish to handle it), for the information withheld in those text records. Regardless, the requests are in addition to, and do not replace this morning's petition.

Thanks,
Anonymous

From:

Good Morning:

The Police Department has been named as a Respondent in the attached complaint filed with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force. Please respond to the following complaint/request within five business days.

The Respondent is required to submit a written response to the allegations including any and all supporting documents, recordings, electronic media, etc., to the Task Force within five (5) business days of receipt of this notice. This is your opportunity to provide a full explanation to allow the Task Force to be fully informed in considering your response prior its meeting.

Please include the following information in your response if applicable:

1. List all relevant records with descriptions that have been provided pursuant to the Complainant request.
2. Date the relevant records were provided to the Complainant.
3. Description of the method used, along with any relevant search terms used, to search for the relevant records.
4. Statement/declaration that all relevant documents have been provided, does not exist, or has been excluded.
5. Copy of the original request for records (if applicable).

Please refer to the File Number when submitting any new information and/or supporting documents pertaining to this complaint.

The Complainant alleges:

Complaint Attached.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Good afternoon SOTF,

Has the Sept. 13, 2019 complaint sent from this email address been captioned and sent to the respondents?
There has been additional movement on the requests that I'd like to document but I'm not sure if there is a file number.

Thanks!
Anonymous

From: San Francisco Police Department

Dear Anonymous:

Your complaint has been forwarded to the Police Department and I cc'd you. They have five business days to respond.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Dear Anonymous:

The file no. is 19098 for this request.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

****FILE 19098****

Thank you very much Ms. Leger - oddly I do not appear to have received such CC-ed email.

Regardless, my follow-up is attached, for the file, as it involves inappropriate withholdings/redactions in text messages disclosed immediately after the complaint was filed.

Thanks,
Anonymous

From:

To Whom It May Concern:

We write to provide an update on the status of our consideration of your petitions. Since September 6, you have submitted five separate petitions to the Supervisor of Records and numerous other email communications concerning prior petitions. We have already responded to four other petitions you submitted in recent months.

Due to the volume of petitions and the complexity of the issues raised, we are invoking the rule of reason and will respond to your petitions within a reasonable time period with the goal of addressing each petition within 30 days of submission. We understand you disagree with this basis. As we recently explained in response to one of your complaints with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, we strive to respond to petitions within the 10-day period specified in Section 67.21(d), but we don’t view it as an absolute deadline. Particularly here, where the issues raised are novel and you have submitted numerous petitions over a short time period, responding within 10 days is not feasible because doing so would unreasonably impinge on our ability to perform our other responsibilities.

Thank you for previously providing your stated preference in terms of prioritization.

Bradley Russi
Deputy City Attorney
Office of City Attorney Dennis Herrera
City Hall, Room 234
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Pl., San Francisco, CA 94102
www.sfcityattorney.org

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

**** FILE 19098 ****

SOTF,

Can you please send me the respondent's response for 19098?
I believe the Respondents' deadline has expired.

Thank you!
Anonymous

From: San Francisco Police Department

Here is set 2 of 2.

Cheryl

From: San Francisco Police Department

Here is the first item.

Cheryl

From: San Francisco Police Department

Here is set 2 of 2

Cheryl

From: San Francisco Police Department

Hello,

I am writing to update you on the status of your PRA P008260-071519.

I was notified on September 17th of your complaint to the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force (SOTF) and I have been working to prepare documents and a response to the SOTF.

I continue to work on your request and am processing emails received from various members of the Command Staff.

Your emails to me dated July 12 and July 13, 2019 arrived when I was off duty. A member of my staff contacted me on July 13th and made me aware of your emails. I asked the staff member to respond to your email and to provide you with the documents (SMS-Text messages from official CCSF phones) that had been previously uploaded to Gov-QA since you expressed your desire to not use the system and to have documents emailed to you. You should have received those SMS-text messages with individual specific explanation of redaction.

In response to your request for specific or itemized redaction of sfgov emails, I will re-process the documents previously sent to you, to include more specific explanation of redaction. Future email/documents will include specific explanation of redaction.

As previously noted in an email to you, there are no responsive documents from any staff member listed in your request, from the following sources/communications platforms:
Personal email accounts
Personal mobile phones (SMS-texts)
Personal or Government accounts under: Facebook messenger, Telegram, Slack, Google Hangouts, or Signal

Attached
Regards,

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Commander GG Div, Fong Emails

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Dir. Of Communications, Stevenson. Emails.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Dir. of Crime Strategies, Sutton inbox

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Dir. of Crime Strategies, Outbox

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Commander of Investigations, Mc Eachern. Emails.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Dir. Crime Strategies, Sutton Inbox 2

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

DC Ops, Mannix. Emails.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Chief Scott emails.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Commander Risk Mgmt. Walsh

NO DRAFTS

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Hello,

We are still working on your request.

Attached are email from Deputy Chief Administration Yee. There were no draft emails, no business emails or texts from personal accounts or devices and no messages from either business or personal messenger services.

Regards,

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Attached are emails for Deputy Chief of Admin.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Attached are emails for Dir Pub Affairs/Policy Hussey

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Please see attached docs. There are no draft emails..

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From:

Please see the attached response to your petition.

Bradley Russi
Deputy City Attorney
Office of City Attorney Dennis Herrera
City Hall, Room 234
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Pl., San Francisco, CA 94102
www.sfcityattorney.org

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Supervisor of Records,

** NOTE: this is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

Thank you for your response. There is no Exhibit A, but I will assume it is the same Exhibit A in your other responses. We do not concede any, and will contest all, of your arguments at SOTF and/or Court when the time comes.

However, some of the issues remain pending even under your analysis. You may consider this another 67.21(d) petition for a written determination whether any part of the records described below are public.

Re #4, 8, 9, 12 - If these records were simply produced properly even in PDF format, most of these issues would be solved, as PDFs can easily handle hyperlinks, color, images and formatting. I know the City knows how to produce proper PDFs of emails since most agencies do it, even the Police Commission itself. Unfortunately SFPD did not actually convert to PDF - they printed these electronic records on physical paper and scanned them back in, which destroys much of the information. For example, take a look at pg 27 of the record identified by SFPD as "Cdr_Inv_inbox1" - it is completely unintelligible due to the fact it is printed and scanned, and thus is not an exact copy of even the "screen" visible portion of the email. Disclosing all email copies as converted directly to PDF is completely practicable and must be done to produce additional public parts of the records, including but not limited to the unintelligible images on that pg 27.

Re #4 - You did not respond to the issue re: Cmdr Fong's records. His emails were not even provided, even in the supplemental production (see SFPD supplemental records "Cdr_GG_Fong_out1" and "Cdr_GG_Fong_in1"). Instead each responsive email was forwarded, creating a new record that does not have the same content as the original record. A copy of that forwarded email was then provided to us. This is not an "exact copy" of the responsive records as required under the CPRA for at least the following reasons:
(1) the forwarded email is a distinct record with a date *after* our request date,
(2) they are between Fong and Andraychak, but not between the original parties,
(3) they include additional descriptive comments by Fong in their body, and
(4) forwarding does not preserve all parts of the original email.
Please disclose a copy of the Fong responsive records, which at this point are still therefore being withheld. We know copies of emails are "practicable" as opposed to copies of forwards of emails, since other custodians provided them (subject to the other caveats throughout the petition).

Re #9, You have asked that I identify the hyperlinks further: I would like every hyperlink in each of the emails that were responsive to this request. They are public parts of these records, and I do not need to list them one by one. You, not I, are required to determine if *any part* of the records are public since of course *I cannot even know* which apparently underlined text may or may not be a hyperlink in the original record. I requested these emails in the original request, and the hyperlinks are parts of the responsive emails. Hyperlink URLs are generally typed in manually by the author of the email thus there can be no doubt that these are "writings" and thus a public record, regardless of the City's legal strategy against metadata. For example, to make a hyperlink you would generally highlight some part of the text, click a menu item to add a hyperlink, and then type in the link URL. I am not asking for the web pages at the other end of the link, just the link URL itself (the content of the target webpages are not responsive records per my request). If the City just uses proper PDFs this problem should be solved.

Re #4 & 12 - You have argued that the PDF format is an acceptable reason to exclude metadata. However, we recently learned the City *does* produce PDF email public records with metadata in a fully redactable PDF form. So it is possible for SFPD to produce in the PDF format but still produce at least some public metadata. See for example Police Commission records request P008994-091119 for responsive PDF emails with fully accessible email addresses, hyperlinks, email headers, and other metadata. The City must produce directly converted PDFs of the emails which may at least include some additional metadata (including government email addresses).

Re #11 & 12 - you have miscited Gov Code 6253(a) because you have excluded the context of the limitation re: reasonable segregation. Your cited clause limits inspection (in person, during business hours), not copying, of records to reasonable segregable portions. As you know, inspection and receiving a copy are distinct rights the public has with respect to records under the CPRA. Furthermore, the Sunshine Ordinance (SFAC 67.26) requires minimal withholding, not reasonable segregation, regardless. I requested only copies.

Re #13 - Below is an example of a portion of the text message record "Cdr_Pete_Walsh_Risk_Management" (from pg 8 of the supplement).
Any normal user view of a text message would show who sent each of these messages. Was it Walsh or the other party? Who is the other party(ies)? This problem applies to all of the produced text messages. We have the identity of one party, but not the other parties, and we don't know which party sent which of the messages. We need these public part of a record for all disclosed text messages.

Example:
ThreadId MessageId Date (UTC) Network Message Type
AttachmentCount Body
2855834247 6459701350 7/15/19 20:24 AT&T Message 0
"""I have a 130. Come up after to touch base?"""
2855834247 6459701483 7/15/19 20:26 AT&T Message 0
"""I have a 2:00. I am free after that """
2855834247 6459701427 7/15/19 20:26 AT&T Message 0
"""Copy"""
2855834247 6459701425 7/15/19 20:26 AT&T Message 0
"""Copy"""
2855834247 6459883599 7/15/19 21:51 AT&T Message 0
"""Free?"""

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: San Francisco Police Department

Greetings,

Links and URLs from Chief Scott's emails are below. Please advise if there was something else you needed/were looking for.

Monday, July 15, 2019 Francisco Da Costa
https://kilamanjaro-kilamanjaro.blogspot.com/2019/07/racial-equity-never-existed-in-san.html

Monday, July 15, 2019 Gordon Hom
911 Security Drone Laws
(attached PDF)

Monday, July 15, 2019 Nicholas Crawford (DPW)
png is the DPW logo - it won't save or copy over.

Monday, July 15, 2019
49ers Training Camp
png's are logos and won't copy

Saturday, July 13, 2019
William Scott to Hirsch and Henderson
png is logo won't copy.

Attached is a PDF of email from William Scott to Christine Fountain and Rowena Carr with working link to "Expanding Gender Identifiers"

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

  • 911 Security - US State Drone Laws and Regs in the USA by State 20190630

  • Fw_ Executive Directive Update Request _Redacted

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

** NOTE: this is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

Thank you for the hyperlinks. However I will remind you that the CPRA requires you to produce exact copies of records when practicable.
SFPD's production of "Fw_ Executive Directive Update Request _Redacted" shows they are in fact quite aware of how to properly produce PDFs of emails, with redactions, with hyperlinks, and with embedded attachments. It is indeed practicable to produce these copies and is what I expect and will proceed at SOTF to receive (in addition to our other complaints).

I've included my earlier reply to the Sup. of Records below, though I assume they are already in contact with you:

Supervisor of Records,

** NOTE: this is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

Thank you for your response. There is no Exhibit A, but I will assume it is the same Exhibit A in your other responses. We do not concede any, and will contest all, of your arguments at SOTF and/or Court when the time comes.

However, some of the issues remain pending even under your analysis. You may consider this another 67.21(d) petition for a written determination whether any part of the records described below are public.

Re #4, 8, 9, 12 - If these records were simply produced properly even in PDF format, most of these issues would be solved, as PDFs can easily handle hyperlinks, color, images and formatting. I know the City knows how to produce proper PDFs of emails since most agencies do it, even the Police Commission itself. Unfortunately SFPD did not actually convert to PDF - they printed these electronic records on physical paper and scanned them back in, which destroys much of the information. For example, take a look at pg 27 of the record identified by SFPD as "Cdr_Inv_inbox1" - it is completely unintelligible due to the fact it is printed and scanned, and thus is not an exact copy of even the "screen" visible portion of the email. Disclosing all email copies as converted directly to PDF is completely practicable and must be done to produce additional public parts of the records, including but not limited to the unintelligible images on that pg 27.

Re #4 - You did not respond to the issue re: Cmdr Fong's records. His emails were not even provided, even in the supplemental production (see SFPD supplemental records "Cdr_GG_Fong_out1" and "Cdr_GG_Fong_in1"). Instead each responsive email was forwarded, creating a new record that does not have the same content as the original record. A copy of that forwarded email was then provided to us. This is not an "exact copy" of the responsive records as required under the CPRA for at least the following reasons:
(1) the forwarded email is a distinct record with a date *after* our request date,
(2) they are between Fong and Andraychak, but not between the original parties,
(3) they include additional descriptive comments by Fong in their body, and
(4) forwarding does not preserve all parts of the original email.
Please disclose a copy of the Fong responsive records, which at this point are still therefore being withheld. We know copies of emails are "practicable" as opposed to copies of forwards of emails, since other custodians provided them (subject to the other caveats throughout the petition).

Re #9, You have asked that I identify the hyperlinks further: I would like every hyperlink in each of the emails that were responsive to this request. They are public parts of these records, and I do not need to list them one by one. You, not I, are required to determine if *any part* of the records are public since of course *I cannot even know* which apparently underlined text may or may not be a hyperlink in the original record. I requested these emails in the original request, and the hyperlinks are parts of the responsive emails. Hyperlink URLs are generally typed in manually by the author of the email thus there can be no doubt that these are "writings" and thus a public record, regardless of the City's legal strategy against metadata. For example, to make a hyperlink you would generally highlight some part of the text, click a menu item to add a hyperlink, and then type in the link URL. I am not asking for the web pages at the other end of the link, just the link URL itself (the content of the target webpages are not responsive records per my request). If the City just uses proper PDFs this problem should be solved.

Re #4 & 12 - You have argued that the PDF format is an acceptable reason to exclude metadata. However, we recently learned the City *does* produce PDF email public records with metadata in a fully redactable PDF form. So it is possible for SFPD to produce in the PDF format but still produce at least some public metadata. See for example Police Commission records request P008994-091119 for responsive PDF emails with fully accessible email addresses, hyperlinks, email headers, and other metadata. The City must produce directly converted PDFs of the emails which may at least include some additional metadata (including government email addresses).

Re #11 & 12 - you have miscited Gov Code 6253(a) because you have excluded the context of the limitation re: reasonable segregation. Your cited clause limits inspection (in person, during business hours), not copying, of records to reasonable segregable portions. As you know, inspection and receiving a copy are distinct rights the public has with respect to records under the CPRA. Furthermore, the Sunshine Ordinance (SFAC 67.26) requires minimal withholding, not reasonable segregation, regardless. I requested only copies.

Re #13 - Below is an example of a portion of the text message record "Cdr_Pete_Walsh_Risk_Management" (from pg 8 of the supplement).
Any normal user view of a text message would show who sent each of these messages. Was it Walsh or the other party? Who is the other party(ies)? This problem applies to all of the produced text messages. We have the identity of one party, but not the other parties, and we don't know which party sent which of the messages. We need these public part of a record for all disclosed text messages.

Example:
ThreadId MessageId Date (UTC) Network Message Type
AttachmentCount Body
2855834247 6459701350 7/15/19 20:24 AT&T Message 0
"""I have a 130. Come up after to touch base?"""
2855834247 6459701483 7/15/19 20:26 AT&T Message 0
"""I have a 2:00. I am free after that """
2855834247 6459701427 7/15/19 20:26 AT&T Message 0
"""Copy"""
2855834247 6459701425 7/15/19 20:26 AT&T Message 0
"""Copy"""
2855834247 6459883599 7/15/19 21:51 AT&T Message 0
"""Free?"""

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: San Francisco Police Department

Hello,

Attached is the PDF printed using the link provided in my earlier email.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Please see attached.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Pleas see attached, representing the only emails available from Commander Lazar, Community Engagement Division.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Please see attached from Director of Forensics, Sanchez

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Good Morning:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Complaint Committee of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: December 17, 2019

Location: City Hall, Room 408

Time: 5:30 p.m.

File No. 19112: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Chief William Scott and Lt. R. Andrew Cox and the Police Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.26, 67.27, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner, failing to justify withholding of records and failing to maintain a Proposition G calendar.

File No. 19098: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Police Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.26 and 67.27, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19084: Complaint filed by Mo Green against the City Attorney's Office for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 and 67.25, by failing to respond to a request for documents in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19085: Complaint filed by Mo Green against the Public Utilities Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 and 67.25, by failing to respond to a request for documents in a timely and/or complete manner.

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure).

For inclusion in the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00 pm, December 10, 2019.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Dear SOTF Parties:

The agenda and packet for the Complaint Committee 12/17/19 - 5:30 p.m. meeting is online at the following link:

https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/default/files/complaint_121719_agenda.pdf

The packet material is linked to each item listed on the agenda mark with an "attachment". Click anywhere on the title of the item to open the link to the pdf of the packet material in question.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Dear Anonymous:

Please see the email below regarding tomorrow's hearing. The Police Department has a typo in their email below. Their hearing is scheduled for tomorrow, December 17. The Police Department is asking that this matter be continued due to a scheduling conflict. By way of this email, I am giving the SOTF Complaint Committee members notice of this request. This is the Police Department's first request for a continuance in this matter. Anonymous, are you willing to grant a continuance in this matter? Thank you.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Greetings,

Attached are the emails provided to me in response to your request for emails from Commander of MTA.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Sgt. Andraychak,
Is this request now complete in SFPD's view?

From: San Francisco Police Department

I will be out of the office from Thursday, February 13th through Sunday, February 23rd. I will return to work on Monday, February 24th.
Please contact the Media Relations Unit for assistance at SFPDMediaRelations@sfgov.org or by calling 1-415-837-7395.
After hours, you can reach the on call PIO at415-535-9354 or via email at OnCallSFPDPIO@sfgov.org

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

SFPD- Is this request now complete in SFPD's view?

From: San Francisco Police Department

Hello

My apologies... i'm out for the week. I am still working on 2 or 3 command staff members' emails. If you are still interested in the documents, I will continue when I get back to work. Please advise.

Thanks

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Public Information Officer

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

http://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Yes I am, I intend that SFPD fully complies with all provisions of the Sunshine Ordinance.

Thanks.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Dear SOTF Petitioners, Respondents and other Stakeholders:
As you most likely know SOTF operations have been delayed over the last few months due to the Covid-19 emergency. The SOTF have started to conduct remote meetings via videoconference and are working to establish procedures to resume all operations including the processing of complaints.
While the Sunshine Ordinance requires that certain actions be taken within 45 days, the Covid-19 emergency has forced delays and immense new backlogs for complaint hearings. We write today to ask if you are willing to waive the 45 day rule for your complaint.
The SOTF intends to resume hearing complaints on a limited basis and complaints will be queued to be heard in the near future. We continue to work to address technical issues posed by remote meetings. We are aware of the time sensitivity of your records requests. Please be assured that the SOTF appreciates the urgency of your matters and the importance of handling them in a timely manner.
If you have further questions about your files or have other issues, please feel free to email the SOTF Administrator at the email below.
Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org<mailto:Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org>
Tel: 415-554-7724
Fax: 415-554-5163
www.sfbos.org

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Good Afternoon:

Notice is hereby given that the Complaint Committee (Committee) of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force (Task Force) shall hold hearings on complaints listed below to: 1) determine if the Task Force has jurisdiction; 2) review the merits of the complaints; and/or 3) issue a report and/or recommendation to the Task Force.

Date: September 15, 2020

Location: Remote Meeting

Time: 5:30 p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

File No. 19098: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Police Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.26 and 67.27, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19120: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the Office of the City Attorney for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(b)(c), 67.26, 67.27, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner; failing to justify withholding of records and failing to provide assistance.

File No. 19101: Complaint filed by Ray Hartz against President Mark Buell and the Joint Zoo Committee for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.15(d), and 67.16, by failing to place the submitted 150-word summaries of Public Comment into the meeting minutes (Meeting of August 15, 2019).

File No. 19140: Complaint filed by Stephen Malloy against the Department of Human Resources for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21and 67.25, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19145: Complaint filed by Chris Kohrs against the Police Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.5 and 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least four (4) working days before the hearing. For inclusion into the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00 pm, September 10, 2020.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

SOTF FILE 19098 - Please add the attached Complainant's presentation for the Sept 15 Agenda.

NOTE: THE EMAIL ADDRESS SENDING THIS REQUEST IS A PUBLICLY-VIEWABLE MAILBOX. Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

From: San Francisco Police Department

Good Afternoon:

The agenda and packet for the Complaint Committee 09/15/20 - 5:30 p.m. REMOTE meeting is online at the following link:

https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/default/files/complaint_091520_agenda.pdf

The packet material is linked to each item listed on the agenda marked with an "attachment". Click anywhere on the title of the item to open the link to the pdf of the packet material in question.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org<mailto:Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org>
Tel: 415-554-7724
Fax: 415-554-5163
www.sfbos.org

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Hi,

Attached are emails that were provided for Commander Ewins (MTA).

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Public Information Officer

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

http://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Director of IT, Merritt

1 of 2, outbox. There were no Drafts.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Public Information Officer

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

http://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Please see attached. There were no Draft emails.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Public Information Officer

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

http://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

Warning An exclamation point.

There are too many files to display on this communication. See all files

From: San Francisco Police Department

2 of 2

Dir, IT Merritt. Outbox

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Public Information Officer

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

http://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Good Morning:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: October 7, 2020

Location: Remote meeting

Time: 4:00 p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

File No. 19080: Complaint filed by Paul A. Vander Waerdt against the Dept. of Homelessness and Supportive Housing for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25, for failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely manner.

File No. 19109: Complaint filed by Stephen Malloy against Dept. of Public Health for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.24, 67.25, 67.26 and 67.27 by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19112: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Chief William Scott and Lt. R. Andrew Cox and the Police Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.25, 67.26, 67.27, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner, failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner; failing to justify withholding of records and failing to maintain a Proposition G calendar.

File No. 19098: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Police Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.26 and 67.27, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19145: Complaint filed by Chris Kohrs against the Police Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.5 and 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19140: Complaint filed by Stephen Malloy against the Department of Human Resources for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21and 67.25, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure).

For inclusion in the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00 pm, September 30, 2020.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Good Afternoon:

The agenda and packet for the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force 10/07/20 - 4:00 p.m. meeting is online at the following link:

https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/default/files/sotf_100720_agenda.pdf

The packet material is linked to each item listed on the agenda marked with an "attachment". Click anywhere on the title of the item to open the link to the pdf of the packet material in question.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org<mailto:Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org>

Tel: 415-554-7724

Fax: 415-554-5163

www.sfbos.org

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Good Afternoon:

The agenda and packet for the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force 10/07/20 - 4:00 p.m. meeting is online at the following link:

https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/default/files/sotf_100720_agenda.pdf

The packet material is linked to each item listed on the agenda marked with an "attachment". Click anywhere on the title of the item to open the link to the pdf of the packet material in question.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org<mailto:Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org>

Tel: 415-554-7724

Fax: 415-554-5163

www.sfbos.org

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Greetings:

The following members replied that they have no responsive documents from personal phone devices (SMS, etc.) or personal email or messenger accounts.
Chief of Police
Chief of Staff
Asst. Chief Operations
DC Operations
DC Airport
DC Special Ops
DC Investigations
Commander GG
Cdr. Metro
Cdr. Risk Management
Cdr. MTA
Cdr. Investigations
Cdr. Air
Dir. Strategic Planning/PSPP
Dir Crime Strategies
Dir. Forensics

Dir Pub Policy - left department
Dir. Communications - left department
Dir. IT - left department

DC Admin - (Yee) provided responsive documents that he sent from his personal email to his SFgov email. I am working on those now.
Commander Admin - (O'Sullivan) provided responsive documents that he sent from his personal email to his SFgov email. I am working on those now.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Public Information Officer

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

http://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Re: P008260-071519

Please also provide, as an immediate disclosure request, a copy of the communications you sent to these persons asking them to perform a corrected City of San Jose search and all of their replies.

--Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Supervisor of Records Dennis Herrera,

Attached is a new 67.21(d) petition against SFPD.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

  • 2020-10-1120-20Supervisor20of20Records20-20SFPD20P008260-071519-f.pdf

From: San Francisco Police Department

Hello,

I am writing to acknowledge your request. The office was closed on Monday, 10/12/2020 which was a holiday. I'll get you the requested documents as soon as possible.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Public Information Officer

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

http://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Emails as requested.

Not every respondent emailed a reply.

I'm still processing the emails provided by Cdr. O'Sullivan and DC Yee.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Public Information Officer

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

http://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Emails, 2 and 3 of 3.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Public Information Officer

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

http://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Thanks Sgt. Since it seems some of them don't understand, here is a paraphrasing:
- Were there *any* messages sent or received by email/text/messenger about the "conduct of public business" for any of the parties on or before July 15, 2019?
- If so provide the 10 most recent sent and 10 most recent received from each account (on or before July 15, 2019).

It's NOT:
- Just records made in July 2019
- Just records made in 2019 before July 15, 2019.

It seems some of them don't understand.

Thanks,
Anonymous

From: San Francisco Police Department

Hi,

I copied and pasted the exact language (from your request) into the email that I sent to the command staff members.

The request was confusing for many members and I spoke with many of them via phone. I did my best to clarify the request and when I did was clear that the request was for the ten most recent messages from each item specified.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Public Information Officer

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

http://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Got it. Is there any progress on the other parts of the case? There were 4 violations found by SOTF:

- personally-held public records (seems you're working on this)
- missing redaction keys
- text message To/From; and email headers
- printing/scanning electronic documents

Thanks,
Anonymous

From: San Francisco Police Department

Hi,

Attached you will find the redaction key that was used for this PRA.
I will need to connect with other staff members to learn how they process text messages to ensure you get you usable documents.
I'll have to consult colleagues to determine how they save emails directly as PDFs vs printing and scanning.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Public Information Officer

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

http://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Thanks - I have the Key itself but the redactions on the documents (prior to filing the complaint) were not keyed by footnote or other clear reference to these justifications (that's the 2nd 67.26 violation).

PDFMaker for emails can be used to generate electronic copies. You've already provided some metadata, except To/From for texts and Email headers which are outstanding.

As I said in email a few days ago, SFPD can either reproduce all of the records in this request in a fully compliant fashion or can reproduce a portion proving SFPD's compliance in principle along with an agreement from Chief Scott that SFPD agrees in writing to comply going forward.

--Anonymous

From: San Francisco Police Department

Can you provide me with an idea of whose emails did not have redactions noted?

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Public Information Officer

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

http://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Sgt. Andraychak,

The 2nd 67.26 violation is for documents provided by SFPD prior to the filing of the complaint on Sep 13, 2019. A few examples include:
- https://cdn.muckrock.com/foia_files/2019/08/26/Summer_Youth_Locations_for_7_16_19_Redacted.pdf
- https://cdn.muckrock.com/foia_files/2019/08/26/Suspect_ID_Needed__Package_Theft__50.00_Redacted.pdf
- https://cdn.muckrock.com/foia_files/2019/08/26/You_are_cordially_invited_to_49ers_Training_Camp_Redacted.pdf

The Task Force did not find a 67.27 violation, but only the 67.26 violation, as it appears you had given two written justifications but haven't keyed them to the redactions (which is which).

If you have re-produced all the files at some point without printing and scanning and with footnotes or a key with references to all redactions (like this one: https://cdn.muckrock.com/foia_files/2020/09/15/RE__Recommendation_76.1__Redacted.pdf ), just let me know where to find those and I can consider violations 2 and 4 complied with.

What would remain is the City of San Jose records (which you are working on I believe) and the text message to/from data, and the email header metadata.

--Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Sgt. Andraychak,

It has been a month and half since anything happened here - are you refusing to comply?

As a reminder:

Moved by Member Hyland, second by Member LaHood, to find the Police
Department in violation of Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections
67.21(b), by failing to provide copies of electronic records by printing and scanning
them instead; 67.21(k) by failing to search for all personally held public records
within the scope of City of San Jose v. Superior Court (2017); Section 67.26 by
withholding partial text message records namely the To and From of each message
and also by withholding all email metadata namely email headers, and Section 67.26
by failing to key each redaction with a footnote or other clear reference to a
justification.

Public Comment:
None.

The motion PASSED by the following vote:
Ayes: 7 - Hyland, LaHood, Schmidt, Wong, Yankee, Hinze, Wolfe
Noes: 0 - None

--Anonymous

From: San Francisco Police Department

Good morning,

I'm working on getting you text messages (re-done) and learned how to directly save an email as a PDF. So I'll get you those work emails from DC Yee from his personal email.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Public Information Officer

Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Sat & Sun

http://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Thanks - if you first show that this decision can and will be implemented properly by SFPD for some smaller sample of records, and agree with a letter signed by Chief Scott that SFPD agrees to, for every public record produced hereafter, (1) provide PDF copies of electronic public records without printing and scanning if requested, (2) disclose all non-exempt email headers if requested, (3) disclose all non-exempt text message metadata if requested, (4) always key every redaction to a written exemption justification in all records requests, and (5) search personal property for records related to the conduct of public business pursuant to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017), I remain willing to waive the remainder of the re-production of the entire request.

Given you haven't responded before I assume SFPD does not wish to settle the matter this way.

--Anonymous

From: San Francisco Police Department

At your request, I recontacted members of the command staff and asked them to double check and let me know if they had any official ccsf work emails on their personal email account.

Attached are emails from Dep. Chief Yee's personal email. They were saved directly as PDFs. As you know, we are redacting Metadata.

He has no other responsive documents.

There are no further command staff members with work emails in their personal accounts.

I am working on the text message portion of this request.

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Public Information Officer

Officer in Charge - Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Fri, Sat, Sun

http://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

> As you know, we are redacting Metadata.

So you are refusing to comply with the SOTF's decision in this case?

From: San Francisco Police Department

Mr. Anonymous,

This is consistent with the City's response requests for metadata. The difficulty of consistent redactions makes the metadata formats not "easily generated" and therefore also exempt under Sunshine 67.21(l).
67.21(l) places reasonable limits on the types of electronic information and formats that must be provided

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Public Information Officer

Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Sat & Sun

http://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Perhaps you are out of date on what has happened with metadata...

67.21(L) limits only the format, not the information itself. Note that the law says "available" or "easily generated" NOT "easily redacted." Generating these files takes moments; redacting them takes longer. The format is certainly "available" to you.
DT and DPW have now provided the information in PDF format, and then redacted it so that redaction can be done in Adobe Acrobat like other records.
DPW started providing their headers in Oct-Nov 2020: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/documents/6046865
DT finished providing headers as of Dec 28, 2020: https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/documents/6211041

I don't plan on re-arguing this with you - SFPD, the Mayor, and the City Attorney each lost these cases.
You might want to send an email to DT before you go down this road.

Anyway... To confirm, SFPD is refusing to comply with the metadata part of SOTF's ruling in 19098, correct?

Thanks,
Anonymous

From: San Francisco Police Department

Hi,

We understand and respect the rulings of SOTF on these issues. We are continuing to consult with the Department of Technology and the City Attorney's Office regarding the scope of any metadata, including calendar ICS data, that can be safely and efficiently disclosed without jeopardizing the safety, security and integrity of the City and County of San Francisco's computer networks, proprietary and licensed systems, and individual users' accounts. See Cal. Govt. Code ? 6253.9(f); 6254.19.

As you are well aware, this task is far from simple. I understand that you have not agreed to a pilot protocol including a metadata field "green list" proposed by the Department of Technology and continue to disagree with the boundaries drawn by the City's technical experts. This reflects the continuing complexity of solving the associated technical and practical challenges of providing all of the information in all of the formats you have sought, without inadvertently disclosing cyber-sensitive information or information traditionally withheld for other reasons such as privilege or privacy, that may be embedded in metadata.

Thus, we are working through additional guidance on these issues from the appropriate City professionals, and will respond further when we have a clearer understanding of our obligations under any applicable authorities or rulings, and a reliable methodology for securely and effectively producing permissibly disclosed information while safeguarding exempt information.

Have a good holiday!

Michael Andraychak #457

Sergeant of Police

Public Information Officer

Media Relations Unit

San Francisco Police Department

1245 - 3rd Street, 6th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

(415) 837-7395

Regular Days Off: Sat & Sun

http://www.sanfranciscopolice.org/

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Dear Parties: The attached Order of Determination was published today. Attached for your records is a copy of that document.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org<mailto:Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org>
Tel: 415-554-7724
Fax: 415-554-5163
www.sfbos.org

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Good Morning:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Compliance and Amendments Committee to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: June 22, 2021

Location: Remote meeting; participant information to be included on the Agenda

Time: 4:30 p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

File No. 19140: Complaint filed by Stephen Malloy against the Department of Human Resources for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 and 67.25, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19124: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Chief William Scott and Lt. R. Andrew Cox and the Police Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.25, 67.26, 67.27, by failing to by failing to assist in a timely or complete manner, by failing to provide a timely or complete response to a records request, by failing to provide rolling responses, by failing to withhold the minimal portion of public records, and by failing by provide written justification for withholding.

File No. 19112: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Chief William Scott and Lt. R. Andrew Cox and the Police Department for violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.25, 67.26, 67.27, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner, failing to justify withholding of records and failing to maintain a Proposition G calendar.

File No. 20108: Complaint filed by E.J. White against the Department of Police Accountability for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19098: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Police Department for violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(b), by failing to provide copies of electronic records by printing and scanning them instead; 67.21(k) by failing to search for all personally held public records within the scope of City of San Jose v. Superior Court (2017); Section 67.26 by withholding partial text message records namely the To and From of each message and also by withholding all email metadata namely email headers, and Section 67.27 by failing to key each redaction with a footnote or other clear reference to a justification.

File No. 18086: Hearing regarding request for reconsideration. Compliant filed by Mark Sullivan against the Mission Dolores Green Benefit District Formation Committee for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.14, by failing to allow video and audio recording filming and still photography of a policy body.

File No. 20079: Complaint filed by Shane Anderies against District Attorney's Office and Chesa Boudin for violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(e) failing to respond to a records request in a timely and/or complete manner; 67.25 by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner; 67.26 withholding kept to a minimum and 67.27 failing to provide justification for withholding responsive documents.

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure). For inclusion into the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00 pm, June 17, 2021.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: San Francisco Police Department

Good Morning Cheryl Leger,

I will be out of the office on 6/22/21. Would it be possible to reschedule?

Please let me know.

Thank you

Lt. Arran Pera #531
Legal Division
415-837-7176 Desk
415-837-7394 Main

This communication, along with any attachments, is covered by federal and state laws governing electronic communications and may contain confidential and legally privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, use, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please reply immediately to the sender and/or delete this message. Thank you.

From:

Hi Ms. Leger, I oppose the postponement (for my complaints) based on the fact that these SOTF decisions are months old and that SFPD has at least two other respondent representatives who represented the agency at the original hearings:  Andraychak and Cox.

Regards,

Anonymous
Twitter @journo_anon

IMPORTANT:
1. If you are a public official: I intend that these communications all be disclosable public records, and I will not hold in confidence any of your messages, notwithstanding any notices to the contrary.
2. If you are NOT a public official: This communication is confidential and may contain unpublished information or confidential source information, protected by the California Shield Law, Evidence Code sec. 1070. I am a member of the electronic media and regularly publish information about the conduct of public officials.
3. I am not a lawyer.  Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever.
4. The digital signature (signature.asc attachment), if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender.

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

RE: SOTF 19098 - Sgt. Sullivan: Please send the letter you discussed yesterday and the remainder of corrected records for this complaint as soon as possible

--Anonymous

From: San Francisco Police Department

Dear Anonymous:

Thank you for your interest in public records of the San Francisco Police Department ("SFPD").

The San Francisco Police Department ("SFPD") received your request, dated June 25, 2021 and given the reference number P039816-062521 for tracking purposes.

Record(s) Requested: This is a follow up request to P008260-071519.

RE:SOTF 19098 - Sgt. Sullivan: Please send the letter you discussed yesterday and the remainder of corrected records for this request as soon as possible.

Your request is being forwarded to the appropriate department(s) for processing and you will be notified once the request is complete.

You can monitor request progress at the link below.  Thank you for using the San Francisco Public Records Center.


San Francisco Police Department
To monitor the progress or update this request please log into the SFPD Public Records Center. (https://u8387795.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=nZGH0ylxadMp5hTpNkeAFs2KguIDF883TvKUiL5Czauo89OcQL1XvHpyaOEmJgddHZionDPZxe8o-2F99A9Uuw2zhIwa2azPvFtI8C5qiH4T6RKGv3i2d6XUWljLe0W1ivudll_69KMf7xcOs2eJQ9IyNAIOokHpycaXcvDGPlJ1lmzERLQWJ7xlkdxa68TxqioxLffQcxlGqOAtjm0Rz9kNyGRrIjbPRmt1vYgiOduUOyV1NpkFPMr-2Byy7m3H4fnv6JzrtsmfLCVP5cg3oyaX3LJypBvs9nLWq-2BNnEv4wW2GpXNY57jJ-2FuQ-2BEg7HkjwwB9RTZ6AEdtbag686L2Lg0SyuJDactd8wDhPz08aXm-2FcfeSX9xeP1pzwZhInLeu-2FXj-2Bzg-2BN6SqoQXrQq-2BrxtvLSCnpHwPOECy0jHMZJoPsLU0-2FPeBoKgamAZPTtrdoj0knDPugvpHIrMbx3NUu4XFFqMfYkOzgNQ3b2Hyygud8xppdU8VH2T16q5q-2FdIr05NYqnEsN4XVOBsbZ5xW8oZmQR49tmOw-3D-3D)

From:

Hello Anonymous,

For your request for the letter, I have made a new request under request P039816 and will be sending you the letter you requested.

Sergeant Victoria Sullivan #571

Legal Division

San Francisco Police Department

1245 3rd Street, 4th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94158

415-837-7184

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication and its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws, including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication

From: San Francisco Police Department

Attachments:
Responsive_letter_and_doc.pdf (https://u8387795.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=nZGH0ylxadMp5hTpNkeAFs2KguIDF883TvKUiL5Czauo89OcQL1XvHpyaOEmJgddhTktxCQo3dAEL3UN6JwjbrIOEhWaSG1hipJN4KjQBAhOvy1V-2Buya2Ed9AJUyKYxO2Q8sVzXOwFfW1RVzzs-2BCVi02VLI4Mv02sIoG92dh4mCBd3A71tZLLdr-2Fe31Lf6z8VQJzG-2Bped-2BrXmcEdtUkPx9e6NEeJ3ejCUSq98dQFT6s-3DctNr_69KMf7xcOs2eJQ9IyNAIOokHpycaXcvDGPlJ1lmzERLQWJ7xlkdxa68TxqioxLffQcxlGqOAtjm0Rz9kNyGRrA7-2F8V5ou5EGP-2FjYFEW1tjNBSzM1CXvRByo3o-2BbXn7OqvWqyUktOv-2Fsg4wTjpZazLEWuvLAWwEoUPao2cF1uo4wG1eFbnpYGoRhl-2BbJZ0cB0-2Fun7EKvOjcHzy0cYsVc7IyJ2-2BaEabNW6Z9hXZn9gF6A903qvwT5FF2f1sA5zAIv7A3-2BfOsd9i2c0cmhEDG62xAzbk70KajKp-2BUVR6joS2OP5nbpVZT7nU2kDmopFmX9TimiQPZu7u7RrVBQf8u8FI5ZP0ct590p6DZsX1LhUdqsQwyftsKo5WH7kcidkZ2iLgSU4Ol2ntNobpJExvlqBbQ-3D-3D)

--- Please respond above this line ---

June 25, 2021
Via email requests@muckrock.com

Anonymous

RE: Public Records Request, dated June 25, 2021, Reference # P039816-062521

Dear Anonymous:

In response to your request, please see attached document(s).

Sincerely,
Lieutenant Arran Pera #531
Officer in Charge
Risk Management - Legal Division
To monitor the progress or update this request please log into the SFPD Public Records Center. (https://u8387795.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=nZGH0ylxadMp5hTpNkeAFs2KguIDF883TvKUiL5Czauo89OcQL1XvHpyaOEmJgddHZionDPZxe8o-2F99A9Uuw2zhIwa2azPvFtI8C5qiH4T6RKGv3i2d6XUWljLe0W1ivC0l6_69KMf7xcOs2eJQ9IyNAIOokHpycaXcvDGPlJ1lmzERLQWJ7xlkdxa68TxqioxLffQcxlGqOAtjm0Rz9kNyGRrA7-2F8V5ou5EGP-2FjYFEW1tjNBSzM1CXvRByo3o-2BbXn7OqvWqyUktOv-2Fsg4wTjpZazLEWuvLAWwEoUPao2cF1uo4wG1eFbnpYGoRhl-2BbJZ0cB0-2Fun7EKvOjcHzy0cYsVc7IyJ2-2BaEabNW6Z9hXZn9gF6A903qvwT5FF2f1sA5zAIv7HN9pzZVElfW8aHp31soqUN3Gmelu0BVQObSCddw53JrxIc-2FmOYbMB0Bz9jb-2BhiwAmgmCt-2F2k1aki5jnNxfosJAii2tBpsBYh-2BlbqHkhwmH-2BquOTcmzKcxdjKr9XFe7i5Qyly-2BZnApNK3od-2Bwyo3gGQ-3D-3D)
This is an auto-generated email and has originated from an unmonitored email account. Please DO NOT REPLY.

From: San Francisco Police Department

--- Please respond above this line ---

Good Morning,
We have had some staffing changes at our unit and it looks like this request was still open. I am checking to see if you still are looking into this matter, or if it can be closed out.
If I do not each from you by 08/23/2022 the request will be closed.
Please reach out to me with any questions at kathryn.winters@sfgov.org.
Sincerely,
Officer Kathryn Winters
Media Relations

This is an auto-generated email and has originated from an unmonitored email account. Please DO NOT REPLY.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

You cannot close out Public Records Request P008260-071519.

It remains pending.

If you do close it out without complying with SOTF's Orders I will ask them the refer Chief Scott to the Ethics Commission for willful violation of the Sunshine Ordinance.

From: San Francisco Police Department

--- Please respond above this line ---

August 12, 2022
Via email requests@muckrock.com

Anonymous

,

RE: Public Records Request, dated July 15, 2019, Reference # P008260-071519

Dear Anonymous:

The San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) received your Public Records Act request, dated July 15, 2019, on August 12, 2022.

You requested, " This is a follow up to a previous request:"

To Whom It May Concern:

I wanted to follow up on the following California Public Records Act request, copied below, and originally submitted on July 2, 2019. Please let me know when I can expect to receive a response.

Thanks for your help, and let me know if further clarification is needed.

Filed via MuckRock.com
E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com
Upload documents directly: https://accounts.muckrock.com/accounts/login/?url_auth_token=AAAIhlTo97b9_LHR4GSfxVrJz9g%3A1hlrQ5%3AwP7oGkTVY5wnLxdkReQflr06gyU&next=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.muckrock.com%2Faccounts%2Flogin%2F%3Fnext%3D%252Faccounts%252Fagency_login%252Fsan-francisco-police-department-367%252Femail-and-electronic-communications-audit-sfpd-76435%252F%253Femail%253Dsfpdmediarelations%252540sfgov.org
Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.

For mailed responses, please address (see note):
MuckRock News
DEPT MR 76435
411A Highland Ave
Somerville, MA 02144-2516

PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.

---

On July 2, 2019:
Subject: California Public Records Act Request: Email and Electronic Communications Audit (SFPD)
RE: Email and Electronic Communications Audit

To Whom It May Concern:

** NOTE: this is a public mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the general public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

We request under the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance (Ordinance) and the California Public Records Act (CPRA) the following items from the SFPD.
Similar requests were recently made of the Board of Supervisors, Clerk, and Mayor's Office. If a person has multiple email addresses (including but not limited to email aliases), 10 emails from each are requested. For example the Mayor may have a public-facing email alias and also an email address she uses to do business internally- 10 from each are requested. Please do not include spam or product advertisement emails.

We remind you of your obligations to provide electronic records in the original format you hold them in. Therefore, e-mails exported in the .eml or .msg format with all non-exempt headers, metadata, attachments, etc. are best.
However, if you choose to convert emails, for example, to PDF or printed format, to easily redact them, you must ensure that you have preserved the full content of the original email record (as specified in request "A"), which contains many detailed headers beyond the generally used From/To/Subject/Sent/etc. For the chat apps, a screenshot or print-out is acceptable.

If you use PDF, use properly redacted searchable or text pdfs. Please don't use image PDFs to make it harder to analyze the records.
If you provide PDFs instead of original email files, only give a few of the headers or lacking attachments/images, and/or improperly withhold public records that exist on private accounts/devices you may be in violation of SF Admin Code and/or CPRA, and we may challenge your decision at the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, Supervisor of Records, judicially, and/or via any other remedies available to us. I currently have pending petitions to the Task Force and Supervisor of Records to correct prior disclosure failures of electronic information from various SF agencies.

You must justify all withholding.

Provide records in a rolling fashion. Do not wait for all records to be available.

Please provide only those copies of records available without any fees. If you determine certain records would require fees, please instead provide the required free notice of which of those records are available and non-exempt for inspection in-person if we so choose. Please use email to respond.

I look forward to your prompt disclosure.

PART 1 - Email

A. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails RECEIVED BY EACH OFFICIAL government email account of
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

B. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails SENT FROM EACH OFFICIAL government email account of
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

C. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails IN THE DRAFT or OUTBOX folder of EACH OFFICIAL government email account of the following. Please remember the special Sunshine exceptions to CPRA draft withholding under SF Admin Code 67.24(a).
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

D. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails regarding the public's business (specifically those disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)) SENT FROM EACH PERSONAL email account(s) of the following officials, TO/CC/BCC any sfgov.org email address. If NO such emails exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

E. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 emails regarding the public's business (specifically those disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)) RECEIVED BY EACH PERSONAL email account(s) of the following officials, FROM any sfgov.org email address. If NO such emails exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

PART 2 - Chat/Messaging

As used below "Conversations" include but are not limited to any metadata records showing that a conversation had taken place but is now deleted (due to expiration for example).
Various types of apps are mentioned below.

A. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Facebook Messenger ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

B. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Telegram ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

C. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Slack ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

D. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Google Hangouts ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

E. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [ Signal ]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

F. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all OFFICIAL government account(s) of the following person in [SMS/MMS/text messages]:
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

G.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Facebook Messenger ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

H.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Telegram ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

I.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Slack ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

J.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Google Hangouts ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

K.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ Signal ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

L.an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all headers, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the most recent 10 conversations (whether individual or group chats) of all PERSONAL account(s) of the following person in [ text/SMS/MMS messaging ], solely to the extent that such conversations are regarding the public's business and disclosable under relevant statute and case law, including but not limited to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017). If NO such conversations exist for each entry, remember you must state under Govt Code 6253(c) that there are no responsive records.
1. Chief of Police
2. Asst. Chief/Chief of Staff
3. Asst. Chief/Operations
4. Deputy Chief/Administration
5. Executive Director/Strategic Management
6. Deputy Chief/Field Operations
7. Deputy Chief/Investigations
8. Deputy Chief/Special Operations
9. Deputy Chief/Airport
10. every Commander
11. every Civilian Director

PART 3: all instruments used to inquire of each official as to whether they possess any responsive records above, and all of their responses

Sincerely,
Anonymous

Filed via MuckRock.com
E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com
Upload documents directly: https://accounts.muckrock.com/accounts/login/?url_auth_token=AAAIhlTo97b9_LHR4GSfxVrJz9g%3A1hlrQ5%3AwP7oGkTVY5wnLxdkReQflr06gyU&next=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.muckrock.com%2Faccounts%2Flogin%2F%3Fnext%3D%252Faccounts%252Fagency_login%252Fsan-francisco-police-department-367%252Femail-and-electronic-communications-audit-sfpd-76435%252F%253Femail%253Dsfpdmediarelations%252540sfgov.org
Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.

For mailed responses, please address (see note):
MuckRock News
DEPT MR 76435
411A Highland Ave
Somerville, MA 02144-2516

PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.

Please provide the following clarification: A number of documents were disclosed under this request. What portions of the request are still outstanding. Clarifying this will allow us to fully complete your request.
If you wish SFPD to proceed with the request, please provide the requested information by 08/23/2022 .

You may provide a response to SFPD by any of the following methods: 1. by responding to this email,
2. by logging into the Public Records Center and adding a message to your request, (https://u8387795.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=nZGH0ylxadMp5hTpNkeAFs2KguIDF883TvKUiL5Czauo89OcQL1XvHpyaOEmJgdd5d784VH9vGnHWOFgsLgPks4x-2FiHPdP1-2BL5rebdB-2BV4Q-3DkeK2_69KMf7xcOs2eJQ9IyNAIOokHpycaXcvDGPlJ1lmzERLQWJ7xlkdxa68TxqioxLffQcxlGqOAtjm0Rz9kNyGRrJlePtoCB4B5WrL9V0Y-2FTgYNkYh3NZVrUkaWZiKaxuSsRjwdLqtvBdkw3qoeD0supLlHgKG8H7PLdMGLXIYFaDtlbR8siO8zKd3eBCWto-2BoCoqJP45G2fNvBjBEwyIxP1mEtY7QdAXKASjVPCIEeMaR1kfJvhcr-2FMTS7xeeWpgfa-2BbwiLYTtrFVsPj-2Bb1PDCqtXhLyPMBQfJngahmf42xhg-2FBXa11DaoLpZOiiOX6SDFCUNvwUnkPJvO-2BSK-2BGEoO3kO39JIYcpUoK8bnhMhIhIwdfA85IRajcwJw-2FFSESJtfhTnRZCoG1b6hhkdztT7ZUQ-3D-3D)
3. by regular mail to Police Department Headquarters, 1245 3rd Street, San Francisco; or
4. in person at Police Department Headquarters, 1245 3rd Street, San Francisco, Monday through Friday, from 8 A.M. until 5 P.M.
Upon receipt of your clarification, SFPD will further respond to your request as required by law, including providing you with an estimate of costs, if any, associated with producing the requested records.

If you have any questions, please contact me at kathryn.winters@sfgov.org or respond to this email.

Thank you for your attention.

Sincerely,

Officer Kathryn Winters
Media Relations

To monitor the progress or update this request please log into the SFPD Public Records Center. (https://u8387795.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=nZGH0ylxadMp5hTpNkeAFs2KguIDF883TvKUiL5Czauo89OcQL1XvHpyaOEmJgddHZionDPZxe8o-2F99A9Uuw23ZNAQENZoUka3DJr-2F-2FZz8YYWHpEo6fFmVKdO4W-2FqNj03ApU_69KMf7xcOs2eJQ9IyNAIOokHpycaXcvDGPlJ1lmzERLQWJ7xlkdxa68TxqioxLffQcxlGqOAtjm0Rz9kNyGRrJlePtoCB4B5WrL9V0Y-2FTgYNkYh3NZVrUkaWZiKaxuSsRjwdLqtvBdkw3qoeD0supLlHgKG8H7PLdMGLXIYFaDtlbR8siO8zKd3eBCWto-2BoCoqJP45G2fNvBjBEwyIxP1mEtY7QdAXKASjVPCIEeMaR1kfJvhcr-2FMTS7xeeWpgfasbQOShaijyRz7DBXE-2BCIvgC8c2RzOFitIytLwwSpebOp3qhj7uYuhzzhP2y2G1XZ67oqiuvxtVJ3r5WZJpNKpHIZS9SjKQuEhB4-2FxJ2Lr682SnnSLOGKI-2F0jC9MYDWa8KCVMBTogGVkw0AfslC1-2BUA-3D-3D)
This is an auto-generated email and has originated from an unmonitored email account. Please DO NOT REPLY.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

I assume you have been brought in new into this complaint?

The SOTF issued an order against SFPD finding that your response violated the law in various ways: https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/default/files/SOTF_ORDER_19098.pdf

You claim to obligate me to do some further work by some deadline. I have no such obligation. Instead you are obligated to correct all of the deficiencies in your response.

I'd suggest you contact Administrator Leger Cheryl.leger@sfgov.org of the SOTF and ask her to send you all of the minutes of Case 19098, including the most recent compliance hearing to see what SFPD must finish doing.

If you refuse to complete the correction of the rrquesty I will ask SOTF to schedule the hearing to consider referral of Chief Scott to the Ethics Commission for willful failure to comply with the SunshineOrdinance.

Files

pages

Close
  • 07/02/2019

    Email-Electronic-Communications-Audit-SFPD.pdf

  • 08/26/2019

    Email for MAYOR LONDON N. BREED’S SCHEDULE OF PUBLIC EVENTS FOR TUESDAY, JULY 16, 2019

  • 08/26/2019

    chief email da costa

  • 08/26/2019

    Request to have your staff travel with officials to Mexico City b

  • 08/26/2019

    re Location for Lunch mtg 7-16-19_

  • 08/26/2019

    QUESTS~1

  • 08/26/2019

    Other Redacted

  • 08/26/2019

    You are cordially invited to 49ers Training Camp!_Redacted

  • 08/26/2019

    Suspect ID Needed_ Package Theft _$50.00_Redacted

  • 08/26/2019

    Summer Youth Locations for 7_16_19_Redacted

  • 08/26/2019

    911 Security_ U.S. State Drone Laws and Regs in the USA by State d

  • 08/26/2019

    911 Security - US State Drone Laws and Regs in the USA by State 20190630

  • 08/26/2019

    7.16.19 Public Schedule Media Advisory

  • 08/29/2019

    Follow Up Meeting re SVRT (AC Chaplin, DC McEachern, Diana and Tiffany)

  • 08/29/2019

    Fw_ DGO for Deaf and Hard of Hearing_Redacted

  • 08/29/2019

    Implementation Memo 2-19-2019 (002)_Redacted

  • 08/29/2019

    Monthly Meeting with Dir. Grant Colfax, DPH

  • 08/29/2019

    Fw_ Executive Directive Update Request _Redacted

  • 08/29/2019

    Fw_ Friends of the Urban Forest_Redacted

  • 08/29/2019

    Re_ 1421 Policy

  • 08/29/2019

    POL_Yee (Administration)_Cont Transmittal Letter

  • 08/29/2019

    Re_ Invitation to know your rights press conference tomorrow 11_30am_Redacted

  • 08/29/2019

    Re_ Friends of the Urban Forest_Redacted

  • 08/29/2019

    POL_Scott_PS Matrix of Findings and Recommendations

  • 08/29/2019

    POL_Scott_Cont Transmittal Letter

  • 08/29/2019

    POL_Scott_Cont Matrix of Findings and Recommendations

  • 08/29/2019

    POL_Sanchez (Forensic Services)_Cont Transmittal Letter

  • 08/29/2019

    POL_Sanchez (Forensic Services)_Cont Matrix of Findings and Recommendations

  • 08/29/2019

    Pedestrian Safety Final Report

  • 08/29/2019

    Continuity Final Report

  • 08/29/2019

    FAQ ED 2-19-2019

  • 08/29/2019

    POL_Yee (Administration)_Cont Matrix of Findings and Recommendations

  • 08/29/2019

    POL_Scott_PS Transmittal Letter

  • 08/31/2019

    Cdr Fong GG Div sent out1_Redacted

  • 08/31/2019

    Cdr Fong GG Div inbox1_Redacted

  • 08/31/2019

    Dir Crime Strategies Suton in and out Redacted

  • 08/31/2019

    Re_ 2020 Who's Telling Your Story_ Summit - Stevenson, David (POL)_Redacted

  • 08/31/2019

    Re_ CGJ JTTF report- Findings and Recommendations - Stevenson, David (POL)_Redacted

  • 08/31/2019

    Re_ Correction to flyer - Stevenson, David (POL)_Redacted

  • 08/31/2019

    Re_ Events Calendar + NNO page corrections - Stevenson, David (POL)_Redacted

  • 08/31/2019

    Twitter captions for Chinese flyer - Stevenson, David (POL)_Redacted

  • 08/31/2019

    Fw_ job description_ SFPD Newly Budgeted positions... - Stevenson, David (POL)_Redacted

  • 08/31/2019

    FB - Stevenson, David (POL)_Redacted

  • 08/31/2019

    FB - Stevenson, David (POL)

  • 08/31/2019

    Boys and girls club - Stevenson, David (POL)

  • 08/31/2019

    Google Alert - sfpd - Stevenson, David (POL)

  • 08/31/2019

    Google Alert - _san francisco police department_ - Stevenson, David (POL)

  • 08/31/2019

    Join the SF Digital Services team - Stevenson, David (POL)

  • 08/31/2019

    Vision Zero Post Fatality Street Team Response [6_... - Stevenson, David (POL)

  • 08/31/2019

    Re_ DOJ Recs - Stevenson, David (POL)_Redacted

Warning An exclamation point.

There are too many files to display on the request page. See all files .