Pretrial drug testing of DC arrestees (Council of the District of Columbia)

Jade Chong-Smith filed this request with the Council of the District of Columbia of the United States of America.
Multi Request Pretrial drug testing of DC arrestees
Est. Completion None
Status
Fix Required

Communications

From: Jade Chong-Smith


To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to the DC Freedom of Information Act, I hereby request the following records:

All statements of the general course and method, rules of procedure, substantive rules of general applicability adopted as authorized by law, statements of general policy or interpretations of general applicability formulated and adopted, and each amendment, revision, or repeal of the foregoing, regarding the pretrial drug testing of arrestees in the District of Columbia, including but not limited to the drug testing of arrestees prior to arraignment. This requests includes the policies, rules, and procedures for testing and measuring an arrestee's use of drugs, what specimen or sample is collected, how much of that specimen or sample is collected, how the specimen or sample is collected, what drugs are tested for, how the drugs are tested, what error rates apply for each drug (such as the rate of false positive and false negatives), how screening is to be done for lawfully prescribed medications, what is done to avoid cross-contamination, what is done to keep track of each specimen or sample, chain of custody, how chain of custody is recorded, what paperwork and forms are to be completed, how such information is stored, retained, and transmitted, and for how long, and any other information regarding the procedure and methods of pretrial drug testing of arrestees in the District of Columbia.

All administrative staff manuals and instructions to staff regarding the pretrial drug testing of arrestees in the District of Columbia.

Copies of all records, regardless of form or format regarding the procedure for pretrial drug testing of arrestees in the District of Columbia (i) that have been released to any person under 5 U.S. Code § 552, paragraph (3); and (ii) (I) that because of the nature of their subject matter, the agency determines have become or are likely to become the subject of subsequent requests for substantially the same records; or (II) that have been requested 3 or more times.

The requested documents will be made available to the general public, and this request is not being made for commercial purposes.

In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 15 business days, as the statute requires.

Sincerely,

Jade Chong-Smith

From: Council of the District of Columbia

Hi Ms. Chong-Smith,

I do not believe the documents you’re seeking would be under the purview of the Council. As a general matter, to the extent any policies aren’t enshrined in law, policies could be found in agency rules. For matters handled by the Council, I believe you will be able to find information on our Legislative Information management System at lims.dccouncil.us.

For now I am considering this request closed, but I am happy to answer any questions you have and re-open the request if after further discussion I believe there could be additional responsive records.
Best,
Brackett

Brackett Smith
Assistant General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
Council of the District of Columbia
P: (202)724-8093 F: (202)724-8129
E: bsmith@dccouncil.us

From: Jade Chong-Smith

Dear Brackett Smith,

Thank you so much for your response. Can you kindly specifically direct me to any and all matters handled by council responsive to my previous request (beyond providing the link lims.dccouncil.us), or confirm that the Council has not legislatively authorised, or considered, or been informed of, or overseen the drug testing of arrestees prior to arraignment, and has no responsive documents? I am aware that through D.C. Code § 23–1321, the DC Council has authorised pretrial drug testing as a condition of release once someone has been arraigned, but am not aware of a code section governing pre-arriagnment drug testing, or whether or how the Council has considered or been informed of such drug testing of pre-arraignment arrestees, and such information would be responsive to my request.

Pursuant to D.C. Code § 2–532, "[i]n making any record available to a person pursuant to this section, a public body shall provide the record in any form or format requested by the person." As stated in my initial request, "In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not."

Thank you once again!

Kind regards,
Jade Chong-Smith

From: Council of the District of Columbia

Hi Jade,

Your July 11 and August 12 emails came through on our fax machine and were only given to me last Thursday, so I apologize for the late response. I am confused by what you are seeking or why you think the Council has “legislatively authorised, or considered, or been informed of, or overseen the drug testing of arrestees prior to arraignment. . . .” Beyond considering and passing legislation, you appear to be asking about executive or judicial functions, at least to my eye. The notes in the gray box at the bottom of the following linked webpage have notes about enacted legislation affecting D.C. Official Code § 23-1321: https://code.dccouncil.us/dc/council/code/sections/23-1321.html. To the extent that there is any other legislation that was introduced, you would be able to find that on LIMS. Thus, it is already publicly available information.

Let me know if you have any further questions.
Best,
Brackett

Brackett Smith
Assistant General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
Council of the District of Columbia
P: (202)724-8093 F: (202)724-8129
E: bsmith@dccouncil.us

From: Jade Chong-Smith

Hello Brackett,

Thank you for your response. I am intersted in receiving any and all records that reflect the process by which arrestees in D.C. are to be drug tested, and record that reflects the D.C. Council's decision-making process regarding passing any law requiring that all arrestees in DC, or whether no such records exist. Please let me know if that helps clarify the situation.

Thank you so much!
Jade

From: Jade Chong-Smith

Hello Brackett,

Thank you for your response. I write to correct the request previously submitted, as I omitted some key words. I am intersted in receiving any and all records that reflect the process by which arrestees in D.C. are to be drug tested prior to arraignment, and records that reflects the D.C. Council's decision-making process regarding passing any law requiring that all arrestees in DC be drug tested prior to arraignment, or whether no such records exist. I am aware that through D.C. Code § 23–1321, the DC Council has authorised pretrial drug testing as a condition of release once someone has been arraigned, but am not aware of a code section governing arraignment drug testing, or whether or how the Council has considered or been informed of such drug testing of pre-arraignment arrestees, and such information would be responsive to my request. Please let me know if that helps clarify the situation.

Thank you so much!
Jade

From: Council of the District of Columbia

Hi Jade,

I am writing in response to your September 23 and August 23 emails. I have been receiving them via fax instead of through my email (this happens with MuckRock emails for some reason) and I believe the August 23 one may have been thrown away. Again, I need to reiterate what I said below, you seek records that appear to be executive records. Records in the Council’s possession would be found in committee reports, which can be found on the Council’s Legislative Information Management System (“LIMS”). For example, the drug testing language in 23-1321 appears to have been added by D.C. Law 14-307, the Fiscal Year 2003 Budget Support Amendment Act of 2002 (“BSA”), an omnibus bill. The committee report for the BSA can be found on LIMS at the following link: http://lims.dccouncil.us/Download/356/B14-0892-COMMITTEEREPORT.pdf. Additional language about drug testing appears to have been added in D.C. Law 20-126, the Marijuana Possession Decriminalization Amendment Act of 2014. Its committee report may be found at the following link: http://lims.dccouncil.us/Download/29565/B20-0409-CommitteeReport1.pdf.

You’re request and attempts at clarification have remained vague as to what you seek. You seem to believe information about drug testing prior to arraignment exists and is in the Council’s possession, but you do not give me a way to search for that information via search terms or names. I don’t know where to begin on running such a search. However, I urge you to rely on the committee reports. They contain witness testimony and other information the Council relied on in forming the amendments to 23-1321.

Given the unreliability of getting emails through MuckRock, is it possible for you to email me through another email address so that I receive it directly? If not, I will continue to monitor the fax machine, but I think it would help me respond faster. I hope the information I’ve provided helps.
Best,
Brackett

Brackett Smith
Assistant General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
Council of the District of Columbia
P: (202)724-8093 F: (202)724-8129
E: bsmith@dccouncil.us

Files