Landon Tucker Davis Calendar

Dear Mr. Coleman,

In order for us to properly process your request, please provide the
following:

Mr. Davis' last name, his relationship with OSMRE (Is he an employee,
contractor or member of the public)? Mr. Davis' position or designation
within OSMRE.

Sincerely,
Dele
*_________________________________________*

*Dele Awoniyi* | *FOIA Officer*

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

Department of the Interior | (202) 208-5840

1849 C Street NW | Washington, D.C. | 20240

Dear Mr. Coleman,

Thank you for the clarification. The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement (OSMRE) received your FOIA request dated April 2, 2018, and
assigned it control number *OSMRE-2018-00105*. Please cite this number in
any future communications with our office regarding your request.

We have reclassified you as a “media-use” requester. As such, we may
charge you for some of our duplication costs, but we will not charge you
for our search or review costs; you also are entitled to up to 100 pages of
photocopies (or an equivalent volume) for free. *See **43 C.F.R. § 2.39*
<http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=0fc3ab3499768eebc2e3691c8cf88dec&rgn=div5&view=text&node=43:1.1.1.1.2&idno=43#43:1.1.1.1.2.7.5.3>.
If, after taking into consideration your fee category entitlements, our
processing costs are less than $50.00, we will not bill you because the
cost of collection would be greater than the fee collected. *See **43
C.F.R. § 2.37(g)
<http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=0fc3ab3499768eebc2e3691c8cf88dec&rgn=div5&view=text&node=43:1.1.1.1.2&idno=43#43:1.1.1.1.2.7.5.13>*

Because we will need to consult with one or more offices of the Department
in order to properly process your request, we are taking a 10-workday
extension under 43 C.F.R. §2.19.

If you have any questions and/or concerns regarding your request, or any of
the issues discussed in this email, you may contact me.

Sincerely,

Dele Awoniyi

Department of the Interior
Office of Surface Mining, FOIA Officer
MS MIB 200 West, 1849 C Street, N.W.
<https://maps.google.com/?q=1951+Constitution+Avenue,+N.W.+Washington,+D.C.+20240&entry=gmail&source=g>
Washington, D.C. 20240
<https://maps.google.com/?q=1951+Constitution+Avenue,+N.W.+Washington,+D.C.+20240&entry=gmail&source=g>
Telephone (202) 208-5840

Dear Mr. Coleman:

On April 12, 2018, you filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request
OSMRE-2018-00105, seeking:

*Mr. Davis' calendar from February 17, 2018 to the date this request is
processed.*

We are writing to provide you with our response to your request. Please
find enclosed one file consisting of 58 pages being released to you in part.

Portions of these materials are being withheld under the following FOIA
Exemptions:

*Portions of the enclosed documents have been redacted pursuant to*
*Exemption 5 of the FOIA (5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5)) under the following
privilege: *

* Confidential Commercial Information*

Exemption 5 allows an agency to withhold “inter-agency or intra-agency
memorandums or letters which would not be available by law to a party... in
litigation with the agency.” (5 U.S.C. § 552 (b)(5)). As such, Exemption 5
“exempt[s] those documents... normally privileged in the civil discovery
context.” *National Labor Relations Bd. v. Sears Roebuck & Co.*, 421 U.S.
132 (1975). The exemption incorporates the privileges that protect
materials from discovery in litigation. These privileges include the
deliberative process, confidential commercial information, attorney
work-product, and attorney-client privilege. *Id*. at 149; *see also* *Federal
Open Market Committee v. Merrill*, 443 U.S. 340, 363 (1979) (finding a
confidential commercial information privilege under Exemption 5).

Confidential Commercial Information Privilege

*When the government enters the marketplace as an ordinary commercial buyer
or seller, the government information is protected from competitive
disadvantage under Exemption 5.*

*Government Land Bank v. General Services Administration**, 671 F.2d 663,
665 (1st Cir. 1982). Exemption 5 prevails “where the document contains
‘sensitive information not otherwise available,’ and disclosure would
significantly harm the government’s commercial interest.” Id. at 666; see
also Federal Open Market Committee v. Merrill, 443 U.S. 340, 363 (1979).*

*Pursuant to the confidential commercial information privilege, conference
call codes and passcodes have been withheld under Exemption 5. The
conference call numbers and passcodes constitute “intra-agency” documents
because they are only shared with members of the Department for the purpose
of conducting official government business. Moreover, the conference call
codes and passcodes qualify as “confidential commercial information”
because the government entered the marketplace as an ordinary commercial
buyer of private conference call numbers and passcodes.*

*In line with Land Bank and Merrill, the information is “sensitive and not
otherwise available” as the numbers provide access to sensitive
conversations between government employees and only the government and
seller have access to the information. If the conference call numbers
and/or passcodes were released, the government's financial interest would
be significantly harmed. The conference calls would no longer be private
since unknown, non-governmental parties would have the ability to listen in
to the calls. The funds spent on purchasing the call-in numbers and
passcodes would therefore be wasted, and the conference call numbers and
passcodes would be of no use.*

*Because the release of the conference call numbers and passcodes would
significantly harm the government’s financial interest by publicizing
sensitive information, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement is withholding the information in accordance with Exemption 5
of the FOIA.*

*Portions of the enclosed documents have been redacted pursuant to* *Exemption
6 of the FOIA (5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6)) because they fit certain categories of
information:*

Personal Medical Information

Exemption 6 allows an agency to withhold “personnel and medical files and
similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” The courts have held that the
phrase “similar files” involves all information that applies to a
particular person. *Hertzberg v. Veneman*, 273 F. Supp. 2d 67, 85 n.11
(D.D.C. 2003); *Sherman v. United States Dep’t of the Army*, 244 F.3d 357,
361 (5th Cir. 2001).

When disclosure of information about a particular individual is requested,
the agency must determine whether release of the information would
constitute a clearly “unwarranted” invasion of the individual’s privacy. *NARA
v. Favish*, 541 U.S. 157, 171 (2004).

To make this determination, we are required to perform a “balancing
test.” This
means that we must weigh the individual’s right to privacy against the
public’s right to disclosure.

(1) First, we must determine whether the individual has a discernable
privacy interest in the information that has been requested.

(2) Next, we must determine whether release of this information would
serve “the public interest generally” (i.e., would “shed light on the
performance of the agency's statutory duties”).

(3) Finally, we must determine whether the public interest in
disclosure is greater than the privacy interest of the individual in
withholding.

The information that we are withholding consists of personal information
about employees’ Personnel file.

The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) have
determined that the individuals to whom this information pertains have a
substantial privacy interest in it. Additionally, we have determined that
the disclosure of this information would shed little or no light on the
performance of the agency’s statutory duties and that, on balance, the
public interest to be served by its disclosure does not outweigh the
privacy interest of the individuals in question, in withholding it. *Nat’l
Ass’n of Retired Fed. Employees v. Horner*, 879 F.2d 873, 879 (D.C. Cir.
1989). In short, we have determined that release of the information that
we have withheld would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of the
privacy of these individuals, and that it therefore may be withheld,
pursuant to Exemption 6.

Emily Morris, Attorney Advisor with the Office of the Solicitor, was
consulted in reaching this decision. Dele Awoniyi, Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement FOIA Officer, is responsible for making
this decision.

*DOI FOIA/Privacy Act Appeals Office Contact Information*

Department of the Interior
Office of the Solicitor
1849 C Street, N.W.
MS-6556 MIB
Washington, DC 20240
Attn: FOIA/Privacy Act Appeals Office

Telephone: (202) 208-5339
Fax: (202) 208-6677
Email: FOIA.Appeals@sol.doi.gov

For your information, Congress excluded three discrete categories of law
enforcement and national security records from the requirements of FOIA.
*See* *5 U.S.C. § 552(c)*. This response is limited to those records that
are subject to the requirements of FOIA. This is a standard notification
that is given to all our requesters and should not be taken as an
indication that excluded records do, or do not, exist.

*Office of Government Information Services Meditation*

The 2007 FOIA amendments created the Office of Government Information
Services (OGIS) to offer mediation services to resolve disputes between
FOIA requesters and Federal agencies as a non-exclusive alternative to
litigation. Using OGIS services does not affect your right to pursue
litigation. You may contact OGIS in any of the following ways:

Office of Government Information Services
National Archives and Records Administration
8601 Adelphi Road - OGIS
College Park, MD 20740-6001
E-mail: ogis@nara.gov
Web: https://ogis.archives.gov
Telephone: 202-741-5770
Fax: 202-741-5769
Toll-free: 1-877-684-6448

Please note that using OGIS services does not affect the timing of filing
an appeal with the Department’s FOIA & Privacy Act Appeals Officer.

This concludes our response to your request.

If you have any questions regarding any issues discussed in our response,
you may contact me by phone at 202-208-5840, by fax at 202-501-0549, by
e-mail at foia@osmre.gov or by mail at Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, 1849 C Street, N.W., MS 1200W-MIB, Washington, D.C. 20240.

Sincerely,
Dele

*_________________________________________*

*Dele Awoniyi* | *FOIA Officer*

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

Department of the Interior | (202) 208-5840

1849 C Street NW | Washington, D.C. | 20240

__________________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

This email (including any attachments) is intended for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain information
that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected by applicable
law. If you are not the intended recipient (or the recipient's agent), you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or use
of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited. If you received this
email in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies.

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 8:03 PM, FOIA, OSM <osm-foia@osmre.gov> wrote:

> Dear Mr. Coleman:
>
>
>
> On April 12, 2018, you filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request
> OSMRE-2018-00105, seeking:
>
>
>
> *Mr. Davis' calendar from February 17, 2018 to the date this request is
> processed.*
>
>
>
> We are writing to provide you with our response to your request. Please
> find enclosed one file consisting of 58 pages being released to you in
> part.
>
>
>
> Portions of these materials are being withheld under the following FOIA
> Exemptions:
>
>
>
> *Portions of the enclosed documents have been redacted pursuant to*
> *Exemption 5 of the FOIA (5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5)) under the following
> privilege: *
>
> * Confidential Commercial Information*
>
>
>
> Exemption 5 allows an agency to withhold “inter-agency or intra-agency
> memorandums or letters which would not be available by law to a party... in
> litigation with the agency.” (5 U.S.C. § 552 (b)(5)). As such, Exemption
> 5 “exempt[s] those documents... normally privileged in the civil discovery
> context.” *National Labor Relations Bd. v. Sears Roebuck & Co.*, 421
> U.S. 132 (1975). The exemption incorporates the privileges that protect
> materials from discovery in litigation. These privileges include the
> deliberative process, confidential commercial information, attorney
> work-product, and attorney-client privilege. *Id*. at 149; *see also* *Federal
> Open Market Committee v. Merrill*, 443 U.S. 340, 363 (1979) (finding a
> confidential commercial information privilege under Exemption 5).
>
>
>
> Confidential Commercial Information Privilege
>
>
>
> *When the government enters the marketplace as an ordinary commercial
> buyer or seller, the government information is protected from competitive
> disadvantage under Exemption 5.*
>
> *Government Land Bank v. General Services Administration**, 671 F.2d 663,
> 665 (1st Cir. 1982). Exemption 5 prevails “where the document contains
> ‘sensitive information not otherwise available,’ and disclosure would
> significantly harm the government’s commercial interest.” Id. at 666; see
> also Federal Open Market Committee v. Merrill, 443 U.S. 340, 363 (1979).*
>
>
>
> *Pursuant to the confidential commercial information privilege, conference
> call codes and passcodes have been withheld under Exemption 5. The
> conference call numbers and passcodes constitute “intra-agency” documents
> because they are only shared with members of the Department for the purpose
> of conducting official government business. Moreover, the conference call
> codes and passcodes qualify as “confidential commercial information”
> because the government entered the marketplace as an ordinary commercial
> buyer of private conference call numbers and passcodes.*
>
>
>
> *In line with Land Bank and Merrill, the information is “sensitive and not
> otherwise available” as the numbers provide access to sensitive
> conversations between government employees and only the government and
> seller have access to the information. If the conference call numbers
> and/or passcodes were released, the government's financial interest would
> be significantly harmed. The conference calls would no longer be private
> since unknown, non-governmental parties would have the ability to listen in
> to the calls. The funds spent on purchasing the call-in numbers and
> passcodes would therefore be wasted, and the conference call numbers and
> passcodes would be of no use.*
>
>
>
> *Because the release of the conference call numbers and passcodes would
> significantly harm the government’s financial interest by publicizing
> sensitive information, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and
> Enforcement is withholding the information in accordance with Exemption 5
> of the FOIA.*
>
>
>
> *Portions of the enclosed documents have been redacted pursuant to* *Exemption
> 6 of the FOIA (5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6)) because they fit certain categories of
> information:*
>
>
>
> Personal Medical Information
>
>
>
> Exemption 6 allows an agency to withhold “personnel and medical files and
> similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly
> unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” The courts have held that the
> phrase “similar files” involves all information that applies to a
> particular person. *Hertzberg v. Veneman*, 273 F. Supp. 2d 67, 85 n.11
> (D.D.C. 2003); *Sherman v. United States Dep’t of the Army*, 244 F.3d
> 357, 361 (5th Cir. 2001).
>
>
>
> When disclosure of information about a particular individual is requested,
> the agency must determine whether release of the information would
> constitute a clearly “unwarranted” invasion of the individual’s privacy. *NARA
> v. Favish*, 541 U.S. 157, 171 (2004).
>
>
>
> To make this determination, we are required to perform a “balancing test.”
> This means that we must weigh the individual’s right to privacy against
> the public’s right to disclosure.
>
>
>
> (1) First, we must determine whether the individual has a
> discernable privacy interest in the information that has been requested.
>
> (2) Next, we must determine whether release of this information
> would serve “the public interest generally” (i.e., would “shed light on the
> performance of the agency's statutory duties”).
>
> (3) Finally, we must determine whether the public interest in
> disclosure is greater than the privacy interest of the individual in
> withholding.
>
>
>
> The information that we are withholding consists of personal information
> about employees’ Personnel file.
>
>
>
> The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) have
> determined that the individuals to whom this information pertains have a
> substantial privacy interest in it. Additionally, we have determined
> that the disclosure of this information would shed little or no light on
> the performance of the agency’s statutory duties and that, on balance, the
> public interest to be served by its disclosure does not outweigh the
> privacy interest of the individuals in question, in withholding it. *Nat’l
> Ass’n of Retired Fed. Employees v. Horner*, 879 F.2d 873, 879 (D.C. Cir.
> 1989). In short, we have determined that release of the information that
> we have withheld would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of the
> privacy of these individuals, and that it therefore may be withheld,
> pursuant to Exemption 6.
>
>
> Emily Morris, Attorney Advisor with the Office of the Solicitor, was
> consulted in reaching this decision. Dele Awoniyi, Office of Surface
> Mining Reclamation and Enforcement FOIA Officer, is responsible for making
> this decision.
>
> *DOI FOIA/Privacy Act Appeals Office Contact Information*
>
> Department of the Interior
> Office of the Solicitor
> 1849 C Street, N.W.
> MS-6556 MIB
> Washington, DC 20240
> Attn: FOIA/Privacy Act Appeals Office
>
> Telephone: (202) 208-5339
> Fax: (202) 208-6677
> Email: FOIA.Appeals@sol.doi.gov
>
> For your information, Congress excluded three discrete categories of law
> enforcement and national security records from the requirements of FOIA.
> *See* *5 U.S.C. § 552(c)*. This response is limited to those records
> that are subject to the requirements of FOIA. This is a standard
> notification that is given to all our requesters and should not be taken as
> an indication that excluded records do, or do not, exist.
>
>
>
> *Office of Government Information Services Meditation*
>
>
>
> The 2007 FOIA amendments created the Office of Government Information
> Services (OGIS) to offer mediation services to resolve disputes between
> FOIA requesters and Federal agencies as a non-exclusive alternative to
> litigation. Using OGIS services does not affect your right to pursue
> litigation. You may contact OGIS in any of the following ways:
>
> Office of Government Information Services
> National Archives and Records Administration
> 8601 Adelphi Road - OGIS
> College Park, MD 20740-6001
> E-mail: ogis@nara.gov
> Web: https://ogis.archives.gov
> Telephone: 202-741-5770
> Fax: 202-741-5769
> Toll-free: 1-877-684-6448
>
> Please note that using OGIS services does not affect the timing of filing
> an appeal with the Department’s FOIA & Privacy Act Appeals Officer.
>
>
>
> This concludes our response to your request.
>
>
> If you have any questions regarding any issues discussed in our response,
> you may contact me by phone at 202-208-5840, by fax at 202-501-0549, by
> e-mail at foia@osmre.gov or by mail at Office of Surface Mining
> Reclamation and Enforcement, 1849 C Street, N.W., MS 1200W-MIB, Washington,
> D.C. 20240.
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Dele
>
> *_________________________________________*
>
> *Dele Awoniyi* | *FOIA Officer*
>
> Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
>
> Department of the Interior | (202) 208-5840
>
> 1849 C Street NW | Washington, D.C. | 20240
>
> __________________________________________
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>
> This email (including any attachments) is intended for the use of the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain information
> that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected by applicable
> law. If you are not the intended recipient (or the recipient's agent), you
> are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or use
> of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited. If you received this
> email in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 5:03 AM, <requests@muckrock.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Department of the Interior, Office of Surface Mining
>> FOIA Office
>> 1951 C Street, NW
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1951+C+Street,+NW+Washington,+DC+20240&entry=gmail&source=g>
>> Washington, DC 20240
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1951+C+Street,+NW+Washington,+DC+20240&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>
>> July 4, 2018
>>
>> This is a follow up to request number OSMRE-2018-00105:
>>
>> To Whom It May Concern:
>>
>> I wanted to follow up on the following Freedom of Information Act
>> request, copied below, and originally submitted on April 2, 2018. Please
>> let me know when I can expect to receive a response, or if further
>> clarification is needed. You had assigned it reference number
>> #OSMRE-2018-00105.
>>
>> Thanks for your help, and let me know if further clarification is needed.
>>
>> Filed via MuckRock.com
>> E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com
>> Upload documents directly: https://www.muckrock.com/accou
>> nts/agency_login/department-interior-office-surface-mining-
>> 6324/landon-tucker-davis-calendar-52010/?uuid-login=
>> 6ee24513-77da-4182-b4ef-d5318354d00b&email=osm-foia%40osmre.
>> gov#agency-reply
>> Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the
>> above link to let us know.
>>
>> For mailed responses, please address (see note):
>> MuckRock News
>> DEPT MR 52010
>> 411A Highland Ave
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=411A+Highland+Ave+Somerville,+MA+02144&entry=gmail&source=g>
>> Somerville, MA 02144
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=411A+Highland+Ave+Somerville,+MA+02144&entry=gmail&source=g>
>> -2516
>>
>> PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is
>> being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share,
>> and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed
>> (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the
>> department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> On April 3, 2018:
>> Dear Mr. Coleman,
>>
>> Thank you for the clarification. The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
>> and Enforcement (OSMRE) received your FOIA request dated April 2, 2018,
>> and
>> assigned it control number *OSMRE-2018-00105*. Please cite this number in
>> any future communications with our office regarding your request.
>>
>> We have reclassified you as a “media-use” requester. As such, we may
>> charge you for some of our duplication costs, but we will not charge you
>> for our search or review costs; you also are entitled to up to 100 pages
>> of
>> photocopies (or an equivalent volume) for free. *See **43 C.F.R. § 2.39*
>> <http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=0fc3ab34997
>> 68eebc2e3691c8cf88dec&rgn=div5&view=text&node=43:1.1.1.1.2&
>> idno=43#43:1.1.1.1.2.7.5.3>.
>> If, after taking into consideration your fee category entitlements, our
>> processing costs are less than $50.00, we will not bill you because the
>> cost of collection would be greater than the fee collected. *See **43
>> C.F.R. § 2.37(g)
>> <http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=0fc3ab34997
>> 68eebc2e3691c8cf88dec&rgn=div5&view=text&node=43:1.1.1.1.2&
>> idno=43#43:1.1.1.1.2.7.5.13>*
>>
>> Because we will need to consult with one or more offices of the Department
>> in order to properly process your request, we are taking a 10-workday
>> extension under 43 C.F.R. §2.19.
>>
>> If you have any questions and/or concerns regarding your request, or any
>> of
>> the issues discussed in this email, you may contact me.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Dele Awoniyi
>>
>> Department of the Interior
>> Office of Surface Mining, FOIA Officer
>> MS MIB 200 West, 1849 C Street, N.W.
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1849+C+Street,+N.W.&entry=gmail&source=g>
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1951+Constitution+Avenue,+N.W.+W
>> ashington,+D.C.+20240&entry=gmail&source=g>
>> Washington, D.C. 20240
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1951+Constitution+Avenue,+N.W.+W
>> ashington,+D.C.+20240&entry=gmail&source=g>
>> Telephone (202) 208-5840
>> ---
>>
>> On April 3, 2018:
>> Landon “Tucker” Davis is serving as a policy advisor within the
>> Department of Interior’s Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and
>> Enforcement.
>> ---
>>
>> On April 3, 2018:
>> Dear Mr. Coleman,
>>
>> In order for us to properly process your request, please provide the
>> following:
>>
>> Mr. Davis' last name, his relationship with OSMRE (Is he an employee,
>> contractor or member of the public)? Mr. Davis' position or designation
>> within OSMRE.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Dele
>> *_________________________________________*
>>
>> *Dele Awoniyi* | *FOIA Officer*
>>
>> Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
>>
>> Department of the Interior | (202) 208-5840
>>
>> 1849 C Street NW | Washington, D.C. | 20240
>>
>> ---
>>
>> On April 2, 2018:
>> To Whom It May Concern:
>>
>> Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, I hereby request the
>> following records:
>>
>> Mr. Davis' calendar from February 17, 2018 to the date this request is
>> processed.
>>
>> The requested documents will be made available to the general public, and
>> this request is not being made for commercial purposes.
>>
>> In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform
>> me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer
>> the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or
>> CD-ROM if not.
>>
>> Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I
>> look forward to receiving your response to this request within 20 business
>> days, as the statute requires.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Jesse Coleman
>>
>> Filed via MuckRock.com
>> E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com
>> Upload documents directly: https://www.muckrock.com/accou
>> nts/agency_login/department-interior-office-surface-mining-
>> 6324/landon-tucker-davis-calendar-52010/?uuid-login=
>> 6ee24513-77da-4182-b4ef-d5318354d00b&email=osm-foia%40osmre.
>> gov#agency-reply
>> Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the
>> above link to let us know.
>>
>> For mailed responses, please address (see note):
>> MuckRock News
>> DEPT MR 52010
>> 411A Highland Ave
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=411A+Highland+Ave+Somerville,+MA+02144&entry=gmail&source=g>
>> Somerville, MA 02144
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=411A+Highland+Ave+Somerville,+MA+02144&entry=gmail&source=g>
>> -2516
>>
>> PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is
>> being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share,
>> and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed
>> (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the
>> department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.
>>
>>
>