FEC unpublished AOs, complaints, & PFRs

Sai . filed this request with the Federal Election Commission of the United States of America.
Due Dec. 17, 2018
Est. Completion None
Awaiting Response


From: Sai .

Dear Federal Election Commission:

As you are aware, the FEC has refused to publish a petition for rulemaking (PFR), filed on February 10, 2016, entitled "Petition for Rulemaking to Amend 11 C.F.R. § 112.3", submitted jointly by
a) Make Your Laws PAC, Inc., Make Your Laws Advocacy, Inc., and Fiat Fiendum, Inc. (f/k/a Make Your Laws, Inc.) and
b) Dan Backer of DB Capitol Strategies PLLC.

Given the FEC's refusal to perform the non-discretionary function required by 11 CFR 200.3, we believe that the FEC may be concealing other submissions which should properly have been made public.

This request relates to such submissions, as well as to communications (such as pre-submission discussions with submitters) that are not published.

This letter is a formal Freedom of Information Act request for the following records.

A. Unpublished submissions.

1. All records relating to all:
a. petitions for rulemaking,
b. advisory opinion requests, and
c. complaints;

2. that have not been published (respectively)
a. with a NOA at http://sers.fec.gov,
b. with an AOR at http://saos.fec.gov, or
c. with a MUR, ADR, or AF at http://eqs.fec.gov;

2. that were communicated to or from any FEC email or FEC mailing address;

3. regardless of the FEC's opinion on its adequacy, propriety, well-formedness, or other status, and in particular regardless of FEC's position, action, or inaction under
a. 11 CFR 112.1(d) (OGC determination of qualification or completeness of an AOR)
b. 11 CFR 111.5 (OGC review of compliance of a complaint), or
c. 11 CFR 200.3(a-b) (OGC review of qualification of a petition for rulemaking);

4. including drafts, pre-submission communications, rejected submissions, and submissions neither rejected nor accepted.

Please prioritize, in order:
1. the items & subitems above, in the order listed
2. within each item or subitem, most recent records first.

I also request:

B. all records relating to the fulfillment of this request, such as FOIA logs, documentation of searches, referral emails, etc.

This part of the request is to be processed only after you have completed processing all of the above parts. This part does not request that you create any new record; rather, it requests the records that you will have created in processing the above parts, and will therefore exist before you conduct the search for this part. See McGehee v. CIA, 697 F. 2d 1095, 1100-05 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (agency must use time-of-search cut-off date, not time-of-request).

C. all records relating to any complaint(s), FOIA request(s)/appeal(s), and/or Privacy Act request(s)/appeal(s) made by me. This includes, but is not limited to:
1. all records relating to the processing my previous requests, complaints, etc;
2. all records containing the terms my name, email address(es), and other contact or identifying information, listed below my signature; and
3. all records containing any of my complaint, request or appeal identifiers.

Parts (B) and (C) must be processed only after you have processed the items above that line, i.e. such that at the time of the search, the records described will have already been created at the time you conduct the search. Part (C) must be processed after part (B) is completed.

Parts (B) and (C) may overlap with similar prior requests. However, the cut-off date is, at earliest, the date that you complete search on all of the above items. If you wish to administratively merge this request with a prior similar request, I consent on condition that you extend the cut-off date for the prior request, and provide rolling updates. Otherwise, you must treat this as a new request.

For all responsive records, I also request:

1. all parts of the record (i.e. no portion of a record with some responsive portion may be considered "non-responsive");
2. all versions of the record, whether or not currently in use;
3. all record metadata, such as dates on which they were drafted, passed, went into effect, withdrawn, or similar events; person(s) / office(s) responsible; authors; IDs; revision numbers; etc.;
4. a detailed index of all claims of exemption/privilege, regardless of whether the record is claimed to be exempt in whole or in part;
access to inspect the record directly, in its native electronic format; and
5. if any classification applies, mandatory declassification review (MDR) under E.O. 13526, and the result of the MDR, including any declassified records.

Items in part (D) should be prioritized at the same level as the record they apply to.

# Timing

For all requests above, the "cut-off date" is, at the earliest, the date that you conduct the search.

The priority order listed above is only for items that may take extra time to respond to, and must not be taken as blocking response to an otherwise lower priority item that could be released more quickly than a higher priority item that is pending time-intensive search or review.

# FOIA IA notice

Please note that this request is made after the enactment of Public Law No. 114-185, S. 337 (114th), the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016 (FOIA IA). The revised statute, as specified in the FOIA IA, applies to this request. FOIA IA § 6.

In particular, please note that:
1. you must provide electronic format documents, §§ 552(a)(2) (undesignated preceding text), 552(a)(2)(E) (undesignated following text), 552(a)(3)(B), and 552(a)(3)(C);
2. you may not specify an appeal duration less than 90 days, § 552(a)(6)(C)(A)(i)(III)(aa);
3. you may not withhold any record unless "the agency reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an interest protected by an exemption described in subsection (b), or disclosure is prohibited by law", § 552(a)(8)(A)(i);
4. you must segregate and partially release records where possible, §§ 552(a)(8)(A)(ii) and 552(b) (undesignated matter following (b)(9)); and
5. you may not claim deliberative process exemption for records more than 25 years old, § 552(b)(5).

# "Record" defined

For the purposes of this request, except as otherwise specified, "record" means any agreement, appendix, application, assessment, attachment, checklist, circular, contract, correspondence (including but not limited to email), data management plan, documentation of search parameters, email, email attachment, form, guide, handbook, index of records, information consent agreement, information sharing agreement, instruction, interpretation, kit, management instruction, manual, memorandum, memorandum of understanding, notice, notification, opinion, order, plan, policy, policy statement, processing note, publication, recording, referral, report, request certification form, request detail report, response, rule, script, standard operating procedure, submission, talking point, training document, video, or related record described, regardless of publication status.

# Anti-duplication exclusion

This request specifically excludes providing me with new copies of any records which have been already provided to me or published online for free (e.g. on the agency's online "reading room"), in full or identically to the form that would be provided to me under this request (i.e. with exactly the same format, redactions, and claimed exemptions).

This is only an exclusion on providing records under this request that are identical to those already provided to me or available online, and only if I am or have already been provided a link to the online version (if "available online").

This exclusion is only intended to limit unnecessary duplication or provision, not to limit what records are responsive to this request, nor to permit failure to disclose the location of a responsive record available online. If this exclusion would in any way increase the cost or duration to respond to this request, it is to be ignored to the extent it does so.

This request is to be treated as separate from all others that I have filed.

# Forwarding; multi-agency / multi-component records

Please forward this request to the FOIA office of every agency component and subcomponent that may have responsive records for independent processing, with a copy to me.

This request includes any records held jointly by your agency in conjunction with any other agency and/or department, in interagency and/or interdepartmental systems of records, or by other agencies or third parties (including contractors) acting pursuant any agreement with your agency.

# Minimal redaction

Please note that the FOIA requires you to service the maximum extent of my request that can be done via e.g. partial redaction of exempt material. If you believe some portions of a record to be exempt because it contains Sensitive Security Information (SSI, 49 CFR 15 & 1520) or classified information (18 USC 798), please provide a version of the record redacted to the minimum extent necessary to remove exempt information (e.g. per 49 CFR 1520.15), along with adequate information to describe the reason for each specific exemption.

# Estimates and rolling updates

In order to help tailor my request, please provide an upfront estimate of the time and cost it will take to complete this request, broken down any significant factors that would affect cost to service, number of records in each category, and your estimate of how many records in the category are likely to be exempt.

Please provide me with incremental updates, with updated estimates for fulfillment of the remainder, rather than having the entirety of the request be blocked until fully completed.

# No new records; electronic & original format

This request does not ask you to create new records.

If you determine that a response would require creating a new record that you do not want to create, please first contact me by email with an explanation of what records you have that would most closely match the information requested and might be acceptable substitutes, so that we can reasonably tailor the request.

In particular, I specifically request that you do not create new documents in response to this request that are modifications of a digital record, such as page-view images, print views, scans, or the like. No such creation or substitution is authorized by FOIA or the Privacy Act.

However, if the same or similar records are held in both electronic and paper formats, this request includes both the paper and electronic versions. The paper version and the digital version are distinct records, and each may contain distinct information such as handwritten or other markings on the paper copy and embedded metadata in the electronic version.

I specifically request both the original, electronic format record, and (if it contains any additional markings) the paper record.

To the extent that the native electronic format is proprietary or otherwise not in format accessible by widely available, open source software, I also request
1. an export of the proprietary format into a standard, open format, as described below, and
2. all proprietary software necessary to use and understand the original, proprietary format records.

# Rehab Act § 508 compliance

Please note that I am partially blind, use screen readers (such as VoiceOver and TalkBack), and need to process documents using computer code (which requires machine-readable data).

In accordance with 5 USC 552(a)(3)(B & C) (E-FOIA), Rehabilitation Act § 508, and FOIA IA, I demand that you respond using original, native format, electronic, machine-processable, accessible, open, and well structured records to the maximum extent possible — for both the content of your response, and any communications about the request (such as response letters).

This means, e.g.:
1. native, original format records rather than PDFs or other conversions (see note above re providing both native electronic records and scans of paper records, if both exist);
2. individual files per distinct source record (e.g. one .msg file per email), named clearly using the record's identifier, title, and date, rather than a single file containing multiple concatenated records;
3. records compliant with the Rehabilitation Act § 508, 36 CFR 1194.22, USAB ATBCB-2015-0002, and I​SO 14289­-1;
4. fully digital text records rather than scans, rasterizations, or OCR;
5. complete electronic records, as held on any computer (including phones, servers, backup servers, mail servers, workstations, etc.), including all headers and attachments, fully expanded e-mail addresses, full addresses for address "aliases", full lists for "distribution list" aliases, all embedded and external metadata, complete bitwise digital copies of the original file, all file headers, and all other file content;
6. blackout rather than whiteout redactions, with every redaction marked with all exemption(s) claimed for that redaction;
7. digital redactions rather than black marker or rasterization;
8. lists and structured data as machine-processable spreadsheets (e.g. CSV, SQL, XSL) rather than word documents (e.g. DOC, PDF, TXT, RTF) or partial printouts (e.g. PDF),
9. open format records (e.g. PDF, AVI, MPG) rather than proprietary format records (e.g. WordPerfect, Microsoft Advanced Systems Format (ASF)) (note above re providing both original, proprietary format records and open format records);
10. scans rather than paper copies;
11. digital audio/video files rather than physical tapes;
12. upload to your Electronic Reading Room (or other publicly accessible server) rather than personal transfer (for all items other than the item requesting records related to me or my requests);
13. email or (S)FTP file transfer rather than CD;
14. email correspondence rather than physical mail; etc.

# Compression, passwords, and uploading large files

Multiple files may be sent in a combined, compressed form using standard ZIP, TAR, GZIP, BZIP2, and/or RAR formats, or sent as separate files, at your discretion.

Do not use any password on any files, including ZIP files etc., unless a password was present in the original, native format (in which case, leave it unaltered, and send me the password).

If there are any files you prefer not to transfer by email (e.g. if they are >10MB), please upload them to me via the link listed below my signature. Doing so is secure, completely free to you, and I will be notified of the upload.

# No physical "duplication"; inspection & direct access

Please note that this request does not request that you physically "duplicate" records, as I do not want you to create any paper or other physical copy for me — I only want electronic versions (or scans, for records that are not fully available in electronic form). As such, I expect there to be no duplication related costs.

Furthermore, I specifically request access for inspection of the records, including direct electronic access, in native format, to any electronic records.

# No fees agreed to; non-commercial status; journalistic & public interest waiver

I am not currently willing to pay for servicing this request. I may be willing to pay if it is necessary; please send a detailed explanation of the costs and their statutory justification, and service the maximum extent of the request that can be done for free in the meantime.

This request is a qualified request for journalistic, public interest purposes. As such, I request fully waived fees, including both public interest fee waiver and journalistic fee waiver.

1. Fiat Fiendum, Inc. (FF) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, organized for charitable, educational, scientific, and/or literary purposes.

This request is a part of FF's bona fide educational and scientific purpose activities, which are public interest purposes as a matter of law.

2. FF's actions in matters such as this request are non-commercial. My personal interest in the records is also non-commercial.

3. Both Fiat Fiendum as an organization, and I as an individual, are representatives of the news media and entitled to waiver of all search fees.

4. I intend and am able to host and publish all received records online to the general public at no charge, as well to publish highlights, analyses, summaries, commentaries, and other creative, original journalistic and scientific work about responsive records through multiple online publications, as part of Fiat Fiendum's work.

5. The records requested are of significant public interest, entitled to waiver of all duplication fees, since
a. they are requested for 501(c)(3) public interest purposes;
b. as above, I both am able and intend to disseminate the files widely;
c. they would contribute greatly to the public understanding of the operations & activities of your agency, in that they are records that directly describe agency operations & activities, as well as the issues and matters described at the top of this letter;
d. they are not currently readily available; and
e. they are likely to be requested by others.

6. As mentioned above, I am explicitly not asking for any physical duplication, but rather direct server-to-server file transfer or email (or posting on your website). FOIA authorizes "duplication" fees strictly limited to your agency's actual costs, and mandates that your agency use the cheapest available requested methods. I consider the actual costs for server-to-server file transfer to be reasonably estimated by, e.g., Amazon S3's pricing (https://aws.amazon.com/s3/pricing/).

7. I request that, pending fee waiver determination or appeal, you proceed with this request as if it were in the "other non-commercial requester" category.

# Requester

This request is made on behalf of both myself, Sai (in personal capacity) and Fiat Fiendum, Inc. (in official capacity).

Please note that “Sai” is my full legal name.

# Request tracking numbers and estimated completion date

Upon receipt, and in every followup response, please state your tracking number(s) for this request, as well as your specific estimated completion date. 5 USC 552(a)(7).

# Communication about this request and method for responding

If you have any questions or updates about this request, please contact me by email, using only the MuckRock email address from which this request was sent. Please do not send responses to my personal or organizational email addresses unless I specifically request you to do so.

Please ensure that all of your responses comply with § 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, 36 CFR 1194.22, and UESB NPRM ATBCB-2015-0002.
In particular, please make all correspondence pursuant to this request — including notification and responsive records — by email, with native electronic format records, as specified in the request. I do not authorize you to send anything to me by physical mail unless I specifically state otherwise.

Do not respond using ZixCorp "Secure Mail" or any other method that "expires" records from being available. Use only actual email and direct attachments, or upload using the link below, unless I explicitly request otherwise.

# "Reasonable description" and tailoring

Please note that a request need only be "reasonably described" in the sense that you understand what is requested and where you can find it. A request is not improper merely because of the amount of responsive records. I will not agree to a limitation premised on this request asking for voluminous records. However, I may agree to a limitation premised on the difficulty of finding particular records or categories thereof, the quality of records available, paper vs electronic format, or similar issues.

If you believe that any of the requested items are not reasonably described, that they would be overly burdensome to fulfill, or that you need any further information, please be specific about what you consider vague.

Please include in any response about "reasonably described", or any request for narrowing, specific questions I can answer that would clarify matters for you; specific descriptions of what parts of the request more or less burdensome (and why) that could serve as the basis for negotiating a narrower request; and any indexes, finding guides, record categories, record storage practices, likely places that responsive records may be located, or similar information that would allow me to understand your concerns and better tailor the request.

President, Fiat Fiendum, Inc.

Fiat Fiendum is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt corporation devoted to public interest journalism, government transparency and accountability, individuals' civil rights, and related issues.

Upload link and physical mail address are below. (Again, do not physically mail responsive records without my explicit request; send all responses electronically.)

From: Federal Election Commission


Re: Your Freedom of Information Act Request to the Federal Election Commission FOIA (2019-002)

Dear Mr. Sai,

This email acknowledges receipt of your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated October 13, 2018. Specifically, you requested the following:

“A. Unpublished submissions.
1. All records relating to all:
a. petitions for rulemaking,
b. advisory opinion requests, and
c. complaints;
2. that have not been published (respectively)
a. with a NOA at http://sers.fec.gov,
b. with an AOR at http://saos.fec.gov, or
c. with a MUR, ADR, or AF at http://eqs.fec.gov;.”

We received your request on October 15, 2018.

We will soon be initiating our search for records responsive to your request. If we determine that you have requested a voluminous amount of records that require extensive searching and examination, we will contact you to discuss your willingness to modify your request.

Any questions regarding the status of this request should be directed to our office at foia@fec.gov or 202-694-1650. Please cite the following unique tracking number in all future correspondence regarding this matter: FOIA Request 2019-002.

Thank you for contacting the Federal Election Commission.


Christopher Mealy
FEC FOIA Requester Service Center

From: Sai .

Thank you for your acknowledgment.

In your email, you left out parts A(3, 4), B, & C of my request. Construing part A as if it were just A(1,2) would cover both too much and too little. Omitting B & C ignores separate parts of the request. Please read it as a whole.

What is your estimated completion date? 5 USC 552(a)(7)


P.S. I'm not a "Mr.". Just Sai, please.

From: Federal Election Commission

Dear Sai:

The Federal Election Commission’s FOIA Service Center has reviewed your FOIA request of October 13, 2018 (assigned the tracking number FOIA 2019-002), and we have determined that because the searches you requested have no time limit, your request is, as written, unreasonably burdensome and fails to comply with Commission regulations that require FOIA requests “reasonably describe the records sought with sufficient specificity with respect to names, dates, and subject matter, to permit the records to be located.” 11 C.F.R. § 4.7(b)(1).
Please note that pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(A), the time period for the Agency to respond to your request will be tolled until we receive a response. Without further clarification, the FEC will not process your request. Therefore, if the FOIA Service Center does not receive a response within 20 business days of the date of this email, we intend to administratively close your request.
Additionally, your FOIA request alleges that the Commission refused to publish your petition for rulemaking. Please note that the Agency does not publish a petition for rulemaking until the Commission has acted on it by publishing a Notice of Availability in the Federal Register. 11 C.F.R. § 200.3(a). Because the Commission has not yet published a Notice of Availability in response to your petition, the petition has not yet been made public. We hope this clarifies any confusion with respect to your rulemaking petition.

Thank you for contacting the Federal Election Commission.


Steve N. Hajjar
FOIA Service Center

From: Sai .

I appeal both the denial, and the pattern and practice of denying on the basis stated.

1. Your denial is contrary to clearly established law.

5 USC 552(b) does not provide for rejection on the basis of "unreasonably burdensome". Nor does it permit denial based on the time scope of a request.

To the contrary, the DoJ has for decades made clear that merely voluminous or burdensome requests are perfectly legitimate.

See <https://www.justice.gov/oip/blog/foia-update-foia-counselor-questions-answers-21>:

"Can an agency deny a FOIA request which requires an extremely burdensome search, and/or encompasses an enormous volume of records, on the ground that the records are not "reasonably described?"

No. The sheer size or burdensomeness of a FOIA request, in and of itself, does not entitle an agency to deny that request on the ground that it does not "reasonably describe" records within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(3)(A). That provision in the FOIA was intended to ensure that a FOIA request description "be sufficient [to enable] a professional employee of the agency who was familiar with the subject area of the request to locate the record with a reasonable amount of effort." H.R. Rep. No. 93-876, 93d Cong., 2d Sess. 6 (1974). See also S. Rep. No. 93-854, 93d Cong., 2d Sess. 10 (1974) ("[T]he identification standard should not be used to obstruct public access to agency records."); Bristol-Meyers Co. v. FTC, 424 F.2d 935, 938 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 824 (1970)."

2. My request was very clearly described.

You have not made any claim at all that you don't understand what I requested, or are unable to locate the responsive records.

3. You have totally failed to respond to parts B & C of my request.

4. Your response does not clearly state whether it is a denial. If you deny a request, you must state so.

5. My allegation was about FEC's "refusal to perform the non-discretionary function required by 11 CFR 200.3". That includes, obviously, publishing a NoA.

You do not dispute the core issue: that FEC has refused to act on my PFR, per 200.3


From: Federal Election Commission

In your letter of November 15, 2018, received by the Federal Election Commission's FOIA Requester Service November 26, 2018, you purported to appeal the denial of your FOIA request to the Federal Election Commission (FOIA 2019-002). We are unable to treat your letter as an appeal of a denial of your FOIA request since our email of November 2, 2018 to you did not, in fact, deny your request.
In our November 2 email, we indicated that because your request contained no time limit, your request, as written, was unreasonably burdensome and failed to comply with Commission regulations, see 11 C.F.R. § 4.7(b)(1), that require FOIA requests to "reasonable describe the records sought with sufficient specificity with respect to names, dates, and subject matter, to permit the records to be located." We also indicated that without further clarification we would not process your request, and that your failure to do so would result in the administrative closure of your request.
Accordingly, we are now seeking confirmation that you are choosing not to further clarify your request by providing a time limit for your requested search. Please let us know if this is your position, or if you are willing to provide us with a time limit. Please respond within 20 business days of the date of this email or we will administratively close your request.

Katrina Sutphin
FOIA/PA Attorney

From: Sai .

1. Your 20 day deadline is illegal.

5 USC 552(a)(6)(A)(i)(III) requires that any adverse decision have no less than a 90 day response period for FOIA requesters. And the Act does not provide for such a thing as "administrative closure". If you intend to deny the request as made, you must do so.

I hereby petition for rulemaking for FEC to promulgate regulations in compliance with the FOIA Improvement Act, including the 90 day minimum cited.

2. At this time, we decline to put any time limit on the request as stated, for the reasons explained in my previous response.

The question of burden is only about the time to *find* responsive records. You've given no reason whatsoever why the time range of the records requested has anything to do with how difficult it would be to find them.

Furthermore, older responsive records would be even more interesting. By the definition of the request, all responsive records for part A will be ones for which FEC violated the APA and FECA by having still failed to respond to a PFR, AOR, or complaint.

If there are e.g. 30 year old PFRs, AORs, or complaints that the agency has *still* failed to act on, I very definitely want them, as they would be evidence of the agency's gross negligence or intentional violation of law.

If you have a specific timespan-related concern that actually affects search time, please explain (e.g. by reference to you record keeping practices), and I may be willing to change the response to accommodate.

In any case, FOIA requires that you service the response as best you can, including rolling responses. The request specifically asked for that, and for most recent records first. You've given no basis for why this issue would block providing more recent records in the meantime.