Direct Energy Weapons Tested Or Used On United States Citizens

To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, I hereby request the following records:

Any documents which pertain to direct energy weapons (DEW) being tested or used on United States citizens.

The requested documents will be made available to the general public, and this request is not being made for commercial purposes.

In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 20 business days, as the statute requires.

Sincerely,

Targeted Individuals

Ninan Duvall

My appeal is based solely upon the public release of documents via your former Booze Allen Hamiliton's contractor employee Edward Snowden. According to the public dissemination of Edward Snowden's documents, the NSA violated the subsection "a" exactly at the subsubsection's 1 and 2 of the section 1.7 of the Executive Order 13526.

Below is the mentioned full text section of Executive Order 13526:

Sec. 1.7. (Executive Order 13526) Classification Prohibitions and Limitations. 
(a) In no case shall information be classified, continue to be maintained as classified, or fail to be declassified in order to:
(1) conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error;
(2) prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency;
(3) restrain competition; or
(4) prevent or delay the release of information that does not require protection in the interest of the national security.

According to the former contractor Edward Snowden, the NSA engaged in illegal domestic surveillance of United States citizens according to the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights. The phrasing "domestic survelliance" never appears in the FOIA rejection letter that was received. The ommison of the phrasisng "domestic surveillance" is a clear legal violation of the executive order 13526. A revision of the rejection letter is requested according to executive order 13526.