CIA-USPS Liaisons 1970s (United States Postal Service)

Emma North-Best filed this request with the United States Postal Service of the United States of America.
Tracking #

2019-FPRO-00073

Multi Request CIA-USPS Liaisons 1970s
Est. Completion None
Status
Fix Required

Communications

From: Emma North-Best


To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, I hereby request the following records:

Records mentioning or generated as a result of liaisons and contacts between CIA officials and the following USPS personnel:

KIRKLAND, Bill
KORTE, Linda
LARKIN, Linda

For the purposes of this request, the words "contacts" and "liaisons" are being used in the way CIA used them in CIA-RDP78-00300R000100090121-9 (dated 1975), which officially disclosed these relationships. A copy of the file can be found at https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP78-00300R000100090121-9.pdf. This request may be limited to the beginning of 1970 through the end of 1979.

I am a member of the news media and request classification as such. I have previously written about the government and its activities, with some reaching over 100,000 readers in outlets such as MuckRock, Motherboard, Property of the People, AND Magazine, Unicorn Riot, and more. As such, as I have a reasonable expectation of publication and my editorial and writing skills are well established. In addition, I discuss and comment on the files online and make them available through non-profits such as the library Internet Archive and and the journalist non-profit, MuckRock, disseminating them to a large audience. While my research is not limited to this, a great deal of it, including this, focuses on the activities and attitudes of the government itself. As such, it is not necessary for me to demonstrate the relevance of this particular subject in advance.

Additionally, case law states that “proof of the ability to disseminate the released information to a broad cross- section of the public is not required.” Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Dep’t of Justice, 365 F.3d 1108, 1126 (D.C. Cir. 2004); see Carney v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 19 F.3d 807, 814-15 (2d Cir. 1994). Further, courts have held that "qualified because it also had “firm” plans to “publish a number of . . . ‘document sets’” concerning United States foreign and national security policy." Under this criteria, as well, I qualify as a member of the news media.

Additionally, courts have held that the news media status "focuses on the nature of the requester, not its request. The provision requires that the request be “made by” a representative of the news media. Id. § 552(a)(4)(A)(ii)(II). A newspaper reporter, for example, is a representative of the news media regardless of how much interest there is in the story for which he or she is requesting information." As such, the details of the request itself are moot for the purposes of determining the appropriate fee category.

As my primary purpose is to inform about government activities by reporting on it and making the raw data available, I request that fees be waived.

The requested documents will be made available to the general public, and this request is not being made for commercial purposes.

In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 20 business days, as the statute requires.

Sincerely,

Emma Best

From: United States Postal Service

An acknowledgement letter, stating the request is being processed.

From: United States Postal Service

Good Morning Ms. Best,

Please see the attached correspondence concerning your Freedom of Information Act request dated October 18, 2018 and assigned FOIA Case Number 2019-FPRO-00073.

Sincerely,

Cheryl Woody
Privacy and Records Management Office | U.S. Postal Service
*475 L'Enfant Plaza SW RM 1P830 | Washington, DC 20260-1101 | 'Office 202.268.7216

From: Emma North-Best

I provided the names, keywords and date ranges you asked for in the original request. How is that not sufficient?

From: United States Postal Service

Good Morning, Ms. Best,

In a letter dated November 19, 2018, we informed you that your request did not provide sufficient detail to allow for the ready identification and retrieval of the desired documents. And, you were advised that your request could not be processed as formulated. Information on how to submit a proper FOIA request was included in the letter to assist you in providing clarification about the records of interest. We informed you that we would close your request if we did not receive a response within 14 business days.

On January 4, 2019, the Privacy and Records Management Office closed the above request, 2019-FPRO-00073, after receiving no response to our letter concerning clarification.

Sincerely,

Cheryl Woody
Privacy and Records Management Office | U.S. Postal Service
•475 L'Enfant Plaza SW RM 1P830 | Washington, DC 20260-1101 | 'Office 202.268.7216

From: Emma North-Best

But I gave you the information you requested.

From: United States Postal Service

Good Afternoon Ms. Best,

Our May 28, 2019 email to you have already responded to the issue raised in this latest email.

Please refer back to our November 19, 2018 response (copy attached). Your request has been administratively closed.

Sincerely,

Cheryl Woody
Privacy and Records Management Office | U.S. Postal Service
•475 L'Enfant Plaza SW RM 1P830 | Washington, DC 20260-1101 | 'Office 202.268.7216

Files

pages

Close