Use of Personal Accounts for Public Business - Immediate Disclosure Request (SF Mayor)

twitter.com/journo_anon filed this request with the Office of the Mayor of San Francisco, CA.
Due March 12, 2021
Est. Completion None
Status
Awaiting Response

Communications

From: twitter.com/journo_anon

London Breed, Hank Heckel, Sean Elsbernd, Andrea Bruss, and Marjan Philhour ("Named Public Officials"),

Below are new Immediate Disclosure Requests (SF Admin Code 67.25(a)) directed to the Mayor's Office and each individual addressed above.

****** We have no duty to, and we will not again, remind the City of its obligations. Instead, we will file complaints for every Sunshine Ordinance or CPRA violation. We will continue to file complaints until the City's procedures are modified to fully comply with the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA, without caveat or exception. ******

1. Due to your June 5, 2020 public records response (https://cdn.muckrock.com/foia_files/2020/06/05/Anonymous_Request_Response_6.5.20_Redacted.pdf), we know your office uses your personal email accounts to conduct public business. Please provide all writings related to the conduct of public business sent or received by any of the Named Public Officials from Jan 14 2020 to present (inclusive) using their personal email accounts.

2. London Breed has previously refused to provide any public records from her personal accounts; yet we know that londonbreed@gmail.com is used for public business due to at least Page 72 of the following public record: https://sfbos.org/ftp/uploadedfiles/bdsupvrs/communications/2013/130066.pdf . Please provide for each of the Named Public Officials every email on their SFGOV email account from Jan 26 2020 to present (inclusive) that was sent TO, CC, or BCC londonbreed@gmail.com (note this is not restricted to email sent by the Named Public Official - they could simply be additional recipients of a Breed-received email).

3. Please provide for each of the Named Public Officials every email on their SFGOV email account from Jan 14 2020 to present (inclusive) that was sent FROM londonbreed@gmail.com .

4. Please provide for each of the Named Public Officials every email on their SFGOV email account from Jan 14 2020 to present (inclusive) that has the case insensitive keyword "londonbreed@gmail.com" (this will for example catch forwards of threads that Breed was previously included on but then removed from).

Do not destroy or discard any responsive records - we will appeal all withholdings or Sunshine violations. Remember your department head has an obligation to maintain in a professional and businesslike manner their correspondence and release them as public records (SF Admin Code 67.27-9(a)); and we will cross-check your responses with all other parties, including every city agency, to ensure you have not destroyed or withheld records improperly.

Your response is required by June 9, 2020. Rolling records responses are requested (SFAC 67.25(d)) if you are unable to immediately produce records. Exact copies of every responsive record are requested (Gov Code 6253(b)) - do not: provide mere URLs, print and scan electronic records, convert native files to PDFs, or provide black and white versions of any color images. Provide only copies of records not requiring fees and in-person inspection of all other records (GC 6253).

Your non-exhaustive obligations:
- All withholding of any information must be justified in writing (SFAC 67.27).
- All withholdings by masking or deletion (aka redactions) must be keyed by footnote or other clear reference to the specific justification for that redaction, and only the minimal exempt portion of any record may be withheld (SFAC 67.26).
- You must respond to emailed requests (SFAC 67.21(b)).
- You must notify us of whether or not responsive records exist and/or were withheld for each below request (Gov Code 6253(c), 6255(b)).
- You must state the name and title of each person responsible for withholding any information (Gov Code 6253(d)).
- Do not impose any end-user restrictions upon me (Santa Clara Co. vs Superior Ct, 170 Cal.App 4th 1301); so if you use a third-party website like NextRequest to publish records, please make them completely public without any login or sign-in.

Your agency must do all of the above things in your response, and you cannot wait until we file complaints.

Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter.

NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon

Sean Elsbernd: The following email was previously sent to the general sunshine email and is being sent directly to you to ensure you do not destroy any responsive records:

London Breed, Hank Heckel, Sean Elsbernd, Andrea Bruss, and Marjan Philhour ("Named Public Officials"),

Below are new Immediate Disclosure Requests (SF Admin Code 67.25(a)) directed to the Mayor's Office and each individual addressed above.

****** We have no duty to, and we will not again, remind the City of its obligations. Instead, we will file complaints for every Sunshine Ordinance or CPRA violation. We will continue to file complaints until the City's procedures are modified to fully comply with the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA, without caveat or exception. ******

1. Due to your June 5, 2020 public records response (https://cdn.muckrock.com/foia_files/2020/06/05/Anonymous_Request_Response_6.5.20_Redacted.pdf), we know your office uses your personal email accounts to conduct public business. Please provide all writings related to the conduct of public business sent or received by any of the Named Public Officials from Jan 14 2020 to present (inclusive) using their personal email accounts.

2. London Breed has previously refused to provide any public records from her personal accounts; yet we know that londonbreed@gmail.com is used for public business due to at least Page 72 of the following public record: https://sfbos.org/ftp/uploadedfiles/bdsupvrs/communications/2013/130066.pdf . Please provide for each of the Named Public Officials every email on their SFGOV email account from Jan 26 2020 to present (inclusive) that was sent TO, CC, or BCC londonbreed@gmail.com (note this is not restricted to email sent by the Named Public Official - they could simply be additional recipients of a Breed-received email).

3. Please provide for each of the Named Public Officials every email on their SFGOV email account from Jan 14 2020 to present (inclusive) that was sent FROM londonbreed@gmail.com .

4. Please provide for each of the Named Public Officials every email on their SFGOV email account from Jan 14 2020 to present (inclusive) that has the case insensitive keyword "londonbreed@gmail.com" (this will for example catch forwards of threads that Breed was previously included on but then removed from).

Do not destroy or discard any responsive records - we will appeal all withholdings or Sunshine violations. Remember your department head has an obligation to maintain in a professional and businesslike manner their correspondence and release them as public records (SF Admin Code 67.27-9(a)); and we will cross-check your responses with all other parties, including every city agency, to ensure you have not destroyed or withheld records improperly.

Your response is required by June 9, 2020. Rolling records responses are requested (SFAC 67.25(d)) if you are unable to immediately produce records. Exact copies of every responsive record are requested (Gov Code 6253(b)) - do not: provide mere URLs, print and scan electronic records, convert native files to PDFs, or provide black and white versions of any color images. Provide only copies of records not requiring fees and in-person inspection of all other records (GC 6253).

Your non-exhaustive obligations:
- All withholding of any information must be justified in writing (SFAC 67.27).
- All withholdings by masking or deletion (aka redactions) must be keyed by footnote or other clear reference to the specific justification for that redaction, and only the minimal exempt portion of any record may be withheld (SFAC 67.26).
- You must respond to emailed requests (SFAC 67.21(b)).
- You must notify us of whether or not responsive records exist and/or were withheld for each below request (Gov Code 6253(c), 6255(b)).
- You must state the name and title of each person responsible for withholding any information (Gov Code 6253(d)).
- Do not impose any end-user restrictions upon me (Santa Clara Co. vs Superior Ct, 170 Cal.App 4th 1301); so if you use a third-party website like NextRequest to publish records, please make them completely public without any login or sign-in.

Your agency must do all of the above things in your response, and you cannot wait until we file complaints.

Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter.

NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon

Andrea Bruss: The following email was previously sent to the general sunshine email and is being sent directly to you to ensure you do not destroy any responsive records:

London Breed, Hank Heckel, Sean Elsbernd, Andrea Bruss, and Marjan Philhour ("Named Public Officials"),

Below are new Immediate Disclosure Requests (SF Admin Code 67.25(a)) directed to the Mayor's Office and each individual addressed above.

****** We have no duty to, and we will not again, remind the City of its obligations. Instead, we will file complaints for every Sunshine Ordinance or CPRA violation. We will continue to file complaints until the City's procedures are modified to fully comply with the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA, without caveat or exception. ******

1. Due to your June 5, 2020 public records response (https://cdn.muckrock.com/foia_files/2020/06/05/Anonymous_Request_Response_6.5.20_Redacted.pdf), we know your office uses your personal email accounts to conduct public business. Please provide all writings related to the conduct of public business sent or received by any of the Named Public Officials from Jan 14 2020 to present (inclusive) using their personal email accounts.

2. London Breed has previously refused to provide any public records from her personal accounts; yet we know that londonbreed@gmail.com is used for public business due to at least Page 72 of the following public record: https://sfbos.org/ftp/uploadedfiles/bdsupvrs/communications/2013/130066.pdf . Please provide for each of the Named Public Officials every email on their SFGOV email account from Jan 26 2020 to present (inclusive) that was sent TO, CC, or BCC londonbreed@gmail.com (note this is not restricted to email sent by the Named Public Official - they could simply be additional recipients of a Breed-received email).

3. Please provide for each of the Named Public Officials every email on their SFGOV email account from Jan 14 2020 to present (inclusive) that was sent FROM londonbreed@gmail.com .

4. Please provide for each of the Named Public Officials every email on their SFGOV email account from Jan 14 2020 to present (inclusive) that has the case insensitive keyword "londonbreed@gmail.com" (this will for example catch forwards of threads that Breed was previously included on but then removed from).

Do not destroy or discard any responsive records - we will appeal all withholdings or Sunshine violations. Remember your department head has an obligation to maintain in a professional and businesslike manner their correspondence and release them as public records (SF Admin Code 67.27-9(a)); and we will cross-check your responses with all other parties, including every city agency, to ensure you have not destroyed or withheld records improperly.

Your response is required by June 9, 2020. Rolling records responses are requested (SFAC 67.25(d)) if you are unable to immediately produce records. Exact copies of every responsive record are requested (Gov Code 6253(b)) - do not: provide mere URLs, print and scan electronic records, convert native files to PDFs, or provide black and white versions of any color images. Provide only copies of records not requiring fees and in-person inspection of all other records (GC 6253).

Your non-exhaustive obligations:
- All withholding of any information must be justified in writing (SFAC 67.27).
- All withholdings by masking or deletion (aka redactions) must be keyed by footnote or other clear reference to the specific justification for that redaction, and only the minimal exempt portion of any record may be withheld (SFAC 67.26).
- You must respond to emailed requests (SFAC 67.21(b)).
- You must notify us of whether or not responsive records exist and/or were withheld for each below request (Gov Code 6253(c), 6255(b)).
- You must state the name and title of each person responsible for withholding any information (Gov Code 6253(d)).
- Do not impose any end-user restrictions upon me (Santa Clara Co. vs Superior Ct, 170 Cal.App 4th 1301); so if you use a third-party website like NextRequest to publish records, please make them completely public without any login or sign-in.

Your agency must do all of the above things in your response, and you cannot wait until we file complaints.

Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter.

NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon

Hank Heckel: The following email was previously sent to the general sunshine email and is being sent directly to you to ensure you do not destroy any responsive records:

London Breed, Hank Heckel, Sean Elsbernd, Andrea Bruss, and Marjan Philhour ("Named Public Officials"),

Below are new Immediate Disclosure Requests (SF Admin Code 67.25(a)) directed to the Mayor's Office and each individual addressed above.

****** We have no duty to, and we will not again, remind the City of its obligations. Instead, we will file complaints for every Sunshine Ordinance or CPRA violation. We will continue to file complaints until the City's procedures are modified to fully comply with the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA, without caveat or exception. ******

1. Due to your June 5, 2020 public records response (https://cdn.muckrock.com/foia_files/2020/06/05/Anonymous_Request_Response_6.5.20_Redacted.pdf), we know your office uses your personal email accounts to conduct public business. Please provide all writings related to the conduct of public business sent or received by any of the Named Public Officials from Jan 14 2020 to present (inclusive) using their personal email accounts.

2. London Breed has previously refused to provide any public records from her personal accounts; yet we know that londonbreed@gmail.com is used for public business due to at least Page 72 of the following public record: https://sfbos.org/ftp/uploadedfiles/bdsupvrs/communications/2013/130066.pdf . Please provide for each of the Named Public Officials every email on their SFGOV email account from Jan 26 2020 to present (inclusive) that was sent TO, CC, or BCC londonbreed@gmail.com (note this is not restricted to email sent by the Named Public Official - they could simply be additional recipients of a Breed-received email).

3. Please provide for each of the Named Public Officials every email on their SFGOV email account from Jan 14 2020 to present (inclusive) that was sent FROM londonbreed@gmail.com .

4. Please provide for each of the Named Public Officials every email on their SFGOV email account from Jan 14 2020 to present (inclusive) that has the case insensitive keyword "londonbreed@gmail.com" (this will for example catch forwards of threads that Breed was previously included on but then removed from).

Do not destroy or discard any responsive records - we will appeal all withholdings or Sunshine violations. Remember your department head has an obligation to maintain in a professional and businesslike manner their correspondence and release them as public records (SF Admin Code 67.27-9(a)); and we will cross-check your responses with all other parties, including every city agency, to ensure you have not destroyed or withheld records improperly.

Your response is required by June 9, 2020. Rolling records responses are requested (SFAC 67.25(d)) if you are unable to immediately produce records. Exact copies of every responsive record are requested (Gov Code 6253(b)) - do not: provide mere URLs, print and scan electronic records, convert native files to PDFs, or provide black and white versions of any color images. Provide only copies of records not requiring fees and in-person inspection of all other records (GC 6253).

Your non-exhaustive obligations:
- All withholding of any information must be justified in writing (SFAC 67.27).
- All withholdings by masking or deletion (aka redactions) must be keyed by footnote or other clear reference to the specific justification for that redaction, and only the minimal exempt portion of any record may be withheld (SFAC 67.26).
- You must respond to emailed requests (SFAC 67.21(b)).
- You must notify us of whether or not responsive records exist and/or were withheld for each below request (Gov Code 6253(c), 6255(b)).
- You must state the name and title of each person responsible for withholding any information (Gov Code 6253(d)).
- Do not impose any end-user restrictions upon me (Santa Clara Co. vs Superior Ct, 170 Cal.App 4th 1301); so if you use a third-party website like NextRequest to publish records, please make them completely public without any login or sign-in.

Your agency must do all of the above things in your response, and you cannot wait until we file complaints.

Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter.

NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon

London Breed: The following email was previously sent to the general sunshine email and is being sent directly to you to ensure you do not destroy any responsive records:

London Breed, Hank Heckel, Sean Elsbernd, Andrea Bruss, and Marjan Philhour ("Named Public Officials"),

Below are new Immediate Disclosure Requests (SF Admin Code 67.25(a)) directed to the Mayor's Office and each individual addressed above.

****** We have no duty to, and we will not again, remind the City of its obligations. Instead, we will file complaints for every Sunshine Ordinance or CPRA violation. We will continue to file complaints until the City's procedures are modified to fully comply with the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA, without caveat or exception. ******

1. Due to your June 5, 2020 public records response (https://cdn.muckrock.com/foia_files/2020/06/05/Anonymous_Request_Response_6.5.20_Redacted.pdf), we know your office uses your personal email accounts to conduct public business. Please provide all writings related to the conduct of public business sent or received by any of the Named Public Officials from Jan 14 2020 to present (inclusive) using their personal email accounts.

2. London Breed has previously refused to provide any public records from her personal accounts; yet we know that londonbreed@gmail.com is used for public business due to at least Page 72 of the following public record: https://sfbos.org/ftp/uploadedfiles/bdsupvrs/communications/2013/130066.pdf . Please provide for each of the Named Public Officials every email on their SFGOV email account from Jan 26 2020 to present (inclusive) that was sent TO, CC, or BCC londonbreed@gmail.com (note this is not restricted to email sent by the Named Public Official - they could simply be additional recipients of a Breed-received email).

3. Please provide for each of the Named Public Officials every email on their SFGOV email account from Jan 14 2020 to present (inclusive) that was sent FROM londonbreed@gmail.com .

4. Please provide for each of the Named Public Officials every email on their SFGOV email account from Jan 14 2020 to present (inclusive) that has the case insensitive keyword "londonbreed@gmail.com" (this will for example catch forwards of threads that Breed was previously included on but then removed from).

Do not destroy or discard any responsive records - we will appeal all withholdings or Sunshine violations. Remember your department head has an obligation to maintain in a professional and businesslike manner their correspondence and release them as public records (SF Admin Code 67.27-9(a)); and we will cross-check your responses with all other parties, including every city agency, to ensure you have not destroyed or withheld records improperly.

Your response is required by June 9, 2020. Rolling records responses are requested (SFAC 67.25(d)) if you are unable to immediately produce records. Exact copies of every responsive record are requested (Gov Code 6253(b)) - do not: provide mere URLs, print and scan electronic records, convert native files to PDFs, or provide black and white versions of any color images. Provide only copies of records not requiring fees and in-person inspection of all other records (GC 6253).

Your non-exhaustive obligations:
- All withholding of any information must be justified in writing (SFAC 67.27).
- All withholdings by masking or deletion (aka redactions) must be keyed by footnote or other clear reference to the specific justification for that redaction, and only the minimal exempt portion of any record may be withheld (SFAC 67.26).
- You must respond to emailed requests (SFAC 67.21(b)).
- You must notify us of whether or not responsive records exist and/or were withheld for each below request (Gov Code 6253(c), 6255(b)).
- You must state the name and title of each person responsible for withholding any information (Gov Code 6253(d)).
- Do not impose any end-user restrictions upon me (Santa Clara Co. vs Superior Ct, 170 Cal.App 4th 1301); so if you use a third-party website like NextRequest to publish records, please make them completely public without any login or sign-in.

Your agency must do all of the above things in your response, and you cannot wait until we file complaints.

Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter.

NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon

Marjan Philhour: The following email was previously sent to the general sunshine email and is being sent directly to you to ensure you do not destroy any responsive records:

London Breed, Hank Heckel, Sean Elsbernd, Andrea Bruss, and Marjan Philhour ("Named Public Officials"),

Below are new Immediate Disclosure Requests (SF Admin Code 67.25(a)) directed to the Mayor's Office and each individual addressed above.

****** We have no duty to, and we will not again, remind the City of its obligations. Instead, we will file complaints for every Sunshine Ordinance or CPRA violation. We will continue to file complaints until the City's procedures are modified to fully comply with the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA, without caveat or exception. ******

1. Due to your June 5, 2020 public records response (https://cdn.muckrock.com/foia_files/2020/06/05/Anonymous_Request_Response_6.5.20_Redacted.pdf), we know your office uses your personal email accounts to conduct public business. Please provide all writings related to the conduct of public business sent or received by any of the Named Public Officials from Jan 14 2020 to present (inclusive) using their personal email accounts.

2. London Breed has previously refused to provide any public records from her personal accounts; yet we know that londonbreed@gmail.com is used for public business due to at least Page 72 of the following public record: https://sfbos.org/ftp/uploadedfiles/bdsupvrs/communications/2013/130066.pdf . Please provide for each of the Named Public Officials every email on their SFGOV email account from Jan 26 2020 to present (inclusive) that was sent TO, CC, or BCC londonbreed@gmail.com (note this is not restricted to email sent by the Named Public Official - they could simply be additional recipients of a Breed-received email).

3. Please provide for each of the Named Public Officials every email on their SFGOV email account from Jan 14 2020 to present (inclusive) that was sent FROM londonbreed@gmail.com .

4. Please provide for each of the Named Public Officials every email on their SFGOV email account from Jan 14 2020 to present (inclusive) that has the case insensitive keyword "londonbreed@gmail.com" (this will for example catch forwards of threads that Breed was previously included on but then removed from).

Do not destroy or discard any responsive records - we will appeal all withholdings or Sunshine violations. Remember your department head has an obligation to maintain in a professional and businesslike manner their correspondence and release them as public records (SF Admin Code 67.27-9(a)); and we will cross-check your responses with all other parties, including every city agency, to ensure you have not destroyed or withheld records improperly.

Your response is required by June 9, 2020. Rolling records responses are requested (SFAC 67.25(d)) if you are unable to immediately produce records. Exact copies of every responsive record are requested (Gov Code 6253(b)) - do not: provide mere URLs, print and scan electronic records, convert native files to PDFs, or provide black and white versions of any color images. Provide only copies of records not requiring fees and in-person inspection of all other records (GC 6253).

Your non-exhaustive obligations:
- All withholding of any information must be justified in writing (SFAC 67.27).
- All withholdings by masking or deletion (aka redactions) must be keyed by footnote or other clear reference to the specific justification for that redaction, and only the minimal exempt portion of any record may be withheld (SFAC 67.26).
- You must respond to emailed requests (SFAC 67.21(b)).
- You must notify us of whether or not responsive records exist and/or were withheld for each below request (Gov Code 6253(c), 6255(b)).
- You must state the name and title of each person responsible for withholding any information (Gov Code 6253(d)).
- Do not impose any end-user restrictions upon me (Santa Clara Co. vs Superior Ct, 170 Cal.App 4th 1301); so if you use a third-party website like NextRequest to publish records, please make them completely public without any login or sign-in.

Your agency must do all of the above things in your response, and you cannot wait until we file complaints.

Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter.

NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon

London Breed, Hank Heckel, Sean Elsbernd, Andrea Bruss, and Marjan Philhour,

Below are new Immediate Disclosure Requests (SF Admin Code 67.25(a)) directed to the Mayor's Office and each individual addressed above.

****** We have no duty to, and we will not again, remind the City of its obligations. Instead, we will file complaints for every Sunshine Ordinance or CPRA violation. We will continue to file complaints until the City's procedures are modified to fully comply with the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA, without caveat or exception. ******

1. Every text, email, or chat message (of any form, in any app) with Walter Wong, Jaidin Consulting Group, or Jaidin Associates that you have retained, on your government or personal accounts, subject to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)

2. Every text, email, or chat message (of any form, in any app) with Harlan Kelly Jr. that you have retained, on your government or personal accounts, subject to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)

Do not destroy or discard any responsive records - we will appeal all withholdings or Sunshine violations. Remember your department head has an obligation to maintain in a professional and businesslike manner their correspondence and release them as public records (SF Admin Code 67.27-9(a)); and we will cross-check your responses with all other parties, including every city agency, to ensure you have not destroyed or withheld records improperly.

Your response is required by June 12, 2020. Rolling records responses are requested (SFAC 67.25(d)) if you are unable to immediately produce records. Exact copies of every responsive record are requested (Gov Code 6253(b)) - do not: provide mere URLs, print and scan electronic records, convert native files to PDFs, or provide black and white versions of any color images. Provide only copies of records not requiring fees and in-person inspection of all other records (GC 6253).

Your non-exhaustive obligations:
- All withholding of any information must be justified in writing (SFAC 67.27).
- All withholdings by masking or deletion (aka redactions) must be keyed by footnote or other clear reference to the specific justification for that redaction, and only the minimal exempt portion of any record may be withheld (SFAC 67.26).
- You must respond to emailed requests (SFAC 67.21(b)).
- You must notify us of whether or not responsive records exist and/or were withheld for each below request (Gov Code 6253(c), 6255(b)).
- You must state the name and title of each person responsible for withholding any information (Gov Code 6253(d)).
- Do not impose any end-user restrictions upon me (Santa Clara Co. vs Superior Ct, 170 Cal.App 4th 1301); so if you use a third-party website like NextRequest to publish records, please make them completely public without any login or sign-in.

Your agency must do all of the above things in your response, and you cannot wait until we file complaints.

Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter.

NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon

Marjan Philhour: The following email was previously sent to the general sunshine email and is being sent directly to you to ensure you do not destroy any responsive records:

London Breed, Hank Heckel, Sean Elsbernd, Andrea Bruss, and Marjan Philhour,

Below are new Immediate Disclosure Requests (SF Admin Code 67.25(a)) directed to the Mayor's Office and each individual addressed above.

****** We have no duty to, and we will not again, remind the City of its obligations. Instead, we will file complaints for every Sunshine Ordinance or CPRA violation. We will continue to file complaints until the City's procedures are modified to fully comply with the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA, without caveat or exception. ******

1. Every text, email, or chat message (of any form, in any app) with Walter Wong, Jaidin Consulting Group, or Jaidin Associates that you have retained, on your government or personal accounts, subject to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)

2. Every text, email, or chat message (of any form, in any app) with Harlan Kelly Jr. that you have retained, on your government or personal accounts, subject to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)

Do not destroy or discard any responsive records - we will appeal all withholdings or Sunshine violations. Remember your department head has an obligation to maintain in a professional and businesslike manner their correspondence and release them as public records (SF Admin Code 67.27-9(a)); and we will cross-check your responses with all other parties, including every city agency, to ensure you have not destroyed or withheld records improperly.

Your response is required by June 12, 2020. Rolling records responses are requested (SFAC 67.25(d)) if you are unable to immediately produce records. Exact copies of every responsive record are requested (Gov Code 6253(b)) - do not: provide mere URLs, print and scan electronic records, convert native files to PDFs, or provide black and white versions of any color images. Provide only copies of records not requiring fees and in-person inspection of all other records (GC 6253).

Your non-exhaustive obligations:
- All withholding of any information must be justified in writing (SFAC 67.27).
- All withholdings by masking or deletion (aka redactions) must be keyed by footnote or other clear reference to the specific justification for that redaction, and only the minimal exempt portion of any record may be withheld (SFAC 67.26).
- You must respond to emailed requests (SFAC 67.21(b)).
- You must notify us of whether or not responsive records exist and/or were withheld for each below request (Gov Code 6253(c), 6255(b)).
- You must state the name and title of each person responsible for withholding any information (Gov Code 6253(d)).
- Do not impose any end-user restrictions upon me (Santa Clara Co. vs Superior Ct, 170 Cal.App 4th 1301); so if you use a third-party website like NextRequest to publish records, please make them completely public without any login or sign-in.

Your agency must do all of the above things in your response, and you cannot wait until we file complaints.

Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter.

NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon

Elsbernd: The following email was previously sent to the general sunshine email and is being sent directly to you to ensure you do not destroy any responsive records:

London Breed, Hank Heckel, Sean Elsbernd, Andrea Bruss, and Marjan Philhour,

Below are new Immediate Disclosure Requests (SF Admin Code 67.25(a)) directed to the Mayor's Office and each individual addressed above.

****** We have no duty to, and we will not again, remind the City of its obligations. Instead, we will file complaints for every Sunshine Ordinance or CPRA violation. We will continue to file complaints until the City's procedures are modified to fully comply with the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA, without caveat or exception. ******

1. Every text, email, or chat message (of any form, in any app) with Walter Wong, Jaidin Consulting Group, or Jaidin Associates that you have retained, on your government or personal accounts, subject to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)

2. Every text, email, or chat message (of any form, in any app) with Harlan Kelly Jr. that you have retained, on your government or personal accounts, subject to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)

Do not destroy or discard any responsive records - we will appeal all withholdings or Sunshine violations. Remember your department head has an obligation to maintain in a professional and businesslike manner their correspondence and release them as public records (SF Admin Code 67.27-9(a)); and we will cross-check your responses with all other parties, including every city agency, to ensure you have not destroyed or withheld records improperly.

Your response is required by June 12, 2020. Rolling records responses are requested (SFAC 67.25(d)) if you are unable to immediately produce records. Exact copies of every responsive record are requested (Gov Code 6253(b)) - do not: provide mere URLs, print and scan electronic records, convert native files to PDFs, or provide black and white versions of any color images. Provide only copies of records not requiring fees and in-person inspection of all other records (GC 6253).

Your non-exhaustive obligations:
- All withholding of any information must be justified in writing (SFAC 67.27).
- All withholdings by masking or deletion (aka redactions) must be keyed by footnote or other clear reference to the specific justification for that redaction, and only the minimal exempt portion of any record may be withheld (SFAC 67.26).
- You must respond to emailed requests (SFAC 67.21(b)).
- You must notify us of whether or not responsive records exist and/or were withheld for each below request (Gov Code 6253(c), 6255(b)).
- You must state the name and title of each person responsible for withholding any information (Gov Code 6253(d)).
- Do not impose any end-user restrictions upon me (Santa Clara Co. vs Superior Ct, 170 Cal.App 4th 1301); so if you use a third-party website like NextRequest to publish records, please make them completely public without any login or sign-in.

Your agency must do all of the above things in your response, and you cannot wait until we file complaints.

Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter.

NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon

Bruss: The following email was previously sent to the general sunshine email and is being sent directly to you to ensure you do not destroy any responsive records:

London Breed, Hank Heckel, Sean Elsbernd, Andrea Bruss, and Marjan Philhour,

Below are new Immediate Disclosure Requests (SF Admin Code 67.25(a)) directed to the Mayor's Office and each individual addressed above.

****** We have no duty to, and we will not again, remind the City of its obligations. Instead, we will file complaints for every Sunshine Ordinance or CPRA violation. We will continue to file complaints until the City's procedures are modified to fully comply with the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA, without caveat or exception. ******

1. Every text, email, or chat message (of any form, in any app) with Walter Wong, Jaidin Consulting Group, or Jaidin Associates that you have retained, on your government or personal accounts, subject to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)

2. Every text, email, or chat message (of any form, in any app) with Harlan Kelly Jr. that you have retained, on your government or personal accounts, subject to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)

Do not destroy or discard any responsive records - we will appeal all withholdings or Sunshine violations. Remember your department head has an obligation to maintain in a professional and businesslike manner their correspondence and release them as public records (SF Admin Code 67.27-9(a)); and we will cross-check your responses with all other parties, including every city agency, to ensure you have not destroyed or withheld records improperly.

Your response is required by June 12, 2020. Rolling records responses are requested (SFAC 67.25(d)) if you are unable to immediately produce records. Exact copies of every responsive record are requested (Gov Code 6253(b)) - do not: provide mere URLs, print and scan electronic records, convert native files to PDFs, or provide black and white versions of any color images. Provide only copies of records not requiring fees and in-person inspection of all other records (GC 6253).

Your non-exhaustive obligations:
- All withholding of any information must be justified in writing (SFAC 67.27).
- All withholdings by masking or deletion (aka redactions) must be keyed by footnote or other clear reference to the specific justification for that redaction, and only the minimal exempt portion of any record may be withheld (SFAC 67.26).
- You must respond to emailed requests (SFAC 67.21(b)).
- You must notify us of whether or not responsive records exist and/or were withheld for each below request (Gov Code 6253(c), 6255(b)).
- You must state the name and title of each person responsible for withholding any information (Gov Code 6253(d)).
- Do not impose any end-user restrictions upon me (Santa Clara Co. vs Superior Ct, 170 Cal.App 4th 1301); so if you use a third-party website like NextRequest to publish records, please make them completely public without any login or sign-in.

Your agency must do all of the above things in your response, and you cannot wait until we file complaints.

Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter.

NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon

Breed: The following email was previously sent to the general sunshine email and is being sent directly to you to ensure you do not destroy any responsive records:

London Breed, Hank Heckel, Sean Elsbernd, Andrea Bruss, and Marjan Philhour,

Below are new Immediate Disclosure Requests (SF Admin Code 67.25(a)) directed to the Mayor's Office and each individual addressed above.

****** We have no duty to, and we will not again, remind the City of its obligations. Instead, we will file complaints for every Sunshine Ordinance or CPRA violation. We will continue to file complaints until the City's procedures are modified to fully comply with the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA, without caveat or exception. ******

1. Every text, email, or chat message (of any form, in any app) with Walter Wong, Jaidin Consulting Group, or Jaidin Associates that you have retained, on your government or personal accounts, subject to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)

2. Every text, email, or chat message (of any form, in any app) with Harlan Kelly Jr. that you have retained, on your government or personal accounts, subject to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)

Do not destroy or discard any responsive records - we will appeal all withholdings or Sunshine violations. Remember your department head has an obligation to maintain in a professional and businesslike manner their correspondence and release them as public records (SF Admin Code 67.27-9(a)); and we will cross-check your responses with all other parties, including every city agency, to ensure you have not destroyed or withheld records improperly.

Your response is required by June 12, 2020. Rolling records responses are requested (SFAC 67.25(d)) if you are unable to immediately produce records. Exact copies of every responsive record are requested (Gov Code 6253(b)) - do not: provide mere URLs, print and scan electronic records, convert native files to PDFs, or provide black and white versions of any color images. Provide only copies of records not requiring fees and in-person inspection of all other records (GC 6253).

Your non-exhaustive obligations:
- All withholding of any information must be justified in writing (SFAC 67.27).
- All withholdings by masking or deletion (aka redactions) must be keyed by footnote or other clear reference to the specific justification for that redaction, and only the minimal exempt portion of any record may be withheld (SFAC 67.26).
- You must respond to emailed requests (SFAC 67.21(b)).
- You must notify us of whether or not responsive records exist and/or were withheld for each below request (Gov Code 6253(c), 6255(b)).
- You must state the name and title of each person responsible for withholding any information (Gov Code 6253(d)).
- Do not impose any end-user restrictions upon me (Santa Clara Co. vs Superior Ct, 170 Cal.App 4th 1301); so if you use a third-party website like NextRequest to publish records, please make them completely public without any login or sign-in.

Your agency must do all of the above things in your response, and you cannot wait until we file complaints.

Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter.

NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon

Heckel: The following email was previously sent to the general sunshine email and is being sent directly to you to ensure you do not destroy any responsive records:

London Breed, Hank Heckel, Sean Elsbernd, Andrea Bruss, and Marjan Philhour,

Below are new Immediate Disclosure Requests (SF Admin Code 67.25(a)) directed to the Mayor's Office and each individual addressed above.

****** We have no duty to, and we will not again, remind the City of its obligations. Instead, we will file complaints for every Sunshine Ordinance or CPRA violation. We will continue to file complaints until the City's procedures are modified to fully comply with the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA, without caveat or exception. ******

1. Every text, email, or chat message (of any form, in any app) with Walter Wong, Jaidin Consulting Group, or Jaidin Associates that you have retained, on your government or personal accounts, subject to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)

2. Every text, email, or chat message (of any form, in any app) with Harlan Kelly Jr. that you have retained, on your government or personal accounts, subject to City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017)

Do not destroy or discard any responsive records - we will appeal all withholdings or Sunshine violations. Remember your department head has an obligation to maintain in a professional and businesslike manner their correspondence and release them as public records (SF Admin Code 67.27-9(a)); and we will cross-check your responses with all other parties, including every city agency, to ensure you have not destroyed or withheld records improperly.

Your response is required by June 12, 2020. Rolling records responses are requested (SFAC 67.25(d)) if you are unable to immediately produce records. Exact copies of every responsive record are requested (Gov Code 6253(b)) - do not: provide mere URLs, print and scan electronic records, convert native files to PDFs, or provide black and white versions of any color images. Provide only copies of records not requiring fees and in-person inspection of all other records (GC 6253).

Your non-exhaustive obligations:
- All withholding of any information must be justified in writing (SFAC 67.27).
- All withholdings by masking or deletion (aka redactions) must be keyed by footnote or other clear reference to the specific justification for that redaction, and only the minimal exempt portion of any record may be withheld (SFAC 67.26).
- You must respond to emailed requests (SFAC 67.21(b)).
- You must notify us of whether or not responsive records exist and/or were withheld for each below request (Gov Code 6253(c), 6255(b)).
- You must state the name and title of each person responsible for withholding any information (Gov Code 6253(d)).
- Do not impose any end-user restrictions upon me (Santa Clara Co. vs Superior Ct, 170 Cal.App 4th 1301); so if you use a third-party website like NextRequest to publish records, please make them completely public without any login or sign-in.

Your agency must do all of the above things in your response, and you cannot wait until we file complaints.

Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter.

NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: Office of the Mayor

Anonymous,

I am confirming receipt to this account. However, you note that you sent it to the general sunshine inbox as well. I don't have a record of that. Was it sent to mayorsunshinerequests@sfgov.org<mailto:mayorsunshinerequests@sfgov.org>?

Please also note that during the continuing pandemic, city workers are naturally working under unusual and difficult conditions with many called in for emergency service as disaster service workers or otherwise prioritizing work on the public health emergency and with many working remotely while also providing care for children or other family members. This impacts the ability to respond to records requests, particularly in gathering documents when working from a remote location. These issues are noted in the Mayor's Second Supplemental Proclamation Declaring the Existence of a Local Emergency, attached.

Pursuant to Section 5 of that emergency order, Sections 67.25(a) and 67.25(b) of the Administrative Code are suspended for the duration of the local emergency. For this reason, we are treating your Immediate Disclosure Request as a standard public records request, and we will further respond in 10 days. Thank you for your patience during this public health emergency.
Regards,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of the Mayor
City and County of San Francisco

  • Second SupplementalDeclaration2_03132020_stamped (003) (004)

From: twitter.com/journo_anon

There are 2 separate sets of requests from June 6 and June 11, see below:

From nobody Sat Jun 6 03:29:48 2020
Subject: California Public Records Act Request: Use of Personal Accounts for Public Business - Immediate Disclosure Request (SF Mayor)
From: requests@muckrock.com
To: "MayorSunshineRequests, MYR (MYR)" <mayorsunshinerequests@sfgov.org>
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 07:29:48 -0000
Message-ID: <20200606072948.5194.33570@1c852acf-cfee-476f-bad7-46c108ea7c4c.prvt.dyno.rt.heroku.com>

From nobody Thu Jun 11 18:16:43 2020
Subject: RE: California Public Records Act Request: Use of Personal Accounts for Public Business - Immediate Disclosure Request (SF Mayor)
From: requests@muckrock.com
To: mayorsunshinerequests@sfgov.org
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 22:16:43 -0000
Message-ID: <20200611221643.5851.36961@64080970-4da7-423c-8e9a-512f04bec4d3.prvt.dyno.rt.heroku.com>

From: Office of the Mayor

Noted. Thank you for the confirmation. Your messages to the sunshine box may have been temporarily diverted to another folder. We will retrieve them.

From: Office of the Mayor

Anonymous,

Please see the responsive records attached. Please note that we are continuing to process your request and we are invoking an extension of time to continue our response for up to 14 days due to the need to consult with another department and to check remote locations for documents. See Cal. Gov. Code § 6253(c) and San Francisco Admin. Code § 67.25(b). Please note that personal contact information has been redacted to protect personal privacy. Cal. Govt. Code Secs. 6254(c), California Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 1.

From: Office of the Mayor

Anonymous,

Please note that we are continuing to process your request and we are invoking an extension of time to continue our response for up to 14 days due to the need to consult with another department and to check remote locations for documents. See Cal. Gov. Code § 6253(c) and San Francisco Admin. Code § 67.25(b). Please note that personal contact information has been redacted to protect personal privacy. Cal. Govt. Code Secs. 6254(c), California Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 1.

Some records responsive to Item 1 below were already produced to you in response to your request from the email address requests@muckrock.com<mailto:requests@muckrock.com> on June 5, 2020.
Regards,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of the Mayor
City and County of San Francisco

From: twitter.com/journo_anon

Are there attachments missing? You claimed redactions so I assume we should have some records in that email.

NOTE: Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. The email address sending this request is a publicly- viewable mailbox. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: Office of the Mayor

Nothing is missing. You can ignore the redaction statement. That was sent in error. Same thing with the other email.

From: Office of the Mayor

Anonymous,

See the attached additional records responsive to Item 1 below. Please note that personal contact information has been redacted to protect personal privacy. Cal. Govt. Code Secs. 6254(c), California Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 1.
Regards,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of the Mayor
City and County of San Francisco

From: twitter.com/journo_anon

This is a 67.21(d) petition to determine in writing that all records requested in June 2020 from this email address to Office of Mayor are public and order them disclosed.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon

This is an immediate disclosure request for London Breed's copies in londonbreed@gmail.com (per https://twitter.com/LondonBreed/status/953517854061608960 ) or any other personal or government account of London Breed of the attached email.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon

This is an immediate disclosure request for exact PDF copies, with all attachments, images, formatting, hyperlink urls, To/From/Cc/Bcc email addresses of the emails previously improperly disclosed in (you must not hide quoted text nor forward emails - provide the original emails without any parts hidden - this will not constitute a copy otherwise):
https://beta.documentcloud.org/documents/20508936-anonymous_request_response_6520_redacted-1

From: twitter.com/journo_anon

Provide all emails as exact PDF copies, with To/From/Cc/Bcc email addresses, sender/recipient names, date/time stamps, text, formatting, image, audio, video, and attachments. Provide all attachment files in emails and all other non-email records as exact copies in their original electronic format.

1. This is an immediate disclosure request for all email, texts, instant message, chats, voicemails, recorded phone calls, recorded meetings, meeting notes, meeting minutes, agendas, and prep notes in the office of the mayor regarding either of the following interviews with Breed, on personal or government accounts:
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/06/01/a-window-onto-an-american-nightmare
https://www.newyorker.com/news/california-chronicles/what-the-san-francisco-bay-area-can-teach-us-about-fighting-a-pandemic

2. This is also an immediate disclosure request for all communications of any form with The New Yorker or its reporters/staff regarding those interviews, on personal or government accounts.

Files

pages

Close