Text and Chat Messages - Immediate Disclosure Request - San Francisco Universal Search (OEWD)

twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester filed this request with the Office of Economic and Workforce Development of San Francisco, CA.

It is a clone of this request.

Est. Completion None
Status
Fix Required

Communications

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

To Office of Economic and Workforce Development and its Department Head or Elected Official:

** DO NOT DESTROY ANY RESPONSIVE RECORDS. YOU MUST PRESERVE AND ORDER YOUR EMPLOYEES TO PRESERVE RECORDS DURING THE PENDENCY OF ALL APPEALS. WE WILL APPEAL ALL REDACTIONS OR WITHHOLDINGS. ** Immediate Disclosure Request.

Every department head/elected official must preserve and maintain all correspondence in a professional and businesslike manner (SFAC 67.29-7(a)) and also separately must comply with retention policies (SFAC 67.29-1). Note that if your retention policies do not retain text messages, I will argue before the SOTF and court that this is a failure to maintain **all correspondence** in a professional and businesslike manner.

Relevant precedent: SOTF 19098 - Anonymous v SFPD. Unanimous finding of violation for unlawfully withholding text message metadata (including the to/from/etc. - note SFPD had provided the dates and times, and you must as well), and also for unlawfully printing and scanning electronic records which does not constitute a "copy" of an electronic record.
See also prior rulings in my favor in SOTF 19044, 19047, 19091, 19098, 19103, and 19108 which ruled against the City for email, text messages, past and future calendar entries, meeting details, electronic metadata, and attachments.

The Mayor's Office appears to have destroyed their copies of certain text messages. I'd be happy to get them from her, if she preserved every record. Alas she did not, therefore we must now conduct a universal search of the City. You cannot refer me to another department unless you search and determine that you have no copies in your department. If this is causing more work for you, ask your Mayor to stop destroying her public records.

Note there are many anonymous requesters using MuckRock - I am just one of them. If you previously produced some subset of these records to a MuckRock email address, please reference that prior response so you do not duplicate work. If I am unable to get the prior MuckRock response because it is someone else's and they have marked it private, you will however need to provide me a copy here as well.

1. This is an immediate disclosure request for text, chat, or instant messages between the Department Head/Elected Official and either Sean Elsbernd, Andrea Bruss, London Breed, Harlan Kelly, Jr., Naomi Kelly, Hank Heckel, or Walter Wong, including all group messages, and all messages in threads, in any form and any app (including, but not limited to, SMS, MMS, text, iMessage, Teams, Discord, WeChat, QQ, Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp, Facebook, Facebook Messenger, Twitter, Instagram, Hangouts, Meet, Slack, Skype, Viber, Snapchat, Line, Kik, FaceTime, Wickr Me, Chatroulette, Threema, KakaoTalk, Duo, GroupMe, Wire, Voxer, Allo, Tango, Bumble, Grindr, Tinder, Olive, Taimi, but NOT including email), on any government accounts/devices or on personal accounts or devices regarding the conduct of public business, including all participant names, message text, images, attachments, dates, and times, including any in trash or deleted folders or similar (see Good Government Guide - if the records have not been permanently deleted as of the time you receive this request, you must retrieve them from the so-called trash folders and provide them). Provide rolling responses. Provide exact copies including all metadata. There is no limitation by subject or date. If the total pages to produce numbers over 500, inform me of the rough dates, employees involved, and subject matter, and I may be willing to narrow the initial production, AS LONG AS YOU PRESERVE ALL THE RECORDS.

2. This is a regular records request for text, chat, or instant messages between any non-department head/elected official (i.e. the other dept employees) and either Sean Elsbernd, Andrea Bruss, London Breed, Harlan Kelly, Jr., Naomi Kelly, Hank Heckel, or Walter Wong, including all group messages, and all messages in threads, in any form and any app (including, but not limited to, SMS, MMS, text, iMessage, Teams, Discord, WeChat, QQ, Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp, Facebook, Facebook Messenger, Twitter, Instagram, Hangouts, Meet, Slack, Skype, Viber, Snapchat, Line, Kik, FaceTime, Wickr Me, Chatroulette, Threema, KakaoTalk, Duo, GroupMe, Wire, Voxer, Allo, Tango, Bumble, Grindr, Tinder, Olive, Taimi, but NOT including email), on any government accounts/devices or on personal accounts or devices regarding the conduct of public business, including all participant names, message text, images, attachments, dates, and times, including any in trash or deleted folders or similar (see Good Government Guide - if the records have not been permanently deleted as of the time you receive this request, you must retrieve them from the so-called trash folders and provide them). Provide rolling responses. Provide exact copies including all metadata. There is no limitation by subject or date. If the total pages to produce numbers over 500, inform me of the rough dates, employees involved, and subject matter, and I may be willing to narrow the initial production, AS LONG AS YOU PRESERVE ALL THE RECORDS.

Please provide only those copies of records available without any fees. If you determine certain records would require fees, please instead provide the required notice of which of those records are available and non-exempt for inspection in-person if we so choose.

Your non-exhaustive obligations:
- All withholding of any information must be justified in writing by specific statutory authority (SFAC 67.27).
- Every redaction must be keyed by footnote or by other clear reference to the specific justification for that redaction, and only the minimal exempt portion of any record may be withheld (SFAC 67.26).
- You must respond to emailed requests (SFAC 67.21(b)).
- You must notify us of whether or not responsive records exist and/or were withheld for each above request (Gov Code 6253(c), 6255(b)).
- You must state the name and title of each person responsible for withholding any information (Gov Code 6253(d)).
- Do not impose any end-user restrictions upon me (Santa Clara Co. vs Superior Ct, 170 Cal.App 4th 1301); so if you use a third-party website to publish records, please make them completely public without any login or sign-in.

Your agency must do all of the above things in your response, and you cannot wait until we file complaints.

****** We have no duty to, and we will not again, remind the City of its obligations. Instead, we will file complaints for every Sunshine Ordinance or CPRA violation. We will continue to file complaints until the City's procedures are modified to fully comply with the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA, without caveat or exception. ******

I look forward to your lawful response.

NOTE: THE EMAIL ADDRESS SENDING THIS REQUEST IS A PUBLICLY-VIEWABLE MAILBOX. Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

This is a further immediate disclosure request for all communications between the person managing the Dec 5 2020 request in this thread and all dept staff either requesting or receiving or discussing responsive records in that request, including all attachments, and to/from/cc/bcc and sent dates produced directly as an exact PDF copy (the remaining metadata is not relevant at this moment). My goal is to find out who has been asked for records and who is giving the records and on what time frame this is occurring.

Note that the mere fact that an attorney is providing a record to someone else does not make that information attorney-client privileged or attorney work-product. And for all your non-attorneys you don't even have those citations.
Here's what DPW gave me for this kind of meta-request:

https://sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/20-4829

--Anonymous

From: Office of Economic and Workforce Development

Anonymous,

This is in response to the request below on behalf of OEWD. Due to the volume of material sent and the labor involved in capturing any responsive texts and chats, we propose limiting the time period of responsive documents to two weeks prior to the date of the request. This will allow us to focus the search and provide the responsive records sought from the entire staff of a large department in myriad platforms and without regard to subject matter.

Please also note that we are continuing our response to the request below for up to 14 additional days from the 10 day response date due to the need to consult with another department. See Cal. Gov. Code § 6253(c) and San Francisco Admin. Code § 67.25(b).

Regards,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of the Mayor
City and County of San Francisco

...

Office of Economic and Workforce Development
PRA Office
City Hall, Room 448
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, CA 94102

December 5, 2020

To Office of Economic and Workforce Development and its Department Head or Elected Official:

** DO NOT DESTROY ANY RESPONSIVE RECORDS. YOU MUST PRESERVE AND ORDER YOUR EMPLOYEES TO PRESERVE RECORDS DURING THE PENDENCY OF ALL APPEALS. WE WILL APPEAL ALL REDACTIONS OR WITHHOLDINGS. ** Immediate Disclosure Request.

Every department head/elected official must preserve and maintain all correspondence in a professional and businesslike manner (SFAC 67.29-7(a)) and also separately must comply with retention policies (SFAC 67.29-1). Note that if your retention policies do not retain text messages, I will argue before the SOTF and court that this is a failure to maintain **all correspondence** in a professional and businesslike manner.

Relevant precedent: SOTF 19098 - Anonymous v SFPD. Unanimous finding of violation for unlawfully withholding text message metadata (including the to/from/etc. - note SFPD had provided the dates and times, and you must as well), and also for unlawfully printing and scanning electronic records which does not constitute a "copy" of an electronic record.
See also prior rulings in my favor in SOTF 19044, 19047, 19091, 19098, 19103, and 19108 which ruled against the City for email, text messages, past and future calendar entries, meeting details, electronic metadata, and attachments.

The Mayor's Office appears to have destroyed their copies of certain text messages. I'd be happy to get them from her, if she preserved every record. Alas she did not, therefore we must now conduct a universal search of the City. You cannot refer me to another department unless you search and determine that you have no copies in your department. If this is causing more work for you, ask your Mayor to stop destroying her public records.

Note there are many anonymous requesters using MuckRock - I am just one of them. If you previously produced some subset of these records to a MuckRock email address, please reference that prior response so you do not duplicate work. If I am unable to get the prior MuckRock response because it is someone else's and they have marked it private, you will however need to provide me a copy here as well.

1. This is an immediate disclosure request for text, chat, or instant messages between the Department Head/Elected Official and either Sean Elsbernd, Andrea Bruss, London Breed, Harlan Kelly, Jr., Naomi Kelly, Hank Heckel, or Walter Wong, including all group messages, and all messages in threads, in any form and any app (including, but not limited to, SMS, MMS, text, iMessage, Teams, Discord, WeChat, QQ, Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp, Facebook, Facebook Messenger, Twitter, Instagram, Hangouts, Meet, Slack, Skype, Viber, Snapchat, Line, Kik, FaceTime, Wickr Me, Chatroulette, Threema, KakaoTalk, Duo, GroupMe, Wire, Voxer, Allo, Tango, Bumble, Grindr, Tinder, Olive, Taimi, but NOT including email), on any government accounts/devices or on personal accounts or devices regarding the conduct of public business, including all participant names, message text, images, attachments, dates, and times, including any in trash or deleted folders or similar (see Good Government Guide - if the records have not been permanently deleted as of the time you receive this request, you must retrieve them from the so-called trash folders and provide them). Provide rolling responses. Provide exact copies including all metadata. There is no limitation by subject or date. If the total pages to produce numbers over 500, inform me of the rough dates, employees involved, and subject matter, and I may be willing to narrow the initial production, AS LONG AS YOU PRESERVE ALL THE RECORDS.

2. This is a regular records request for text, chat, or instant messages between any non-department head/elected official (i.e. the other dept employees) and either Sean Elsbernd, Andrea Bruss, London Breed, Harlan Kelly, Jr., Naomi Kelly, Hank Heckel, or Walter Wong, including all group messages, and all messages in threads, in any form and any app (including, but not limited to, SMS, MMS, text, iMessage, Teams, Discord, WeChat, QQ, Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp, Facebook, Facebook Messenger, Twitter, Instagram, Hangouts, Meet, Slack, Skype, Viber, Snapchat, Line, Kik, FaceTime, Wickr Me, Chatroulette, Threema, KakaoTalk, Duo, GroupMe, Wire, Voxer, Allo, Tango, Bumble, Grindr, Tinder, Olive, Taimi, but NOT including email), on any government accounts/devices or on personal accounts or devices regarding the conduct of public business, including all participant names, message text, images, attachments, dates, and times, including any in trash or deleted folders or similar (see Good Government Guide - if the records have not been permanently deleted as of the time you receive this request, you must retrieve them from the so-called trash folders and provide them). Provide rolling responses. Provide exact copies including all metadata. There is no limitation by subject or date. If the total pages to produce numbers over 500, inform me of the rough dates, employees involved, and subject matter, and I may be willing to narrow the initial production, AS LONG AS YOU PRESERVE ALL THE RECORDS.

Please provide only those copies of records available without any fees. If you determine certain records would require fees, please instead provide the required notice of which of those records are available and non-exempt for inspection in-person if we so choose.

Your non-exhaustive obligations:
- All withholding of any information must be justified in writing by specific statutory authority (SFAC 67.27).
- Every redaction must be keyed by footnote or by other clear reference to the specific justification for that redaction, and only the minimal exempt portion of any record may be withheld (SFAC 67.26).
- You must respond to emailed requests (SFAC 67.21(b)).
- You must notify us of whether or not responsive records exist and/or were withheld for each above request (Gov Code 6253(c), 6255(b)).
- You must state the name and title of each person responsible for withholding any information (Gov Code 6253(d)).
- Do not impose any end-user restrictions upon me (Santa Clara Co. vs Superior Ct, 170 Cal.App 4th 1301); so if you use a third-party website to publish records, please make them completely public without any login or sign-in.

Your agency must do all of the above things in your response, and you cannot wait until we file complaints.

****** We have no duty to, and we will not again, remind the City of its obligations. Instead, we will file complaints for every Sunshine Ordinance or CPRA violation. We will continue to file complaints until the City's procedures are modified to fully comply with the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA, without caveat or exception. ******

I look forward to your lawful response.

NOTE: THE EMAIL ADDRESS SENDING THIS REQUEST IS A PUBLICLY-VIEWABLE MAILBOX. Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Filed via MuckRock.com
E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com<mailto:requests@muckrock.com>
Upload documents directly: https://avanan.url-protection.com/v1/url?o=https%3A//accounts.muckrock.com/accounts/login/%3Fnext%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.muckrock.com%252Faccounts%252Flogin%252F%253Fnext%253D%25252Faccounts%25252Fagency_login%25252Foffice-economic-and-workforce-development-14659%25252Ftext-and-chat-messages-immediate-disclosure-request-san-francisco-universal-search-oewd-105580%25252F%25253Femail%25253DMarianne.Thompson%25252540sfgov.org%26amp%3Burl_auth_token%3DAABAqrZ1rRoN-mRCL2ZUwPh3k7c%253A1kldDa%253AD3Vhepu56uVQezOsopGd3UjFz3g&g=Yjk1MTA4ZTQzNThmZjU5NA==&h=OTQyM2Q5YjFkMmY4OGZiZmE1NjY4YzcwYjRhYmFmNzlkYmNkOTlhMjFmMTM2NTA5ZDA1YmRmYmFkMGUzNmY4Yw==&p=YXAzOnNmZHQyOmF2YW5hbjpvZmZpY2UzNjVfZW1haWxzX2VtYWlsOjlmZTljN2ZjNGE5OWIyMTVjN2FmODgyZTA3ODQ5ZWY5OnYx
Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.

For mailed responses, please address (see note):
MuckRock News
DEPT MR 105580
411A Highland Ave
Somerville, MA 02144-2516

PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.
[http://email.requests.muckrock.com/o/eJwNyjsSwiAQANDTSMks6xJIQaHO2NnZO_ySMAlBwXh-qV7zgpFyYDHbtL1SMEKMUmliiyFwTgd0IRJpp_zoVJdg8rqDkSWDgCAQpBhREXLBAe56AH3BK5wHRbcTQY2fI7Zv4_nway1-5b5kVs3D1mT3PfLnUvK7lb3fNs3lx0ud_y8ILH0]

[cid:image001.png@01D6D31E.9BF71830]

From: Office of Economic and Workforce Development

On behalf of OEWD, please note that we are continuing our response to the request below for up to 14 additional days from the 10 day response date due to the need to consult with another department. See Cal. Gov. Code § 6253(c) and San Francisco Admin. Code § 67.25(b).

Regards,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of the Mayor
City and County of San Francisco

Office of Economic and Workforce Development
PRA Office
City Hall, Room 448
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, CA 94102

December 10, 2020

This is a follow up to a previous request:

This is a further immediate disclosure request for all communications between the person managing the Dec 5 2020 request in this thread and all dept staff either requesting or receiving or discussing responsive records in that request, including all attachments, and to/from/cc/bcc and sent dates produced directly as an exact PDF copy (the remaining metadata is not relevant at this moment). My goal is to find out who has been asked for records and who is giving the records and on what time frame this is occurring.

Note that the mere fact that an attorney is providing a record to someone else does not make that information attorney-client privileged or attorney work-product. And for all your non-attorneys you don't even have those citations.
Here's what DPW gave me for this kind of meta-request:

https://avanan.url-protection.com/v1/url?o=https%3A//sanfrancisco.nextrequest.com/requests/20-4829&g=MjhmZjAzYjdkMDBkNDlkNA==&h=MmU5NTU1MjM5MmEyNjZhZDA3MjEzY2MzNDJjOTIxM2FhODQxZDFlMjJkMTdmNmI5YjViNmM4YjUyYjYzNjc3ZQ==&p=YXAzOnNmZHQyOmF2YW5hbjpvZmZpY2UzNjVfZW1haWxzX2VtYWlsOmQ1MDJjZmJhY2YxYzVmNzg1OWFlZDQwNmZlMDA0MTJlOnYx

--Anonymous

Filed via MuckRock.com
E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com<mailto:requests@muckrock.com>
Upload documents directly: https://avanan.url-protection.com/v1/url?o=https%3A//accounts.muckrock.com/accounts/login/%3Fnext%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.muckrock.com%252Faccounts%252Flogin%252F%253Fnext%253D%25252Faccounts%25252Fagency_login%25252Foffice-economic-and-workforce-development-14659%25252Ftext-and-chat-messages-immediate-disclosure-request-san-francisco-universal-search-oewd-105580%25252F%25253Femail%25253DMarianne.Thompson%25252540sfgov.org%26amp%3Burl_auth_token%3DAABAqrZ1rRoN-mRCL2ZUwPh3k7c%253A1knEe0%253AiDHOFt1s3IWwfSc5fgOIFdgSp5c&g=NjliYTc3NTM3ODhhZjA3NQ==&h=N2QyODYxNGEwNjhmM2I1ZGE4MDBhZGM2ZDI4YjAwZmE0NzE5MDllYTI4NTgwN2JkMjdlMTUzNjdhYjY1NWMwOA==&p=YXAzOnNmZHQyOmF2YW5hbjpvZmZpY2UzNjVfZW1haWxzX2VtYWlsOmQ1MDJjZmJhY2YxYzVmNzg1OWFlZDQwNmZlMDA0MTJlOnYx
Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.

For mailed responses, please address (see note):
MuckRock News
DEPT MR 105580
411A Highland Ave
Somerville, MA 02144-2516

PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.

---

On Dec. 5, 2020:
Subject: California Public Records Act Request: Text and Chat Messages - Immediate Disclosure Request - San Francisco Universal Search (OEWD)
To Office of Economic and Workforce Development and its Department Head or Elected Official:

** DO NOT DESTROY ANY RESPONSIVE RECORDS. YOU MUST PRESERVE AND ORDER YOUR EMPLOYEES TO PRESERVE RECORDS DURING THE PENDENCY OF ALL APPEALS. WE WILL APPEAL ALL REDACTIONS OR WITHHOLDINGS. ** Immediate Disclosure Request.

Every department head/elected official must preserve and maintain all correspondence in a professional and businesslike manner (SFAC 67.29-7(a)) and also separately must comply with retention policies (SFAC 67.29-1). Note that if your retention policies do not retain text messages, I will argue before the SOTF and court that this is a failure to maintain **all correspondence** in a professional and businesslike manner.

Relevant precedent: SOTF 19098 - Anonymous v SFPD. Unanimous finding of violation for unlawfully withholding text message metadata (including the to/from/etc. - note SFPD had provided the dates and times, and you must as well), and also for unlawfully printing and scanning electronic records which does not constitute a "copy" of an electronic record.
See also prior rulings in my favor in SOTF 19044, 19047, 19091, 19098, 19103, and 19108 which ruled against the City for email, text messages, past and future calendar entries, meeting details, electronic metadata, and attachments.

The Mayor's Office appears to have destroyed their copies of certain text messages. I'd be happy to get them from her, if she preserved every record. Alas she did not, therefore we must now conduct a universal search of the City. You cannot refer me to another department unless you search and determine that you have no copies in your department. If this is causing more work for you, ask your Mayor to stop destroying her public records.

Note there are many anonymous requesters using MuckRock - I am just one of them. If you previously produced some subset of these records to a MuckRock email address, please reference that prior response so you do not duplicate work. If I am unable to get the prior MuckRock response because it is someone else's and they have marked it private, you will however need to provide me a copy here as well.

1. This is an immediate disclosure request for text, chat, or instant messages between the Department Head/Elected Official and either Sean Elsbernd, Andrea Bruss, London Breed, Harlan Kelly, Jr., Naomi Kelly, Hank Heckel, or Walter Wong, including all group messages, and all messages in threads, in any form and any app (including, but not limited to, SMS, MMS, text, iMessage, Teams, Discord, WeChat, QQ, Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp, Facebook, Facebook Messenger, Twitter, Instagram, Hangouts, Meet, Slack, Skype, Viber, Snapchat, Line, Kik, FaceTime, Wickr Me, Chatroulette, Threema, KakaoTalk, Duo, GroupMe, Wire, Voxer, Allo, Tango, Bumble, Grindr, Tinder, Olive, Taimi, but NOT including email), on any government accounts/devices or on personal accounts or devices regarding the conduct of public business, including all participant names, message text, images, attachments, dates, and times, including any in trash or deleted folders or similar (see Good Government Guide - if the records have not been permanently deleted as of the time you receive this request, you must retrieve them from the so-called trash folders and provide them). Provide rolling responses. Provide exact copies including all metadata. There is no limitation by subject or date. If the total pages to produce numbers over 500, inform me of the rough dates, employees involved, and subject matter, and I may be willing to narrow the initial production, AS LONG AS YOU PRESERVE ALL THE RECORDS.

2. This is a regular records request for text, chat, or instant messages between any non-department head/elected official (i.e. the other dept employees) and either Sean Elsbernd, Andrea Bruss, London Breed, Harlan Kelly, Jr., Naomi Kelly, Hank Heckel, or Walter Wong, including all group messages, and all messages in threads, in any form and any app (including, but not limited to, SMS, MMS, text, iMessage, Teams, Discord, WeChat, QQ, Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp, Facebook, Facebook Messenger, Twitter, Instagram, Hangouts, Meet, Slack, Skype, Viber, Snapchat, Line, Kik, FaceTime, Wickr Me, Chatroulette, Threema, KakaoTalk, Duo, GroupMe, Wire, Voxer, Allo, Tango, Bumble, Grindr, Tinder, Olive, Taimi, but NOT including email), on any government accounts/devices or on personal accounts or devices regarding the conduct of public business, including all participant names, message text, images, attachments, dates, and times, including any in trash or deleted folders or similar (see Good Government Guide - if the records have not been permanently deleted as of the time you receive this request, you must retrieve them from the so-called trash folders and provide them). Provide rolling responses. Provide exact copies including all metadata. There is no limitation by subject or date. If the total pages to produce numbers over 500, inform me of the rough dates, employees involved, and subject matter, and I may be willing to narrow the initial production, AS LONG AS YOU PRESERVE ALL THE RECORDS.

Please provide only those copies of records available without any fees. If you determine certain records would require fees, please instead provide the required notice of which of those records are available and non-exempt for inspection in-person if we so choose.

Your non-exhaustive obligations:
- All withholding of any information must be justified in writing by specific statutory authority (SFAC 67.27).
- Every redaction must be keyed by footnote or by other clear reference to the specific justification for that redaction, and only the minimal exempt portion of any record may be withheld (SFAC 67.26).
- You must respond to emailed requests (SFAC 67.21(b)).
- You must notify us of whether or not responsive records exist and/or were withheld for each above request (Gov Code 6253(c), 6255(b)).
- You must state the name and title of each person responsible for withholding any information (Gov Code 6253(d)).
- Do not impose any end-user restrictions upon me (Santa Clara Co. vs Superior Ct, 170 Cal.App 4th 1301); so if you use a third-party website to publish records, please make them completely public without any login or sign-in.

Your agency must do all of the above things in your response, and you cannot wait until we file complaints.

****** We have no duty to, and we will not again, remind the City of its obligations. Instead, we will file complaints for every Sunshine Ordinance or CPRA violation. We will continue to file complaints until the City's procedures are modified to fully comply with the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA, without caveat or exception. ******

I look forward to your lawful response.

NOTE: THE EMAIL ADDRESS SENDING THIS REQUEST IS A PUBLICLY-VIEWABLE MAILBOX. Please be certain you have properly redacted all of your responses. Once you send them to us, there is no going back. All of your responses (including all responsive records) may be instantly and automatically available to the public online via the MuckRock.com FOIA service used to issue this request (though the requester is an anonymous user, not a representative of MuckRock). Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be disclosable public records.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Filed via MuckRock.com
E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com<mailto:requests@muckrock.com>
Upload documents directly: https://avanan.url-protection.com/v1/url?o=https%3A//accounts.muckrock.com/accounts/login/%3Fnext%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.muckrock.com%252Faccounts%252Flogin%252F%253Fnext%253D%25252Faccounts%25252Fagency_login%25252Foffice-economic-and-workforce-development-14659%25252Ftext-and-chat-messages-immediate-disclosure-request-san-francisco-universal-search-oewd-105580%25252F%25253Femail%25253DMarianne.Thompson%25252540sfgov.org%26amp%3Burl_auth_token%3DAABAqrZ1rRoN-mRCL2ZUwPh3k7c%253A1knEe0%253AiDHOFt1s3IWwfSc5fgOIFdgSp5c&g=ZmE2MjUyYjAwOTFkYzczOQ==&h=YTUwYWU2OWNmZGEwYzI4ZjZjYjNiNjNhN2U2NWU5MTkzOGQ4ZjJiZmZmM2Q5NTg2ZDE3M2Y4ODMwYWY5ZDBiYw==&p=YXAzOnNmZHQyOmF2YW5hbjpvZmZpY2UzNjVfZW1haWxzX2VtYWlsOmQ1MDJjZmJhY2YxYzVmNzg1OWFlZDQwNmZlMDA0MTJlOnYx
Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.

For mailed responses, please address (see note):
MuckRock News
DEPT MR 105580
411A Highland Ave
Somerville, MA 02144-2516

PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.

Marianne Mazzucco Thompson
Office of Economic and Workforce Development
City Hall, Room 448
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, CA 94102
P: 415-554-6297
E: Marianne.Thompson@sfgov.org<mailto:Marianne.Thompson@sfgov.org>
[cid:image001.png@01D6D31E.03BFA820]<http://www.twitter.com/sfoewd> [cid:image002.png@01D6D31E.03BFA820] <http://www.facebook.com/sfoewd> [cid:image003.png@01D6D31E.03BFA820] <http://www.oewd.org/>

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Mr. Heckel:

Regarding your proposal:
I would not be willing to narrow in the way you have said, but I may be willing to narrow the production to be "messages sent or received the 21 days prior to and including Decmber 5, 2020 AND ALSO the oldest 5 messages without date limit in any responsive conversation" (which allows me to see the full range of communications with the persons in the Mayor's Office who apparently don't have all their records) - BUT first I would have to understand your position on some things.

1. Its unclear what authority you have over OEWD, given your role in the Office of the Mayor. Do you possess the authority to bind OEWD and to be responsible for OEWD's CPRA/Sunshine response?

2. Would the OEWD willing to provide a letter on official letterhead (signed by whoever has the authority to bind OEWD) to in fact retain all records responsive to my original requests (which has no date/time limit, and whether on government or personal property) of December 5th from this email address during the pendency of all appeals, complaints, etc. of the narrower response? To be clear: I could at any time later request you to provide those other records that are not within the narrower scope, and you would still have to do so.

3. What are the rough number of responsive records with no date limit and what is the rough number within the last two weeks? Have you done a search to know how many there are? I'm pretty sure DPW is a far larger department and they appear to be doing just fine in processing the full unlimited request.

--Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Supervisor of Records:

OEWD and Hank Heckel (who now apparently represents OEWD???) have refused to comply with the requests from this email address.
Under 67.21(d) please determine that some or all parts of the records requested are public.

Weird, right - other agencies are turning over their texts, but as soon as its related to the Mayor or Hank Heckel, everything gets slow walked to improve the political outcomes for the Mayor...

--Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Supervisor of Records:

OEWD and Hank Heckel (who now apparently represents OEWD???) have refused to comply with the requests from this email address.
Under 67.21(d) please determine that some or all parts of the records requested are public.

Weird, right - other agencies are turning over their texts, but as soon as its related to the Mayor or Hank Heckel, everything gets slow walked to improve the political outcomes for the Mayor...

--Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Oh and order them disclosed too, Mr. Herrera.

From:

Anonymous,

I am responding to this request on behalf of the Office of the Mayor and the Office of Economic and Workforce development and have been authorized to do so in order to assist OEWD with a challenging request during a time when staffing has been impacted by the response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are willing to follow your second terms below in exchange for the narrowing of the time limitation on this request as you have stated. Regarding your question to our office, we are facing roughly hundreds of records for the full time frame as opposed to tens for the narrowed one.
Regards,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of the Mayor
City and County of San Francisco

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Great, per those terms:
1. Provide a letter on official letterhead (signed by whoever has the authority to bind OEWD) to in fact retain all records responsive to my original requests (which has no date/time limit, and whether on government or personal property) of December 5th from this email address during the pendency of all appeals, complaints, etc. of the narrower response? (To be clear: I could at any time later request you to provide those other records that are not within the narrower scope, and you would still have to do so.)
2. IF and AFTER the letter is provided, you may temporarily narrow the scope to "messages sent or received the 21 days prior to and including Decmber 5, 2020 AND ALSO the oldest 5 messages without date limit in any responsive conversation" (which allows me to see the full range of communications with the persons in the Mayor's Office who apparently don't have all their records) .

From: Office of Economic and Workforce Development

Anonymous,

On behalf of the Office of the Mayor and the Office of Economic and Workforce Development, please see the attached correspondence in further response to this request and your proposal below.

Thank you,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of the Mayor
City and County of San Francisco

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Great - thanks.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

OEWD (not Mayor's Office): Your office recently received a request "All City comms with Mr. Kelly's yahoo accounts - immediate disclosure request".
Please provide all further responses on this email address.

All of your responses will be available to the public on MuckRock.com

Thank you,
Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

OEWD: Please provide as an immediate disclosure request all copies within your office of the emails attached, and all replies and forwards thereto, as exact PDF copies using PDFMaker with all email addresses, to , from, cc, bcc, attachments, date/time stamps.

City employees' attacks on the First Amendment to protect their actions from scrutiny will itself be scrutinized. It is also sad that you tried to use Trump's attacks on the First Amendment to invite the SOTF to suppress free speech. Fortunately you failed. There's no difference when your agency attacks transparency versus when the former President did. Fortunately at least one City employee, Ms. Boomer, seemed to understand.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

From: Office of Economic and Workforce Development

Anonymous,

On behalf of OEWD, please see the attached texts responsive to the Universal Search request below. Please note that certain material has been redacted to protect personal privacy as indicated. See Cal. Gov. Code § 6254(c), California Constitution, Art. I.
Regards,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of the Mayor
City and County of San Francisco

From: Office of Economic and Workforce Development

Anonymous,

On behalf of OEWD please see the attached responsive to your request below.
Regards,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of the Mayor
City and County of San Francisco

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

See attached 67.21(d) petition against OEWD.

  • 2021-03-1020Text20and20Chat20Messages20-20Immediate20Disclosure20Request20-20San20Fra.pdf

  • petition_20210310_OEWD201.pdf

From: Office of Economic and Workforce Development

Please see the attached response to your petition. Thank you.

Bradley Russi
Deputy City Attorney
Office of City Attorney David Chiu
City Hall, Room 234
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Pl., San Francisco, CA 94102
www.sfcityattorney.org

Files

pages

Close