DPA SB 1421 Police Misconduct Records - Immediate Disclosure Request and 67.21(c) request

twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester filed this request with the Department Of Police Accountability of San Francisco, CA.

It is a clone of this request.

Tracking #

0870-09

0068-01

Est. Completion Feb. 26, 2022
Status
Partially Completed
Tags

Communications

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Paul Henderson and DPA,

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com FOIA web service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Redact your responses correctly - once you send them to us there is no going back. Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be public records.**

This is a new Immediate Disclosure Request under the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance and the CPRA, made on November 27, 2019, to Paul Henderson as an individual custodian of public records and to the Department of Police Accountability as a public agency.

This is also an SFAC 67.21(c) request for statements of quantity, nature, existence, and form (even if content is exempt) of records responsive to each of 1 and 2 -- you must provide these statements within 7 days without any form extension.

All records must be provided in a rolling fashion (SFAC 67.25).  If you use a web portal, you must publish all records openly without login or terms and conditions; or you may provide records as attachments to emails.  You may not impose any conditions on me beyond than those of the CPRA (including any conditions that I must use a private entity's website which imposes terms and conditions).

A warning: every record you release to this publicly viewable email mailbox may become automatically visible to the public via the Muckrock.com FOIA service, and via other journalistic services that publish FOIA and public records documents for searching and indexing online. Please be absolutely certain you have correctly redacted all records prior to transmitting them to us, because there is no going back.

Please read carefully the exact wording of my request. Please follow the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA precisely as I am auditing your agency's public records regimen. As the City is aware, every violation of the Sunshine Ordinance or CPRA will be appealed immediately, including:
- any untimely or incomplete response, failure to provide records in a rolling fashion as soon as they are available, or failing to indicate whether you have responsive records or not for each request and whether you withheld any records for each request (SFAC 67.21, 67.25, Gov Code 6253(c)),
- withholding more than the minimum exempt portion of any record (SFAC 67.26),
- failure to justify with "clear reference" to an exemption statute or case law for each and every redaction or withholding, including any so-called 'metadata' (SFAC 67.26, 67.27),
- failure to provide "exact copies" of records (Gov Code 6253(b)),
- failure to provide the "electronic format in which [you] hold[] the information" (Gov Code 6253.9),
- failure to provide any "easily generated" format that we requested (SFAC 67.21(l)),
- refusing to provide the quantity of exempt records (SFAC 67.21(c)),
- unlawful use of the exemptions prohibited by SFAC 67.24, including but not limited to GC 6255, any public interest balancing test,
- redacting or withholding information whose exemption you have already waived by producing it to the public before (Gov Code 6254.5).

Please provide:

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: all responsive records DPA has already provided under SB 1421 to any other requestor. Since you should not redact more information for me than you have provided any other member of the public (Gov Code 6254.5), you should be able to immediately provide these.

2) REGULAR DISCLOSURE: every record retained, owned, prepared, or used by DPA of: all records of officer's discharge of a firearm at a person, all records of an officer's use of force that results in death or great bodily injury, sustained findings of officer's sexual assault of a member of the public, sustained findings of officer's dishonesty that are disclosable under DB 1421. This is of course a very large request, and you may provide rolling responses. You stated in a letter (https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/default/files/sotf_120419_item12.pdf, page 12) that others have made similar expansive requests and I expect you to treat me with no less priority than anyone else. Please note, I expect you to redact these records in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance - and you must justify each and every redaction or withholding with a clear reference, such as a footnote (SFAC 67.26), to a statute or case law (SFAC 67.27). If you provide only a general list of justifications, I will appeal, and you will eventually have to do all of the redaction work again as other City agencies have had to do. (For example, consider the functionality of Adobe Acrobat that allows you to put a redaction code in every redaction.) Please do not destroy any records during the pendency of my request or appeals. All records must be provided in their original electronic record, or .EML/.MSG formats, and with all metadata and headers. Please perform record production correctly the first time, as appeals and Orders from Court, SOTF, or Sup. of Records, will be quite time-consuming to have to re do.

For the sake of building a good record for any appeals I would ask that you issue formal letters detailing your expected timelines and a notice if you would like to negotiate any part of this request, if you need to.

Please provide only those copies of records available without any fees. If you determine certain records would require fees, please instead provide the required notice of which of those records are available and non-exempt for inspection in-person if we so choose.

I look forward to your immediate disclosure.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Paul Henderson and DPA,

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com FOIA web service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Redact your responses correctly - once you send them to us there is no going back. Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be public records.**

This is a new Immediate Disclosure Request under the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance and the CPRA, made on November 27, 2019, to Paul Henderson as an individual custodian of public records and to the Department of Police Accountability as a public agency.

This is also an SFAC 67.21(c) request for statements of quantity, nature, existence, and form (even if content is exempt) of records responsive to each of 1 and 2 -- you must provide these statements within 7 days without any form extension.

All records must be provided in a rolling fashion (SFAC 67.25). If you use a web portal, you must publish all records openly without login or terms and conditions; or you may provide records as attachments to emails. You may not impose any conditions on me beyond than those of the CPRA (including any conditions that I must use a private entity's website which imposes terms and conditions).

A warning: every record you release to this publicly viewable email mailbox may become automatically visible to the public via the Muckrock.com FOIA service, and via other journalistic services that publish FOIA and public records documents for searching and indexing online. Please be absolutely certain you have correctly redacted all records prior to transmitting them to us, because there is no going back.

Please read carefully the exact wording of my request. Please follow the Sunshine Ordinance and CPRA precisely as I am auditing your agency's public records regimen. As the City is aware, every violation of the Sunshine Ordinance or CPRA will be appealed immediately, including:
- any untimely or incomplete response, failure to provide records in a rolling fashion as soon as they are available, or failing to indicate whether you have responsive records or not for each request and whether you withheld any records for each request (SFAC 67.21, 67.25, Gov Code 6253(c)),
- withholding more than the minimum exempt portion of any record (SFAC 67.26),
- failure to justify with "clear reference" to an exemption statute or case law for each and every redaction or withholding, including any so-called 'metadata' (SFAC 67.26, 67.27),
- failure to provide "exact copies" of records (Gov Code 6253(b)),
- failure to provide the "electronic format in which [you] hold[] the information" (Gov Code 6253.9),
- failure to provide any "easily generated" format that we requested (SFAC 67.21(l)),
- refusing to provide the quantity of exempt records (SFAC 67.21(c)),
- unlawful use of the exemptions prohibited by SFAC 67.24, including but not limited to GC 6255, any public interest balancing test,
- redacting or withholding information whose exemption you have already waived by producing it to the public before (Gov Code 6254.5).

Please provide:

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: all responsive records DPA has already provided under SB 1421 to any other requestor. Since you should not redact more information for me than you have provided any other member of the public (Gov Code 6254.5), you should be able to immediately provide these.

2) REGULAR DISCLOSURE: every record retained, owned, prepared, or used by DPA of: all records of officer's discharge of a firearm at a person, all records of an officer's use of force that results in death or great bodily injury, sustained findings of officer's sexual assault of a member of the public, sustained findings of officer's dishonesty that are disclosable under DB 1421. This is of course a very large request, and you may provide rolling responses. You stated in a letter (https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/default/files/sotf_120419_item12.pdf, page 12) that others have made similar expansive requests and I expect you to treat me with no less priority than anyone else. Please note, I expect you to redact these records in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance - and you must justify each and every redaction or withholding with a clear reference, such as a footnote (SFAC 67.26), to a statute or case law (SFAC 67.27). If you provide only a general list of justifications, I will appeal, and you will eventually have to do all of the redaction work again as other City agencies have had to do. (For example, consider the functionality of Adobe Acrobat that allows you to put a redaction code in every redaction.) Please do not destroy any records during the pendency of my request or appeals. All records must be provided in their original electronic record, or .EML/.MSG formats, and with all metadata and headers. Please perform record production correctly the first time, as appeals and Orders from Court, SOTF, or Sup. of Records, will be quite time-consuming to have to re do.

For the sake of building a good record for any appeals I would ask that you issue formal letters detailing your expected timelines and a notice if you would like to negotiate any part of this request, if you need to.

Please provide only those copies of records available without any fees. If you determine certain records would require fees, please instead provide the required notice of which of those records are available and non-exempt for inspection in-person if we so choose.

I look forward to your immediate disclosure.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requestor,

We received your emailed request, dated November 28, 2019, for immediate disclosure of the following records:

1) IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE: all responsive records DPA has already provided under SB 1421 to any other requestor. Since you should not redact more information for me than you have provided any other member of the public (Gov Code 6254.5), you should be able to immediately provide these.
2) REGULAR DISCLOSURE: every record retained, owned, prepared, or used by DPA of: all records of officer's discharge of a firearm at a person, all records of an officer's use of force that results in death or great bodily injury, sustained findings of officer's sexual assault of a member of the public, sustained findings of officer's dishonesty that are disclosable under DB 1421. This is of course a very large request, and you may provide rolling responses. You stated in a letter (https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/default/files/sotf_120419_item12.pdf, page 12) that others have made similar expansive requests and I expect you to treat me with no less priority than anyone else. Please note, I expect you to redact these records in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance - and you must justify each and every redaction or withholding with a clear reference, such as a footnote (SFAC 67.26), to a statute or case law (SFAC 67.27). If you provide only a general list of justifications, I will appeal, and you will eventually have to do all of the redaction work again as other City agencies have had to do. (For example, consider the functionality of Adobe Acrobat that allows you to put a redaction code in every redaction.) Please do not destroy any records during the pendency of my request or appeals. All records must be provided in their original electronic record, or .EML/.MSG formats, and with all metadata and headers. Please perform record production correctly the first time, as appeals and Orders from Court, SOTF, or Sup. of Records, will be quite time-consuming to have to re do.

We cannot treat this as an immediate disclosure request because it is not, "simple, routine, or otherwise readily answerable request." Admin. Code 67.25(a). Rather, it is extensive, demanding, and voluminous. Thus, the maximum deadlines under the Public Records Act and the Sunshine Ordinance for responding to a request apply. Admin. Code § 67.25(a).

Diana Rosenstein
Attorney
[dpa]
(T) 415-241-7750
(F) 415-241-7733
http://sfgov.org/dpa/

This communication, along with any attachments, is covered by federal and state laws governing electronic communications and may contain confidential and legally provided information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, use, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply immediately to the sender and/or delete this message. Thank you.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com FOIA web service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Redact your responses correctly - once you send them to us there is no going back. Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be public records.**

Please do not forget the SFAC 67.21(c) statement due Dec. 7.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

I apologize - its due Dec. 9.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requestor,

We received your November 28, 2019 Immediate Disclosure and Public Records Act request on December 2, 2019. We responded to your request on that same day, rejecting your request for immediate disclosure in light of the circumstances. However, we are prepared to provide you with all disclosable records responsive to your request for, “all responsive records DPA has already provided under SB 1421 to any other requestor.” We are using the electronic link you provided to upload all responsive documents. We will provide you with information early next week regarding compliance with the rest of your request.

Warning An exclamation point.

There are too many files to display on this communication. See all files

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requestor,

We received your November 28, 2019 Immediate Disclosure and Public Records Act request on December 2, 2019. We responded to your request on that same day, rejecting your request for immediate disclosure in light of the circumstances. However, we are prepared to provide you with all disclosable records responsive to your request for, "all responsive records DPA has already provided under SB 1421 to any other requestor." We are using the electronic link you provided to upload all responsive documents. We will provide you with information early next week regarding compliance with the rest of your request.

Mary Polk for Attorney Diana Rosenstein
Senior Clerk
[1517861123573_PastedImage]
T: 415.241.7711 | F: 415.241.7733
http://sfgov.org/dpa/

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

DPA,

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com FOIA web service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Redact your responses correctly - once you send them to us there is no going back. Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be public records.**

Thank you very much. On Dec. 3, you published online the 24 records listed below on MuckRock's FOIA service.
It appears the records marked with asterisks appear to be duplicates. Were there other records you intended to publish instead of the duplicates?

https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/0081-1920-20File20220of203.pdf *
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/0081-1920-20File20320of203.pdf *
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/0081-1920-20File20220of203_JXYHXR2.pdf *
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/0081-1920-20File20320of203_PJvoFm3.pdf *

https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/0013-0520-20Prepared20for20Production.pdf
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/0179-1420-20Production20Ready20-207.1.201920-20Final.pdf
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/0881-9820-20Prepared20for20Production.pdf
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/FINAL20Redacted20-200188-16.pdf
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/FINAL20Redacted20Bates20Stamped20for20Disclosure200500-98.pdf
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/Lopez20-200134-1520-20Final20Production.pdf
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/Prepared20for20Production20-200006-07.pdf
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/Prepared20for20Production20-200068-06.pdf
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/Prepared20for20Production20-200126-05.pdf
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/Prepared20for20Production20-20184-04.pdf
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/REDACTED20-200503-0520SWW.pdf
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/Duarte20ACLU20production20-20Part205.pdf
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/Duarte20ACLU20production20-20pdf20220of204.pdf
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/Duarte20ACLU20production20-20pdf20320of204.pdf
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/Duarte20ACLU20production20-20pdf20420of204.pdf
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/Gongora20-200164-1620-20Final20Production20-207.1.2019.pdf
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/Gongora20-200164-1620Third20Production20-2011.27.2019.pdf
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/Gongora20Redacted20OIS20-200164-1620-20Sustained20Report20and20Exhibits.pdf
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/0081-1920-20File20120of203.pdf
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/Duarte20ACLU20production20-20pdf20120of204.pdf

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: Department Of Police Accountability

No.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Please see the attached file disclosed in the GBI category.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Please see the attached file disclosed in the GBI category.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Hi,

You published two responses today. Only one had a file. Is that just a duplicate again?

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Yes.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requestor,

Please direct all further correspondence regarding the above-referenced request to the undersigned.

On November 28, 2019, you made two requests. The request for documents under the Immediate Disclosure category have previously been provided to you. This will address the remainder of your request for, "every record retained, owned, prepared, or used by DPA of: all records of officer's discharge of a firearm at a person, all records of an officer's use of force that results in death or great bodily injury, sustained findings of officer's sexual assault of a member of the public, sustained findings of officer's dishonesty that are disclosable under DB 1421."

DPA will, of course, respond to your request in compliance with the law. But, as explained below, we will face time constraints in doing so.

Prior to January 1. 2019, California Penal Code Section 832.7 protected from public disclosure peace officer personnel records and the information in those records subject to certain narrow exceptions. But on September 30, 2018, Governor Brown signed into law SB 1421, which, effective January 1, 2019, amended Section 832.7 to create additional exceptions to the confidentiality for peace officer personnel records, thus making available to the public a broad range of records that previously could not be disclosed. These new exceptions relate to specific incidents or determinations, allowing for the public release of:

* the report, investigation, or findings regarding an officer's discharge of a firearm at a person;
* the report, investigation, or findings regarding an officer's use of force that results in death or great bodily injury;
* a sustained finding that an officer engaged in sexual assault involving a member of the public; and
* a sustained finding that an officer was dishonest directly relating to the reporting, investigation, or prosecution of a crime, or directly relating to the reporting of, or investigation of misconduct by, another officer. (See Penal Code § 832.7(b)(1)(A)-(C).)

Unfortunately, DPA has not maintained personnel records according to the above listed categories. Rather, DPA has maintained records under the names of individual
officers. This makes our search for records responsive to your request exceedingly time-consuming, as we must manually look through the personnel file of every officer
covered by your request to determine if it contains responsive records. And, in reviewing a responsive record covered by SB 1421, we must be careful to redact information
that may be confidential for other reasons, before releasing the record. You have requested all records in our possession. This includes officers that have retired or separated
from the SFPD. Our records go back to 1982. Therefore, your request requires us to review thousands of files.

Complicating this problem is that DPA has received a number of requests for previously confidential peace officer records made public as a result of the passage of SB 1421.
Despite our best efforts to respond promptly, a backlog has quickly developed and will remain for some time.

DPA must balance its duty to respond to public records requests with its duty to perform the broad range of tasks performed by DPA personnel that result in keeping the
peace and maintaining safety in our communities. Responding to your request will be quite burdensome and time-consuming, especially when coupled with our duty also to
respond to like public records requests from others. DPA will not be able to respond within the customary time frame without unreasonably impinging on its ability to perform
its other duties.

It is in this rare circumstance that we find it necessary to invoke a rule of reason to guide the timing of our response to your public records request. As the City Attorney has
stated on pages 97-98 of the Good Government Guide, which is available on the City Attorney's website, the law recognizes that when there is a conflict between a
department's performance of its wide range of duties, and its responsibilities under public records laws, reason demands flexibility in the timing of responses to requests.
Under this rule and given DPA's other public obligations, we will not be able to devote an unlimited amount of staff time to your request and like requests. Nevertheless we
intend to provide a complete response to your request, but it will take longer than ordinarily is the case.

Over time, we expect this backlog problem to recede, and expect to be able to move more quickly on requests such as yours, particularly if the records being sought have
already been reviewed in order to respond to an earlier request. But we are not there yet. For now, we intend to provide records in response to your request, and other like
requests, on a rolling basis. We will be providing you with periodic updates

You have the option to narrow your request, for example, confining it to a particular officer or small number of officers, which might allow us to complete our response to your
request sooner. However, we do not suggest you should forgo your rights to obtain the full range of records to which you are entitled under SB 1421.

In addition, you have the option to tell us which records you have sought that are your highest priority. In that event, we would do what we reasonably could to honor your
preferences, in sequencing our provision of responsive records to you.

Please let me know if you have any questions pertaining to this letter, or any suggestions you might have that could expedite our response to your request.

Thank you,

Diana Rosenstein
Attorney
[dpa]
(T) 415-241-7750
(F) 415-241-7733
http://sfgov.org/dpa/

This communication, along with any attachments, is covered by federal and state laws governing electronic communications and may contain confidential and legally provided information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, use, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply immediately to the sender and/or delete this message. Thank you.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Thanks, Diana. I will respond substantiatively to your letter later on, but just for our information, is diana.rosenstein@sfgov.org the email address to be used for ALL records requests to DPA, or just this one? I am asking because I want to make sure all IDRs, including about your executive director, will get timely response even if sent to diana.rosenstein@sfgov.org . Also note that when your email comes from other addresses (like the Legal Team mailing list), we just naturally reply to the email address that sent the response.

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com FOIA web service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Redact your responses correctly - once you send them to us there is no going back. Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be public records.*

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requestor,

Please direct all record requests related to SB 1421 to me. Please be so kind as to carbon copy (cc) me on all other requests and if they don’t go to me, I will do my best to make sure they are assigned to someone who can respond.

Thank you,

Diana Rosenstein
Attorney
[dpa]
(T) 415-241-7750
(F) 415-241-7733
http://sfgov.org/dpa/

This communication, along with any attachments, is covered by federal and state laws governing electronic communications and may contain confidential and legally provided information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, use, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply immediately to the sender and/or delete this message. Thank you.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Please see the attached file disclosed in the GBI category.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Diana,

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com FOIA web service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Redact your responses correctly - once you send them to us there is no going back. Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be public records.*

You will receive a letter response from another email address shortly. Please continue to keep your disclosed records on this email address.

Thanks,
Anonymous

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Please see the attached file disclosed in the GBI category.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Please see the attached transcripts that accompany the file disclosed on December 9, 2019 in the GBI category.

  • Prepared20for20Production20-200040-1520-20Transcripts.pdf

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Supervisor of Records,

Please see the attached 67.21(d) petition against DPA.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Please see the two attachments.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Supervisor of Records,

Please see the attached NEW 67.21(d) petition against DPA.
This is an additional, distinct petition re: different records than our past DPA petition and does not replace those petitions.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

DPA,

On Dec. 9 you asked if I would like to prioritize or narrow this request. This applies only to the request made Nov 28 from this email address. I will not narrow my request, but I would like to prioritize the records as follows (highest priority on top):
1. Any sustained unnecessary force (UF) findings, resulting in death or great bodily injury
2. Sustained findings of sexual assault
3. Any sustained unnecessary force (UF) findings, related to firearm discharge
4. Sustained findings of dishonesty
5. All remaining requested records (i.e. unsustained death/GBI/firearm discharges)

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com FOIA web service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Redact your responses correctly - once you send them to us there is no going back. Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be public records.*

Thanks,
Anonymous

From: Department Of Police Accountability

I am away from my desk from my desk from December 20, 2019 to January 6, 2020. I will respond to your emails when I return. If you need immediate assistance, please contact the front desk at (415)241-7711

Thank you,

Diana Rosenstein

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

DPA,

On Dec. 9 you asked if I would like to prioritize or narrow this request. This applies only to the request made Nov 28 from this email address. I will not narrow my request, but I would like to prioritize the records as follows (highest priority on top):
1. Any sustained unnecessary force (UF) findings, resulting in death or great bodily injury
2. Sustained findings of sexual assault
3. Any sustained unnecessary force (UF) findings, related to firearm discharge
4. Sustained findings of dishonesty
5. All remaining requested records (i.e. unsustained death/GBI/firearm discharges)

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com FOIA web service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Redact your responses correctly - once you send them to us there is no going back. Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be public records.*

Thanks,
Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

SOTF,

Please file a new attached complaint, provide a file number and CC me on response. NOTE: SOTF has not heard 19127 Anonymous vs DPA, et al. for merit yet, therefore, if you have the power, I'd ask that SOTF combine (NOT replace) this complaint into SOTF 19127 for efficiency. DPA would still need an opportunity to respond to the new violations in this complaint.

Complainant: Anonymous ( requests@muckrock.com )
Respondents: Dept of Police Accountability, Paul Henderson, Diana Rosenstein, Stephanie Wargo-Wilson, Mary Polk
Allegations: failed to respond to a records request in a timely or complete manner, failed to assist in a timely or complete manner, failed to cite lawful justifications for exemption, failed to key redactions by footnotes or other clear references to justifications, and failed to withhold the minimal portion of records
Sections: SFAC 67.21, 67.24, 67.26, 67.27

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com FOIA web service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Redact your responses correctly - once you send them to us there is no going back. Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be public records.*

Thanks,
Anonymous

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Good Afternoon:

The Department of Police Accountability has been named as a Respondent in the attached complaint filed with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force. Please respond to the following complaint/request within five business days.

The Respondent is required to submit a written response to the allegations including any and all supporting documents, recordings, electronic media, etc., to the Task Force within five (5) business days of receipt of this notice. This is your opportunity to provide a full explanation to allow the Task Force to be fully informed in considering your response prior its meeting.

Please include the following information in your response if applicable:

1. List all relevant records with descriptions that have been provided pursuant to the Complainant request.
2. Date the relevant records were provided to the Complainant.
3. Description of the method used, along with any relevant search terms used, to search for the relevant records.
4. Statement/declaration that all relevant documents have been provided, does not exist, or has been excluded.
5. Copy of the original request for records (if applicable).

Please refer to the File Number when submitting any new information and/or supporting documents pertaining to this complaint.

The Complainant alleges:

Complaint Attached.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Good Afternoon:

Notice is hereby given that the Compliance and Amendments Committee of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force shall hold hearings on complaints listed below to determine if the Task Force has jurisdiction pursuant to Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21(e). A hearing to review the merits of the complaint will be scheduled on a future date.

The Complainant and Respondent are NOT REQUIRED to attend the January 28, 2020, Committee meeting but may attend to provide testimony related to the above listed determinations only.

Date: January 28, 2020

Location: City Hall, Room 408

Time: 4:30 p.m.

Complaints:

File No. 19091: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Mayor London Breed, the Office of the Mayor, Hank Heckel, Sean Elsbernd, Andres Power, Andrea Bruss, Marjon Philhour, Jeff Cretan, Sophia Kittler for allegedly violating Administrative Code, (Sunshine Ordinance) Sections 67.21, 67.26, 67.27 and 67.29-7, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19094: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Linda Gerull and the Department of Technology for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.25, 67.26 and 67.27 by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19097: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Public Works for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.26 and 67.27, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19109: Complaint filed by Stephen Malloy against Dept. of Public Health for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.24, 67.25, 67.26 and 67.27 by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19110: Complaint filed by Stephen Malloy against the Fire Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.24, 67.25, 67.26 and 67.27 by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19117: Complaint filed by Conrad Wu against the Public Utilities Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code, (Sunshine Ordinance) Sections 67.25 by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19118: Complaint filed by Paul Ondik against the Police Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(b), by failing to respond to a records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19119: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the Department of Technology for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(b), 67.26 and 67.27 by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19120: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the Office of the City Attorney for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(b)(c), 67.26, 67.27, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner; failing to justify withholding of records and failing to provide assistance.

File No. 19121: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the Police Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(b)(k), 67.26 and 67.27, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner; withholding more than the minimum and failing to justify withholding.

File No. 19122: Complaint filed by Anonymous against City Librarian Michael Lambert and the Public Library for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19123: Complaint filed by Paul Kniha against the San Francisco Municipal Executive Association for allegedly violating Administrative Code, (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19125: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the Controller's Office for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(b)(c)(k), 67.26, 67.27, by failing to respond to a request for records in a timely and/or complete manner, failing to assist, withheld more than the minimally exempt portion of a public record, failing to justify withholdings with clear reference to exemption statute or case law and failing to provide an exact copy of records.

File No. 19126: Complaint filed by Ann Treboux against the San Francisco Arts Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19128: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Chief William Scott, Sgt. Brian Rodriguez, Michael Andraychak and the Police Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.25, 67.26, 67.27 and 67.29-7(a), by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19130: Complaint filed by Stephen Malloy against Chesa Boudin and the District Attorney's Office for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19131: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Jose Cisneros, Theresa Buckley and the Treasurer's Office for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.24, 67.26, 67.27, by failing to respond to a request for records in a timely and/or complete manner, failing to assist, withheld more than the minimally exempt portion of a public record.

File No. 19132: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Mary Ellen Carroll and the Department of Emergency Management for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 and 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19133: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Tom Maguire and the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 and 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19134: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Rob Reiter and City Hall Building Management for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 and 67.25 by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19135: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Vicki Hennessy and the Sheriff's Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 and 67.25 by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19136: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Naomi Kelly and the Office of the City Administrator for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 and 67.25 by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19137: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Thomas P. Campbell and the Fine Arts Museum for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.25 and 67.34 by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19138: Complaint filed by Stephen Malloy against the University of California, Regents of the University of California, for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19139: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Jeanne Buick, Henry Voong and the Department of Human Resources for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.24, 67.26 and 67.27(a), by withholding public records.

File No. 19140: Complaint filed by Stephen Malloy against the Department of Human Resources for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21and 67.25, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19141: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Chief William Scott and the Police Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 and 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19143: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Sheriff Vicki Hennessy, James Wilson and the Sheriff's Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.24, 67.25 and 67.27, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19144: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the Department of Police Accountability for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections, 67.21, 67.24, 67.26 and 67.27, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19145: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the Police Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.5 and 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19146: Complaint filed by Anonymous against City Librarian Michael Lambert and the Public Library for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

The agenda and packet material for the meeting is available online at the following link:

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Good Afternoon:

Notice is hereby given that the Compliance and Amendments Committee of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force shall hold hearings on complaints listed below to determine if the Task Force has jurisdiction pursuant to Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21(e). A hearing to review the merits of the complaint will be scheduled on a future date.

The Complainant and Respondent are NOT REQUIRED to attend the January 28, 2020, Committee meeting but may attend to provide testimony related to the above listed determinations only.

Date: January 28, 2020

Location: City Hall, Room 408

Time: 4:30 p.m.

Complaints:

File No. 19091: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Mayor London Breed, the Office of the Mayor, Hank Heckel, Sean Elsbernd, Andres Power, Andrea Bruss, Marjon Philhour, Jeff Cretan, Sophia Kittler for allegedly violating Administrative Code, (Sunshine Ordinance) Sections 67.21, 67.26, 67.27 and 67.29-7, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19094: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Linda Gerull and the Department of Technology for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.25, 67.26 and 67.27 by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19097: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Public Works for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.26 and 67.27, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19109: Complaint filed by Stephen Malloy against Dept. of Public Health for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.24, 67.25, 67.26 and 67.27 by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19110: Complaint filed by Stephen Malloy against the Fire Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.24, 67.25, 67.26 and 67.27 by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19117: Complaint filed by Conrad Wu against the Public Utilities Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code, (Sunshine Ordinance) Sections 67.25 by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19118: Complaint filed by Paul Ondik against the Police Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(b), by failing to respond to a records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19119: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the Department of Technology for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(b), 67.26 and 67.27 by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19120: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the Office of the City Attorney for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(b)(c), 67.26, 67.27, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner; failing to justify withholding of records and failing to provide assistance.

File No. 19121: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the Police Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(b)(k), 67.26 and 67.27, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner; withholding more than the minimum and failing to justify withholding.

File No. 19122: Complaint filed by Anonymous against City Librarian Michael Lambert and the Public Library for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19123: Complaint filed by Paul Kniha against the San Francisco Municipal Executive Association for allegedly violating Administrative Code, (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19125: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the Controller's Office for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(b)(c)(k), 67.26, 67.27, by failing to respond to a request for records in a timely and/or complete manner, failing to assist, withheld more than the minimally exempt portion of a public record, failing to justify withholdings with clear reference to exemption statute or case law and failing to provide an exact copy of records.

File No. 19126: Complaint filed by Ann Treboux against the San Francisco Arts Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19128: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Chief William Scott, Sgt. Brian Rodriguez, Michael Andraychak and the Police Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.25, 67.26, 67.27 and 67.29-7(a), by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19130: Complaint filed by Stephen Malloy against Chesa Boudin and the District Attorney's Office for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19131: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Jose Cisneros, Theresa Buckley and the Treasurer's Office for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.24, 67.26, 67.27, by failing to respond to a request for records in a timely and/or complete manner, failing to assist, withheld more than the minimally exempt portion of a public record.

File No. 19132: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Mary Ellen Carroll and the Department of Emergency Management for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 and 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19133: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Tom Maguire and the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 and 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19134: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Rob Reiter and City Hall Building Management for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 and 67.25 by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19135: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Vicki Hennessy and the Sheriff's Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 and 67.25 by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19136: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Naomi Kelly and the Office of the City Administrator for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 and 67.25 by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19137: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Thomas P. Campbell and the Fine Arts Museum for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.25 and 67.34 by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19138: Complaint filed by Stephen Malloy against the University of California, Regents of the University of California, for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19139: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Jeanne Buick, Henry Voong and the Department of Human Resources for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.24, 67.26 and 67.27(a), by withholding public records.

File No. 19140: Complaint filed by Stephen Malloy against the Department of Human Resources for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21and 67.25, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19141: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Chief William Scott and the Police Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 and 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19143: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Sheriff Vicki Hennessy, James Wilson and the Sheriff's Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.24, 67.25 and 67.27, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19144: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the Department of Police Accountability for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections, 67.21, 67.24, 67.26 and 67.27, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19145: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the Police Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.5 and 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19146: Complaint filed by Anonymous against City Librarian Michael Lambert and the Public Library for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

The agenda and packet material for the meeting is available online at the following link:

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Anonymous:

I just received the response below plus attachments.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From:

Please see the attached response to your petition.

Bradley Russi
Deputy City Attorney
Office of City Attorney Dennis Herrera
City Hall, Room 234
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Pl., San Francisco, CA 94102
www.sfcityattorney.org

From:

Please see the attached response to your petition.

Bradley Russi
Deputy City Attorney
Office of City Attorney Dennis Herrera
City Hall, Room 234
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Pl., San Francisco, CA 94102
www.sfcityattorney.org

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

DPA:

The following reply and presentation was filed in this complaint 19144.

I would also like to remind you that a pending SOTF complaint in no way suspends or tolls your requirement to continue providing records, in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance, pursuant to this request. If DPA stops providing me SB 1421 records because I filed a complaint, then a willful and intentional violation complaint will be filed as well.

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com FOIA web service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Redact your responses correctly - once you send them to us there is no going back. Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be public records.*

Sincerely,

Anonymous

From: Department Of Police Accountability

I am away from my desk from my desk from January 23, 2020 to January 27, 2020. I will respond to your emails when I return. If you need immediate assistance, please contact the front desk at (415)241-7711

Thank you,

Diana Rosenstein

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Paul Henderson and DPA,

This is an immediate disclosure request for the currently effective policies, memos, directives, and orders regarding your SB 1421 record production and redaction process.

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com FOIA web service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Redact your responses correctly - once you send them to us there is no going back. Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be public records.*

Sincerely,

Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Supervisor of Records Herrera,

Thank you for your response. First, it should not be your responsibility to justify these redactions or full withholdings. There's nothing you can do about that, but we shall proceed against DPA at SOTF for the underlying violations of SFAC 67.26 and 67.27 itself.

Below is a further SFAC 67.21(d) petition regarding these same two cases 168-01 and 441-12, please deem all of the following redactions or withholdings public and order them immediately disclosed:
1. All redactions citing PC 832.7(b) as an exemption are unlawful. 832.7(b) is not an exemption from disclosure. It is an exception to the generic exemption in PC 832.7(a) and other laws; and thus it demands disclosure. Also, 832.7(b)(5) has 4 different provisions for redactions, it is not just one.
2. Redactions 2.i, 2.m, 2.p and all other Gov Code 6254(k)/EC 1040 redactions are unlawful. PC 832.7(b)(5) specifically states (emphasis mine) "An agency shall redact a record disclosed pursuant to this section **only** for any of the following purposes: [4 types]". No SB 1421 record can be redacted for any other reason other than PC 832.7(b)(5)(A,B,C,D) (and, outside of SF, PC 832.7(b)(6)).
3. All CLETS redactions (which are not labeled by you) are unlawful. See argument (2) above.
4. All attorney-client privilege/work product doctrine redactions are unlawful. See argument (2) above.

In addition, this is a 67.21(d) petition regarding case DPA 40-15 published by DPA on MuckRock here:
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/Prepared20for20Production20-200040-1520-2012.9.2019.pdf

Because all redactions lack a footnote or other clear reference to justification, they are all unlawful and must be ordered unredacted/disclosed.
Their sole justification is "The records contain information redacted based on subdivisions of Penal Code Section 832.7 that mandate and allow redactions of certain information listed in the code section" which fails to meet the specificity requirements of SFAC 67.27. Furthermore, PC 832.7(b)(6) is a subdivision of 832.7, and is an optional redaction reason specifically prohibited locally by SFAC 67.21(g, i) (DPA claims authority to redact pursuant to PC 832.7(b)(6)). And finally, your prior response indicates cases clearly have been redacted pursuant to reasons that are not in PC 832.7(b)(5), which is not permitted.

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com FOIA web service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Redact your responses correctly - once you send them to us there is no going back. Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be public records.*

Sincerely,

Anonymous

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Please see attached.

Thank you,
Diana Rosenstein

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Thank you very much.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Thank you very much.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Supervisor of Records,

I am correcting my petition today as follows:

Supervisor of Records Herrera,

Thank you for your response. First, it should not be your responsibility to justify these redactions or full withholdings. There's nothing you can do about that, but we shall proceed against DPA at SOTF for the underlying violations of SFAC 67.26 and 67.27 itself.

Below is a further SFAC 67.21(d) petition regarding these same two cases 168-01 and 441-12, please deem all of the following redactions or withholdings public and order them immediately disclosed:
1. [Retracted]
2. Redactions 2.i, 2.m, 2.p and all other Gov Code 6254(k)/EC 1040 redactions are unlawful. PC 832.7(b)(5) specifically states (emphasis mine) "An agency shall redact a record disclosed pursuant to this section **only** for any of the following purposes: [4 types]". No SB 1421 record can be redacted for any other reason other than PC 832.7(b)(5)(A,B,C,D) (and, outside of SF, PC 832.7(b)(6)).
3. All CLETS redactions (which are not labeled by you) are unlawful. See argument (2) above.
4. All attorney-client privilege/work product doctrine redactions are unlawful. See argument (2) above.

In addition, this is a 67.21(d) petition regarding case DPA 40-15 published by DPA on MuckRock here:
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/DepartmentOfPoliceAccountability/83876/Prepared20for20Production20-200040-1520-2012.9.2019.pdf

Because all redactions lack a footnote or other clear reference to justification, they are all unlawful and must be ordered unredacted/disclosed.
Their sole justification is "The records contain information redacted based on subdivisions of Penal Code Section 832.7 that mandate and allow redactions of certain information listed in the code section" which fails to meet the specificity requirements of SFAC 67.27. Furthermore, PC 832.7(b)(6) is a subdivision of 832.7, and is an optional redaction reason specifically prohibited locally by SFAC 67.21(g, i) (DPA claims authority to redact pursuant to PC 832.7(b)(6)). And finally, your prior response indicates cases clearly have been redacted pursuant to reasons that are not in PC 832.7(b)(5), which is not permitted.

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com FOIA web service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Redact your responses correctly - once you send them to us there is no going back. Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be public records.*

Sincerely,

Anonymous

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Please use this link to access the attached files disclosed in the GBI category.
[cid:6acb4727-6ada-4685-afc0-e240cbe35bd6] This link only works for the direct recipients of this message.
[cid:63b7df41-12b0-4eb0-8ddc-35ed28c1312b] <https://sfgov1-my.sharepoint.com:443/:f:/g/personal/dpa_legalteam_sfgov_org/EtlE-LFZvulLjLoXb6nWAoYBokmmy7yZ-rTaqbGoj8K9bw?e=5%3al6OfnI&at=9> <https://sfgov1-my.sharepoint.com:443/:f:/g/personal/dpa_legalteam_sfgov_org/EtlE-LFZvulLjLoXb6nWAoYBokmmy7yZ-rTaqbGoj8K9bw?e=5%3al6OfnI&at=9>
SB 1421 Request - 0394-05, 0435-05, 0843-10 - MuckRock

Open <https://sfgov1-my.sharepoint.com:443/:f:/g/personal/dpa_legalteam_sfgov_org/EtlE-LFZvulLjLoXb6nWAoYBokmmy7yZ-rTaqbGoj8K9bw?e=5%3al6OfnI&at=9>

[Microsoft]
Microsoft respects your privacy. To learn more, please read our Privacy Statement.<https://usgovtexasr-notifyp.svc.ms:443/api/v2/tracking/method/Click?mi=4tEul1bAkU24FOVDfnBgew&tc=PrivacyStatement&cs=47eec467ae61cf834a7c03086458dc5e&ru=https%3a%2f%2fprivacy.microsoft.com%2fprivacystatement>
Microsoft Corporation, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Hello,

Attached please find the cover letters for files 0394-05, 0435-05 and 0843-10. The OneDrive link granting access to the files is to follow.
Best,

Mary Polk for Attorney Stephanie Wargo-Wilson
Senior Clerk
[1517861123573_PastedImage]
T: 415.241.7711 | F: 415.241.7733
http://sfgov.org/dpa/

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

DPA:

Thank you for your response, however:

1. Please provide the actual files as you have in the past. I cannot be forced to sign-in to any third-party private system like Microsoft's. You cannot make me agree to any end user restrictions (such as Microsoft's Terms) to receive my CPRA records (see for example Santa Clara Co. vs Superior Ct, 170 Cal.App 4th 1301, "As a matter of first impression in California, we conclude that end user restrictions are incompatible with the purposes and operation of the CPRA.").

2. I refuse to follow any extra-legal procedures not stated in the Sunshine Ordinance, such as: "If you would like more information about a specific redaction, the DPA invites you to meet and confer. Please contact the undersigned in writing, and identify the page, line, and identifying context for the redaction you wish to challenge. The DPA will then provide a written explanation for each redaction at issue. "

I have zero legal obligations to perform any labor under the CPRA or Sunshine Ordinance.
DPA will not break the Sunshine Ordinance, and I will not allow DPA to chip away at the Ordinance on account of my requests.

If you do not provide a key by footnote or other clear reference for every redaction, I will assume that you are unlawfully (in violation of 67.26) withholding all redacted portions, and petition for every last one to be unredacted.

From my experience in past cases, SOTF will presume that any withholding of any information in any form is unlawful and order it disclosed unless the government provides a specific legal reason for every one, precisely in accordance with SFAC 67.26.

I am confident in my own legal position. If you refuse to comply, that's up to you.

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com FOIA web service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Redact your responses correctly - once you send them to us there is no going back. Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be public records.*

Sincerely,

Anonymous

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Good afternoon,

Please find attached the DPA’s response to your February 3, 2020 e-mail.

Newton Oldfather
Staff Attorney
[cid:image001.jpg@01D4D4E1.64B23E00]
Tel: (415) 241-7702
Fax: (415) 241-7733
(TTY) 415.241.7770
www.sfgov.org/occ<http://www.sfgov.org/occ>
https://www.facebook.com/occsf

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Thank you for your response.

1. Re: OneDrive. No, I do not want printed records, I want electronic ones and I will not be paying anything. There is a way to meet your obligations to provide both electronic records and not impose any conditions beyond those of the CPRA. As I have discussed with other agencies with large files: make the files accessible to requestors without sign-in so I don't have to agree to anything. Numerous agencies now do this on SF's NextRequest portal. I am not sure why you are requiring a "sign-in" procedure for disclosable public records. OneDrive definitely has a sharing setting to make folders completely public to the Internet without sign-in, and then you can just provide me that public no-Sign-In URL. If you do that, this part is no longer in contention.

2. Re: meet and confer. Please read SFAC 67.26 again, you are required to perform this process as part of the exemption review. Since DPA never performed the process of ensuring every redaction is legally justified, how does the public know that you aren't just redacting whatever you want? You've explicitly claimed a right in your SB 1421 policy to for example redact gruesome content, but there is absolutely no permission to make subjective choices like this in SF (SFAC 67.24(g,i)). Your argument that this is an inefficient process and thus the law can be ignored is just not supported by the text of the law. I care a lot more about accuracy of redactions than efficiency, given the gravity of these records. I've carefully listened to SOTF in many many hearings now, and as of tonight I have won 4 different cases against London Breed, Dennis Herrera, and their offices and I remain confident in my position that they will not accept your argument unless you cite something in the Sunshine Ordinance specifically that allows you to ignore SFAC 67.26. You have not even addressed the issue that you admit that you are redacting info beyond what PC 832.7(b)(5) says are the *only* four permissible redaction reasons.

I will be contacting various supporters of police transparency to gather support at my SOTF public hearings against what DPA is doing. The Police Commission and its subordinate agencies have bent the specific text of the laws in their SB 1421 policies and they don't have any right to give anything less than the full Sunshine procedure passed by SF's citizenry in 1999 by ballot initiative. Fortunately it is the SOTF, and not the Police Commission, with jurisdiction over Sunshine and the CPRA in SF.

Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com FOIA web service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Redact your responses correctly - once you send them to us there is no going back. Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be public records.*

Sincerely,

Anonymous

From:

Please see the attached response to your petition.

Bradley Russi
Deputy City Attorney
Office of City Attorney Dennis Herrera
City Hall, Room 234
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Pl., San Francisco, CA 94102
www.sfcityattorney.org

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Supervisor of Records,

Thank you for your response, however you know as well as I do that the Becerra case considered state agencies' SB 1421 documents, which are not subject to the exclusion of Gov Code 6255 pursuant to SFAC 67.24(g,i) for SF agencies. For state agencies, the public-interest balancing test, which permits others exceptions, is permitted due to Penal Code 832.7(b)(6), but (b)(6) is prohibited within the city of San Francisco.

It appears you continue to ignore the increased rights of access that the voters of SF have given this City.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

DPA,

Please let me know prior to close of business today whether or not you plan to release 0394-05, 0435-05 and 0843-10 with a completely public, no sign-in link. If you will not, further complaints will be filed.

NOTE: this is a public email mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com FOIA web service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Redact your responses correctly - once you send them to us there is no going back. Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be public records.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Please see attached.
[cid:image002.png@01D5F92C.30A87000]

Diana Rosenstein
Attorney

One South Van Ness Avenue, Floor 8 - New Address!
415 - 241 - 7711 phone
415 - 241 - 7770 tty
www . sfgov . org / dpa.

This communication, along with any attachments, is covered by federal and state laws governing electronic communications and may contain confidential and legally provided information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, use, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply immediately to the sender and/or delete this message. Thank you.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

You have still not released 0394-05, 0435-05 and 0843-10 to me in a way that imposes no end user restrictions on me and thus you simply have not released them to me at all.

NOTE: this is a public email mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com FOIA web service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Redact your responses correctly - once you send them to us there is no going back. Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be public records.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

From: Department Of Police Accountability

(Please see attached)

[cid:image003.png@01D65613.A93E0630]

Sara Maunder
Attorney
she, her, hers
One South Van Ness Avenue, Floor 8 - New Address!
415 - 241 - 7711 phone
415 - 241 - 7770 tty
www . sfgov . org / dpa.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

You have still not released 0394-05, 0435-05 and 0843-10 to me in a way that imposes no end user restrictions on me and thus you simply have not released them to me at all.

NOTE: this is a public email mailbox, and all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com FOIA web service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). Redact your responses correctly - once you send them to us there is no going back. Nothing herein is legal, IT, or professional advice of any kind. The author disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including but not limited to all warranties of merchantability or fitness. In no event shall the author be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or any other damages whatsoever. The digital signature, if any, in this email is not an indication of a binding agreement or offer; it merely authenticates the sender. Please do not include any confidential information, as I intend that these communications with the City all be public records.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

From: Department Of Police Accountability

(Please see attached)

[cid:image002.png@01D65ED8.9FB38EA0]

Sara Maunder
Attorney
she, her, hers
One South Van Ness Avenue, Floor 8 - New Address!
415 - 241 - 7711 phone
415 - 241 - 7770 tty
www . sfgov . org / dpa.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Hello:

Attached, please find the cover letter for file 0252-16. The OneDrive link granting access to the file is to follow.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson
Legal Assistant

From: Department Of Police Accountability

LegalTeam, DPA (DPA) shared the folder "SB 1421 Request - WILLIAMS -MuckRock (286)" with you.
[cid:b826bbbf-2a79-4b7f-af76-d00f0e6a8a4f] This link only works for the direct recipients of this message.
[cid:92063772-ce2f-4eab-8723-e4f8a3a608d5] <https://sfgov1-my.sharepoint.com:443/:f:/g/personal/dpa_legalteam_sfgov_org/ElD39oq3hnNMq9FlrJR5ThUByx2Y8XRPq6UfYDDyRhJDcQ?email=83876-31149286%40requests.muckrock.com&e=5%3azRDljl&at=9> <https://sfgov1-my.sharepoint.com:443/:f:/g/personal/dpa_legalteam_sfgov_org/ElD39oq3hnNMq9FlrJR5ThUByx2Y8XRPq6UfYDDyRhJDcQ?email=83876-31149286%40requests.muckrock.com&e=5%3azRDljl&at=9>
SB 1421 Request - WILLIAMS -MuckRock (286)

Open <https://sfgov1-my.sharepoint.com:443/:f:/g/personal/dpa_legalteam_sfgov_org/ElD39oq3hnNMq9FlrJR5ThUByx2Y8XRPq6UfYDDyRhJDcQ?email=83876-31149286%40requests.muckrock.com&e=5%3azRDljl&at=9>

[Microsoft]
Sender will be notified when you open this link for the first time.
Microsoft respects your privacy. To learn more, please read our Privacy Statement.<https://usgovtexasr-notifyp.svc.ms:443/api/v2/tracking/method/Click?mi=4y-BawhYPUqL1NTjpV0uGA&tc=PrivacyStatement&cs=53ec05540835f2f82e95744f5e510682&ru=https%3a%2f%2fprivacy.microsoft.com%2fprivacystatement>
Microsoft Corporation, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Time of Access Time of Access v2







Hello,
For security purposes, you must enter the code below to verify your account to access SB 1421 Request - 0394-05, 0435-05, 0843-10 - MuckRock. The code will only work for 15 minutes and if you request a new code, this code will stop working.

Account verification code:
89320470
Having problems with the code?
View the error and make sure that the email identifier is "N3LK40B". If it's not, look for an updated email or try requesting a new code.

© 2017 Microsoft Privacy & Cookies (https://privacy.microsoft.com/privacystatement)

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Time of Access Time of Access v2







Hello,
For security purposes, you must enter the code below to verify your account to access SB 1421 Request - WILLIAMS -MuckRock (286). The code will only work for 15 minutes and if you request a new code, this code will stop working.

Account verification code:
63551591
Having problems with the code?
View the error and make sure that the email identifier is "6C6TZGC". If it's not, look for an updated email or try requesting a new code.

© 2017 Microsoft Privacy & Cookies (https://privacy.microsoft.com/privacystatement)

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requestor,

The DPA is releasing officer-involved shooting investigation records pursuant to your SB1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file, which has been split into two parts:

Part A

1. OIR Policy Report
2. Investigation Reports and Chronologies
3. Incident Report and Related Records
4. Forensic Reports
5. Photos
6. Transcripts

Part B

1. Department Rules
2. Investigator Notes
3. Training Records
4. Correspondence
5. Miscellaneous Records

Thank you,

Sandra Wilkerson on behalf of Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:321158e8-a55f-4753-b5c1-0f0f2cb90496]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in Nextrequest.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:6ff2fd5f-5e86-4e0f-9c75-a0bad2ce6066]

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

We will continue to file complaints against DPA and its employees for willfully refusing to comply with SFAC 67.26 and not providing footnotes or other clear references for each and every redaction. We have forced the Police Commission to comply with this section of the Ordinance for their SB 1421 records and we will force you to comply as well.

--Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

SOTF,

This is the email/file for 19144. I've never withdrawn or closed it - it is for DPA's SB 1421 records. Please do schedule it for committee when it is the appropriate turn for this case.

--Anonymous

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Hi Cheryl,

Can you confirm now that 19144 is back and will be scheduled normally?

19144 had nothing to do with the other withdrawn DPA case you emailed me about, and 19144 in fact has a response from the DPA too.

Thanks,
Anonymous

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Yes, it will be scheduled.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org<mailto:Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org>
Tel: 415-554-7724
Fax: 415-554-5163
www.sfbos.org

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information—including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees—may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

(Please see attached)

[A picture containing food, drawing Description automatically generated]

One South Van Ness Avenue, Eighth Floor
415 - 241 - 7711 phone
415 - 241 - 7770 tty
www . sfgov . org / dpa web
sfdpa.nextrequest.com.public records portal

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in Nextrequest.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:2dbd896f-6dd5-4b85-9f12-a143ce9d5b8d]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in Nextrequest.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:1bde4d2d-8964-4e1c-ae1d-20304d997d57]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in Nextrequest.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:a2b3d292-8103-4e35-ba1e-a243a4bf33fe]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Good Morning:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Compliance and Amendments Committee to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: December 22, 2020

Location: Remote meeting; participant information to be included on the Agenda

Time: 4:30 p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

1. File No. 19124: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Chief William Scott and Lt. R. Andrew Cox and the Police Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.25, 67.26, 67.27, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner, failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner, failing to justify withholding of records and failing to maintain a Proposition G calendar.

2. File No. 19144: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the Department of Police Accountability for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections, 67.21, 67.24, 67.26 and 67.27, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

3. File No. 20066: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the Police Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(b) incomplete response; 67.24(i) citation of unlawful public-interest balancing test; 67.26 nonminimal withholding; 67.27 failure to cite a specific provision of law for justification

4. File No. 20074: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the City Attorney for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(b) incomplete response to public records request and 67.21(c) failure to provide written statement as to the existence, quantity, form and nature of records.

5. File No. 20110: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Sheriff Paul Miyamoto, Alison Lambert and the Sheriff's Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 by failing to respond to a records request in a timely and/or complete manner, 67.26 failing to keep withholding to a minimum and 67.27 failing to justify withholding.

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure). For inclusion into the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00 pm, December 16, 2020.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in Nextrequest.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:bbea133c-c10a-4a60-a54b-8fddad2813ef]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Hello SOTF Parties: It has come to my attention that the subject line states that the Compliance and Amendments Committee hearing occurred on November 24, which is correct. The Notice below is for December 22, 2020 - TOMORROW! Apologies for any confusion.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org<mailto:Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org>
Tel: 415-554-7724
Fax: 415-554-5163
www.sfbos.org

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in Nextrequest.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:61bfbb21-7916-450c-9d4e-7eebb5251bca]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Good Afternoon:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in the following complaints scheduled before the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: February 3, 2021

Location: Remote Meeting

Time: 4:00 p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

File No. 19124: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Chief William Scott, Lt. R. Andrew Cox and the Police Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.25, 67.26, 67.27, by failing to provide assistance in a timely or complete manner, failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner, failing to provide responses on a rolling basis, failing to keep withholdings to a minimal portion of public records, and failing to provide written justification for withholding.

File No. 19144: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the Department of Police Accountability, Paul Henderson, Diana Rosenstein, Stephanie Wargo-Wilson, and Mary Polk for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections, 67.21, 67.24, 67.26 and 67.27, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner, failing to assist in a timely or complete manner, failing to cite lawful justification for exemption, failing to key redactions by footnotes or other clear references to justifications, and failing to withhold the minimal portion of records.

File No. 20010: Complaint filed by Patrick Monette-Shaw against the Office of the City Attorney for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(b) and 67.25(d), by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner

File No. 20062: Complaint filed by Patrick Monette-Shaw against the City Attorney's Office for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21 by failing to respond to a records request in a timely and complete manner.

File No. 19115: Complaint filed by Ann Treboux against Margaret Baumgartner for allegedly violating Administrative Code, (Sunshine Ordinance) Sections 67.25 by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19126: Complaint filed by Ann Treboux against the San Francisco Arts Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least three (3) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure).

For inclusion in the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00 pm, January 28, 2021.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear SOTF Parties: Since the Notice of Appearance for the February 3, 2021 Sunshine Task Force hearing went out last night, there has been a change in plans. The following matters will not be heard on that date due to new member participation. The SOTF Orientation will take place instead.

File No. 19124: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Chief William Scott, Lt. R. Andrew Cox and the Police Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.25, 67.26, 67.27, by failing to provide assistance in a timely or complete manner, failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner, failing to provide responses on a rolling basis, failing to keep withholdings to a minimal portion of public records, and failing to provide written justification for withholding.

File No. 19144: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the Department of Police Accountability, Paul Henderson, Diana Rosenstein, Stephanie Wargo-Wilson, and Mary Polk for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections, 67.21, 67.24, 67.26 and 67.27, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner, failing to assist in a timely or complete manner, failing to cite lawful justification for exemption, failing to key redactions by footnotes or other clear references to justifications, and failing to withhold the minimal portion of records.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org<mailto:Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org>
Tel: 415-554-7724
Fax: 415-554-5163
www.sfbos.org

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.

In the event that you are unable to access the file in Nextrequest, you will also be receiving an email invitation to access the file on OneDrive.

Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[https://attachments.office.net/owa/dpa.legalteam%40sfgov.org/service.svc/s/GetAttachmentThumbnail?id=AQMkAGExYjc1ZGI5LTQ2YTUtNDZjNy1iNDZkLTdkNTIwNTkxZjkzNQBGAAADG2ubwp%2BmAU%2BuXXKuXuCmngcASi87b6PW%2Bki4CKdWMqub%2BgAAAgEPAAAASi87b6PW%2Bki4CKdWMqub%2BgABhN%2Bf%2FgAAAAESABAAi37RggVX40m9rfmQPpOAeg%3D%3D&thumbnailType=2&token=eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsImtpZCI6IjMwODE3OUNFNUY0QjUyRTc4QjJEQjg5NjZCQUY0RUNDMzcyN0FFRUUiLCJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJ4NXQiOiJNSUY1emw5TFV1ZUxMYmlXYTY5T3pEY25ydTQifQ.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.OlSkWKjiJ2L4uvd7If4l0_adeFioAza45CicwE-GlRGMgIMIUbMEloQwqDKlxJjSxq1C9MdXcEdoWl2sEsvBplKNJp2yOlPgqWndsJfDEnqHnoKM326MRjXUnfPNeyDWDWKY88G1Xdo4X3De-nqbi1ray2nW_OJlLS7SFbLYCpsX6pMav3yNpJPvoiLVFAgSL2t0jRUsp0VoRzJ7LowXNq5dwGGyvA8k1Apq_-7dEYXO6Dcv09Wfkf9FVfwA9da8YNqPQZBwWrXkLJthc2y3kPlWedYf4m4sCRvbNF829VHp6pK3L6E87-GUU-CjIUhX4oS9828kUHJT_JX0DWK22A&X-OWA-CANARY=UY8m3CXBMUurBpZROIsUTvBtp6SSz9gY7SYne5kIkQXw6b4qYC8Jb74XgN6BrsOAl7DUQEASN2E.&owa=outlook.office365.com&scriptVer=20210208002.03&animation=true]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.

In the event that you are unable to access the file in Nextrequest, you will also be receiving an email invitation to access the file on OneDrive.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:1d4d56d9-8d42-498e-a4f3-5d38a026c30c]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Here's the document that LegalTeam, DPA (DPA) shared with you.
[cid:b21afae1-60c6-4d26-8568-40e533b9d51a] This link only works for the direct recipients of this message.
[cid:36ea3791-05ee-4618-a3e5-0d03f033e1e2] <https://sfgov1-my.sharepoint.com:443/:b:/g/personal/dpa_legalteam_sfgov_org/EVZnpoeKWkxBoIcN4VxJjbgBwSJLs1C5TwCIG9vLQP06BA?e=4%3akZJ0zF&at=9> <https://sfgov1-my.sharepoint.com:443/:b:/g/personal/dpa_legalteam_sfgov_org/EVZnpoeKWkxBoIcN4VxJjbgBwSJLs1C5TwCIG9vLQP06BA?e=4%3akZJ0zF&at=9>
Production - 0658-08 Part B

Open <https://sfgov1-my.sharepoint.com:443/:b:/g/personal/dpa_legalteam_sfgov_org/EVZnpoeKWkxBoIcN4VxJjbgBwSJLs1C5TwCIG9vLQP06BA?e=4%3akZJ0zF&at=9>

[Microsoft]
Microsoft respects your privacy. To learn more, please read our Privacy Statement.<https://usgovtexasr-notifyp.svc.ms:443/api/v2/tracking/method/Click?mi=kQzXsIkqJUe5AI3cucCSrw&tc=PrivacyStatement&cs=53ec05540835f2f82e95744f5e510682&ru=https%3a%2f%2fprivacy.microsoft.com%2fprivacystatement>
Microsoft Corporation, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.

In the event that you are unable to access the file in Nextrequest, you will also be receiving an email invitation to access the file on OneDrive.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:a6a5a8bf-48d9-4beb-a4a8-7edf43ab1c58]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:18ca888d-0aa1-4034-a1a9-2b95fc389055]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Here's the document that LegalTeam, DPA (DPA) shared with you.
[cid:f4ef67e0-8a59-4234-b917-ef601cf0cc22] This link only works for the direct recipients of this message.
[cid:4e3617dc-0109-4aec-8080-cb7739f21bbc] <https://sfgov1-my.sharepoint.com:443/:b:/g/personal/dpa_legalteam_sfgov_org/EakD3cv0pgJKpUs2k4Wfv-sBI6irhV8NcA8BcatJT-aSbw?e=4%3aypvnVA&at=9> <https://sfgov1-my.sharepoint.com:443/:b:/g/personal/dpa_legalteam_sfgov_org/EakD3cv0pgJKpUs2k4Wfv-sBI6irhV8NcA8BcatJT-aSbw?e=4%3aypvnVA&at=9>
Production - 0870-09

Open <https://sfgov1-my.sharepoint.com:443/:b:/g/personal/dpa_legalteam_sfgov_org/EakD3cv0pgJKpUs2k4Wfv-sBI6irhV8NcA8BcatJT-aSbw?e=4%3aypvnVA&at=9>

[Microsoft]
Microsoft respects your privacy. To learn more, please read our Privacy Statement.<https://usgovtexasr-notifyp.svc.ms:443/api/v2/tracking/method/Click?mi=zW_nFGQtvkaCEo1yLqVZfg&tc=PrivacyStatement&cs=53ec05540835f2f82e95744f5e510682&ru=https%3a%2f%2fprivacy.microsoft.com%2fprivacystatement>
Microsoft Corporation, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Time of Access Time of Access v2







Hello,
For security purposes, you must enter the code below to verify your account to access Production - 0870-09.pdf. The code will only work for 15 minutes and if you request a new code, this code will stop working.

Account verification code:
78931385
Having problems with the code?
View the error and make sure that the email identifier is "V89VJBB". If it's not, look for an updated email or try requesting a new code.

Š 2017 Microsoft Privacy & Cookies (https://privacy.microsoft.com/privacystatement)

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Time of Access Time of Access v2







Hello,
For security purposes, you must enter the code below to verify your account to access Production - 0870-09.pdf. The code will only work for 15 minutes and if you request a new code, this code will stop working.

Account verification code:
91594300
Having problems with the code?
View the error and make sure that the email identifier is "XH5Z2DB". If it's not, look for an updated email or try requesting a new code.

Š 2017 Microsoft Privacy & Cookies (https://privacy.microsoft.com/privacystatement)

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Good Afternoon:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in the following complaints scheduled before the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: April 7, 2021

Location: Remote Meeting

Time: 4:00 p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

1. File No. 19048: Complaint filed by Justin Barker against the San Francisco Zoo for violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

2. File No. 19092: Complaint filed by Justin Barker against the San Francisco Zoo for violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

3. File No. 19115: Complaint filed by Ann Treboux against Margaret Baumgartner for allegedly violating Administrative Code, (Sunshine Ordinance) Sections 67.25 by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

4. File No. 19126: Complaint filed by Ann Treboux against the San Francisco Arts Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

5. File No. 19124: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Chief William Scott and Lt. R. Andrew Cox and the Police Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.25, 67.26, 67.27, by failing to by failing to assist in a timely or complete manner, by failing to provide a timely or complete response to a records request, by failing to provide rolling responses, by failing to withhold the minimal portion of public records, and by failing by provide written justification for withholding. (attachments)

6. File No. 19144: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the Department of Police Accountability, Paul Henderson, Diana Rosenstein, Stephanie Wargo-Wilson, and Mary Polk for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections, 67.21, 67.24, 67.26 and 67.27, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner, failing to assist in a timely or complete manner, failing to cite lawful justification for exemption, failing to key redactions by footnotes or other clear references to justifications, and failing to withhold the minimal portion of records

7. File No. 19145: Complaint filed by Chris Kohrs against the Police Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.5 and 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least three (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure).

For inclusion in the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00 pm, April 1, 2021.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Ms. Maunder: I am in receipt of and thank you for your email below. In order to grant your request, we must get an agreement from the Petitioner. By way of this email, I am asking the Petitioner to either grant or deny your request to postpone File No. 19144. This is the Respondent's first request. Thank you.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org<mailto:Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org>
Tel: 415-554-7724
Fax: 415-554-5163
www.sfbos.org

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Case 19144

Hi,
Two questions:
1) Ms. Leger - can you schedule another case in this slot if this one is postponed to May?
2) Ms. Maunder - does DPA commit to presenting at May?

If the answer to both is yes, I am willing to grant the request to postpone 19144.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Hello,

Yes, I can commit to appearing in May for File No. 19144.

Thank you,

Sara Maunder
DPA

[A picture containing food, drawing Description automatically generated]

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Great. Then postponing until May is fine for 19144.
Ms. Leger: I hope you find another case to present in April - I assume keeping a full schedule would keep bringing the backlog done.

--Anonymous

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:2c058635-d61b-4d17-b319-19988246fd55]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Good Afternoon:

Paul Henderson, Sara Maunder and the Department of Police Accountability have been named as Respondents in the attached complaint filed with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force. Please respond to the attached complaint/request within five business days.

The Respondent is required to submit a written response to the allegations including any and all supporting documents, recordings, electronic media, etc., to the Task Force within five (5) business days of receipt of this notice. This is your opportunity to provide a full explanation to allow the Task Force to be fully informed in considering your response prior its meeting.

Please include the following information in your response if applicable:

1. List all relevant records with descriptions that have been provided pursuant to the Complainant request.
2. Date the relevant records were provided to the Complainant.
3. Description of the method used, along with any relevant search terms used, to search for the relevant records.
4. Statement/declaration that all relevant documents have been provided, does not exist, or has been excluded.
5. Copy of the original request for records (if applicable).

Please refer to the File Number when submitting any new information and/or supporting documents pertaining to this complaint.

The Complainant alleges:

Complaint Attached.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Hello: Apparently, when I sent out this notice, the complaint somehow was not attached. Please now find it attached.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org<mailto:Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org>
Tel: 415-554-7724
Fax: 415-554-5163
www.sfbos.org

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Hello All: For some reason my attachments have not been included in my various emails. Apologies for any confusion. Attached is the Complaint for 21031.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org<mailto:Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org>
Tel: 415-554-7724
Fax: 415-554-5163
www.sfbos.org

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Good evening Ms. Leger,

Please find attached the DPA's response to Complaint 21031. Exhibits A, B, C, and D are attached. Due to the large file size, Exhibit F<https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:dc919084-23c2-414d-9411-008c788a3019> is provided using an Adobe Document Cloud link. Please let me know if you need any additional information.

Thank you,

Sara Maunder

You can view "Exhibit F - DPA Case No. 0367-96.pdf" at: https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:dc919084-23c2-414d-9411-008c788a3019

[A picture containing food, drawing Description automatically generated]

Sara Maunder
Attorney
she, her, hers
One South Van Ness Avenue, Floor 8
415 - 241 - 7711 phone
415 - 241 - 7770 tty
www . sfgov . org / dpa.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

SOTF FILE 20131 - Anonymous's Reply

1. DPA's response on all 7 examples fails even to refute my argument that courts have held that the personnel file exemption (PC 832.7(a)) only exempts records *created in connection with* the personnel/complaint process (Long Beach Police Officers Ass’n v. City of Long Beach, 172 Cal. Rptr. 3d 56, 64 (Cal. 2014); City of Eureka v. Superior Court of Humboldt Cnty., 1 Cal.App.5th 755, 764 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016)) and that the physical location of a record in a complaint file does not cause a non-personnel record to become an exempt personnel record (City of San Jose v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cnty., 2 Cal.5th 608, 624 (Cal. 2017) ). The assignments/dispatch logs of officers or units is not thus an exempt personnel record.

2. My examples are non-exhaustive. I am challenging all such POBRA redactions.

3. They now admit that some of their redactions under POBRA were incorrect, therefore proving a violation of Admin Code 67.26.

4. SB 1421 policies created by the department or the Police Commission have no bearing on the Sunshine Ordinance or CPRA or SB 1421 itself. I have previously successfully argued that signatures of police officers are not exempt and the City Attorney's Office in a different case has relented and unredacted them to me. There is no difference here.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Good Afternoon:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in the following complaints scheduled before the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: May 5, 2021

Location: Remote Meeting

Time: 4:00 p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

File No. 19144: Complaint filed by Anonymous against the Department of Police Accountability, Paul Henderson, Diana Rosenstein, Stephanie Wargo-Wilson, and Mary Polk for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections, 67.21, 67.24, 67.26 and 67.27, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner, failing to assist in a timely or complete manner, failing to cite lawful justification for exemption, failing to key redactions by footnotes or other clear references to justifications, and failing to withhold the minimal portion of records.

File No. 20033: Complaint filed by Anonymous against London Breed for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 67.29-5 by failing to keep or cause to be kept a compliant Prop G calendar.

File No. 20077: Complaint filed by Tom Borden against Recreation and Parks Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 20079: Complaint filed by Shane Anderies against District Attorney's Office and Chesa Boudin for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(e) failing to respond to a records request in a timely and/or complete manner; 67.25 by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner; 67.26 withholding kept to a minimum and 67.27 failing to provide justification for withholding responsive documents.

File No. 20092: Complaint filed by Karl Kramer against the Department of Recreation and Parks for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21 by failing to respond to a records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 20082: Complaint filed by Library Users Association against the Library Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.15 by failing to allow participation in public comment during a remote Library Commission meeting.

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure).

For inclusion in the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00 pm, April 29 , 2021.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Good Morning:

The agenda and packet for the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force May 5, 2021 4:00 p.m. meeting is online at the following link:

https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/default/files/sotf_050521_agenda.pdf

The packet material is linked to each item listed on the agenda marked with an "attachment". Click anywhere on the title of the item to open the link to the pdf of the packet material in question.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org<mailto:Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org>

Tel: 415-554-7724

Fax: 415-554-5163

www.sfbos.org

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:d6b3ba96-c7a5-4161-9c48-77cb5448c001]

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

Please see the attached for Ms. Maunder and Mr. Henderson based on last night's ruling by SOTF against DPA in 19144 Anonymous v Henderson, et al.

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

DPA and Ms. Maunder,

Last night we had a hearing and rulings against the DPA on a variety of SB 1421 issues (you have received a separate email to comply with those laws that DPA was deemed to have violated). However, no ruling was made on the video/index issue (note the SOTF did *not* make a motion for no violation regarding the issue, as they could do). This appears to be based on certain representations to the SOTF by you that the records not being provided are not actually being withheld, but instead simply waiting on appropriate technology. That is not what DPA had told me earlier.

I will now verify your representations made to the SOTF.

REQUEST: Please produce under the CPRA and Sunshine Ordinance video, index, and all other types of records not yet produced in all records disclosable under Penal Code 832.7(b) in DPA's constructive possession. Under National Lawyers Guild v City of Hayward and Admin Code 67.26 you cannot charge me or anyone else for these records.

If your current response is that you will produce all of the missing records on a rolling basis, similar to the audio records, even if that takes longer than the PDFs, that is fine.

If DPA's response to this request is that you will not produce those records, or you will ask me to pay, etc, then I will be:
1) making a request for reconsideration on that issue under the SOTF's complaint procedure for misrepresentation, and, if you are a manager, asking you to be found in willful violation of the Ordinance,
2) suing for writ of mandate under CPRA, and
3) filing a complaint before the State Bar (as you know, as a lawyer you have obligations of complete candor to a tribunal under the Rules of Professional Conduct).

None of these records are exempt under any PRA provision.

Keep in mind that you Sara Maunder also made the following written representation previously: "The DPA will produce records in response to your February 26, 2021 request for audio and video files separately and on a rolling basis."

Furthermore, pursuant to Gov Code 6253 remember to provide an estimate in your response as to when the records would be produced.

--Anonymous

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:66292c2d-74fe-41fa-88e8-16a0bacaa6d2]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:3eb4fdd2-eae8-4b53-a879-09704ab811b9]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:1098bde3-eabd-46e0-ae02-33efa6bd4290]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:90fea5a3-0c1a-43e1-a7f8-853090baeae9]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:ea6a564a-7684-4b31-9e09-27f98d9ff6f1]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:86f6af37-f39e-46ce-8675-9c3ce2a1a8f0]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:77de7f9d-d814-436f-b27c-3e906494836a]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:4546bb8d-8657-4bb6-ba57-9ee8736bf95e]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:2020fcb2-9d9e-4938-8581-096b7436c0a8]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:7c57cd68-7b97-4bcb-9d71-5b3db2db9560]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:6df03780-5ff6-4663-b2eb-c467581c9ea3]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:1d884f2c-beff-42d2-9ba7-c81dfa5e6a4c]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:dbf44739-b48f-4671-a011-e6efb0317349]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:f2fcb47b-e4c9-4db8-b8cd-04135007dce4]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Anonymous,

Please see the attached letter regarding your recent request for records.

Sincerely,

DPA Legal Team

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:07e3154b-a73c-4069-a735-333a54472a9d]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Anonymous:

Please see the attached correspondence regarding your recent request for records.

Sincerely,

DPA Legal Team

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Anonymous:

Please see the attached correspondence with regard to your recent request for records.

Sincerely,

DPA Legal Team

From: twitter.com/journo_anon Public Records Requester

To be clear, I asked for ALL records disclosable under SB 1421 in my original November 2019 request from this email address: https://www.muckrock.com/foi/san-francisco-141/dpa-sb-1421-police-misconduct-records-immediate-disclosure-request-and-6721c-request-83876/#comm-817363
That includes ALL audio, video, and audio-video records - since those types of records are in fact public records like any other.
You cannot simply produce 3 of them and call it done.
You seem to incorrectly think I only requested audio, video, or audio-video records later, or that I am forced to request them one by one.
Both are false.

Please acknowledge that you are produce ALL of the records in your next letter.

In January an SB16 request including all audio, video, and audio-video records will also be filed.

You will have to produce ALL responsive records, regardless of format, for all disclosable files.

--Anonymous

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Anonymous,

Please see the attached correspondence regarding your recent request for records.

Sincerely,

DPA Legal Team

[cid:image003.png@01D7F5BC.46969750]

DPA Legal Team

One South Van Ness Avenue, Floor 8 - New Address!
415 - 241 - 7711 phone
415 - 241 - 7770 tty
www . sfgov . org / dpa.

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Anonymous,

Please see the attached correspondence regarding your recent request for records.

Sincerely,

DPA Legal Team

Warning An exclamation point.

There are too many files to display on this communication. See all files

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:10ad524e-4c1a-4c88-8d58-0e21745ddb7a]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:af6d4585-b3ce-4b64-85d9-26334681d8a1]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:c110bc3d-2300-4eba-8bc3-78d63ba3eb49]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 16 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:c3b563da-5f4f-4ca3-803c-5ff2d791f45b]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requestor:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:fa17113d-6195-4c40-b2f0-759fcf05d583]

Warning An exclamation point.

There are too many files to display on this communication. See all files

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:c0d89ef7-cc5d-45eb-807e-f3dd044119b3]

Warning An exclamation point.

There are too many files to display on this communication. See all files

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Sara Maunder

[cid:2bbe7b4b-745b-40a7-8d08-729584f62b9b]

Warning An exclamation point.

There are too many files to display on this communication. See all files

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

Sandra Wilkerson for Attorney Susan Gray

[cid:3f179ad2-c65a-417c-8a50-f748e5f5bb1f]

From: Department Of Police Accountability

Dear Requester:

The DPA is releasing records pursuant to your SB 1421 request. The attached letter contains a link to the file in our public Nextrequest portal.
Regards,

[cid:6d2150e3-4997-4d51-a3a4-c5a2d8d3b9ee]