2018 Vigilant Data Sharing Information (Castle Hills Police Department)

Dave Maass filed this request with the Castle Hills Police Department of San Antonio, TX.
Est. Completion None
Status
Fix Required

Communications

From: Dave Maass


To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to the Texas Public Information Act, I hereby request the following records:

1) The names of agencies and organizations with which the Agency shares ALPR data;
2) The names of agencies and organizations from which the Agency receives ALPR data;
3) The names of agencies and organizations with which the Agency shares “hot list” information;
4) The names of agencies and organizations from which the Agency receives “hot list” information;

This information is easily available within the Agency’s LEARN system. The simplest way to extract this data is to generate an “Agency Data Sharing Report” PDF file from within LEARN. To do this, a user may simply go to the “Sharing” section of LEARN and select “Output Report.” A CSV/XLS file containing these records would also satisfy this request.

The instructions for extracting this data is described on pages 62-63 of the LEARN Agency Manager Guide, which may be found at this link:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3860685-LEARN-5-1-Agency-Manager-Guide.html

An example of this record may be found at this link:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3936113-Palos-Verdes-Estates-Police-Department-Data.html

A number of other agencies have regularly determined the above information constitutes a public record and have provided an “Agency Data Sharing Report.” These agencies include:

Anaheim Police Department, Antioch Police Department, Bakersfield Police Department Chino Police Department, Clovis Police Department, Elk Grove Police Department, Fontana Police Department, Fountain Valley Police Department, Glendora Police Department, Hawthorne Police Department, Irvine Police Department, Livermore Police Department, Lodi Police Department, Long Beach Police Department, Montebello Police Department, Orange Police Department, Palos Verdes Estates Police Department, Red Bluff Police Department ,Sacramento Police Department, San Bernardino Police Department, San Diego Police Department, San Rafael Police Department, San Ramon Police Department, Simi Valley Police Department, and the Tulare Police Department.

We further request the following records

The aggregate number of “detections” (i.e. license plate scans and associated data) collected during 2016.
The aggregate number of detections collected during 2017.
The aggregate number of “hits” (i.e. times that a plate on a hotlist was detected) during 2016.
The aggregate number of “hits” during 2017.

This information is easily available within the Agency’s LEARN system. The simplest way to extract this data is to generate a “Dashboard Hit Ratio Report” PDF file from within LEARN. We would prefer the data for each year to be provided separately.

An example of this document may be found at: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3870802-Sacramento-PD-Hit-Ratio-Rpt-010112-051917-Redacted.html

The instructions for extracting this data is described on pages 78-79 of the LEARN Agency Manager Guide, which may be found at this link:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3860685-LEARN-5-1-Agency-Manager-Guide.html

The following agencies have regularly determined the above information constitutes a public record and have provided an “Dashboard Hit Ratio Report.” These agencies include:

Anaheim Police Department; Bakersfield Police Department; Chino Police Department; Clovis Police Department; Elk Grove Police Department; Fontana Police Department; Irvine Police Department; La Habra Police Department; Laguna Beach Police Department; Lodi Police Department; Sacramento Police Department; San Diego Police Department; San Ramon Police Department; and the Red Bluff Police Department.

The requested documents will be made available to the general public, and this request is not being made for commercial purposes.

In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 10 business days, as the statute requires.

Sincerely,

Dave Maass

From: Castle Hills Police Department

Mr. Maass,

We sincerely apologize that we are just responding to your open records request. The request was emailed to our former Chief of Police.
Your request appears to be specific to Vigilant LPR data, as evidenced by the specific data outputs requested via the LEARN system, which is Vigilant-specific. We have no participation in, or affiliation with, any Vigilant LPR system or database. At the moment we utilize, Houston HIDTA LPR system. Which is currently only capable of receiving, storing, and sharing ELSAG generated LPR data. Since your request is specific to Vigilant data, does this change your request for our LPR data? Please let me know, and I will assist you the best I can.

Respectfully,

Valorie Medellin
Police Administrator
Castle Hills Police Department
209 Lemonwood Drive
San Antonio, Texas 78213
210-342-2341 ext.# 204
vmedellin@cityofcastlehills.com<mailto:vmedellin@cityofcastlehills.com>
[cid:image001.png@01D407E9.34123590]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message, as well as any files or documents attached to it, contains information which may be privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. It is intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed. Unless you are the addressee, you are hereby notified that the forwarding, copying, distribution or other use of this message is strictly prohibited. You may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy /delete all forms of this message. ATTENTION PUBLIC OFFICIALS: A "Reply to All" of this e-mail could lead to violations of the Texas Open Meetings Act, so please reply only to the sender.

Files