April 28-May 4, 2019 Calendar - Immediate Disclosure Request

Received. We are processing our response.

Thank you,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of Mayor London N. Breed
City and County of San Francisco
(415) 554-4796

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
Requestor: Anonymous

Email: requests@muckrock.com

May 9, 2019

Re: Public Records Request received May 8, 2019

To whom it may concern:

This responds to your Immediate Disclosure Request below.

Response Dated April 24, 2019

Thank you for your inquiry. Please see attached the requested information.

This information has been provided in a PDF format for its ease of transferability and accessibility, consistent with Cal. Gov. Code 6253.9(a)(1). Moreover, pursuant to Cal. Gov. Code 6253.9 (f), an agency is not required to provide an electronic record in an electronic format that would jeopardize or compromise the security or integrity of the original record. The PDF format ensures the security and integrity of the original record.

Please also note that we are responding on behalf of the Mayor's Office only, and not on behalf of other city departments.

If you have any questions about your request or would like to submit another public records request, please feel free to contact us at mayorsunshinerequests@sfgov.org<mailto:mayorsunshinerequests@sfgov.org>.
Best Regards,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of Mayor London N. Breed
City and County of San Francisco

Good Morning:

Mayor London Breed, Hank Heckel and the Office of the Mayor have been named as Respondents in the attached complaint filed with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force. Please respond to the following complaint/request within five business days.

The Respondent is required to submit a written response to the allegations including any and all supporting documents, recordings, electronic media, etc., to the Task Force within five (5) business days of receipt of this notice. This is your opportunity to provide a full explanation to allow the Task Force to be fully informed in considering your response prior its meeting.

Please include the following information in your response if applicable:

1. List all relevant records with descriptions that have been provided pursuant to the Complainant request.
2. Date the relevant records were provided to the Complainant.
3. Description of the method used, along with any relevant search terms used, to search for the relevant records.
4. Statement/declaration that all relevant documents have been provided, does not exist, or has been excluded.
5. Copy of the original request for records (if applicable).

Please refer to the File Number when submitting any new information and/or supporting documents pertaining to this complaint.

The Complainant alleges:

Complaint Attached.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

To Whom It May Concern:

I write to inform you that we are working on responding to your petition. I hope to have a response to you no later than the end of next week. Thank you for your patience.

[cid:image003.jpg@01D51003.935E8850]Bradley Russi
Deputy City Attorney
Office of City Attorney Dennis Herrera
City Hall, Room 234
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Pl., San Francisco, CA 94102
www.sfcityattorney.org

Dear Honorable Members of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force,

Please see the attached response to the complaint noticed below, and the attached associated files.
Best Regards,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of Mayor London N. Breed
City and County of San Francisco

Thank you for this. We are still working through the issues raised by your petition and appreciate your patience.

[cid:image002.jpg@01D51D21.73207190]Bradley Russi
Deputy City Attorney
Office of City Attorney Dennis Herrera
City Hall, Room 234
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Pl., San Francisco, CA 94102
www.sfcityattorney.org

Good Morning:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Compliance and Amendments Committee to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: July 3, 2019

Location: City Hall, Room 408

Time: 4:30 p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

File No. 19052: Complaint filed by Alex Koskinen against the Department of Public Health for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19060: Complaint filed by Ashley Rhodes against the Arts Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code, Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19025: Complaint filed by Jamie Whitaker against the Homelessness and Supportive Housing for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19047: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Mayor London Breed, Hank Heckel and the Office of the Mayor for allegedly violating Administrative Code, (Sunshine Ordinance) Sections 67.25 and 67.29-5, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure). For inclusion into the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00 pm, June 26, 2019.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear Anonymous:

I just received a phone call from Hank Heckel of the Mayor's office who notified me that he will be out of the office on July 3 and therefore unavailable for the Compliance and Amendments Committee hearing on that date. Mr. Heckel also stated that there is no other person most knowledgeable available to attend this hearing from the Mayor's office. This request refers to file no. 19047 (complaint description below). By way of this email, I am also notifying the Chair of that Committee of the Respondent's request. Please acknowledge receipt of this message. Thank you.

File No. 19047: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Mayor London Breed, Hank Heckel and the Office of the Mayor for allegedly violating Administrative Code, (Sunshine Ordinance) Sections 67.25 and 67.29-5, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Good Afternoon:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Complaint Committee to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: July 23, 2019

Location: City Hall, Room 408

Time: 5:30 p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

File No. 19044: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Dennis Herrera and the Office of the City Attorney for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19047: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Mayor London Breed, Hank Heckel and the Office of the Mayor for allegedly violating Administrative Code, (Sunshine Ordinance) Sections 67.25 and 67.29-5, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19052: Complaint filed by Alex Koskinen against the Department of Public Health for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19060: Complaint filed by Ashley Rhodes against the Arts Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code, Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19025: Complaint filed by Jamie Whitaker against the Homelessness and Supportive Housing for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure). For inclusion into the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00 pm, July 16, 2019.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear SOTF Parties and Members:

Please see attached a Notice of Cancellation of the July 3, 2019, hearing of the Compliance And Amendments Committee. If you have questions, please contact me at the number below. Hope everyone has a nice holiday.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Unfortunately, we are still working with our IT staff on the issues you have raised and won't be able to respond to your petitions until next week. Thanks for your patience.

[cid:image002.jpg@01D53024.C30D6AD0]Bradley Russi
Deputy City Attorney
Office of City Attorney Dennis Herrera
City Hall, Room 234
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Pl., San Francisco, CA 94102
www.sfcityattorney.org

I thought we would be able to get back to you sooner, but unfortunately we are still investigating these issues and have not reached a resolution. We are continuing to look into the questions you have raised and hope to be able to provide a response soon. Thank you for your patience.

[cid:image003.jpg@01D54226.F4AC2310]Bradley Russi
Deputy City Attorney
Office of City Attorney Dennis Herrera
City Hall, Room 234
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Pl., San Francisco, CA 94102
www.sfcityattorney.org

Good Afternoon:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Complaint Committee to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: August 20, 2019

Location: City Hall, Room 408

Time: 5:30 p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

File No. 19068: Complaint filed by Sophia De Anda against the Human Services Agency for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19061: Complaint filed by John Hooper against the Office of Economic and Workforce Development for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19062: Complaint filed by John Hooper against Public Works for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19044: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Dennis Herrera and the Office of the City Attorney for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19047: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Mayor London Breed, Hank Heckel and the Office of the Mayor for allegedly violating Administrative Code, (Sunshine Ordinance) Sections 67.25 and 67.29-5, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure). For inclusion into the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00 pm, August 13, 2019.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear Anonymous:

I write to you today to confirm your audio appearance at the August 20, 2019, Complaint Committee hearing. This is because you will need to provide your telephone number for a telephone appearance in hearing room 408 at City Hall in San Francisco. I will forward instructions for your appearance before that date.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Re: Files: 19061 and 19062

Hi Cheryl: May I submit written materials ahead of time for SOTF to read? If so, when would you like to receive materials?

May I assume information previously submitted by myself or others is already part of the SOTF record and may be referenced without resubmitting?

Thank you.

John Hooper

Dear SOTF Parties:

The agenda packet for the August 20, 2019, Complaint Committee of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, 5:30 pm hearing is available online at the following link:

https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/default/files/complaint082019_agenda.pdf

The packet material is linked to each item listed on the agenda mark with an "attachment". Click anywhere on the title of the item to open the link to the pdf of the packet material in question.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear Anonymous:

By now you should have received the Agenda packet sent to you this morning regarding the upcoming hearing on your complaints. Since your matters will be heard at the end of the hearing, I am asking that you be named Callers No. 1 (72056, File No. 19044) and No. 2 (72902, File No. 19047); items 7 and 8, respectively. You need to call in to 415-554-9632 before the hearing begins to make certain that both of you are on line and can hear the proceeding. You will be able to hear the audio from the room on the phone line. Please note that this is a conference line so both parties will be on the line at the same time. If you have further questions regarding calling in, please let me know. Thank you.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear Callers:

Please make certain to call before the start of the meeting which is 5:30. If you could call at 5:15 PM that would be ideal so that you can hear the proceeding and I will know that you are on the telephone line. I will have both of you on mute until your matter is called at which time I will ask if you can hear me. Looking forward to hearing your case.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear Anonymous:

It is the process of the Sunshine Task Force to have complaints heard at the Committee level first to determine if the records are public, there is jurisdiction and whether or not to forward to the SOTF for review and to make a ruling on the matter. The complaint below seems to be your commentary of what took place during the hearing last night. Can you please confirm if this is true? Thank you.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information—including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees—may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Good Afternoon:

Bradley Russi and the City Attorney's Office have been named as Respondents in the attached complaint filed with the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force. Please respond to the following complaint/request within five business days.

The Respondent is required to submit a written response to the allegations including any and all supporting documents, recordings, electronic media, etc., to the Task Force within five (5) business days of receipt of this notice. This is your opportunity to provide a full explanation to allow the Task Force to be fully informed in considering your response prior its meeting.

Please include the following information in your response if applicable:

1. List all relevant records with descriptions that have been provided pursuant to the Complainant request.
2. Date the relevant records were provided to the Complainant.
3. Description of the method used, along with any relevant search terms used, to search for the relevant records.
4. Statement/declaration that all relevant documents have been provided, does not exist, or has been excluded.
5. Copy of the original request for records (if applicable).

Please refer to the File Number when submitting any new information and/or supporting documents pertaining to this complaint.

The Complainant alleges:

Complaint Attached.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

To Whom it may concern:

Please see the attached response to your petition to the Supervisor of Records, submitted on May 15, 2019, concerning the Mayor's Office's response to your May 8, 2019 request. Thank you.

Good Morning:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Compliance and Amendments Committee to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: September 24, 2019

Location: City Hall, Room 408

Time: 4:30 p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

File No. 19048: Hearing on the Status of the Order of Determination: Complaint filed by Justin Barker against the San Francisco Zoo for violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 16117: Hearing on the Status of the Order of Determination: Complaint filed by Ray Hartz against City Librarian Luis Herrera and the Public Library for violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.29-6, by failing to disclose the amount and source of all outside funds or services worth more than one hundred dollars in aggregate, accepted by the Public Library for the purpose of carrying out or assisting any City function, on their website.

File No. 19017: Hearing on the Status of the Order of Determination: Complaint filed by Elica Vafaie, Asian Americans Advancing Justice, Asian law Caucus, Jeffrey Wang, Council on American-Islamic Relations, San Francisco Bay Area, Alan Schlosser No. CA American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California against Lt. Kathryn Waaland and the Police Department for violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19083: Complaint filed by Tyler Breisacher against the Police Department for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19080: Complaint filed by Paul A. Vander Waerdt against the Dept. of Homelessness and Supportive Housing for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25 for failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely manner.

File No. 19087: Complaint filed by Peter Dolan against the San Francisco Port for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19089: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Dennis Herrera, Bradley Russi and the Office of the City Attorney for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(d), by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure). For inclusion into the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00 pm, September 17, 2019.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear Anonymous:

Once I have those materials, I will forward.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear Anonymous:

Please see the email and attachment below in response to File No. 19089.
Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear Anonymous, I just received the materials this morning.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear Anonymous,

This is a supplemental response to your request below. This provides additional responsive information regarding the requested calendar entries. This should obviate the portion of your complaint relating to entries outside the final Prop G calendar format.

The responsive information has been provided in a PDF format for its ease of transferability and accessibility, consistent with Cal. Gov. Code 6253.9(a)(1). Metadata from any native format has not been provided to avoid risks to the security and integrity of the original record as well as the city's data and information technology systems and to avoid the release of exempt confidential or privileged information. See Cal. Gov. Code 6253.9 (f) and 6254.19. The PDF format ensures the security and integrity of the original record as well as the security and integrity of the city's data and information technology systems.

Please also note the following redactions of exempt information and the basis for each withholding:

- Redactions at the top of each page - security procedures information related to security detail redacted pursuant to Cal. Gov. Code 6254(f).

- All redactions for senior staff check-in call entries - call-in information redacted pursuant to the official information privilege. See Cal. Evid. Code Sec. 1040(b)(2).

- All other redactions - personal cell phone numbers redacted to avoid an unwarranted breach of personal privacy pursuant to Cal. Govt. Code Secs. 6254(c), 6254(k); California Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 1.
Regards,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of Mayor London N. Breed
City and County of San Francisco

May 11, 2019

This is a follow up to a previous request:

The following Sunshine Task Force complaint against Office of Mayor was filed earlier today:
https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/Anonymous_2859385/72902/SF-Mayor-Calendar-SOTF-Appeal-72902.pdf

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

Thank you,
Anonymous

Filed via MuckRock.com
E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com<mailto:requests@muckrock.com>
Upload documents directly: https://www.muckrock.com/
Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.

For mailed responses, please address (see note):
MuckRock News
DEPT MR 72902
411A Highland Ave
Somerville, MA 02144-2516

PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.

---

On May 11, 2019:
A new Sunshine Task Force complaint against Office of Mayor is attached.
We will also submit an entry on your webform.

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

Thank you,
Anonymous
---

On May 9, 2019:
We do not believe your arguments re: the acceptability of PDF format are valid and intend to contest them at the Sunshine Task Force. First, 6253.9(f) protects the integrity and security of the *original* record, not the copy of the record you provide to the public. Regardless, PDFs which are not digitally signed can be quite easily edited by anyone, no differently than editing say the .ics calendar file you could have provided to us. Second, 6253.9(a)(1) plainly requires provision of the in "any electronic format in which it holds the information" and we asked for the original format. Our understanding of computer systems indicates that format is not PDF.

In the mean time, I will point out that the original electronic format of the Mayor's calendar may contain substantial additional information (such as email addresses, conference call numbers, actual names of attendees instead of group descriptions, the acceptance/rejection of individual attendees to the invite, etc.) than that which was printed out for us. In addition to, and separately from, not being in the original format, by converting to PDF, you may have withheld such portions of the record from us, without pointing out to us that the portions were in fact withheld nor providing statutory justification for exemption (required by CPRA and the Sunshine Ordinance) nor providing the name and title of the official responsible for such withholding. Please provide all such information, if any information was withheld in the PDF you released to us, as compared to the original format.

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

Thank you.
---

On May 9, 2019:
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
Requestor: Anonymous

Email: requests@muckrock.com<mailto:requests@muckrock.com>

May 9, 2019

Re: Public Records Request received May 8, 2019

To whom it may concern:

This responds to your Immediate Disclosure Request below.

Response Dated April 24, 2019

Thank you for your inquiry. Please see attached the requested information.

This information has been provided in a PDF format for its ease of transferability and accessibility, consistent with Cal. Gov. Code 6253.9(a)(1). Moreover, pursuant to Cal. Gov. Code 6253.9 (f), an agency is not required to provide an electronic record in an electronic format that would jeopardize or compromise the security or integrity of the original record. The PDF format ensures the security and integrity of the original record.

Please also note that we are responding on behalf of the Mayor's Office only, and not on behalf of other city departments.

If you have any questions about your request or would like to submit another public records request, please feel free to contact us at mayorsunshinerequests@sfgov.org<mailto:mayorsunshinerequests@sfgov.org<mailto:mayorsunshinerequests@sfgov.org%3cmailto:mayorsunshinerequests@sfgov.org>>.
Best Regards,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of Mayor London N. Breed
City and County of San Francisco
---

On May 8, 2019:
Received. We are processing our response.

Thank you,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of Mayor London N. Breed
City and County of San Francisco
(415) 554-4796

---

On May 8, 2019:
We remind you of your obligation under City of San Jose v Superior Court (2017) to search personal accounts/devices for calendar items regarding the public's business, as appropriate.

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **
---

On May 8, 2019:
This is an Immediate Disclosure Request under the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance, made before close of business May 8, 2019.

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

We request under the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance (Ordinance) and the California Public Records Act (CPRA):

"1. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all calendar item headers, email addresses, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the Mayor's calendar, with all items, from April 28 to May 4, 2019 (inclusive)."

We remind you of your obligations to provide electronic records in the original format you hold them in. Therefore, calendars exported in the .ics, iCalendar, or vCard formats with all non-exempt headers, metadata, attachments, etc. are best. Such formats are easily exportable from Google Calendar, Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Exchange or other common calendaring/email systems.

However, if you choose to convert calendar items, for example, to PDF or printed format, to easily redact them, you must ensure that you have preserved the full content of the original calendar item record (as specified in request "1"), which contains many detailed headers beyond the ones generally printed out. If you instead provide PDFs or printed items with only a few of the headers or lacking attachments/images, and therefore withhold the other headers/attachments without justification, you may be in violation of SF Admin Code 67.26, 67.27, Govt Code 6253(a), 6253.9, and/or 6255, and we may challenge your decision.

Please provide only those copies of records available without any fees. If you determine certain records would require fees, please instead provide the required notice of which of those records are available and non-exempt for inspection in-person if we so choose.

I look forward to your immediate disclosure.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

Filed via MuckRock.com
E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com<mailto:requests@muckrock.com>
Upload documents directly: https://www.muckrock.com/
Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.

For mailed responses, please address (see note):
MuckRock News
DEPT MR 72902
411A Highland Ave
Somerville, MA 02144-2516

PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.

Please see attached correspondence.

Bradley Russi
Deputy City Attorney
Office of City Attorney Dennis Herrera
City Hall, Room 234
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Pl., San Francisco, CA 94102
www.sfcityattorney.org

Dear Anonymous,

This responds to your request below sent on Saturday September 7 and received by the Office of the Mayor on Monday, September 9. Your request purports to be an immediate disclosure request but satisfies neither the criteria of listing "Immediate Disclosure Request" nor of seeking material that is simple and routine to provide. Moreover, your request necessitates consultation with another department. Accordingly, the Office of the Mayor will treat this request as subject to the full 10 day period to respond for a regular request and reserves its rights to seek a further extension as needed. See Admin Code 67.25; Government Code § 6253(c).

Additionally, Item 2 of your request does not seek written communications and is therefore not the subject of a "records" request. Please clarify what type of information you are seeking responsive to Item 2.

Please let us know if you have questions regarding your request.

Regards,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of Mayor London N. Breed
City and County of San Francisco

September 9, 2019

This is a follow up to request number 19047:

Office of Mayor,

In items #1 and #2 of this request, the phrases "on Aug." are amended to "on Aug. 27." So it should read:
"... this is an IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE REQUEST for
1) records of all written communication (emails/texts/chat/etc.) between the Mayor's Office and City Attorney's office acting in its capacity as the Supervisor of Records regarding disclosure of non-Prop G calendar information and/or my petition to the Sup. of Records on Aug. 27 and/or the Sup. of Records' response to that petition.
2) *public information* (not records) regarding any non-written communications your office (specifically Hank Heckel) has with the City Attorney's office acting in its capacity as the Supervisor of Records regarding disclosure of non-Prop G calendar information and/or my petition to the Sup. of Records on Aug. 27 and/or the Sup. of Records' response to that petition. I am asking for a release of oral public information in this item."

If needed, you may consider this a new request with today's date, and cancel yesterday's similar IDR.

Thanks,
Anonymous

Filed via MuckRock.com
E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com<mailto:requests@muckrock.com>
Upload documents directly: https://www.muckrock.com/
Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.

For mailed responses, please address (see note):
MuckRock News
DEPT MR 72902
411A Highland Ave
Somerville, MA 02144-2516

PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.

---

On Sept. 7, 2019:
Subject: RE: California Public Records Act Request #19047
*** FILE 19047 *** . RE: your supplemental disclosure on Sept 6, and a further IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE REQUEST

Mayor's Office,

I will not withdraw any of my allegations before the SOTF, and have informed them as such.

Hank Heckel stated at the Aug. 20 committee (1h 17min in audio): "Anonymous's complaint is focused on information which either (a) was provided, (b) does not exist, or (c) compromises non-substantiative metadata...". This appears to be false, evidenced by the 2nd, non-Prop G calendar recently disclosed by your office. Note that this non-Prop G calendar does, in fact, identify (among other things) individual staff where the original disclosed record (the public-facing Prop G calendar) failed to do so. It is possible Mr. Heckel was unaware of this other calendar - I cannot know.

Since the Aug. 20 committee determination, I have been pressing many parallel tracks to get all the calendar documents and/or force your office to properly justify all their withholding. One of those methods was a second (and then third) SFAC 67.21(d) petition to the Supervisor of Records to determine that non-Prop G calendar records are also public. On the due date of my petition, your office provided a non-Prop G calendar and the Sup. of Records also replied to us nearly simultaneously, without formally denying or granting my petition. This appears to be a maneuver of internal negotiation between the Sup. of Records and your office allowing the Sup. of Records to not have to make an on-the-record determination that such non-Prop G calendars are public.

Note when the City Attorney, as Supervisor of Records, maneuvers in this way with your office, they are *not* acting as your legal counsel, and therefore your communications regarding my petiton (but not the advice you may have requested separately from your DCA's) are NOT subject to attorney-client privilege. The Supervisor of Records is supposedly acting on behalf of the people, to enforce disclosure of records pursuant to the Sunshine Ordinance. With all that in mind, this is an IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE REQUEST for
1) records of all written communication (emails/texts/chat/etc.) between the Mayor's Office and City Attorney's office acting in its capacity as the Supervisor of Records regarding disclosure of non-Prop G calendar information and/or my petition to the Sup. of Records on Aug. and/or the Sup. of Records' response to that petition.
2) *public information* (not records) regarding any non-written communications your office (specifically Hank Heckel) has with the City Attorney's office acting in its capacity as the Supervisor of Records regarding disclosure of non-Prop G calendar information and/or my petition to the Sup. of Records on Aug. and/or the Sup. of Records' response to that petition. I am asking for a release of oral public information in this item.

Finally, there is no mootness rule in the Sunshine Ordinance for either the Task Force or the Supervisor of Records - the fact that your office previously withheld this information, in contravention of the Sunshine Ordinance/CPRA, triggering my petitions and complaints, means I am due such an Order of Determination and still want the Task Force to find that your office violated the ordinance. I will continue to pursue that Order from the Task Force and the Supervisor of Records.

I want these orders on the record, and available for me to enforce at Superior Court under 67.21(f) and 67.35, if need be.
I intend to have enforceable precedent for the public at large so they do not have to go through this arduous process of months of appeals, petitions, and complaints.

Note also that all my metadata/format objections in 19047 are still unresolved as well.
Even in this latest disclosure you have plainly withheld public, non-exempt metadata. Note the circles with arrows next to some of the events. This is recurrence information (how often a meeting occurs). If you provided each item, and all of their metadata, as I requested originally, you would not have improperly withheld this non-exempt information.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

---

On Sept. 7, 2019:
Subject: RE: California Public Records Act Request #19047
*** FILE 19047 ***

Dear SOTF,

[I earlier today sent you a follow-up to 19047 re: my more in-depth requests for calendars. This is yet another follow-up for the 19047 case using a different mechanism of enforcing compliance by the City. Please add both to the file.]

Hank Heckel stated at the Aug. 20 committee (1h 17min in audio): "Anonymous's complaint is focused on information which either (a) was provided, (b) does not exist, or (c) compromises non-substantiative metadata...". This appears to be false, evidenced by the 2nd, non-Prop G calendar attached, recently disclosed by Respondents (titled by me SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD). Note that this non-Prop G calendar does, in fact, identify (among other things) individual staff where the original disclosed record (the public-facing Prop G calendar) failed to do so.

Since your Aug. 20 committee determination, I have been pressing many parallel tracks to get all the calendar documents or force the Respondents to properly justify all their withholding. One of those methods is a second (and then third) SFAC 67.21(d) petition to the Supervisor of Records to determine that non-Prop G calendar records are also public. On the due date of my petition, the Mayor's Office provided a non-Prop G calendar and the Sup. of Records also replied to us nearly simultaneously, without formally denying or granting my petition. This appears to be a maneuver of internal negotiation between the Sup. of Records and the Respondents (Mayor's Office) allowing the Supervisor of Records to not have to make an on-the-record determination that such calendars are public. I have attached the supplemental record, Respondents' supplemental response, and the petition response.

There is no mootness rule in the Sunshine Ordinance for either your Task Force or the Supervisor of Records - the fact that the Respondents previously withheld this information, in contravention of the Sunshine Ordinance/CPRA, triggering my petitions and complaints, means I am due such an Order of Determination and still want you to find that the Respondents violated the ordinance. I will continue to pursue that Order from your Task Force and the Supervisor of Records - I want these orders on the record, and available for me to enforce at Superior Court under 67.21(f) and 67.35, if need be.

Note also that all my metadata/format objections in 19047 are still unresolved as well.

Sincerely,

Anonymous
---

On Sept. 7, 2019:
Subject: RE: California Public Records Act Request #19047
*** FILE 19047 ***

Dear SOTF,

[I earlier today sent you a follow-up to 19047 re: my more in-depth requests for calendars. This is yet another follow-up for the 19047 case using a different mechanism of enforcing compliance by the City. Please add both to the file.]

Hank Heckel stated at the Aug. 20 committee (1h 17min in audio): "Anonymous's complaint is focused on information which either (a) was provided, (b) does not exist, or (c) compromises non-substantiative metadata...". This appears to be false, evidenced by the 2nd, non-Prop G calendar attached, recently disclosed by Respondents (titled by me SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD). Note that this non-Prop G calendar does, in fact, identify (among other things) individual staff where the original disclosed record (the public-facing Prop G calendar) failed to do so.

Since your Aug. 20 committee determination, I have been pressing many parallel tracks to get all the calendar documents or force the Respondents to properly justify all their withholding. One of those methods is a second (and then third) SFAC 67.21(d) petition to the Supervisor of Records to determine that non-Prop G calendar records are also public. On the due date of my petition, the Mayor's Office provided a non-Prop G calendar and the Sup. of Records also replied to us nearly simultaneously, without formally denying or granting my petition. This appears to be a maneuver of internal negotiation between the Sup. of Records and the Respondents (Mayor's Office) allowing the Supervisor of Records to not have to make an on-the-record determination that such calendars are public. I have attached the supplemental record, Respondents' supplemental response, and the petition response.

There is no mootness rule in the Sunshine Ordinance for either your Task Force or the Supervisor of Records - the fact that the Respondents previously withheld this information, in contravention of the Sunshine Ordinance/CPRA, triggering my petitions and complaints, means I am due such an Order of Determination and still want you to find that the Respondents violated the ordinance. I will continue to pursue that Order from your Task Force and the Supervisor of Records - I want these orders on the record, and available for me to enforce at Superior Court under 67.21(f) and 67.35, if need be.

Note also that all my metadata/format objections in 19047 are still unresolved as well.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

---

On Sept. 6, 2019:
Subject: RE: California Public Records Act Request #19047
Also, I missed this in the last email: while I understand the Mayor's Office turned over this non-Prop G calendar eventually, I think I am still owed a determination from the Supervisor of Records on my Aug 27 petition. You did not make that determination, and that is quite important to ensuring agencies cannot run rough-shod over our transparency laws.

Please issue me the obvious determination that these non-Prop G calendars now disclosed were and are in fact public records. This should be a very simple legal determination - there was a calendar prepared, owned, used, or retained by the Office of Mayor, and so it was plainly a public record, regardless of the Sunshine Ordinance or the Good Government Guide (which has no legal authority). This is not a new petition - it was made on Aug. 27.

Thank you,
Anonymous

---

On Sept. 6, 2019:
Subject: RE: California Public Records Act Request #19047
Thank you very much for your response.

The Office of the Mayor in their supplemental response states "- Redactions at the top of each page - security procedures information related to security detail redacted pursuant to Cal. Gov. Code 6254(f)." 6254(f) is not a permitted exemption reason for the reasons specified fully on the last para on page 3 and on the full page 5 of the following petition regarding other calendars: https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/94383620Anonymous/79117/79117-SupervisorPetition-20190906_3Fx53BW.pdf , those paragraphs being incorporated by reference herein.

Furthermore, the Mayor has withheld specific metadata, partially visible on this newest PDF, that is obviously public. Note the circles with arrows on the right hand side; these indicate recurrence information in the calendar record. This information must be disclosed, as explained under heading "Recurrence Metadata" of page 4 of the link above, those paragraphs being incorporated by reference herein.

Thanks,
Anonymous

---

On May 8, 2019:
Subject: California Public Records Act Request: April 28-May 4, 2019 Calendar - Immediate Disclosure Request
This is an Immediate Disclosure Request under the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance, made before close of business May 8, 2019.

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

We request under the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance (Ordinance) and the California Public Records Act (CPRA):

"1. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all calendar item headers, email addresses, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the Mayor's calendar, with all items, from April 28 to May 4, 2019 (inclusive)."

We remind you of your obligations to provide electronic records in the original format you hold them in. Therefore, calendars exported in the .ics, iCalendar, or vCard formats with all non-exempt headers, metadata, attachments, etc. are best. Such formats are easily exportable from Google Calendar, Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Exchange or other common calendaring/email systems.

However, if you choose to convert calendar items, for example, to PDF or printed format, to easily redact them, you must ensure that you have preserved the full content of the original calendar item record (as specified in request "1"), which contains many detailed headers beyond the ones generally printed out. If you instead provide PDFs or printed items with only a few of the headers or lacking attachments/images, and therefore withhold the other headers/attachments without justification, you may be in violation of SF Admin Code 67.26, 67.27, Govt Code 6253(a), 6253.9, and/or 6255, and we may challenge your decision.

Please provide only those copies of records available without any fees. If you determine certain records would require fees, please instead provide the required notice of which of those records are available and non-exempt for inspection in-person if we so choose.

I look forward to your immediate disclosure.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

Filed via MuckRock.com
E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com<mailto:requests@muckrock.com>
Upload documents directly: https://www.muckrock.com/
Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.

For mailed responses, please address (see note):
MuckRock News
DEPT MR 72902
411A Highland Ave
Somerville, MA 02144-2516

PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.
[http://email.requests.muckrock.com/o/eJw1ykEOgyAQAMDXlCNhLbDsgUNjfEdDFlRikQi1SX9fL81cJ3pjrEgl5NczRw8K0Lm7WH10JtroIGgmzUBkkckxchw080wi-0EBqQugUWAkSMRxpIcZ7GQ1Tog3rVo6ztTfXZaTt1Z5k1yLaL6Eb2393Pua9_RP1-_zUj-ytuUH-d0u9w]

To clarify the response below, your request did not indicate that it was an "Immediate Disclosure Request" in the subject line of the request as required by Admin Code 67.25(a).

Dear Anonymous:

Here is the DCA Memo; just received it last Friday afternoon.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information—including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees—may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear Anonymous:

I am in receipt of and thank you for your email below. Right now I do not have a call in number for you, but will provide it once I do.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information—including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees—may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

I am in receipt of and thank you for your email below. Can you please in the future put the correct File No. is the subject line of your emails and in the body? You say in your email that this is a follow up to 19047 and it isn’t. Thank you.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information—including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees—may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear Anonymous,

This responds to your inquiry below. Your request seeks confidential discussions between the City Attorney's Office and a client department that is exempt from disclosure pursuant to the attorney/client privilege. See Gov't Code § 6254(k); Evidence Code § 954; Admin. Code § 67.21(k). Accordingly, we will refrain from providing any such information.

Moreover, to the extent you are making a request under Admin Code 67.22 for specific interactions between Mayor's Office staff and the City Attorney's Office, it exceeds the scope of this procedure which only applies to requests for certain information about a department's
"operations, plans, policies and positions."

Please let me know if you have any additional questions.

Regards,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of the Mayor

...

September 10, 2019

This is a follow up to request number 19047:

Mr. Heckel,

The non-IDR nature is acknowledged.

Although the purpose of my request cannot be considered in withholding, it may help you identify responsive information. My purpose is to determine whether the Supervisor of Records and/or Mayor's Office are working to ensure the Supervisor of Records does not have to formally grant petitions under SFAC 67.21(d). Historically, the Sup. of Records denies my petitions formally. In the case of the response of Sept. 6 re: these calendars, the petition appears neither to be denied nor granted, even though there is no mootness rule in the Sunshine Ordinance, and your office had in fact withheld the non-Prop G records you later provided, as of the date I filed the petition. I am trying to figure out what's going on here. I will be attempting to find all public information from whatever agency neccessary to answer this.

Therefore, here is the public information in #2 that I would like:
* Did the Mayor's Office coordinate with the Supervisor of Records (or his delegates, including but not limited to, Bradley Russi, DCA) re: its supplementary response to my May 8 request? If so what was the nature of this coordination?
* Did the Mayor's Office request that my petition not be granted (even in part), even though the Mayor's Office did in fact provide non-Prop G calendars?
* Did the Supervisor of Records (or his delegates) request that the Mayor's Office provide the supplemental records no later than Sept. 6 to attempt to avoid granting my petition (even in part)?

Please note, I am allowed to make a oral request for information (SFAC 67.22). Therefore, if you refuse to provide a written response to the above, please provide your city phone number such that I may call and request that information. Since I believe you as Custodian of Records are in fact the person, if any, who would be coordinating with the Sup. of Records, it should take you less than the 15 minutes maximum to answer.

Thanks,
Anonymous

Filed via MuckRock.com
E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com<mailto:requests@muckrock.com>
Upload documents directly: https://www.muckrock.com/
Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.

For mailed responses, please address (see note):
MuckRock News
DEPT MR 72902
411A Highland Ave
Somerville, MA 02144-2516

PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.

---

On Sept. 10, 2019:
Subject: RE: California Public Records Act Request #19047
To clarify the response below, your request did not indicate that it was an "Immediate Disclosure Request" in the subject line of the request as required by Admin Code 67.25(a).

---

On Sept. 10, 2019:
Subject: California Public Records Act Request #19047
Dear Anonymous,

This responds to your request below sent on Saturday September 7 and received by the Office of the Mayor on Monday, September 9. Your request purports to be an immediate disclosure request but satisfies neither the criteria of listing "Immediate Disclosure Request" nor of seeking material that is simple and routine to provide. Moreover, your request necessitates consultation with another department. Accordingly, the Office of the Mayor will treat this request as subject to the full 10 day period to respond for a regular request and reserves its rights to seek a further extension as needed. See Admin Code 67.25; Government Code § 6253(c).

Additionally, Item 2 of your request does not seek written communications and is therefore not the subject of a "records" request. Please clarify what type of information you are seeking responsive to Item 2.

Please let us know if you have questions regarding your request.

Regards,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of Mayor London N. Breed
City and County of San Francisco

September 9, 2019

This is a follow up to request number 19047:

Office of Mayor,

In items #1 and #2 of this request, the phrases "on Aug." are amended to "on Aug. 27." So it should read:
"... this is an IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE REQUEST for
1) records of all written communication (emails/texts/chat/etc.) between the Mayor's Office and City Attorney's office acting in its capacity as the Supervisor of Records regarding disclosure of non-Prop G calendar information and/or my petition to the Sup. of Records on Aug. 27 and/or the Sup. of Records' response to that petition.
2) *public information* (not records) regarding any non-written communications your office (specifically Hank Heckel) has with the City Attorney's office acting in its capacity as the Supervisor of Records regarding disclosure of non-Prop G calendar information and/or my petition to the Sup. of Records on Aug. 27 and/or the Sup. of Records' response to that petition. I am asking for a release of oral public information in this item."

If needed, you may consider this a new request with today's date, and cancel yesterday's similar IDR.

Thanks,
Anonymous

Filed via MuckRock.com
E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com<mailto:requests@muckrock.com<mailto:requests@muckrock.com%3cmailto:requests@muckrock.com>>
Upload documents directly: https://www.muckrock.com/
Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.

For mailed responses, please address (see note):
MuckRock News
DEPT MR 72902
411A Highland Ave
Somerville, MA 02144-2516

PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.

---

On Sept. 7, 2019:
Subject: RE: California Public Records Act Request #19047
*** FILE 19047 *** . RE: your supplemental disclosure on Sept 6, and a further IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE REQUEST

Mayor's Office,

I will not withdraw any of my allegations before the SOTF, and have informed them as such.

Hank Heckel stated at the Aug. 20 committee (1h 17min in audio): "Anonymous's complaint is focused on information which either (a) was provided, (b) does not exist, or (c) compromises non-substantiative metadata...". This appears to be false, evidenced by the 2nd, non-Prop G calendar recently disclosed by your office. Note that this non-Prop G calendar does, in fact, identify (among other things) individual staff where the original disclosed record (the public-facing Prop G calendar) failed to do so. It is possible Mr. Heckel was unaware of this other calendar - I cannot know.

Since the Aug. 20 committee determination, I have been pressing many parallel tracks to get all the calendar documents and/or force your office to properly justify all their withholding. One of those methods was a second (and then third) SFAC 67.21(d) petition to the Supervisor of Records to determine that non-Prop G calendar records are also public. On the due date of my petition, your office provided a non-Prop G calendar and the Sup. of Records also replied to us nearly simultaneously, without formally denying or granting my petition. This appears to be a maneuver of internal negotiation between the Sup. of Records and your office allowing the Sup. of Records to not have to make an on-the-record determination that such non-Prop G calendars are public.

Note when the City Attorney, as Supervisor of Records, maneuvers in this way with your office, they are *not* acting as your legal counsel, and therefore your communications regarding my petiton (but not the advice you may have requested separately from your DCA's) are NOT subject to attorney-client privilege. The Supervisor of Records is supposedly acting on behalf of the people, to enforce disclosure of records pursuant to the Sunshine Ordinance. With all that in mind, this is an IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE REQUEST for
1) records of all written communication (emails/texts/chat/etc.) between the Mayor's Office and City Attorney's office acting in its capacity as the Supervisor of Records regarding disclosure of non-Prop G calendar information and/or my petition to the Sup. of Records on Aug. and/or the Sup. of Records' response to that petition.
2) *public information* (not records) regarding any non-written communications your office (specifically Hank Heckel) has with the City Attorney's office acting in its capacity as the Supervisor of Records regarding disclosure of non-Prop G calendar information and/or my petition to the Sup. of Records on Aug. and/or the Sup. of Records' response to that petition. I am asking for a release of oral public information in this item.

Finally, there is no mootness rule in the Sunshine Ordinance for either the Task Force or the Supervisor of Records - the fact that your office previously withheld this information, in contravention of the Sunshine Ordinance/CPRA, triggering my petitions and complaints, means I am due such an Order of Determination and still want the Task Force to find that your office violated the ordinance. I will continue to pursue that Order from the Task Force and the Supervisor of Records.

I want these orders on the record, and available for me to enforce at Superior Court under 67.21(f) and 67.35, if need be.
I intend to have enforceable precedent for the public at large so they do not have to go through this arduous process of months of appeals, petitions, and complaints.

Note also that all my metadata/format objections in 19047 are still unresolved as well.
Even in this latest disclosure you have plainly withheld public, non-exempt metadata. Note the circles with arrows next to some of the events. This is recurrence information (how often a meeting occurs). If you provided each item, and all of their metadata, as I requested originally, you would not have improperly withheld this non-exempt information.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

---

On Sept. 7, 2019:
Subject: RE: California Public Records Act Request #19047
*** FILE 19047 ***

Dear SOTF,

[I earlier today sent you a follow-up to 19047 re: my more in-depth requests for calendars. This is yet another follow-up for the 19047 case using a different mechanism of enforcing compliance by the City. Please add both to the file.]

Hank Heckel stated at the Aug. 20 committee (1h 17min in audio): "Anonymous's complaint is focused on information which either (a) was provided, (b) does not exist, or (c) compromises non-substantiative metadata...". This appears to be false, evidenced by the 2nd, non-Prop G calendar attached, recently disclosed by Respondents (titled by me SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD). Note that this non-Prop G calendar does, in fact, identify (among other things) individual staff where the original disclosed record (the public-facing Prop G calendar) failed to do so.

Since your Aug. 20 committee determination, I have been pressing many parallel tracks to get all the calendar documents or force the Respondents to properly justify all their withholding. One of those methods is a second (and then third) SFAC 67.21(d) petition to the Supervisor of Records to determine that non-Prop G calendar records are also public. On the due date of my petition, the Mayor's Office provided a non-Prop G calendar and the Sup. of Records also replied to us nearly simultaneously, without formally denying or granting my petition. This appears to be a maneuver of internal negotiation between the Sup. of Records and the Respondents (Mayor's Office) allowing the Supervisor of Records to not have to make an on-the-record determination that such calendars are public. I have attached the supplemental record, Respondents' supplemental response, and the petition response.

There is no mootness rule in the Sunshine Ordinance for either your Task Force or the Supervisor of Records - the fact that the Respondents previously withheld this information, in contravention of the Sunshine Ordinance/CPRA, triggering my petitions and complaints, means I am due such an Order of Determination and still want you to find that the Respondents violated the ordinance. I will continue to pursue that Order from your Task Force and the Supervisor of Records - I want these orders on the record, and available for me to enforce at Superior Court under 67.21(f) and 67.35, if need be.

Note also that all my metadata/format objections in 19047 are still unresolved as well.

Sincerely,

Anonymous
---

On Sept. 7, 2019:
Subject: RE: California Public Records Act Request #19047
*** FILE 19047 ***

Dear SOTF,

[I earlier today sent you a follow-up to 19047 re: my more in-depth requests for calendars. This is yet another follow-up for the 19047 case using a different mechanism of enforcing compliance by the City. Please add both to the file.]

Hank Heckel stated at the Aug. 20 committee (1h 17min in audio): "Anonymous's complaint is focused on information which either (a) was provided, (b) does not exist, or (c) compromises non-substantiative metadata...". This appears to be false, evidenced by the 2nd, non-Prop G calendar attached, recently disclosed by Respondents (titled by me SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD). Note that this non-Prop G calendar does, in fact, identify (among other things) individual staff where the original disclosed record (the public-facing Prop G calendar) failed to do so.

Since your Aug. 20 committee determination, I have been pressing many parallel tracks to get all the calendar documents or force the Respondents to properly justify all their withholding. One of those methods is a second (and then third) SFAC 67.21(d) petition to the Supervisor of Records to determine that non-Prop G calendar records are also public. On the due date of my petition, the Mayor's Office provided a non-Prop G calendar and the Sup. of Records also replied to us nearly simultaneously, without formally denying or granting my petition. This appears to be a maneuver of internal negotiation between the Sup. of Records and the Respondents (Mayor's Office) allowing the Supervisor of Records to not have to make an on-the-record determination that such calendars are public. I have attached the supplemental record, Respondents' supplemental response, and the petition response.

There is no mootness rule in the Sunshine Ordinance for either your Task Force or the Supervisor of Records - the fact that the Respondents previously withheld this information, in contravention of the Sunshine Ordinance/CPRA, triggering my petitions and complaints, means I am due such an Order of Determination and still want you to find that the Respondents violated the ordinance. I will continue to pursue that Order from your Task Force and the Supervisor of Records - I want these orders on the record, and available for me to enforce at Superior Court under 67.21(f) and 67.35, if need be.

Note also that all my metadata/format objections in 19047 are still unresolved as well.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

---

On Sept. 6, 2019:
Subject: RE: California Public Records Act Request #19047
Also, I missed this in the last email: while I understand the Mayor's Office turned over this non-Prop G calendar eventually, I think I am still owed a determination from the Supervisor of Records on my Aug 27 petition. You did not make that determination, and that is quite important to ensuring agencies cannot run rough-shod over our transparency laws.

Please issue me the obvious determination that these non-Prop G calendars now disclosed were and are in fact public records. This should be a very simple legal determination - there was a calendar prepared, owned, used, or retained by the Office of Mayor, and so it was plainly a public record, regardless of the Sunshine Ordinance or the Good Government Guide (which has no legal authority). This is not a new petition - it was made on Aug. 27.

Thank you,
Anonymous

---

On Sept. 6, 2019:
Subject: RE: California Public Records Act Request #19047
Thank you very much for your response.

The Office of the Mayor in their supplemental response states "- Redactions at the top of each page - security procedures information related to security detail redacted pursuant to Cal. Gov. Code 6254(f)." 6254(f) is not a permitted exemption reason for the reasons specified fully on the last para on page 3 and on the full page 5 of the following petition regarding other calendars: https://cdn.muckrock.com/outbound_request_attachments/94383620Anonymous/79117/79117-SupervisorPetition-20190906_3Fx53BW.pdf , those paragraphs being incorporated by reference herein.

Furthermore, the Mayor has withheld specific metadata, partially visible on this newest PDF, that is obviously public. Note the circles with arrows on the right hand side; these indicate recurrence information in the calendar record. This information must be disclosed, as explained under heading "Recurrence Metadata" of page 4 of the link above, those paragraphs being incorporated by reference herein.

Thanks,
Anonymous

---

On May 8, 2019:
Subject: California Public Records Act Request: April 28-May 4, 2019 Calendar - Immediate Disclosure Request
This is an Immediate Disclosure Request under the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance, made before close of business May 8, 2019.

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

We request under the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance (Ordinance) and the California Public Records Act (CPRA):

"1. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all calendar item headers, email addresses, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the Mayor's calendar, with all items, from April 28 to May 4, 2019 (inclusive)."

We remind you of your obligations to provide electronic records in the original format you hold them in. Therefore, calendars exported in the .ics, iCalendar, or vCard formats with all non-exempt headers, metadata, attachments, etc. are best. Such formats are easily exportable from Google Calendar, Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Exchange or other common calendaring/email systems.

However, if you choose to convert calendar items, for example, to PDF or printed format, to easily redact them, you must ensure that you have preserved the full content of the original calendar item record (as specified in request "1"), which contains many detailed headers beyond the ones generally printed out. If you instead provide PDFs or printed items with only a few of the headers or lacking attachments/images, and therefore withhold the other headers/attachments without justification, you may be in violation of SF Admin Code 67.26, 67.27, Govt Code 6253(a), 6253.9, and/or 6255, and we may challenge your decision.

Please provide only those copies of records available without any fees. If you determine certain records would require fees, please instead provide the required notice of which of those records are available and non-exempt for inspection in-person if we so choose.

I look forward to your immediate disclosure.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

Filed via MuckRock.com
E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com<mailto:requests@muckrock.com<mailto:requests@muckrock.com%3cmailto:requests@muckrock.com>>
Upload documents directly: https://www.muckrock.com/
Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.

For mailed responses, please address (see note):
MuckRock News
DEPT MR 72902
411A Highland Ave
Somerville, MA 02144-2516

PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.
[http://email.requests.muckrock.com/o/eJw1ykEOgyAQAMDXlCNhLbDsgUNjfEdDFlRikQi1SX9fL81cJ3pjrEgl5NczRw8K0Lm7WH10JtroIGgmzUBkkckxchw080wi-0EBqQugUWAkSMRxpIcZ7GQ1Tog3rVo6ztTfXZaTt1Z5k1yLaL6Eb2393Pua9_RP1-_zUj-ytuUH-d0u9w]

---

On Sept. 9, 2019:
Subject: RE: California Public Records Act Request #19047
Office of Mayor,

In items #1 and #2 of this request, the phrases "on Aug." are amended to "on Aug. 27." So it should read:
"... this is an IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE REQUEST for
1) records of all written communication (emails/texts/chat/etc.) between the Mayor's Office and City Attorney's office acting in its capacity as the Supervisor of Records regarding disclosure of non-Prop G calendar information and/or my petition to the Sup. of Records on Aug. 27 and/or the Sup. of Records' response to that petition.
2) *public information* (not records) regarding any non-written communications your office (specifically Hank Heckel) has with the City Attorney's office acting in its capacity as the Supervisor of Records regarding disclosure of non-Prop G calendar information and/or my petition to the Sup. of Records on Aug. 27 and/or the Sup. of Records' response to that petition. I am asking for a release of oral public information in this item."

If needed, you may consider this a new request with today's date, and cancel yesterday's similar IDR.

Thanks,
Anonymous

---

On Sept. 7, 2019:
Subject: RE: California Public Records Act Request #19047
*** FILE 19047 *** . RE: your supplemental disclosure on Sept 6, and a further IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE REQUEST

Mayor's Office,

I will not withdraw any of my allegations before the SOTF, and have informed them as such.

Hank Heckel stated at the Aug. 20 committee (1h 17min in audio): "Anonymous's complaint is focused on information which either (a) was provided, (b) does not exist, or (c) compromises non-substantiative metadata...". This appears to be false, evidenced by the 2nd, non-Prop G calendar recently disclosed by your office. Note that this non-Prop G calendar does, in fact, identify (among other things) individual staff where the original disclosed record (the public-facing Prop G calendar) failed to do so. It is possible Mr. Heckel was unaware of this other calendar - I cannot know.

Since the Aug. 20 committee determination, I have been pressing many parallel tracks to get all the calendar documents and/or force your office to properly justify all their withholding. One of those methods was a second (and then third) SFAC 67.21(d) petition to the Supervisor of Records to determine that non-Prop G calendar records are also public. On the due date of my petition, your office provided a non-Prop G calendar and the Sup. of Records also replied to us nearly simultaneously, without formally denying or granting my petition. This appears to be a maneuver of internal negotiation between the Sup. of Records and your office allowing the Sup. of Records to not have to make an on-the-record determination that such non-Prop G calendars are public.

Note when the City Attorney, as Supervisor of Records, maneuvers in this way with your office, they are *not* acting as your legal counsel, and therefore your communications regarding my petiton (but not the advice you may have requested separately from your DCA's) are NOT subject to attorney-client privilege. The Supervisor of Records is supposedly acting on behalf of the people, to enforce disclosure of records pursuant to the Sunshine Ordinance. With all that in mind, this is an IMMEDIATE DISCLOSURE REQUEST for
1) records of all written communication (emails/texts/chat/etc.) between the Mayor's Office and City Attorney's office acting in its capacity as the Supervisor of Records regarding disclosure of non-Prop G calendar information and/or my petition to the Sup. of Records on Aug. and/or the Sup. of Records' response to that petition.
2) *public information* (not records) regarding any non-written communications your office (specifically Hank Heckel) has with the City Attorney's office acting in its capacity as the Supervisor of Records regarding disclosure of non-Prop G calendar information and/or my petition to the Sup. of Records on Aug. and/or the Sup. of Records' response to that petition. I am asking for a release of oral public information in this item.

Finally, there is no mootness rule in the Sunshine Ordinance for either the Task Force or the Supervisor of Records - the fact that your office previously withheld this information, in contravention of the Sunshine Ordinance/CPRA, triggering my petitions and complaints, means I am due such an Order of Determination and still want the Task Force to find that your office violated the ordinance. I will continue to pursue that Order from the Task Force and the Supervisor of Records.

I want these orders on the record, and available for me to enforce at Superior Court under 67.21(f) and 67.35, if need be.
I intend to have enforceable precedent for the public at large so they do not have to go through this arduous process of months of appeals, petitions, and complaints.

Note also that all my metadata/format objections in 19047 are still unresolved as well.
Even in this latest disclosure you have plainly withheld public, non-exempt metadata. Note the circles with arrows next to some of the events. This is recurrence information (how often a meeting occurs). If you provided each item, and all of their metadata, as I requested originally, you would not have improperly withheld this non-exempt information.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

---

On Sept. 7, 2019:
Subject: RE: California Public Records Act Request #19047
*** FILE 19047 ***

Dear SOTF,

[I earlier today sent you a follow-up to 19047 re: my more in-depth requests for calendars. This is yet another follow-up for the 19047 case using a different mechanism of enforcing compliance by the City. Please add both to the file.]

Hank Heckel stated at the Aug. 20 committee (1h 17min in audio): "Anonymous's complaint is focused on information which either (a) was provided, (b) does not exist, or (c) compromises non-substantiative metadata...". This appears to be false, evidenced by the 2nd, non-Prop G calendar attached, recently disclosed by Respondents (titled by me SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD). Note that this non-Prop G calendar does, in fact, identify (among other things) individual staff where the original disclosed record (the public-facing Prop G calendar) failed to do so.

Since your Aug. 20 committee determination, I have been pressing many parallel tracks to get all the calendar documents or force the Respondents to properly justify all their withholding. One of those methods is a second (and then third) SFAC 67.21(d) petition to the Supervisor of Records to determine that non-Prop G calendar records are also public. On the due date of my petition, the Mayor's Office provided a non-Prop G calendar and the Sup. of Records also replied to us nearly simultaneously, without formally denying or granting my petition. This appears to be a maneuver of internal negotiation between the Sup. of Records and the Respondents (Mayor's Office) allowing the Supervisor of Records to not have to make an on-the-record determination that such calendars are public. I have attached the supplemental record, Respondents' supplemental response, and the petition response.

There is no mootness rule in the Sunshine Ordinance for either your Task Force or the Supervisor of Records - the fact that the Respondents previously withheld this information, in contravention of the Sunshine Ordinance/CPRA, triggering my petitions and complaints, means I am due such an Order of Determination and still want you to find that the Respondents violated the ordinance. I will continue to pursue that Order from your Task Force and the Supervisor of Records - I want these orders on the record, and available for me to enforce at Superior Court under 67.21(f) and 67.35, if need be.

Note also that all my metadata/format objections in 19047 are still unresolved as well.

Sincerely,

Anonymous
---

On May 8, 2019:
Subject: California Public Records Act Request: April 28-May 4, 2019 Calendar - Immediate Disclosure Request
This is an Immediate Disclosure Request under the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance, made before close of business May 8, 2019.

** Note that all of your responses (including disclosed records) may be automatically and instantly available to the public on the MuckRock.com service used to issue this request (though I am not a MuckRock representative). **

We request under the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance (Ordinance) and the California Public Records Act (CPRA):

"1. an electronic copy, in the original electronic format, with all calendar item headers, email addresses, metadata, timestamps, attachments, appendices, exhibits, and inline images, except those explicitly exempted by the Ordinance, of the Mayor's calendar, with all items, from April 28 to May 4, 2019 (inclusive)."

We remind you of your obligations to provide electronic records in the original format you hold them in. Therefore, calendars exported in the .ics, iCalendar, or vCard formats with all non-exempt headers, metadata, attachments, etc. are best. Such formats are easily exportable from Google Calendar, Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Exchange or other common calendaring/email systems.

However, if you choose to convert calendar items, for example, to PDF or printed format, to easily redact them, you must ensure that you have preserved the full content of the original calendar item record (as specified in request "1"), which contains many detailed headers beyond the ones generally printed out. If you instead provide PDFs or printed items with only a few of the headers or lacking attachments/images, and therefore withhold the other headers/attachments without justification, you may be in violation of SF Admin Code 67.26, 67.27, Govt Code 6253(a), 6253.9, and/or 6255, and we may challenge your decision.

Please provide only those copies of records available without any fees. If you determine certain records would require fees, please instead provide the required notice of which of those records are available and non-exempt for inspection in-person if we so choose.

I look forward to your immediate disclosure.

Sincerely,
Anonymous

Filed via MuckRock.com
E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com<mailto:requests@muckrock.com>
Upload documents directly: https://www.muckrock.com/
Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.

For mailed responses, please address (see note):
MuckRock News
DEPT MR 72902
411A Highland Ave
Somerville, MA 02144-2516

PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.
[http://email.requests.muckrock.com/o/eJw1y0EOwiAQAMDXyJHsstCyBw4YfYdBSluilAjWxN_bi_eZyRkziFRCft7y5BDQkhnF6oYYDSfLNioAsiFo4jCrceY7TZqUyE4BMjAeB4FYomTtB7zAGfzVK0v-pKGl1576u8uyx0er8SFjLaK5Er619X3ra97SHx2-z0v9yNqWH8NDLm8]

Good Morning:

The agenda packet for the September 24, 2019, Compliance and Amendments Committee, 4:30 pm hearing is available online at the following link:

https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/default/files/cac092419_agenda.pdf

The packet material is linked to each item listed on the agenda mark with an "attachment". Click anywhere on the title of the item to open the link to the pdf of the packet material in question.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Good Afternoon:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: October 2, 2019

Location: City Hall, Room 408

Time: 4:00 p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

File No. 17097: Complaint filed by Marc Bruno against the Planning Department, Board of appeals and the Department of Building Inspection for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 and 67.25, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 17114: Complaint filed by Marc Bruno against the Department of Building Inspection for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 and 67.25, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 17115: Complaint filed by Marc Bruno against the Board of Appeals for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21 and 67.25, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 17079: Complaint filed by Mary Miles against Mike Sallaberry, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 17080: Complaint filed by Mary Miles against Will Tabajonda, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 17081: Complaint filed by Mary Miles against Luis Montoya, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25, by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19044: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Dennis Herrera and the Office of the City Attorney for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19047: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Mayor London Breed, Hank Heckel and the Office of the Mayor for allegedly violating Administrative Code, (Sunshine Ordinance) Sections 67.25 and 67.29-5, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

File No. 19010: Hearing to consider action to close Sunshine Ordinance Task Force complaints due inactivity and other violations of the SOTF Complaint Procedures for the following files:

17102 Liz Arbus vs Arts Commission

18071 Liz Arbus vs Arts Commission

18085 Liz Arbus vs Arts Commission

18090 Carlos Petri vs Office of the City Attorney

18091 Mark Zuckerberg vs Arts Commission

19009 Lucinda Page vs Arts Commission.

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure). For inclusion into the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00 pm, September 25, 2019.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear Anonymous:

Attached is the Agenda for the Complaint Committee hearing. Your file nos. 19047 and 19044 are included. Just place your curser on the file description and your records should appear.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information—including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees—may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear Anonymous:

Please only send me documents that you have not already forwarded. Thank you.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information—including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees—may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear Anonymous:

I have the call in information for your appearance tomorrow. Please call 1-877-402-9753 and use participant Code 5547726. Please call me at 4:00 pm so that I can assure you are heard in the hearing room. If you still have questions, please get in touch with me at the number below. I will be heading up to the conference room tomorrow at 3:30 pm. Thank you.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear Anonymous:

I meant for you to call me tomorrow at 4:00 PM to ensure that you are on line and we can hear you before the hearing begins. Thank you.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear Anonymous:

I think the call might come through clearer if you do not use an speaker phone. What do you think?

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear Anonymous:

Yes, I did get the 19047 presentation and it is in the file. With regard to changing your complaint, typically, we only notice Sunshine Ordinance numbers, not government codes. However, I have included them in your complaint.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Anonymous: You need to find a way to correctly reference the file numbers in your emails and documents. It can be confusing when you don't and I want to make certain that your materials go into the correct file. Thank you.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear SOTF Parties:

The agenda packet for the October 2, 2019, Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, 4:00 pm hearing is available online at the following link:

https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/default/files/sotf_100219_agenda.pdf

The packet material is linked to each item listed on the agenda mark with an "attachment". Click anywhere on the title of the item to open the link to the pdf of the packet material in question.

I will be on vacation beginning September 30 returning October 18. Should you have questions or need assistance please contact Victor Young at 415-554-7724 or email the Sunshine Task Force at sotf@sfgov.org<mailto:sotf@sfgov.org>. Otherwise I will respond to you inquiry upon my return. Thank you.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Please see the attached response to your petitions.

Bradley Russi
Deputy City Attorney
Office of City Attorney Dennis Herrera
City Hall, Room 234
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Pl., San Francisco, CA 94102
www.sfcityattorney.org

Dear Parties:

Please see attached the signed Order of Determination in file no. 19047 which was published today.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.


Thank you for your email. Please note my new email address is mayorlondonbreed@sfgov.org<mailto:mayorlondonbreed@sfgov.org>. Please direct your correspondence to this new address.

Please use the following resources are available for your more immediate needs:

If you are writing with a request for non-emergency neighborhood services (such as park repairs, street and sidewalk cleaning, and tree maintenance), or for inquiries regarding the shelter reservation waitlist, please Call 3-1-1. If your request has not been addressed and you would like our office to follow up, please contact the Mayor’s Office of Neighborhood Services at (415) 554-5977 with your confirmation number.

If there is a homeless individual in distress on the street in need of assistance, please contact the SF Homeless Outreach Team (SF HOT) at the following dispatch numbers:

• For all urgent matters: 415-355-7445
(Services include 24/7 urgent/emergent client transportation; transportation to shelter drop-in center or resource center; and client care coordination)
• For non-urgent matters: 415-355-7401
(Services include outreach requests and/or client wellness checks; and client consultation)

**Please note that non-urgent calls to the urgent dispatch lines will be asked to call the non-urgent line so that the urgent medical providers and operators can be available for emergency situations.**

If you wish to make a Request for Public Records or other request under the City’s Sunshine Ordinance, please contact your request to mayorsunshinerequests@sfgov.org. If you are making an immediate disclosure request, please remember to put the words “Immediate Disclosure Request” in the subject line of your e-mail.

For all scheduling inquiries and requests, please contact scheduling@sfgov.org<mailto:scheduling@sfgov.org> with the following information:

• For events: event details and nature of request (speaking, attending, hosting, etc.)
• For meetings: purpose of meeting and meeting attendees

Sincerely,

London N. Breed
Mayor

Dear Anonymous,

Please see the attached files responsive to the referenced Order and your request below.

Please note that the "non-Prop G" calendar records you reference were previously produced in a supplemental production on September 6 for these dates. To the extent the production of those records is a subject of the Order those records have already been produced.

Please note that we are producing a daily view of the "non-Prop G" calendar records in a text PDF as opposed to a scanned PDF as requested. Thus, to the extent that format is a subject of the Order we are providing those records herewith.

Please note that we are producing individual ICS calendar views of entries from these dates in PDF. However, our understanding is that SOTF has not made a final determination as to the ICS format and the inherent metadata associated with that format or for metadata associated with other Outlook "native" formats such as .msg.

As you know, this issue was discussed extensively during the hearing on this file as was related metadata issues concerning your complaints on request to the City Attorney's Office at the same hearing. At the conclusion of that hearing SOTF referred all such metadata issues from the City Attorney complaints to the Technology Committee. I also requested that the metadata issues in this file also be so referred. SOTF granted that request.

At the October 22 Technology Committee meeting there was again extensive discussion of these issues including the scope and manner of appropriate redactions for these types of metadata. These issues were not resolved and were narrowed and referred back to the full Task Force.

Pending further determinations regarding such issues we maintain our objections to production in ICS format with metadata. We are also continuing to consult with the City Attorney's Office and City IT regarding these issues and other potential exemptions in the meantime. Accordingly, we are not currently providing such formats and metadata pending this consultation, pursuant to at least Cal. Gov. Code 6253.9(f) and 6254.19 and Admin. Code 67.21(l).

We reserve our rights to amend and supplement this response in accordance with the outcome of this consultation.

Please note the following redactions in this production.

* The redacted information associated with recurrences has been withheld for security reasons pursuant to Cal. Gov. Code 6254(f);
* The redacted "SID" information about the Mayor's security detail has been withheld for security reasons pursuant to Cal. Gov. Code 6254(f);
* The cell phone and dial in numbers have been redacted to protect personal privacy and to protect official information. See Cal. Govt. Code Secs. 6254(c), 6254(k); California Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 1; Cal. Evid. Code Sec. 1040(b)(2).
We reserve all rights to seek clarification or a challenge to any part of the referenced Order.
Regards,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of the Mayor
City and County of San Francisco

Good Afternoon:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: December 4, 2019

Location: City Hall, Room 408

Time: 4:00 p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

File No. 19077: Complaint filed by Ahimsa Porter Sumchai against Mayor London Breed for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner and 67.7 for not posting the Agenda in a timely manner.

File No. 19079: Complaint filed by Thomas Picarello against the Dept. of Homelessness and Supportive Housing for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25 for failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely manner.

File No. 19089: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Dennis Herrera and the Office of the City Attorney for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21(d), by failing to provide a determination to a Supervisor of Records petition in a timely or complete manner.

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure).

For inclusion in the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00 pm, November 20, 2019.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear Complainant,

We are writing concerning File No. 19089, which is currently scheduled for hearing before the full Task Force on December 4, 2019. Unfortunately, the person from our office who is most well-suited to address this complaint, John Cote, is out of the office and will not return on December 5, due to a previously-scheduled family vacation. We would like to request a continuance so that Mr. Cote can participate. This is the first continuance that we have requested on this complaint.

Please let us know if you would agree to this request. Based on Task Force Rule 8(b), it is our understanding that the Task Force would automatically grant the continuance if you were to agree to it. If you do not agree, we understand Rule 8(b) to state that the Task Force could authorize a continuance by a simple majority vote of the members present.

Thank you.

Please send replies to cityattorney@sfcityatty.org<mailto:cityattorney@sfcityatty.org>
Sincerely,

[cid:image002.jpg@01D5A151.16E90310]Elizabeth A. Coolbrith
Paralegal
Office of City Attorney Dennis Herrera
(415) 554-4685 Direct
www.sfcityattorney.org
Find us on: Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/sfcityattorney/> Twitter<https://twitter.com/SFCityAttorney> Instagram<https://www.instagram.com/sfcityattorney/>

Dear Complainant,

My apologies - I made a typo in the email below, that is now corrected in bold.

Thank you,

[cid:image003.jpg@01D5A154.36D967C0]Elizabeth A. Coolbrith
Paralegal
Office of City Attorney Dennis Herrera
(415) 554-4685 Direct
www.sfcityattorney.org
Find us on: Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/sfcityattorney/> Twitter<https://twitter.com/SFCityAttorney> Instagram<https://www.instagram.com/sfcityattorney/>

Hello, the corrected version is as follows:

Dear Complainant,

We are writing concerning File No. 19089, which is currently scheduled for hearing before the full Task Force on December 4, 2019. Unfortunately, the person from our office who is most well-suited to address this complaint, John Cote, is out of the office and will not return until December 5, due to a previously-scheduled family vacation. We would like to request a continuance so that Mr. Cote can participate. This is the first continuance that we have requested on this complaint.

Please let us know if you would agree to this request. Based on Task Force Rule 8(b), it is our understanding that the Task Force would automatically grant the continuance if you were to agree to it. If you do not agree, we understand Rule 8(b) to state that the Task Force could authorize a continuance by a simple majority vote of the members present.

Thank you.

Please send replies to cityattorney@sfcityatty.org<mailto:cityattorney@sfcityatty.org>
Sincerely,

[cid:image002.jpg@01D5A36C.D4CFA0B0]Elizabeth A. Coolbrith
Paralegal
Office of City Attorney Dennis Herrera
(415) 554-4685 Direct
www.sfcityattorney.org
Find us on: Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/sfcityattorney/> Twitter<https://twitter.com/SFCityAttorney> Instagram<https://www.instagram.com/sfcityattorney/>

Dear SOTF Parties:

The agenda and packet for the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force 12/4/19 - 4:00 p.m. meeting is online at the following link:

https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/default/files/sotf_120419_agenda.pdf

The packet material is linked to each item listed on the agenda mark with an "attachment". Click anywhere on the title of the item to open the link to the pdf of the packet material in question.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Via E-mail Only to SOTF@sfgov.org

Honorable Members of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244

San Francisco, CA 94102

Re: File No. 19132, Anonymous (c/o requests@muckrock.com) v. Department of Emergency Management and Mary Ellen Carroll

Dear Honorable Members of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force ("SOTF"):

We write in response to Complaint No. 19132, filed by Anonymous on December 16, 2019, and received by the Department of Emergency Management on December 19, 2019. Anonymous alleges that Executive Director Mary Ellen Carroll and the Department of Emergency Management (DEM) violated Sections 67.21 and 67.25 of the Sunshine Ordinance (Admin. Code § 67.25), for failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request dated December 7, 2019 ("IDR"), in a timely and/or complete manner.

The Task Force should dismiss this complaint.

After a thorough search, DEM has found no record of the IDR and has determined that DEM did not receive the IDR. DEM did receive a December 14, 2019 email in DEM's Outlook junk mail folder, which referenced the IDR.

Background

Anonymous,

We are reviewing this request in light of your follow-up and will respond further in due course.
Regards,

Hank Heckel
Compliance Officer
Office of the Mayor
City and County of San Francisco

Dear SOTF Parties:

Attached in PDF format is the signed Order of Determination for file no. 19089. It has also been published on the Sunshine Task Force website.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Tel: 415-554-7724

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Hi,

We are an Estimation Organization holds 98-100 percent accuracy in our
estimates & takeoffs. If you require our services on any project, just send
over the plans so we can come up with a quote on our service charges and
turnaround time, if you agreed to that quote then we will proceed further
with your estimate.

You may ask for sample estimates and take-offs, which will help you to
understand our basic formatting. For any queries, reply to this email. Or if
you've any question, you can ask me.

Thanks & Have a nice Day!

Antonio Damain

Intl MEP Estimating, LLC

2701 Ponce De Leon, Coral Gables, FL 33134

O: 718-450-9282

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Good Afternoon:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Compliance and Amendments Committee to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: January 26, 2021

Location: Remote meeting; participant information to be included on the Agenda

Time: 4:30 p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

1. File No. 19044: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Dennis Herrera and the Office of the City Attorney for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 61.26, 61.27, Government Code Sections 6253, 6253.9 and 6255, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

2. File No. 19047: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Mayor London Breed, Hank Heckel and the Office of the Mayor for allegedly violating Administrative Code, (Sunshine Ordinance) Sections 67.21 and 67.26 and 67.27 and Government Code (CPRA) 6253.9, 6253, and 6255, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

3. File No. 19145: Complaint filed by Chris Kohrs against the Police Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.5 and 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

4. File No. 19140: Complaint filed by Stephen Malloy against the Department of Human Resources for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21and 67.25, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

5. File No. 19114: Complaint filed by Shane Anderies against Tyler Vu and the Public Defender's Office for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.24, 67.25, 67.26, 67.27 and 67.29 by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure). For inclusion into the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00 pm, January 20, 2021..

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Good Afternoon:

You are receiving this notice because you are named as a Complainant or Respondent in one of the following complaints scheduled before the Compliance and Amendments Committee to: 1) hear the merits of the complaint; 2) issue a determination; and/or 3) consider referrals from a Task Force Committee.

Date: January 26, 2021

Location: Remote meeting; participant information to be included on the Agenda

Time: 4:30 p.m.

Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing.

Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing.

Complaints:

1. File No. 19044: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Dennis Herrera and the Office of the City Attorney for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21, 61.26, 61.27, Government Code Sections 6253, 6253.9 and 6255, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

2. File No. 19047: Complaint filed by Anonymous against Mayor London Breed, Hank Heckel and the Office of the Mayor for allegedly violating Administrative Code, (Sunshine Ordinance) Sections 67.21 and 67.26 and 67.27 and Government Code (CPRA) 6253.9, 6253, and 6255, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

3. File No. 19145: Complaint filed by Chris Kohrs against the Police Commission for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.5 and 67.21, by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and/or complete manner.

4. File No. 19140: Complaint filed by Stephen Malloy against the Department of Human Resources for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Sections 67.21and 67.25, by failing to respond to a request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner.

5. File No. 19114: Complaint filed by Shane Anderies against Tyler Vu and the Public Defender's Office for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.24, 67.25, 67.26, 67.27 and 67.29 by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner.

Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)

For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure). For inclusion into the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00 pm, January 20, 2021..

Cheryl Leger

Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors

Tel: 415-554-7724

<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.

Dear SOTF Parties:

The agenda and packet for the Compliance and Amendments Committee of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force January 26, 2021 4:30 p.m. meeting is online at the following link:

https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/default/files/cac012621_agenda.pdf

The packet material is linked to each item listed on the agenda marked with an "attachment". Click anywhere on the title of the item to open the link to the pdf of the packet material in question.

Cheryl Leger
Assistant Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org<mailto:Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org>
Tel: 415-554-7724
Fax: 415-554-5163
www.sfbos.org

[CustomerSatisfactionIcon]<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> Click here<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=104> to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form.

The Legislative Research Center<http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=9681> provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998.

Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal information-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of the public may inspect or copy.