Police Report for "Wellness Visit Assist" August 15, 2018

Susan A. filed this request with the Police Department of Lexington, MA.
Est. Completion None
Status
Fix Required

Communications

From: Susan A.


To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to the Massachusetts Public Records Law, I hereby request the following records:

`A copy of the Police Report for a police visit assigned case number 18.00 7706 ang according to one of the two police officers who
were involved, this was called a "Wellness Visit Assist." I already filled out a police request form attached herein as a pdf, dated
August 15,2018 and requesting US mail delivery. I was told the police report would tke 4-5 days but I have not yet received it.

It remains unclear to me why anyone came to this apartment last Wednesday morning at about 9:30AM. I reside here as a companion
and caregiver for my elderly mother. We did not request nor seek any visit from Minuteman Protective Services, and they did not
contact us requesting to come to this apartment for any "wellness visit" or "welfare check." We did not open the apartment
door when we heard the pounding and knocking, as we were not expecting anyone. We did not know if it would be a man
claiming to work for the landlord but does not work for the landlord.

Three people who were at the door were apparently let into the building by the landlord. The police were then called when my
mom and I did not answer the door. It was clear we were home because we are the only ones who park in a handicap spot and
our car was there.

The police then banged out the deadbolt lock on the apt door which is still missing to date. Apparently the landlord then used
a key to the apt door to let them in.

Kim Gardner of Minuteman Services announced "This is a safety check" after the door lock was broken off. Another woman
who is a lawyer but did not identify herself as one, a Ms. Bullwinkel, identified herself as a guardian ad litum but no order was
ever issued by any court to my knowledge (nor accepted by her on the date she was here). She then took photos of
bank records. A man identified himself as Doug White, a lawyer but it is unclear why all three people were here on a "wellness visit."

One of the two Lexington Polcie officers, Officer Bulger Limchao, briefly showed me a 2-page order that appeared to be an order
for an assessment of my elderly mother. However, Minuteman Protective Agency never sent a written notice to my mother
informing her of any assessment, and such notice is required by state law.

Recently the chief of police has claimed the purpose of this visit was not wellness check or an assessment, but rather due to
a guardian being appointed. Kim Gardner of Minuteman emailed me a 3-page guardian order days later, but the Middlesex Probate
Court has yet to respond to my requests for a copy of any order, whether 2 pages that Officer Limchao showed me or 3 pages
that Kim Gardner then emailed to me.

Since a wellness check or safety visit does not actually require any court order in Massachusetts, and as Kim Gardner of MInuteman said it
was a wellness check, I do not know why or how this visit could have 3 different alleged purposes:
--a wellness visit not requiring any court order
--an assessment pursuant to a 2-page order shown to me by Offier Limchao
-- a guardian visit pursuant to a 3-page order emailed to me by Minuteman but not sent to us by any court.

When I requested the police report Sgt DeMambrok told me this was called a "Wellness Visit with Assist" yet other information
emailed to me is different.

It is still unclear to me why anyone would make any complaint unless it has to do with retaliation against my elderly mom and me
for a lawsuit we filed almost a year ago, pro se, in Suffolk Probate Court, against an Ameriprise trustee due to the fact this is a fake trustee on a fake trust.
The matter is still pending in Suffolk Probate Court. We proved there is a fake trustee as the trustee lacked the certification she claimed
to us according to a Washington DC organization which keeps such records of people holding the Certified Trust and Financial Advisor license/designations.

And it unclear to me why our deadlock lock was removed by fore and remains removed and not fixed, for a week now. It seems to me this was an illegal
trespass and a violation of our 4th Amendment Right prohibiting illegal searches and seizures, and there was no actual legal justification for any of it,
since state law prohibits MInuteman from accepting complaints from those who would benefit from harming my mother or me (ie, someone involved
in this pending lawsuit).

I apologize for the lengthy nature of this request, but the entire matter was and remains very disturbing to both my mom and me.
When I filed the police report I was told there are no fees. (However, here on MuckRock the form letter text will request info on fees.)

I also request that, if appropriate, fees be waived as we believe this request is in the public interest, as suggested but not stipulated by the recommendations of the Massachusetts Supervisor of Public Records. The requested documents will be made available to the general public free of charge as part of the public information service at MuckRock.com, processed by a representative of the news media/press and is made in the process of news gathering and not for commercial usage.

I expect the request to be filled in an accessible format, including for screen readers, which provide text-to-speech for persons unable to read print. Files that are not accessible to screen readers include, for example, .pdf image files as well as physical documents.

In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 10 business days, as the statute requires.

Sincerely,

Susan A.

From: Susan A.

To Whom It May Concern at Public Records, Lexington Police Dept:

To date there has been no acknowledgement or response to the attached public records request dated August 15th, despite the form stating the request will be filled within "ten business days."

The form also states you provide "written notification" if the request is not filled within that time, but no written notification or explanation has been provided either.

Please respond. Thank you.

From: Susan A.

This report has been sent to me via US mail. I will post it here.

From: Susan A.

Here are pages 1 to 3 of 5. (This program only uploads 3 pages max.)

From: Susan A.

Here are pages 4 to 5 of 5 of the police report sent to me.

From: Susan A.

I don't actually know if MuckRock failed to contact the Lexington Police or if the Lexington Police failed to respond to MuckRock. This is the first time I have had to post my docs on MuckRock instead of the public agency responding to Muckrock.

From: Susan A.

After receiving the above 5 pages I sent the Lexington Police this email:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Susan A.
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 11:37:27 -0400
Subject: Question RE Police Report for Case 18-007706
To: mmclean@lexingtonma.gov

Re: Question RE Police Report for Case 18-007706

Dear Captain McLean,

I just received the above-referenced police report. I believe there
are erroneous
statements and material omissions in this report. Can your dept issue
a revised report to correct the errors and material omissions? I
believe my future due process rights in a court of law may be
adversely affected if I can not correct this report.

I believe these are the errors and material omissions:

1) Omission of time – “09:47” should read “09:47AM”

2) “Offense 1” – “055” – What is this offense?

3) “6212” is not my address. Should state “6214” Lexington Ridge Drive.

4) DAM – Omits that deadbolt local was removed. Entire door will have
to be replaced at a cost of $1,000 (one thousand dollars) is what I
was told by someone who inspected the damage.

5) “three members of Minuteman Senior Services” is incorrect. One
person was employed by Minuteman Senior Services. The other two were:
a lawyer claiming to have been appointed by the court, who is NOT an
employee of Minuteman Senior Services, and another attorney who
claims to have been appointed by the court as guardian ad litem and is
also NOT an employee of Minuteman Senior Services.

6) Material omission of photographs taken of bank records by the
attorney/guardian ad litem.

7) Material omission of Yolanda’s statement in response to daughter’s
question “Do you want to buy a house” and Yolanda’s answer:
“Absolutely.”

8) Material omission that Officer Limchao showed Susan Alyn a document
which was allegedly given to him by Minuteman and was a 2-page order.

9) Material omission that Susan and her mother were found not in one
of their two bedrooms but in a spare guest bedroom used for computer
use, sewing machine use, and piano playing.

As this report may become part of court records, it is imperative that
the information in this report be accurate and materially complete.

Also - I do not see how “MA Public Records Exemption C” applies to all
the redacted information. I read the exemption here:
https://www.rcfp.org/massachusetts-open-government-guide/ii-exemptions-and-other-legal-limitations/exemptions-open-reco-4

I intend to appeal all the redacted information.

In the meantime, please email and let me know if you can issue a
revised police report based on any of the above nine (9) points.

Thank you.

Susan A.

From: Susan A.

This narrative is so heavily redacted and contains so many errors in information that no one can possibly understand what happened that morning by reading this police report. I have reported the errors to the police above and asked for a revised report. I will be appealing the redactions to the address in the first page cover letter:

Supervisor of Records
Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth
McCormack Building, Room 1719
One Ashburton Place
Boston, MA 02108

I

From: Susan A.

The Police Dept was supposed to provide MuckRock with a copy of this public record within 10 days. They did not. Here is the law:

Appealing a Denial of Access to Public Records in Massachusetts

Anyone denied access to public records has the right of appeal to the Supervisor of Records. A records custodian must comply with a request for records within ten (10) business days. If a custodian fails to respond within ten (10) business days, a requester may file an appeal, so long as the appeal is filed within ninety (90) calendar days of the request. If a response has been provided, a requester may appeal within ninety (90) days of the response. To petition an appeal, you must send the Supervisor of Records copies of the following:

The written request;
The written response, if any; and
A brief letter detailing the reason for the appeal.

You may mail, fax or email your appeal. See the Contact Us tab above for information on how to reach the Public Records Division. Requesters must also provide a copy of the appeal petition to the records custodian.

For more information on the appeals process, please see 950 CMR 32.08 (1) or our publication, A Guide to the Massachusetts Public Records Law (PDF).

From: Susan A.

I am finding this letter mailed to me from the police, attached to a
public record police report that was full of errors, a very strange
document for the following reasons:

1) ZIP CODE - At the bottom of this letter is a printed zip code which
is not a Lexington zip code. In fact, if you look up this zip code on
the USPS search zip code page, the message that comes up is that no
such zip code exists.

2) FAX NUMBER - The fax number on this letter does not match the
publicly available fax number on this police dept web site.

3) MORE THAN TEN DAYS - The letter is dated Sept 5th in response to a
request made August 15th, which is more than the ten business days
allowed by law in MA to fill a public records request. Technically, my
request was therefore denied.

4) SIGNATURE - I do not think that is the actual signature of Capt
Michael McLean nor do I think he ever approved this signature.

5) OMITTED RECORDS ACCESS OFFICER - The Records Access Officer is
supposed to sign this letter, and I don't believe Capt McLean works in
the records deparment at all.

6) ENVELOPE POSTMARK PROCESSED IN BOSTON - I am finding it odd how
the envelope, from Lexington Police Dept, to me in Lexington, found
its way to Boston and how the envelope has a Boston postmark.

It seems to me some entity from outside Lexington wrote and mailed
this letter to me --someone who wants me to know this letter did not
come from a zip code in Lexington, but rather from a zip code that does not exist.

It looks to me like a rogue entity has taken over the Lexington Police Dept.

From: Police Department

Dear To Whom It May Concern @ MuckRock.com:

Please refer to the attached response regarding your Public Records Request.

Diane Gillis
Diane Gillis
Administrative Assistant
Lexington Police Department
1575 Massachusetts Avenue
Lexington, MA 02420
Phone: (781) 863-9302
FAX: (781) 863-1291

When writing or responding, please be aware that the Massachusetts Secretary of State has determined that most email is a public record and, therefore, may not be kept confidential.

NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This transmission is intended only for the addressee(s) listed above, and may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If you are not the addressee, any use, disclosure, copying or communication of the contents of this transmission may be subject to legal restrictions or sanctions. If this message was received in error, please telephone us immediately at (781) 862-1212.

From: Susan A.

This is now the 3rd report issued by the Lexington Police in this matter, and all three reports are erroneous.

I appealed the first report I received, thinking it was the only one I would receive, as there were so many redactions.

The 2nd report, also written by Officer Limchao, had no redactions, but still had errors.

This "Supplemental" 3rd report, now written by the female officer, is also full of what I believe is erroneous information.

Captain McLean still has not answered my email regarding errors on the first report's errors. I will now make a list of
what I believe to be errors on this new "Supplemental" report and submit that list of errors to Captain McLean as well.

I notice on this new, "Supplement" report that the zip code of the police department has now been corrected. I have
never received via US mail this "Supplemental" report.

Omitted in this "Supplemental" Report and all reports are actual facts of this matter, which includes the following:

1) State law prohibits Minuteman from accepting complaints in retaliation from people who are being sued by the elderly person and
her caregiver daughter - and Minuteman knew of these court hearings and should not have accepted such complaints.

2) State law requires Minuteman to provide a written notice and MInuteman in Bedford never once sent us a written notice.

3) The court has told us no court order was ever issued.

4) Based on the above actual facts and other facts, this visit by Minuteman was an illegal trespass into this apartment in violation
of our 4th Amendment Rights.

5) Kristin Bullwinkel is also an attorney, and the purpose of her illegal visit here, without any court order or actual legitimate complaint,
was to violate my 4th Amendment Rights.

Because of the harassment by Minuteman's attorney in this matter, and their violations of state law, they are the ones who should pay for
a new door, since they had no actual legal valid complaint and no actual right to enter this apartment based on information I have been
given by the court.

I am very disappointed that it takes Lexington Police three reports, none of which were issued in the required 10-day period to respond to
a public record request. This "Supplemental" report is illegally issued in light of actual public record laws requiring a response within 10 days
in this state, and in light of the fact that this report claims both police officers arrived together while the first and second reports by
Officer LImchoa claim he arrived alone and then called the Sgt. These three reports conflict in other ways as well.

It is extremely disheartening to see this happening.

One report, issued within 10 days, is what state law requires. Not three erroneous reports,
all issued late, and all containing what I know to be material errors of fact.

Very disturbing.

From: Susan A.

Here is the 2nd of 3 versions of this police report - all late, and only one sent to me via US mail, which I immediately appealed due to all the redactions. This 2nd one, written again by Officer LImcaho, has no redactions. But it is still erroneous. It was emailed to me:

Public Records Request
Add star Diane Gillis<DGILLIS@lexingtonma.gov> AttachmentTue, Sep 11, 2018 at 9:57 AM
To: "susan.alyn@gmail.com" <susan.alyn@gmail.com>
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original

Dear Ms. Alyn:

Please refer to the attached response regarding your Public Records Request.

Diane Gillis

Diane Gillis

Administrative Assistant

Lexington Police Department

1575 Massachusetts Avenue

Lexington, MA 02420

Phone: (781) 863-9302

FAX: (781) 863-1291

When writing or responding, please be aware that the Massachusetts Secretary of State has determined that most email is a public record and, therefore, may not be kept confidential.

NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This transmission is intended only for the addressee(s) listed above, and may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If you are not the addressee, any use, disclosure, copying or communication of the contents of this transmission may be subject to legal restrictions or sanctions. If this message was received in error, please telephone us immediately at (781) 862-1212.

From: Susan A.

Here is email I wrote to Capt McLean and Officer Limchao after I was shocked to received the first erroneous and redacted police report -

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Susan Alyn <susan.alyn@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 20:54:57 -0400
Subject: To Capt McLean and Officer Limchao - Have you ever seen this police report before now?
To: mmclean@lexingtonma.gov
Cc: Bulger Limchao <blimchao@lexingtonma.gov>, Yolanda Grula (my mom)

Dear Captain McLean (and Office Limchao - cc-ed),

I previously received the two emails from you, Capt McLean, below, in
response to an 11-page (eleven page) complaint I had faxed to two
district attorneys (Suffolk and Middlesex Counties) concerning
on-going public corruption by former US presidential candidate Jeb
Bush, whom I believe has been faking a college degree for more than 30
years now (thanks to a forgery created by his father of an "Academic
Certification" and his father's destruction of Jeb Bush's actual
transcript, and corruption of the University of Texas lawyer in charge
of the registrar's office there). Faking a college degree is a crime
in Massachusetts, and although I faxed evidence of this crime and
cited the criminal statute to those two DA's, I never heard back from
either one of them.

I am writing to you now because I believe my elderly mom and I have
been harassed and stalked and threatened by agents of former CIA
Director GH Bush and his son Jeb, because of the above matter and
another matter involving public corruption.

I believe one of the many many ways they harass my mom and me is by
compromising local law enforcement.

Consequently, it seems to me, in light of what I have already
experienced in the past 33 years concerning this on-going situation,
that it may be you have actually never seen the attached 5-page police
report, despite the fact your name and alleged signature appears
on page 1 of 5, the cover letter.

It may also be that Lexington Police Officer Bulger Limchao never
wrote the narrative of this report, even though he is credited as the
author of this report.

I realize now no one will ever prosecute former CIA Director GH Bush
or former US presidential candidate Jeb Bush for forgery, fraud or
public corruption or embezzling public funds or any other crime they
have actually committed, and I do believe they did committ crimes and
with the help of the media, always duped to cover up for them, got
away with it.

However, my elderly mom and I continue to be hurt by their crimes.
What is injuring us now is this attached false, fake, fabricated
police report.

I personally do not believe you or Officer Limchao had anything to do
with this report. One of the reasons is because I called recently and
was told this report had still not yet been written and was "Due" but
the report is dated August 16th, as if it had been written one day
after the incident, when clearly it was not.

It seems to me some people from outside Lexington Police Dept took
their time - more than the ten business days allowed by your
department - to write this fabricated report, which I only received in
the past day or so, and it is now Sept 8th.

I am appealing this report as per the cover letter.

It may be I have to someday sue the Lexington Police because of this
fabricated report.
However, I personally do not believe you or Office LImchao had
anything to do with the
writing of this report.

I am enclosing this email with my request for an appeal, and with any
other legal paperwork I may have to file in the future.

I understand what is going on, and what has been going on, and while I
wish someone would stop it, no one seems to have the political will or
spine or law enforcement authority to do anything about the on-going,
never-ending harassment of me and my elderly mom because we are
witnesses to public corruption that no one will prosecute because the
alleged thieves are named "Bush" and the media has been duped and
trained to conceal their public corruption.

I understand that my mom and I basically have no civil rights anywhere.

Nevertheless, I am appealing this blatantly false and fabricated
police report written by people I believe may not actually be
connected with Lexington Police.

I understand what happens when a good and honest citizen such as
myself attempts to be a whistleblower against those who are powerful -
even when they are not in office. You can't get anywhere and all you
get is harassed.

This police report, false as it is, is just another example of the
harassment my mom and I are subjected to on an almost daily basis by
their many agents.

If you and/or Officer Limchao want to email me and confirm each of you
actually had something to do with this attached police report, please
feel free to do so. I may end up filing a lawsuit over this police
report because it seeks to deprive my mom and me of due process in a
pending lawsuit we have in Suffolk Probate Court to recover her $1
million in life savings that was taken from her without her
authorization. That is why we live in an apartment instead of a house.
And, that is why I am always being falsely accused of things like DUI,
elder abuse, etc. because I helped my mom try to get her money back. I
realize we probably have no chance to ever recover her money because
of who stole it, and no chance for due process, but this false police
report is making everything far worse for us.

If you (and Officer Limchao) want to take credit for the attached
false police report, feel free to do so, but I honestly do not believe
Lexington Police had anything to do with this attached police report;
I would not be surprised in the least to learn it is actually written
and approved by people outside of Lexington Police Dept who are
harassing us each day in many ways.

A false police report to deprive my mom and me of due process and
money and property would, frankly, be nothing new to me in light of
our status as witnesses to public corruption
suffering each and every day because of who was involved.

Susan Alyn
cc Mom
Lexington Police Officer Limchao

PS I did end up sending my complaint to the FBI. I believe the result
was that Jeb Bush went on tv and I believe lied that he took a year of
CLEP tests, when in fact the University of Texas did not accept CLEP
test scores at the time he claimed he took those tests. In short, Jeb
Bush lied more and got away with his public corruption again is what
it seems to me, a former FL teacher.
--------

Re Jeb Bush public corruption - for faking a college degree for more
than 30 years while collecting $1 million in public money salary
pursuant to his fake resume -

On 5/31/18, Policeinfo <policeinfo@lexingtonma.gov> wrote:
> Ms. Alyn,
>
> I am a Captain with the Lexington Police Department. I can only attest that
> we have received your email and will not be investigating the matter as your
> allegations did not occur in Lexington. If you have sent it to the
> Middlesex District Attorney's office, I am sure they will advise you how to
> proceed.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Michael A. McLean, FBI NA 258
> Captain of Operations
> Lexington Police Department
> 1575 Massachusetts Ave.
> Lexington, MA 02420
> 781-863-9307
> mmclean@lexingtonma.gov
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Susan Alyn [mailto:susan.alyn@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 3:17 PM
> To: Policeinfo
> Subject: Who has it? / Re: Please forward this email to Detective Soule in
> Major Crimes; thank you.
>
> Thank you for your email. If the procedure is not to contact the local
> police, then was I correct to provide it to the Middlesex District Attorney?
> Or, are you with the FBI and you will forward to the FBI? What will happen
> to this complaint? I think I did a very good job proving my allegation;
> consequently, I would like to know what agency, if any, now has it.
> Thank you again.
> Susan Alyn
>
> On 5/30/18, Policeinfo <policeinfo@lexingtonma.gov> wrote:
>> Ms. Alyn,
>>
>> A complaint of this nature would not start here at the Lexington
>> Police Department. It is out of both the department's and district
>> court's jurisdiction. I appreciate you sending us a copy of your
>> complaint. I wish you the best of luck.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Michael A. McLean, FBI NA 258
>> Captain of Operations
>> Lexington Police Department
>> 1575 Massachusetts Ave.
>> Lexington, MA 02420
>> 781-863-9307
>> mmclean@lexingtonma.gov
>>
-------------

And here is what Capt McLean wrote back to me:

Add star Michael McLean<MMCLEAN@lexingtonma.gov> Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 1:51 PM
To: Susan Alyn <susan.alyn@gmail.com>
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
Susan,

I am sorry you feel this way. I am going to begin by saying that the report you received was written by Officer Limchao and reviewed and cleared by Lt. Christopher Barry. I then reviewed and read it before it was released. No other agency, federal or otherwise, has access to the Lexington Police Department's record management system. Stating that anyone other than Officer Limchao wrote this report, is simply not true. If you would like to call me to discuss the matter further, please do so at the number below.

Sincerely,

Michael A. McLean, FBI NA 258
Captain of Operations
Lexington Police Department
1575 Massachusetts Ave.
Lexington, MA 02420
781-863-9307
mmclean@lexingtonma.gov

From: Susan A.

Here are questions I asked Capt McLean about what is now the 1st of 3 erroneous police reports all issued late about one Aug 15th incident - and he did not answer all these questions:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Susan Alyn <susan.alyn@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 11:37:27 -0400
Subject: Question RE Police Report for Case 18-007706
To: mmclean@lexingtonma.gov

Re: Question RE Police Report for Case 18-007706

Dear Captain McLean,

I just received the above-referenced police report. I believe there
are erroneous
statements and material omissions in this report. Can your dept issue
a revised report to correct the errors and material omissions? I
believe my future due process rights in a court of law may be
adversely affected if I can not correct this report.

I believe these are the errors and material omissions:

1) Omission of time – “09:47” should read “09:47AM”

2) “Offense 1” – “055” – What is this offense?

3) “6212” is not my address. Should state “6214” Lexington Ridge Drive.

4) DAM – Omits that deadbolt local was removed. Entire roor will have
to be replaced at a cost of $1,000 (one thousand dollars) is what I
was told by someone who inspected the damage.

5) “three members of Minuteman Senior Services” is incorrect. One
person was employed by Minuteman Senior Services. The other two were:
a lawyer claiming to have been appointed by the court, who is NOT an
employee of Minuteman Senior Services, and another attorney who
claims to have been appointed by the court as guardian ad litem and is
also NOT an employee of Minuteman Senior Services.

6) Material omission of photographs taken of bank records by the
attorney/guardian ad litem.

7) Material omission of Yolanda’s statement in response to daughter’s
question “Do you want to buy a house” and Yolanda’s answer:
“Absolutely.”

8) Material omission that Officer Limchao showed Susan Alyn a document
which was allegedly given to him by Minuteman and was a 2-page order.

9) Material omission that Susan and her mother were found not in one
of their two bedrooms but in a spare guest bedroom used for computer
use, sewing machine use, and piano playing.

As this report may become part of court records, it is imperative that
the information in this report be accurate and materially complete.

Also - I do not see how “MA Public Records Exemption C” applies to all
the redacted information. I read the exemption here:
https://www.rcfp.org/massachusetts-open-government-guide/ii-exemptions-and-other-legal-limitations/exemptions-open-reco-4

I intend to appeal all the redacted information.

In the meantime, please email and let me know if you can issue a
revised police report based on any of the above nine (9) points.

Thank you.

Susan Alyn
susan.alyn@gmail.com

-----

He answered one question - and I did NOT call the police dept for any reason. I have NOT spoken to any police officers about this 1st, 2nd or 3rd reports:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Policeinfo <policeinfo@lexingtonma.gov>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:50:15 +0000
Subject: RE: What is "055" in the MA code?
To: Susan Alyn <susan.alyn@gmail.com>

Susan,

That is not a charge. It is the call for service code in our Records Management System and stands for "Assist" which you can see at the top of the report. It is a reference to the type of call we are responding to. In this case we were assisting another agency on their visit to your home. Call me if you have any further questions.

Sincerely,

Michael A. McLean, FBI NA 258
Captain of Operations
Lexington Police Department
1575 Massachusetts Ave.
Lexington, MA 02420
781-863-9307
mmclean@lexingtonma.gov

From: Susan A.

After the 1st erroneous police report. I sent an email to the chief of LExington Police because I believed the cover letter and report were forgeries:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Susan Alyn <susan.alyn@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 09:47:25 -0400
Subject: Illegal trespass complaint for August 15th and attached forgery of letter from Lexington Police Report
To: Mark Corr <mcorr@lexingtonma.gov>
Cc: Michael McLean <mmclean@lexingtonma.gov>, ....

Re attached letter sent to me via US mail allegedly from Capt McLean

To Lexington Chief of Police Mark Corr:

I believe the attached letter recently sent to me via US mail, allegedly from
Capt McLean, is a forgery.

My belief is based on the following:

1) I notice the fax number published on this letter does not match the
fax number
on your web site.

2) I notice the zip code published at the bottom of the letter is not actually
the zip code of your department, and when entered in the search zip code
function of the US postal site, comes up with an error message as not a valid
zip code.

3) I believe the signature is not that of Capt McLean and was not authorized
by him in any way,

In addition to this letter being a forgery, there appears to be
forgeries of court
orders being issued and shown to your police officers and to Avalon employees
here at Avalon apartments.

In the future, please advise your police department not to respond to additional
phone calls or requests by anyone claiming to be connected with
Minuteman Senior Services seeking access or entry into this apartment,
and/or claiming to have a court order
to enter.

I have been told by the court that no court order was ever issued for entry into
this department, despite a 2-page court order shown to me by your
Officer Limchao
after your officers broke the lock and forcibly entered on the morning of
August 15th and despite a subsequent 3-page order emailed to me by Minuteman.

This August 15th incident was actually an illegal trespass on August
15th by MInuteman Protective Services abusing their power and acting
without any actual legal basis or legal authority, and I have already
emailed you a complaint about this illegal trespass.

Please process my complaint of illegal trespass.

Please also note I am in contact with federal authorities about these
matters which I believe pertain to the fact my mom and I are witnesses
to high level public corruption and the fact these people through
their agents have unlawfully taken $1 million dollars of my mother's
life savings to prevent her from buying a house, so that they force us
to live in an apartment where they can continue to abuse and harass us
in an apartment setting and demand entry from the landlord and police
for illegal purposes.

My mother and I have a court case pending in Suffolk Probate Court
against a fake trustee from Ameriprise, which acts as agents of these
corrupt politicians, and we are trying to obtain the return of her
money.

After you process my trespass complaint, please notify me by US mail
the complaint has been processed and the court date for this matter.

Thank you.

Susan Alyn
cc Mom
Captain McLean
...

Encl.
----------
Here is his reply:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mark Corr <MCORR@lexingtonma.gov>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 20:14:27 +0000
Subject: RE: Illegal trespass complaint for August 15th and attached forgery of letter from Lexington Police Report
To: Susan Alyn <susan.alyn@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael McLean <MMCLEAN@lexingtonma.gov>, ...
Good afternoon,

Your attachment is the form letter that comes with Public Information requests from the Lexington Police Department.

1)The fax number is to my office which is why it is not on the website.
2)The zip code is incorrect. Someone used an old letter head and that needs to be fixed.
3) Captain McLean authorized this document.

You requested information and it was sent to you. Isn't it logical that no other agency would have that document?

Your complaint is not a trespass. If you disagree, you can go to the Concord Court and file your own complaint. The officer and the Minuteman Protective Services were acting in good faith on an order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction to an Attorney appointed to represent your mother.

...

Chief Mark Corr
Lexington PD
----------

I did not write to him again but one of the problems with his reply is that false zip code has never been a Lexington zip code as far as I know - so his claim
that the zip code appears on "old letterhead" is erroneous.

From: Susan A.

I complained to the Chief of LExington Police Mark Corr of an Illegal Trespass - but he won't process my complaint based on a false reason he gave me, that the court issued an order for a guardian. The court never did, according to the court. But here is what he wrote to me:

Mark Corr <MCORR@lexingtonma.gov>
To: Susan Alyn <susan.alyn@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian Savage <bsavage@lexingtonma.gov>
Good morning,
Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 7:56 AM

No trespass and no theft took place. A lawful order, issued by a court of competent jurisdiction, gave a court appointed guardian the right to see your mother. Locking your door and/or refusing to answer the door was not the correct response by you.
I strongly recommend that you obtain the assistance of legal counsel.
I will ask Detective Savage to speak with your landlord about the deadbolt. Respectfully,
Chief Mark Corr
----

I wrote to him that he is incorrect.

Susan Alyn <susan.alyn@gmail.com>
To: Mark Corr <mcorr@lexingtonma.gov>
...

Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 8:42 AM

Gmail - To Lexington Police Chief Corr: My complaint of illegal tre...

Good morning,
I have already emailed to you the attached documents but I am emailing those 5 documents again, because your email claim to me that I was aware of and received a court order such as you described is mistaken.
I have never received from the court any such court order.
All I received from the court in the attached envelope from the court
is a motion appointing an attorney for my mother, a 2-page order for an attorney, a one page unsigned and unnotarized form re Ms, Bullwinkel, and a motion impounding all documents which I believe is fraudulent because the underlying complaint was from the fake trustee on a fake Ameriprise trust we are litigating.

WIthout any court order sent to me via US mail from the court, my belief is I have a right to protect myself, my mother and property
under the 4th Amendment which prohibits illegal searches and seizures - and we are not required to open our door, as this is a
constitutional right.

Consequently, I believe I acted appropriately and well within my constitutional rights, and this was an illegal trespass and the theft of property by Ms. Bullwinkel.

I will not be emailing again as I know you have many other duties to attend to.
Respectfully, Susan Alyn

  • 0000TrespassComplaint_Gmail20-20To20Lexington20Police20Chief20Corr_20My20complaint20of.pdf

From: Susan A.

My mother and I still have a pending complaint in Suffolk Probate Court against a fake trustee on a fake Ameriprise trust. Complaints from those representing a fake trustee to Minuteman can not be the basis of a legitimate complaint of elder abuse, as my mom and I are the ones complaining about elder abuse and the theft of her life savings in our probate court case, pending for a year now. Such complaint to Minuteman in retaliation for our lawful complaint is against the law in Massachusetts, and Minuteman knows all this but harassed us anyway, illegally trespassed and broke down our doorlock which is still missing.

I also filed a complaint in Lowel District court against an entity that took money from me without actual authorization and they, too, are prohibited from filing bogus complaints of elder abuse against me with Minuteman.

I am so sad that Minuteman Protective Services is not actually protecting elders at all, but joining in the retaliation against an elderly person and her caregiver daughter when they seek to recover the life savings/money stolen from an elderly person by a fake trustee at Ameriprise and others, all acting together to deprive my mother and me of her funds, her right to buy a house, and my right to an inheritance. ALl stolen because my mom and I are witnesses to public corruption by GH Bush and Jeb Bush is what I believe. And gee, do they have a lot of people helping them: the media and all those who help the media on the Establishment Left, and all those on the Establishment Right. It's everyone against my mom and me.
All because my mom and me tell the truth and have tried to recover her money.

From: Susan A.

And now when I most need to file public records requests, here at MuckRock, I have had 4 draft complaints pending still in draft, because the "submit" button no longer works when I submit a public records request. I am being framed for elder abuse because I complained with my mom of elder abuse in Suffolk Probate Court against Ameriprise and its agents. Michael of Muckrock says to me on email he filed these 4 drafts for me, but - he did not.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Susan Alyn <susan.alyn@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 10:05:59 -0400
Subject: You did not file the 4 drafts / Fwd: Thanks for getting the drafts filed as requests
To: mike <mike@muckrock.com>
Cc: jpat <jpat@muckrock.com>, Beryl Lipton <beryl@muckrock.com>, Information Muckrock <info@muckrock.com>

I am now seeing that you did not submit the 4 drafts even though you
wrote that you did. J Pat or Beryl, can you please submit these
drafts? For some reason my ability to submit a public records request
seems to be disabled - at a time I am being framed for elder abuse.
Thank you.

Drafts
Following

File a Request

Showing 1 to 4 of 4

Page

of 1

items per page
First Page Previous Page Next Page Last Page
Title Agencies Created
Middlesex County District Attorney - Complaint re Jeb Bush faking a
college degree
Middlesex County District Attorney's Office 09/11/2018
Court Case - Middlesex Probate Court
Middlesex Probate And Family Court 09/11/2018
Court Case - Suffolk County Probate re Fake Trustee on Ameriprise
Irrevocable Trust
Suffolk Probate and Family Court 09/11/2018
Suffolk County District Attorney - Complaint re Jeb Bush faking a college degree
Suffolk County District Attorney's Office 09/11/2018

On 9/11/18, MuckRock Support <info@muckrock.com> wrote:
> Thank you Susan. This is Michael.
>
> I just checked and was able to get the request to work properly. What
> browser are you using? Do you have any ad blockers working?
>
>
> Please try submitting again and let me know what happens — if the button
> doesn't click, or if there is an error message. From our end everything
> seemed fine. If that doesn't work I'll manually get them sent through....

---------------

Is this the United States of America? Or Nazi Germany? Has any one ever heard of "civil rights" or "due process" or the right of an elderly woman and her daughter to recover $1 million dollars stolen from her by crooked politicians hiding behind others? Is there any law enforcement in this country that investigates corrupt politicians who steal that kind of money from the elderly and her daughter? Or is framing the honest daughter for elder abuse the way this country handled crimes against corrupt politicians who are immune from prosecution?

From: Susan A.

I meant to type:

Or is framing the honest daughter for elder abuse the way this country handles crimes against corrupt politicians who are immune from prosecution?

What a tragedy.

From: Susan A.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Susan Alyn <susan.alyn@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 11:10:00 -0400
Subject: More questions / Fwd: PS Fwd: Question RE Police Report for Case 18-007706
To: Michael McLean <mmclean@lexingtonma.gov>

Dear Captain McLean:

I did not receive all the answers to the all the questions I
previously asked you
about the police report I received, via US mail, late, from Lexington
Police Dept.

Since that time, Officer Limchao has apparently written a 2nd version
of the police
report. And, the female Sgt has now written a 3rd version of the police report.

Neither the 2nd nor 3rd version was sent to me via US mail.

Yet, these two subsequent, late, versions were sent by Lexington
Police to MuckRock.

Can you tell me why Lexington Police wrote 3 conflicting versions of a
police report,
all late, in response to my public records request for 1 police report
on a August 15th incident?

I already appealed the 1st version, which the police never sent to
MuckRock and I had to post there myself/

Why are there now 3 versions of this report?

What all the answers to all my questions below about the first report?

Does Lexington Police have a copy of any court order? Because Officer
Limchao showed me a 2-page court order claiming to be for an
assessment which I have never seen again. And Chief Corr says there is
a court order for a guardian ad litem which I have never seen.
The court claimed to me neither court order was ever issued.

A "wellness visit" or "welfare check" does not require any court order
under state law.

This was an illegal trespass and I made my complaint of illegal
trespass to Lexingotn Police which has not processed my complaint.

I would appreciate it if you would email me and explain what is going
on with Lexington Police issuing 3 different versions, all late, of
one public record to one incident on August 15th As you are in charge
of operations, I hope you can explain to me in writing, on email. why
this is happening.

I will also post this request on MuckRock since I am being publicly
falsely accused of elder abuse after my mother and I filed a lawsuit
about elderly abuse and the theft of her life savings via a fake
trustee at Ameriprise in Suffolk Probate Court in Boston which is
still pending. It seems to me there is a lot of retaliation going on
against us for trying to recover her stolen life savings -- and no
one in law enforcement or the courts is helping us recover her stolen
life savings despite our 60+ page petition detailing this theft in
court.

Thank you.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Susan Alyn <susan.alyn@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 11:39:32 -0400
Subject: PS Fwd: Question RE Police Report for Case 18-007706
To: mmclean@lexingtonma.gov

PS In point 4 below I meant to type "entire door" and corrected it.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Susan Alyn <susan.alyn@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 11:37:27 -0400
Subject: Question RE Police Report for Case 18-007706
To: mmclean@lexingtonma.gov

Re: Question RE Police Report for Case 18-007706

Dear Captain McLean,

I just received the above-referenced police report. I believe there
are erroneous
statements and material omissions in this report. Can your dept issue
a revised report to correct the errors and material omissions? I
believe my future due process rights in a court of law may be
adversely affected if I can not correct this report.

I believe these are the errors and material omissions:

1) Omission of time – “09:47” should read “09:47AM”

2) “Offense 1” – “055” – What is this offense?

3) “6212” is not my address. Should state “6214” Lexington Ridge Drive.

4) DAM – Omits that deadbolt local was removed. Entire door will have
to be replaced at a cost of $1,000 (one thousand dollars) is what I
was told by someone who inspected the damage.

5) “three members of Minuteman Senior Services” is incorrect. One
person was employed by Minuteman Senior Services. The other two were:
a lawyer claiming to have been appointed by the court, who is NOT an
employee of Minuteman Senior Services, and another attorney who
claims to have been appointed by the court as guardian ad litem and is
also NOT an employee of Minuteman Senior Services.

6) Material omission of photographs taken of bank records by the
attorney/guardian ad litem.

7) Material omission of Yolanda’s statement in response to daughter’s
question “Do you want to buy a house” and Yolanda’s answer:
“Absolutely.”

8) Material omission that Officer Limchao showed Susan Alyn a document
which was allegedly given to him by Minuteman and was a 2-page order.

9) Material omission that Susan and her mother were found not in one
of their two bedrooms but in a spare guest bedroom used for computer
use, sewing machine use, and piano playing.

As this report may become part of court records, it is imperative that
the information in this report be accurate and materially complete.

Also - I do not see how “MA Public Records Exemption C” applies to all
the redacted information. I read the exemption here:
https://www.rcfp.org/massachusetts-open-government-guide/ii-exemptions-and-other-legal-limitations/exemptions-open-reco-4

I intend to appeal all the redacted information.

In the meantime, please email and let me know if you can issue a
revised police report based on any of the above nine (9) points.

Thank you.

Susan Alyn
susan.alyn@gmail.com

From: Susan A.

PS Captain McLean - And I did already appeal the first, erroneous, redacted version of this police report.

But now there are three late reports -- two by Officer Limchao, and a third by another officer - which are all erroneous and omit material information. I would never have believed it is so difficult to obtain an accurate police report.

From: Susan A.

I sent this on email to Captain McLean who is in charge of operations at the Lexington, MA police department.

I am hoping there is an explanation from him about this important material omission that exists in all three late
versions of this police report. It seems to me the 4th amendment rights of my mom and me were violated by the
people who came to our apartment that day. There was never any prior notice, either, despite what is claimed
in police reports. State law requires MInuteman of Bedford to give written notice; Minuteman of Bedford
never sent anything to us.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Susan Alyn <susan.alyn@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 13:17:06 -0400
Subject: PS - Please explain why this material omission exists in all 3 versions / Fwd: More questions / Fwd: PS Fwd: Question RE Police Report for Case 18-007706
To: mmclean@lexingtonma.gov

PS Please explain why both police officers saw and heard Attorney
Kristin Bullwinkel demand bank records, take out her i phone and take
photos for quite some time of private bank records, and yet, this
event appears nowhere on any police report.

It seems to me that if Ms. Kristin Bullwinkel, an attorney, had
actually been appointed by the court as anything, that she or the
other attorney would have the legal authority to obtain a subpoena for
bank records, and could then obtain bank records legally, through a
subpoena and from the banks.

But, when there is actually a lot of fraud going on, it is quite
impossible to legally obtain a subpoena for bank records, and one can
not then go to banks to obtain bank records.

instead, one could call the police, hand the police a forgery of a
court order, break down the door and lock and terrorize the residents
inside, and then illegally obtain bank record info that way, from a
violation of the 4th Amendment Rights of the residents, to illegally
seize and search.

All you'd have to do is get the police to omit that any such event
happened from their police report.

I am wondering why this event of her taking photos is omitted. Do you
have an answer for me? I am asking politely. Please email your answer
to this question, because it is my belief this was an illegal trespass
and our 4th Amendment Rights were grossly violated, in front of the
police, who had been given a forgery of a court order by Kim Gardner
of MInuteman Protective Services.

And, no, I do not wish to discuss this. I would prefer an answer in
writing from you, as you signed the cover letter in 2 of the now 3
police reports, only one of which was sent to me via US mail as I had
requested.

Again, I am just asking politely here why this event, which is
material, is omitted from all three versions. Both police officers
were standing right here in the apartment when all this happened. I
feel was coerced to provide private banking information which was
actually none of Kristin Bullwinkel's business as she is a stranger
who broke into this apartment, with the help of a forgery of a court
order handed to police. I have seen no legal document whatsoever
issued by the court that would allow Ms. Bullwinkel to be here, and
the court has told me no orders whatsoever were issued, which means
Kim Gardner should not have handed an order to Lexington Police.

If a "wellness check" or "welfare check" is what was happening, no
court order is required - and no attorneys are required - and no
photos of bank records should have taken place.

And there was no actual basis for a "welfare check" anyway. Our
apartment was broken into that day and our lock is still missing, and
the door, which costs $1,000, has yet to be replaced and fixed.

Thank you.
Susan Alyn
susan.alyn@gmail.com

cc Mom

From: Police Department

To Whom It May Concern at MuckRock.com:

Please refer to the attached response below regarding your Public Records Request received on October 17, 2018.

This is the email sent by Capt. McLean to Susan Alyn on October 2, 2018.

Diane Gillis
Diane Gillis
Administrative Assistant
Lexington Police Department
1575 Massachusetts Avenue
Lexington, MA 02420
Phone: (781) 863-9302
FAX: (781) 863-1291

When writing or responding, please be aware that the Massachusetts Secretary of State has determined that most email is a public record and, therefore, may not be kept confidential.

NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This transmission is intended only for the addressee(s) listed above, and may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If you are not the addressee, any use, disclosure, copying or communication of the contents of this transmission may be subject to legal restrictions or sanctions. If this message was received in error, please telephone us immediately at (781) 862-1212.

Files

pages

Close