2018 Vigilant Data Sharing Information (Grosse Pointe Park Public Safety)

Dave Maass filed this request with the Grosse Pointe Park Public Safety of Grosse Pointe Park, MI.
Tracking #

18-055

Multi Request 2018 Vigilant Data Sharing Information
Status
Rejected

Communications

From: Dave Maass


To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to the Michigan Freedom of Information Act, I hereby request the following records:

1) The names of agencies and organizations with which the Agency shares ALPR data;
2) The names of agencies and organizations from which the Agency receives ALPR data;
3) The names of agencies and organizations with which the Agency shares “hot list” information;
4) The names of agencies and organizations from which the Agency receives “hot list” information;

This information is easily available within the Agency’s LEARN system. The simplest way to extract this data is to generate an “Agency Data Sharing Report” PDF file from within LEARN. To do this, a user may simply go to the “Sharing” section of LEARN and select “Output Report.” A CSV/XLS file containing these records would also satisfy this request.

The instructions for extracting this data is described on pages 62-63 of the LEARN Agency Manager Guide, which may be found at this link:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3860685-LEARN-5-1-Agency-Manager-Guide.html

An example of this record may be found at this link:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3936113-Palos-Verdes-Estates-Police-Department-Data.html

A number of other agencies have regularly determined the above information constitutes a public record and have provided an “Agency Data Sharing Report.” These agencies include:

Anaheim Police Department, Antioch Police Department, Bakersfield Police Department Chino Police Department, Clovis Police Department, Elk Grove Police Department, Fontana Police Department, Fountain Valley Police Department, Glendora Police Department, Hawthorne Police Department, Irvine Police Department, Livermore Police Department, Lodi Police Department, Long Beach Police Department, Montebello Police Department, Orange Police Department, Palos Verdes Estates Police Department, Red Bluff Police Department ,Sacramento Police Department, San Bernardino Police Department, San Diego Police Department, San Rafael Police Department, San Ramon Police Department, Simi Valley Police Department, and the Tulare Police Department.

We further request the following records

The aggregate number of “detections” (i.e. license plate scans and associated data) collected during 2016.
The aggregate number of detections collected during 2017.
The aggregate number of “hits” (i.e. times that a plate on a hotlist was detected) during 2016.
The aggregate number of “hits” during 2017.

This information is easily available within the Agency’s LEARN system. The simplest way to extract this data is to generate a “Dashboard Hit Ratio Report” PDF file from within LEARN. We would prefer the data for each year to be provided separately.

An example of this document may be found at: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3870802-Sacramento-PD-Hit-Ratio-Rpt-010112-051917-Redacted.html

The instructions for extracting this data is described on pages 78-79 of the LEARN Agency Manager Guide, which may be found at this link:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3860685-LEARN-5-1-Agency-Manager-Guide.html

The following agencies have regularly determined the above information constitutes a public record and have provided an “Dashboard Hit Ratio Report.” These agencies include:

Anaheim Police Department; Bakersfield Police Department; Chino Police Department; Clovis Police Department; Elk Grove Police Department; Fontana Police Department; Irvine Police Department; La Habra Police Department; Laguna Beach Police Department; Lodi Police Department; Sacramento Police Department; San Diego Police Department; San Ramon Police Department; and the Red Bluff Police Department.

The requested documents will be made available to the general public, and this request is not being made for commercial purposes.

In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 5 business days, as the statute requires.

Sincerely,

Dave Maass

From: Grosse Pointe Park Public Safety

Dear Dave, This was sent to the City Attorney on June 1st. They should have sent you and I both a letter stating what you can or can’t have. Since neither of us got a response I contacted his assistant again this morning. I still have not heard back from them. I will keep you posted. Carol in records

From: Grosse Pointe Park Public Safety

From: Public Safety [mailto:publicsafety@grossepointepark.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 9:44 AM
To: 'Public Safety' <publicsafety@grossepointepark.org>
Subject: RE: Michigan Freedom of Information Act Request: 2018 Vigilant Data Sharing Information (Grosse Pointe Park Public Safety)

Dear Dave (again), I just talked to the City Attorney’s assistant again today because I didn’t hear from them yesterday. She promised to let you and I know what you can or can’t have today. Apparently, when I sent it to them on June 1st it somehow got put into their file with another FOIA that was sent the same day. Hopefully they will apologize when they get in touch with you today! We will see… Carol

From: Public Safety [mailto:publicsafety@grossepointepark.org]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 12:08 PM
To: 'requests@muckrock.com' <requests@muckrock.com <mailto:requests@muckrock.com> >
Subject: RE: Michigan Freedom of Information Act Request: 2018 Vigilant Data Sharing Information (Grosse Pointe Park Public Safety)

Dear Dave, This was sent to the City Attorney on June 1st. They should have sent you and I both a letter stating what you can or can’t have. Since neither of us got a response I contacted his assistant again this morning. I still have not heard back from them. I will keep you posted. Carol in records

From: requests@muckrock.com <mailto:requests@muckrock.com> [mailto:requests@muckrock.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 5:01 AM
To: publicsafety@grossepointepark.org <mailto:publicsafety@grossepointepark.org>
Subject: RE: Michigan Freedom of Information Act Request: 2018 Vigilant Data Sharing Information (Grosse Pointe Park Public Safety)

Grosse Pointe Park Public Safety
FOIA Office
15115 E. Jefferson Ave
Grosse Pointe Park, MI 48230

August 13, 2018

This is a follow up to a previous request:

To Whom It May Concern:

I wanted to follow up on the following Michigan Freedom of Information Act request, copied below, and originally submitted on May 31, 2018. Please let me know when I can expect to receive a response, or if further clarification is needed.

Thanks for your help, and let me know if further clarification is needed.

Filed via MuckRock.com
E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com <mailto:requests@muckrock.com>
Upload documents directly: https://www.muckrock.com/accounts/agency_login/grosse-pointe-park-public-safety-11976/2018-vigilant-data-sharing-information-grosse-pointe-park-public-safety-55103/?uuid-login=4d563986-bed3-4db7-9c97-34aba7b08054 <https://www.muckrock.com/accounts/agency_login/grosse-pointe-park-public-safety-11976/2018-vigilant-data-sharing-information-grosse-pointe-park-public-safety-55103/?uuid-login=4d563986-bed3-4db7-9c97-34aba7b08054&email=publicsafety%40grossepointepark.org#agency-reply> &email=publicsafety%40grossepointepark.org#agency-reply
Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.

For mailed responses, please address (see note):
MuckRock News
DEPT MR 55103
411A Highland Ave
Somerville, MA 02144-2516

PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.

---

On May 31, 2018:

To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to the Michigan Freedom of Information Act, I hereby request the following records:

1) The names of agencies and organizations with which the Agency shares ALPR data;
2) The names of agencies and organizations from which the Agency receives ALPR data;
3) The names of agencies and organizations with which the Agency shares “hot list” information;
4) The names of agencies and organizations from which the Agency receives “hot list” information;

This information is easily available within the Agency’s LEARN system. The simplest way to extract this data is to generate an “Agency Data Sharing Report” PDF file from within LEARN. To do this, a user may simply go to the “Sharing” section of LEARN and select “Output Report.” A CSV/XLS file containing these records would also satisfy this request.

The instructions for extracting this data is described on pages 62-63 of the LEARN Agency Manager Guide, which may be found at this link:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3860685-LEARN-5-1-Agency-Manager-Guide.html

An example of this record may be found at this link:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3936113-Palos-Verdes-Estates-Police-Department-Data.html

A number of other agencies have regularly determined the above information constitutes a public record and have provided an “Agency Data Sharing Report.” These agencies include:

Anaheim Police Department, Antioch Police Department, Bakersfield Police Department Chino Police Department, Clovis Police Department, Elk Grove Police Department, Fontana Police Department, Fountain Valley Police Department, Glendora Police Department, Hawthorne Police Department, Irvine Police Department, Livermore Police Department, Lodi Police Department, Long Beach Police Department, Montebello Police Department, Orange Police Department, Palos Verdes Estates Police Department, Red Bluff Police Department ,Sacramento Police Department, San Bernardino Police Department, San Diego Police Department, San Rafael Police Department, San Ramon Police Department, Simi Valley Police Department, and the Tulare Police Department.

We further request the following records

The aggregate number of “detections” (i.e. license plate scans and associated data) collected during 2016.
The aggregate number of detections collected during 2017.
The aggregate number of “hits” (i.e. times that a plate on a hotlist was detected) during 2016.
The aggregate number of “hits” during 2017.

This information is easily available within the Agency’s LEARN system. The simplest way to extract this data is to generate a “Dashboard Hit Ratio Report” PDF file from within LEARN. We would prefer the data for each year to be provided separately.

An example of this document may be found at: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3870802-Sacramento-PD-Hit-Ratio-Rpt-010112-051917-Redacted.html

The instructions for extracting this data is described on pages 78-79 of the LEARN Agency Manager Guide, which may be found at this link:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3860685-LEARN-5-1-Agency-Manager-Guide.html

The following agencies have regularly determined the above information constitutes a public record and have provided an “Dashboard Hit Ratio Report.” These agencies include:

Anaheim Police Department; Bakersfield Police Department; Chino Police Department; Clovis Police Department; Elk Grove Police Department; Fontana Police Department; Irvine Police Department; La Habra Police Department; Laguna Beach Police Department; Lodi Police Department; Sacramento Police Department; San Diego Police Department; San Ramon Police Department; and the Red Bluff Police Department.

The requested documents will be made available to the general public, and this request is not being made for commercial purposes.

In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 5 business days, as the statute requires.

Sincerely,

Dave Maass

Filed via MuckRock.com
E-mail (Preferred): requests@muckrock.com <mailto:requests@muckrock.com>
Upload documents directly: https://www.muckrock.com/accounts/agency_login/grosse-pointe-park-public-safety-11976/2018-vigilant-data-sharing-information-grosse-pointe-park-public-safety-55103/?uuid-login=4d563986-bed3-4db7-9c97-34aba7b08054 <https://www.muckrock.com/accounts/agency_login/grosse-pointe-park-public-safety-11976/2018-vigilant-data-sharing-information-grosse-pointe-park-public-safety-55103/?uuid-login=4d563986-bed3-4db7-9c97-34aba7b08054&email=publicsafety%40grossepointepark.org#agency-reply> &email=publicsafety%40grossepointepark.org#agency-reply
Is this email coming to the wrong contact? Something else wrong? Use the above link to let us know.

For mailed responses, please address (see note):
MuckRock News
DEPT MR 55103
411A Highland Ave
Somerville, MA 02144-2516

PLEASE NOTE: This request is not filed by a MuckRock staff member, but is being sent through MuckRock by the above in order to better track, share, and manage public records requests. Also note that improperly addressed (i.e., with the requester's name rather than "MuckRock News" and the department number) requests might be returned as undeliverable.

From:

Please see attached correspondence.

Dennis J. Levasseur
BODMAN PLC
6th Floor at Ford Field
1901 St. Antoine Street
Detroit, Michigan 48226
office: 313-393-7596
email: dlevasseur@bodmanlaw.com<mailto:dlevasseur@bodmanlaw.com>
My biography on bodmanlaw.com<http://www.bodmanlaw.com/attorneys/dennis-j-levasseur>

Bodman is a Corp! Magazine
"Diversity-Focused Company"
[cid:image003.png@01D44C2A.5D15E380]

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The contents of this message from Bodman PLC may be privileged and confidential. Therefore, if this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message was secured by ZixCorp(R).

Files