Judge James Adams FOIA request - Fl Court Corruption - Civil Rights Violation lawsuit discovery (State Attorney, 20th Circuit)

scott huminski filed this request with the State Attorney, 20th Circuit of Florida.
Multi Request Judge James Adams FOIA request - Fl Court Corruption - Civil Rights Violation lawsuit discovery
Est. Completion None
Awaiting Response


From: scott huminski

To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to the Florida Sunshine Law, I hereby request the following records:

All incoming and outgoing emails in 2017 and 2018 for Judge Elizabeth Krier and Judge James Adams.

The case names and docket numbers for all cases handled by Judge Krier or Judge Adams whereby a removal to federal court was filed, also including cases removed under bankruptcy rule 9027. Include all cases that had a filing of a notice of removal to any federal court for the last 10 years.

The case names and docket numbers for all cases handled by Judge Adams whereby he seized jurisdiction from another judge or court in the last 10 years. Such as his illegal seizure of jurisdiction from the 20th Circuit Court (17-ca-421) and his moving of that case to his docket in County Court (17-mm-815) and cases transferred pursuant to the logic condemned in 2D17-4465.

The case names and docket numbers for all cases handled by both Judges where a motion for contempt was filed in a case in the last ten years.

The case names and docket numbers for all cases handled by both Judges where any paper was entered into to docket/record containing the phrase "sui generis" was filed in a case in the last twenty years.

The case names and docket numbers for all cases handled by both Judges where an order was issued concerning contempt. Please produce copies of said contempt orders for the last 10 years.

All orders issued by either judge in the last 20 years that impacted the First Amendment rights (Human right of free expression) of a litigant including any type of gag or protective order. Also include any orders that restricted speech absent any narrow-tailoring whatsoever or where the order containing the speech prohibition failed to provide reasonable time, place and manner restrictions on speech sought to be silenced.

Any documents or papers in the possession of either judge detailing the process or procedure followed when Judge Adams engaged in what he described as an "administrative jurisdictional transfer" concerning the transfer of 17-ca-421 to county court 17-mm-815 or Judge Adam's transfers condemned in the recent 2 dca case, 17-4465 . Huminski has found no law, statute, court rule or valid authority to allow a county judge to seize jurisdiction of a case pending in Circuit Court or the traffic cases central to 17-4465.

All documents/materials mentioning scott huminski for the last five years including all documents possessed by the State's Attorney concerning 17-ca-421 and/or 17-mm-815.

All time frames are for calendar years 2017-2018 except where specified otherwise.

Do not supply copies of any documents authored by Huminski, specify these by title of the papers, case caption, docket # in list form.

This discovery is in support of Scott Huminski's Human Rights Complaint filed with the United Nations and to support domestic attempts to restore Huminski's Human Right of free expression and his First Amendment rights.

Supportive documents,


Now Judge Adams is charged with inappropriately seizing jurisdiction from other judges because of his personal interest in certain cases as set forth in the below 2 DCA opinion.


NBC story on Judge Adams - more than just traffic court corrupted

Pleading of prevailing 2 DCA parties citing ethical violations/judicial cannons (Circuit filing).

My only personal addition is the exactly similar conduct of Judge Adams seizing jurisdiction from the Circuit Court, 17-ca-421, moving it to county court, 17-mm-815, and assigning himself to the case. There exists no law, statute, rule or authority that would allow a county judge to seize a case from a Circuit Court, not unlike the above-noted conduct by the DCA.

On a separate issue with Judge Adams is criminal violation of civil rights under U.S. Law (Civil rights crimes 18 U.S.C. ยงยง 241,242), violative of the First Amendment.

Here is the Human Rights complaint against Judge Adams as filed with the United Nations.
As a federal crime and an international human rights violation, Judge Adams' conduct constitutes an act of moral turpitude violating attorney and judicial ethical cannons. Conspiracy to violate my first amendment rights between Judge Adams and Mr. Kunasek and Mr. Russell is undisputed on the record and a Title 18 federal crime.

-- scott huminski


The requested documents will be made available to the general public, and this request is not being made for commercial purposes.

In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 10 business days.


scott huminski

From: State Attorney, 20th Circuit

The State Attorney's office will be closing at 2 p.m. on 12/21 and will be closed 12/24 + 12/25 for the holiday. I will be out of the office all week. If you need assistance call ASA Sara Schmidt at (239) 533-1154.

From: Muckrock Staff

To Whom It May Concern:
I wanted to follow up on the following request, copied below. Please let me know when I can expect to receive a response.
Thanks for your help, and let me know if further clarification is needed.