Contracts and Policies Regarding IMSI Catchers (Detroit Police Department)
| Tracking # |
A16-06116 |
| Submitted | Oct. 31, 2016 |
| Est. Completion | None |
MuckRock users can file, duplicate, track, and share public records requests like this one. Learn more.
Communications
From: Curtis Waltman
To Whom It May Concern:
Pursuant to Michigan's Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), I hereby request the following records:
Documents concerning IMSI catchers or any of the following words: "Stingray", "cell site simulator", or "dirtbox". including:
-Contracts with the Harris Corporation regarding the acquisition of their Stingray or KingFish IMSI catchers
-Department policies and procedure regarding the use of IMSI catcher technology
-policies and procedures on the keeping of statistics about the Department's use and acquisition of IMSI catchers
The requested documents will be made available to the general public, and this request is not being made for commercial purposes.
In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.
Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 5 business days, as the statute requires.
Sincerely,
Curtis Waltman
From: MuckRock.com
To Whom It May Concern:
I wanted to follow up on the following Freedom of Information request, copied below, and originally submitted on Oct. 31, 2016. Please let me know when I can expect to receive a response, or if further clarification is needed.
Thanks for your help, and let me know if further clarification is needed.
From: MuckRock.com
To Whom It May Concern:
I wanted to follow up on the following Freedom of Information request, copied below, and originally submitted on Oct. 31, 2016. Please let me know when I can expect to receive a response, or if further clarification is needed.
Thanks for your help, and let me know if further clarification is needed.
From: Detroit Police Department
A no responsive documents response.
From: MuckRock.com
To Whom It May Concern:
I wanted to follow up on the following Freedom of Information request, copied below, and originally submitted on Oct. 31, 2016. Please let me know when I can expect to receive a response, or if further clarification is needed.
Thanks for your help, and let me know if further clarification is needed.
From: Amanda Rakos
Mr. Waltman,
Attached please find a copy of the City's response to your FOIA request, A16-06116. This response was originally sent to you on November 14, 2016.
Best,
Amanda Rakos
Law Clerk to
Ellen Ha, Esq.
Chief of Staff
City of Detroit-Law Dept.
Freedom of Information Act Section (FOIA)
Coleman A. Young Municipal Center
2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 500
Detroit, Michigan 48226
Phone: (313) 237-6673
Email: rakosa@detroitmi.gov
Website:
http://detroitmi.gov/law
WARNING: This communication may include, in whole or in part, information protected by attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine, the deliberative process privilege, or by other privilege. This communication is intended solely for receipt by the individual or entity to whom it was addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use of the communication is neither allowed nor intended. If you received this E-mail in error, please securely delete.
** Attached file(s):
response.pdf
Confidential Attorney Work Product
From: Amanda Rakos
Mr. Waltman,
Attached please find a copy of the City's response to your FOIA request, A16-06116. This response was originally sent to you on November 14, 2016.
Best,
Amanda Rakos
Law Clerk to
Ellen Ha, Esq.
Chief of Staff
City of Detroit-Law Dept.
Freedom of Information Act Section (FOIA)
Coleman A. Young Municipal Center
2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 500
Detroit, Michigan 48226
Phone: (313) 237-6673
Email: rakosa@detroitmi.gov
Website:
http://detroitmi.gov/law
WARNING: This communication may include, in whole or in part, information protected by attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine, the deliberative process privilege, or by other privilege. This communication is intended solely for receipt by the individual or entity to whom it was addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use of the communication is neither allowed nor intended. If you received this E-mail in error, please securely delete.
** Attached file(s):
response.pdf
Confidential Attorney Work Product
Files
pages