Tracey Woodruff emails

Stephan Neidenbach filed this request with the University of California, San Francisco of California.
Tracking # PRA 017-093
Due Sept. 8, 2017
Est. Completion Sept. 14, 2017
Status
Awaiting Response

Communications

From: Stephan Neidenbach

To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to the California Public Records Act (California Government Code §§ 6250), I hereby request the following records:

Any emails to or from Tracey Woodruff to or from the following domains:

sciencecom.org
ehsic.org
everettassociates.net
fenton.com

Please include emails from January 1, 2014 to the present.

The requested documents will be made available to the general public, and this request is not being made for commercial purposes.

In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 10 calendar days, as the statute requires.

Sincerely,

Stephan Neidenbach

From: Dellner, Tom

Hello and good morning, I hope this finds you well.

Per the response sent on August 31 (see below), please note that requests for copies of public records are properly directed to the UCSF Communication Coordinators. The UCSF Office of Legal Affairs does not process requests for records. Please also note that requests for University of California records are processed pursuant to the California Public Records Act (“CPRA”). The University is not governed by the federal Freedom of Information Act. Per CPRA statutes, UCSF will log and respond to your request within 10 business days of the date of receipt, which was officially 8/31/17. You will receive a formal written response on or before Thursday, September 14.

Thank you, kind regards, td
Tom Dellner
UCSF Legal Affairs
415-476-2812
tdellner@legal.ucsf.edu<mailto:tdellner@legal.ucsf.edu>

From: Gee, Brenda

Dear Mr. Neidenbach:

The attached letter is in regard to your request dated August 21, 2017, and received in my office on August 31, 2017. I apologize for my delay in responding to you.

Sincerely,

Brenda Gee
Policy, Records, and Communications Coordinator
Office of the Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost
https://evcprovost.ucsf.edu/evcp-communications-team
1 (415) 476-4317

From: Gee, Brenda

Dear Mr. Neidenbach:

The attached letter is in regard to your request dated September 8, 2017.

Sincerely,

Brenda Gee
Policy, Records, and Communications Coordinator
Office of the Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost
https://evcprovost.ucsf.edu/evcp-communications-team
1 (415) 476-4317

From: Gee, Brenda

Mr. Neidenbach,

In regards to your recent CPRA requests, 017– 087 (Emails of Dr. Gerona) and 017-093 (Emails of Dr. Woodruff), potentially responsive documents are currently being reviewed by UCSF Legal.

I regret that the University was unable to complete that task by the initial date estimate. I will write again when the review has been completed.

Sincerely,

Brenda Gee
Policy, Records, and Communications Coordinator
Office of the Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost
https://evcprovost.ucsf.edu/evcp-communications-team
1 (415) 476-4317

From: University of California, San Francisco

Dear Mr. Neidenbach:

The attached letter is in regard to your request dated September 8, 2017.

Sincerely,

Brenda Gee
Policy, Records, and Communications Coordinator
Office of the Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost
https://evcprovost.ucsf.edu/evcp-communications-team
1 (415) 476-4317

From: Stephan Neidenbach

The University of California system has released similar emails when requested by activist organizations such as US Right to Know on other professors, such as Alison Van Eenennaam at UC Davis. Would you please explain the contradiction here?

From: Stephan Neidenbach

Keyishian v. Board of Regents applies professors belonging seditious groups and does not apply here.
Bakke was an affirmative action case and does not apply here.

The protection of academic freedom policies pertain the University and its employees, not to the public requesting free of information requests.

The very fact that tax payer funded professors are involved in political decisions is the reason why the public should have access to suck records. I hereby appeal your rejection.

If there is another, more appropriate recipient for this message, provision of that party's contact information would be greatly appreciated.

From: University of California, San Francisco

Dear Mr. Neidenbach:

After further consultation with our colleagues across the UC system, and in the interest of consistency, UCSF is now reviewing the previous determination for PRA 017-093. I will provide further response within the next 10 business days.

Sincerely,

Brenda Gee
Policy, Records, and Communications Coordinator
Office of the Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost
https://evcprovost.ucsf.edu/evcp-communications-team
1 (415) 476-4317

Files

pages

Close